In article <xn0oihrv8aaltyr002@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote:
>
>> In article <xn0oigupu9isjpe001@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> > FishFood wrote:
>> >>
>> >> speaking of which what is everyone/those remaining using for
>> >> Usenet now that google.groups has waved byebye?
>> >
>> > Most of us are using what we were using before Thursday!
>> >
>> > The main Google Group's poster to RADW hasn't resurfaced yet...
>>
>> Because h was too stupid to realise his challenges!
>
>I don't know if Tim really understood what was going to happen... or
>maybe he didn't think it actually would happen?!

Such is a dumbocrat like Tim!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <urf9fm$1r1q8$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 25/2/24 12:01 pm:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>> GG is dead!
>>
>> Nothing informative to post .... but MUST post, anyway!!
>
>Not even true. Google Groups continues - it’s just chosen to become more
>insular and to no longer carry UseNet groups. Sadly there’s no real
>organisation to Google Groups and so there are hundreds of tiny Doctor Who
>groups on there. You truly can’t see the wood for the trees - or even if
>there is a wood, and not just a thousand scattered trees.
>

Better off with GG!!

>--
>“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

The Last Doctor wrote:
>
> Google Groups continues - it’s just chosen to become more
> insular and to no longer carry UseNet groups. Sadly there's
> there’s no real organisation to Google Groups and so there are
> hundreds of tiny Doctor Who groups on there. You truly can’t see
> the wood for the trees - or even if there is a wood, and not just
> a thousand scattered trees.

Google Groups, as in its own groups, were always a mess. Groups
everywhere with no overall cohesion. I think Google will, in time,
wind those down... as I wouldn't think there was much $$ in it for
them. I suppose it'll depend on if their usage drops following the
Usenet de-peering...

In article <xn0oii5feat2x3v003@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>The Last Doctor wrote:
>>
>> Google Groups continues - it’s just chosen to become more
>> insular and to no longer carry UseNet groups. Sadly there's
>> there’s no real organisation to Google Groups and so there are
>> hundreds of tiny Doctor Who groups on there. You truly can’t see
>> the wood for the trees - or even if there is a wood, and not just
>> a thousand scattered trees.
>
>Google Groups, as in its own groups, were always a mess. Groups
>everywhere with no overall cohesion. I think Google will, in time,
>wind those down... as I wouldn't think there was much $$ in it for
>them. I suppose it'll depend on if their usage drops following the
>Usenet de-peering...

Google just did themselves in!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <xn0oii5feat2x3v003@news.eternal-september.org>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > The Last Doctor wrote:
> >>
> >> Google Groups continues - it’s just chosen to become more
> >> insular and to no longer carry UseNet groups. Sadly there's
> >> there’s no real organisation to Google Groups and so there are
> >> hundreds of tiny Doctor Who groups on there. You truly can’t see
> >> the wood for the trees - or even if there is a wood, and not
> >> just a thousand scattered trees.
> >
> > Google Groups, as in its own groups, were always a mess. Groups
> > everywhere with no overall cohesion. I think Google will, in
> > time, wind those down... as I wouldn't think there was much $$
> > in it for them. I suppose it'll depend on if their usage drops
> > following the Usenet de-peering...
>
> Google just did themselves in!

Depends if the majority of people were using Google Groups for
Google's own groups or for access to Usenet. (I'm sure some would
have used it for both.) But if usage of the Google Groups service
falls as their ex-Usenet users go elsewhere who knows how long
Google will keep its own groups open?

It's irrelevant to us anyway so I don't care either way.

In article <xn0oii6p3aurv49009@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote:
>
>> In article <xn0oii5feat2x3v003@news.eternal-september.org>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> > The Last Doctor wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Google Groups continues - it’s just chosen to become more
>> >> insular and to no longer carry UseNet groups. Sadly there's
>> >> there’s no real organisation to Google Groups and so there are
>> >> hundreds of tiny Doctor Who groups on there. You truly can’t see
>> >> the wood for the trees - or even if there is a wood, and not
>> >> just a thousand scattered trees.
>> >
>> > Google Groups, as in its own groups, were always a mess. Groups
>> > everywhere with no overall cohesion. I think Google will, in
>> > time, wind those down... as I wouldn't think there was much $$
>> > in it for them. I suppose it'll depend on if their usage drops
>> > following the Usenet de-peering...
>>
>> Google just did themselves in!
>
>Depends if the majority of people were using Google Groups for
>Google's own groups or for access to Usenet. (I'm sure some would
>have used it for both.) But if usage of the Google Groups service
>falls as their ex-Usenet users go elsewhere who knows how long
>Google will keep its own groups open?
>
>It's irrelevant to us anyway so I don't care either way.

Google Groups x-rated are really twits!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

The Last Doctor wrote on 25/2/24 10:49 pm:
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 25/2/24 12:01 pm:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>> GG is dead!
>>
>> Nothing informative to post .... but MUST post, anyway!!
>
> Not even true. Google Groups continues - it’s just chosen to become
> more insular and to no longer carry UseNet groups. Sadly there’s no
> real organisation to Google Groups and so there are hundreds of tiny
> Doctor Who groups on there. You truly can’t see the wood for the
> trees - or even if there is a wood, and not just a thousand scattered
> trees.
>
So, maybe, the 'there are hundreds of tiny Doctor Who groups on there'
are keeping Tim busy .... at least for the time being!
--
Daniel

Daniel65 wrote:

> The Last Doctor wrote on 25/2/24 10:49 pm:
> >
> > Google Groups continues - it’s just chosen to become more
> > insular and to no longer carry UseNet groups. Sadly there's
> > no real organisation to Google Groups and so there are
> > hundreds of tiny Doctor Who groups on there. You truly can’t see
> > the wood for the trees - or even if there is a wood, and not
> > just a thousand scattered trees.
> >
> So, maybe, the 'there are hundreds of tiny Doctor Who groups on
> there' are keeping Tim busy .... at least for the time being!

Or Tim is keeping THEM busy!

I doubt they'd be impressed with all of his number threads though...

In article <urhnv8$2fiep$4@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>The Last Doctor wrote on 25/2/24 10:49 pm:
>> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote on 25/2/24 12:01 pm:
>>>
>>> <Snip>
>>>
>>>> GG is dead!
>>>
>>> Nothing informative to post .... but MUST post, anyway!!
>>
>> Not even true. Google Groups continues - it’s just chosen to become
>> more insular and to no longer carry UseNet groups. Sadly there’s no
>> real organisation to Google Groups and so there are hundreds of tiny
>> Doctor Who groups on there. You truly can’t see the wood for the
>> trees - or even if there is a wood, and not just a thousand scattered
>> trees.
>>
>So, maybe, the 'there are hundreds of tiny Doctor Who groups on there'
>are keeping Tim busy .... at least for the time being!

We hope!

Tim is also an idiot on Facebook!

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <xn0oij8k7bsz8n3003@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>Daniel65 wrote:
>
>> The Last Doctor wrote on 25/2/24 10:49 pm:
>> >
>> > Google Groups continues - it’s just chosen to become more
>> > insular and to no longer carry UseNet groups. Sadly there's
>> > no real organisation to Google Groups and so there are
>> > hundreds of tiny Doctor Who groups on there. You truly can’t see
>> > the wood for the trees - or even if there is a wood, and not
>> > just a thousand scattered trees.
>> >
>> So, maybe, the 'there are hundreds of tiny Doctor Who groups on
>> there' are keeping Tim busy .... at least for the time being!
>
>Or Tim is keeping THEM busy!
>
>I doubt they'd be impressed with all of his number threads though...

Hear! Hear! Captain BlueBeard!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

The Doctor wrote on 27/2/24 2:39 am:
> In article <urhnv8$2fiep$4@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Last Doctor wrote on 25/2/24 10:49 pm:
>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 25/2/24 12:01 pm:
>>>>
>>>> <Snip>
>>>>
>>>>> GG is dead!
>>>>
>>>> Nothing informative to post .... but MUST post, anyway!!
>>>
>>> Not even true. Google Groups continues - it’s just chosen to become
>>> more insular and to no longer carry UseNet groups. Sadly there’s no
>>> real organisation to Google Groups and so there are hundreds of tiny
>>> Doctor Who groups on there. You truly can’t see the wood for the
>>> trees - or even if there is a wood, and not just a thousand scattered
>>> trees.
>>>
>> So, maybe, the 'there are hundreds of tiny Doctor Who groups on there'
>> are keeping Tim busy .... at least for the time being!
>
> We hope!
>
> Tim is also an idiot on Facebook!

As I understand Facebook, YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE PART OF EACH AND EVERY
GROUP, so why don't YOU, "Yellow Beard Yadallee", just disconnect from
EVERY group that YOUR arch-enemy, Tim, is part of, "Yellow Beard Yadallee"??
--
Daniel

In article <urkcek$3516v$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote on 27/2/24 2:39 am:
>> In article <urhnv8$2fiep$4@dont-email.me>,
>> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>> The Last Doctor wrote on 25/2/24 10:49 pm:
>>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 25/2/24 12:01 pm:
>>>>>
>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>> GG is dead!
>>>>>
>>>>> Nothing informative to post .... but MUST post, anyway!!
>>>>
>>>> Not even true. Google Groups continues - it’s just chosen to become
>>>> more insular and to no longer carry UseNet groups. Sadly there’s no
>>>> real organisation to Google Groups and so there are hundreds of tiny
>>>> Doctor Who groups on there. You truly can’t see the wood for the
>>>> trees - or even if there is a wood, and not just a thousand scattered
>>>> trees.
>>>>
>>> So, maybe, the 'there are hundreds of tiny Doctor Who groups on there'
>>> are keeping Tim busy .... at least for the time being!
>>
>> We hope!
>>
>> Tim is also an idiot on Facebook!
>
>As I understand Facebook, YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE PART OF EACH AND EVERY
>GROUP, so why don't YOU, "Yellow Beard Yadallee", just disconnect from
>EVERY group that YOUR arch-enemy, Tim, is part of, "Yellow Beard Yadallee"??

Usenet has been around longer than FB. Clue!!

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

The Doctor wrote on 28/2/24 1:20 am:
> In article <urkcek$3516v$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 27/2/24 2:39 am:
>>> In article <urhnv8$2fiep$4@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> The Last Doctor wrote on 25/2/24 10:49 pm:
>>>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 25/2/24 12:01 pm:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> GG is dead!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing informative to post .... but MUST post, anyway!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Not even true. Google Groups continues - it’s just
>>>>> chosen to become more insular and to no longer carry UseNet
>>>>> groups. Sadly there’s no real organisation to Google
>>>>> Groups and so there are hundreds of tiny Doctor Who groups on
>>>>> there. You truly can’t see the wood for the trees - or
>>>>> even if there is a wood, and not just a thousand scattered
>>>>> trees.
>>>>>
>>>> So, maybe, the 'there are hundreds of tiny Doctor Who groups on
>>>> there' are keeping Tim busy .... at least for the time being!
>>>
>>> We hope!
>>>
>>> Tim is also an idiot on Facebook!
>>
>> As I understand Facebook, YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE PART OF EACH AND
>> EVERY GROUP, so why don't YOU, "Yellow Beard Yadallee", just
>> disconnect from EVERY group that YOUR arch-enemy, Tim, is part of,
>> "Yellow Beard Yadallee"??
>
> Usenet has been around longer than FB. Clue!!

NO, "Yellow Beard Yadallee", as is often the case, I've got NO FUCKING
IDEA what YOU, "Yellow Beard Yadallee", are on about!!
--
Daniel

In article <urnceh$3t943$3@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote on 28/2/24 1:20 am:
>> In article <urkcek$3516v$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote on 27/2/24 2:39 am:
>>>> In article <urhnv8$2fiep$4@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>> The Last Doctor wrote on 25/2/24 10:49 pm:
>>>>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 25/2/24 12:01 pm:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> GG is dead!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nothing informative to post .... but MUST post, anyway!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not even true. Google Groups continues - it’s just
>>>>>> chosen to become more insular and to no longer carry UseNet
>>>>>> groups. Sadly there’s no real organisation to Google
>>>>>> Groups and so there are hundreds of tiny Doctor Who groups on
>>>>>> there. You truly can’t see the wood for the trees - or
>>>>>> even if there is a wood, and not just a thousand scattered
>>>>>> trees.
>>>>>>
>>>>> So, maybe, the 'there are hundreds of tiny Doctor Who groups on
>>>>> there' are keeping Tim busy .... at least for the time being!
>>>>
>>>> We hope!
>>>>
>>>> Tim is also an idiot on Facebook!
>>>
>>> As I understand Facebook, YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE PART OF EACH AND
>>> EVERY GROUP, so why don't YOU, "Yellow Beard Yadallee", just
>>> disconnect from EVERY group that YOUR arch-enemy, Tim, is part of,
>>> "Yellow Beard Yadallee"??
>>
>> Usenet has been around longer than FB. Clue!!
>
>NO, "Yellow Beard Yadallee", as is often the case, I've got NO
>IDEA what YOU, "Yellow Beard Yadallee", are on about!!
>--
>Daniel

And according to ChatGPT Tim Bruening is

As of my last update in January 2022, there is no widely recognised or notable
individual named Tim Bruening in the public sphere. It's possible that Tim
Bruening is a private individual or someone known within a specific community
or context that is not widely known or documented. If Tim Bruening is a
fictional character or a person of interest in a particular context, please
provide more details, and I'd be happy to offer relevant information.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown