The Doctor wrote on 27/10/22 1:07 am:
> In article <tjai2m$2dbfg$2@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 26/10/2022 6:50 am:
>>> On Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 6:13:46 AM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>> In article <tj8kk2$205kt$4...@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>> <dani...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 25/10/22 5:44 am:
>>>>>> On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 11:42:32 AM UTC-7, The Dark
>>>>>> Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>> "tsbr...@gmail.com" wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:ed61b673-c99e-4f72...@googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>> On Sunday, October 23, 2022 at 8:35:04 PM UTC-7, The Dark
>>>>>>>> Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Well played, Chibnall. Well played.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ice cream, not sex! They never did get to the love making
>>>>>>>> stage!:(
>>>>>>> If you read between the lines, it was implied. They wouldn't
>>>>>>> have been able to show what the ice cream represents on TV.
>>>>>>> This is a family show after all!! (with a dirty, dirty
>>>>>>> subtext)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Top of TARDIS doesn't look suitable for love making!
>>>>>>
>>>>> Ah!! But the blue light on the top of The TARDIS, Tim, ..... when
>>>>> a stimulated woman lays down on her back, Tim, .....
>>>> You are quicker than Timbot, Daniel!
>>>
>>> Wouldn't the simulated woman have to be solid to satisfy her partner,
>>> and thus be affected by lying down on the light?
>>>
>> Who typed anything about a 'simulated woman', Tim??
>
> That is Titit for you Idlehands-mouth Dannyboy!

Why did YOU, asswipe, elsewhere agree with Tim, asswipe, "Touche!"??
--
Daniel

On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 7:17:47 AM UTC-5, tsbru...@gmail.com wrote:

> > >> >> >>>>>>> Top of TARDIS doesn't look suitable for love making!
> > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>> Ah!! But the blue light on the top of The TARDIS, Tim, .....
> > >> >> >>>>>> when a stimulated woman lays down on her back, Tim, .....

> > >> >Wouldn't the pain of that light digging into her back break the
> > >romantic mood?
> > >> You really are dense Tim!
> > >
> > >Are you saying that you have made love with a large something digging
> > >into either your back, or your partner's back?
> > You really are dense Tim!
> If you haven't, how do you know that it can be done?

Here's a hint: the person above wasn't referring to a woman's back.

(Although, if you don't want to sink to that level of crudeness, women do tend to arch their backs when they become stimulated, so that would address the concerns you raised.)

The Doctor wrote on 27/10/22 10:45 pm:
> In article <51dfa2bb-64b0-458d-830e-2b44efa69c67n@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 3:17:51 PM UTC-7,
>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> In article <b955fd3f-8d20-47fc...@googlegroups.com>,
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:

<Snip>

>>>> Wouldn't the pain of that light digging into her back break
>>>> the romantic mood?
>>> You really are dense Tim!
>>
>> Are you saying that you have made love with a large something
>> digging into either your back, or your partner's back?
>
> You really are dense Tim!
>
Yes, Tim, you really are dense ........ for thinking the asswipe might
have made love to anybody, anywhere, any time, anyway!!

Oh, except "Mrs Palmer and her five daughters" .... but they'd probably
knock him back, too!!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 28/10/22 6:45 am:
> In article <a9fa0629-d3fb-486c-9c57-f0f745107a79n@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbru...@gmail.com <tsbrueni264@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 4:54:10 AM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> In article <tjdord$2oesb$2...@dont-email.me>,
>>> Daniel65 <dani...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

<Snip>

>>>> Why did YOU, asswipe, elsewhere agree with Tim, asswipe, "Touche!"??
>>> You must be Pop-drunk Idlehands-mouth Dannyboy!
>>
>> Drunk on fizz?
>
> OR on Communion wine!
>
Once again, asswipe, YOU show YOUR ignorance, asswipe!
--
Daniel