Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Do not take life too seriously; you will never get out of it alive.


arts / rec.arts.drwho / Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

SubjectAuthor
* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
||`- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|+- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreWouter Valentijn
| `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|  `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreWouter Valentijn
+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| +* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| ||`- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| | `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| +* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| | `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |  `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   +* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   |+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   ||+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   |||+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   ||||+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   |||||+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget andThe Last Doctor
|| |   ||||||`- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget andThe Last Doctor
|| |   |||||+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   ||||||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   |||||| +* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||| |`- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreIdlehands
|| |   |||||| `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   ||||||  `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   |||||+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   ||||||`- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||+- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   ||||||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||| `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   ||||||  `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   ||||||   +- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   ||||||   `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   |||||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   ||||| `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   |||||  `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||   `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    +* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||    |+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget andThe Last Doctor
|| |   |||||    ||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||    || `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget andThe Last Doctor
|| |   |||||    ||  `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||    ||   +- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreIdlehands
|| |   |||||    ||   `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget andThe Last Doctor
|| |   |||||    ||    `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||    ||     `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget andThe Last Doctor
|| |   |||||    ||      +* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||    ||      |+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget andThe Last Doctor
|| |   |||||    ||      ||+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||    ||      |||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||      ||| +* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||    ||      ||| |`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||      ||| | `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||      ||| |  `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreIdlehands
|| |   |||||    ||      ||| +* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   |||||    ||      ||| |`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||      ||| | `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   |||||    ||      ||| `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||      |||  `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||      |||   +- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreIdlehands
|| |   |||||    ||      |||   `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||      |||    `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||      |||     `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||      ||+- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreIdlehands
|| |   |||||    ||      ||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget andsolar penguin
|| |   |||||    ||      || `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   |||||    ||      ||  `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||      ||   `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||      ||    `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||      |`- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget andsolar penguin
|| |   |||||    ||      `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    |+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   |||||    ||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||    || `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   |||||    ||  +* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||    ||  |+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||  ||+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   |||||    ||  |||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||  ||| `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   |||||    ||  |||  `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||  |||   `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   |||||    ||  |||    `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||  ||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||    ||  || `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreIdlehands
|| |   |||||    ||  ||  `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   |||||    ||  |`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||  | +* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   |||||    ||  | |+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||  | ||`- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||  | |`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   |||||    ||  | `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||  `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   |||||    |`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   ||||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   |||+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   |||`- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   ||+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   ||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   |`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65

Pages:12345678910111213
Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<nnd$5a8c4f59$31362e20@5b702094315eaec7>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13092&group=rec.arts.drwho#13092

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: bluesh...@indigo.news (Blueshirt)
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
References: <tkcsdg$108s$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nnd$00b18d3d$55ad6243@07b1060077fa798a> <tl6hd3$2m9f$7@gallifrey.nk.ca> <nnd$2e0f943d$48e7e529@407018721e7908fc> <tl6r4i$2sk5$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Organization: XanaNews
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <nnd$5a8c4f59$31362e20@5b702094315eaec7>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 11:59:35 +0100
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed.abavia.com!abe005.abavia.com!abp003.abavia.com!reader.xsusenet.com!not-for-mail
Lines: 21
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 11:59:35 +0100
Injection-Info: reader.xsusenet.com; mail-complaints-to="abuse@xsusenet.com"
X-Received-Bytes: 1518
 by: Blueshirt - Fri, 18 Nov 2022 10:59 UTC

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <nnd$2e0f943d$48e7e529@407018721e7908fc>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > The Doctor wrote:
> >
> >> In article <nnd$00b18d3d$55ad6243@07b1060077fa798a>,
> >> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Mr Yadallee is a man of distinction obviously... not that Canada are
> >> > going far in the tournament anyway.
> >>
> >> Do not underestimate Canada.
> >
> > Not a hope. Blueshirt predicts Belgium & Croatia to proceed from Group
> > F.
>
> AS I said, this is not 1986.

As I said, NOT A HOPE!

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tl7oj9$2u0m4$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13094&group=rec.arts.drwho#13094

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 21:59:53 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 109
Message-ID: <tl7oj9$2u0m4$1@dont-email.me>
References: <tkcsdg$108s$1@gioia.aioe.org> <xn0np7sbthur72v000@nntp.aioe.org>
<tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org> <xn0np8betikncqt002@nntp.aioe.org>
<tklus1$t3de$2@dont-email.me> <tkmie0$v56j$1@dont-email.me>
<tkr9s2$1gftu$1@dont-email.me> <xn0npbdil30xk18000@nntp.aioe.org>
<tkrvr9$1ia80$2@dont-email.me> <nnd$5b244385$33934b71@abd8c187b08f83e7>
<tkuqln$1snru$2@dont-email.me> <nnd$3a2831be$2755bdb7@e44dd9b47d0194d2>
<tl34gk$2d3ou$2@dont-email.me> <tl50j9$2kic9$1@dont-email.me>
<tl5jge$2lver$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 10:59:54 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4b2f6512fd1b1b3f722c2a9a81439e5e";
logging-data="3080900"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/3RHLrYrraGWVzG9htDSQVRrUBbWen8Ew="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2MfqwIu6kS+StbIppgs4ntfXLOQ=
In-Reply-To: <tl5jge$2lver$2@dont-email.me>
 by: Daniel65 - Fri, 18 Nov 2022 10:59 UTC

The True Doctor wrote on 18/11/22 2:20 am:
> On 17/11/2022 09:58, Daniel65 wrote:
>> The True Doctor wrote on 17/11/22 3:52 am:
>>> On 15/11/2022 22:32, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>> On 14/11/2022 22:04, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I love Disney+, I'm half-way through 'Andor' (nearly as
>>>>>> good as The Mandalorian) and there's two more episodes of
>>>>>> 'The Walking Dead' to be screened before that finishes for
>>>>>> good, so I can't wait for them. There's also some fairly
>>>>>> good Nazi documentaries on Disney+ too, which you'd
>>>>>> probably find interesting ...
>>>>>
>>>>> You mean like showing how the the Nazis were far left
>>>>> National Socialists whose divisive self-serving supremacist
>>>>> ideology is still followed today by woke morons such as
>>>>> feminists and transvestites who are now at war with each
>>>>> other over whose form of socialism is best, just like Hitler
>>>>> and Stalin.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, exactly like that... it's why I said you'd find it
>>>> interesting. As it goes against the grain. Which is what you
>>>> deliberately do all the time.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've not been proven wrong, but you have. Your idea of how
>>>>> the broadcast industry works is totally fallacious and naive.
>>>>> You might wish it worked that way, but it does not. Doctor
>>>>> Who is not and never has been co-produced with either
>>>>> Netflix, Amazon, HBO, or Disney. It's currently produced by
>>>>> Bad Wolf/Sony for the BBC which has sold (allegedly) the
>>>>> finished product to Disney+.
>>>>
>>>> You've been proven wrong on many things time and time again on
>>>> RADW but you are so thick you don't even realise it!
>>>
>>> I have never been proven wrong here the number of times you and
>>> the woke retards have.
>>
>> Ah!! So you, Aggy, ARE admitting that you HAVE been proven wrong!
>> Occasionally!! Well done!!
>
> Retarded fool.

You shouldn't insult yourself like that, Aggy, I mean YOU did,
apparently, type "I have never been proven wrong here the number of
times you and the woke retards have.", so admitting that YOU HAVE BEEN
PROVEN WRONG at least once or twice!!

> I said David Tennant was going to be doing 4 specials, when it's
> actually 3, with the 4th special being Ncuti Gatwa's first episode at
> Christmas, and I freely accepted the correction.

I wasn't contesting this, so why did you include it, Aggy??

>>>> I've never claimed Doctor Who is co-produced by anyone, Bad
>>>> Wolf Productions make Doctor Who... and will do so as long as
>>>> the BBC are happy for them to do so. Your hate of a differing
>>>> opinion twists things in your mind so you can't see straight...
>>>> or read properly.
>>>
>>> It's the woke retards that hate differing opinions and those that
>>> voice them,
>>
>> Gee!! You, Aggy, seem to "hate differing opinions and those that
>> voice them" ... so does that make YOU, Aggy, WOKE??
>
> I allow people to have differing opinions and don't try to suppress
> peoples freedom to express them

Yes, but then you continually try to convert "them" to your opinion!!

> unlike the woke retards try to do to those they attack for
> disagreeing with their lies

Sorry!! Have you, Aggy, really never done this??

> and propaganda as if they were the absolute truth and not just
> personal of political opinions.

Aren't all political opinions "personal of political opinions"??

>>> and attempt to present their opinions and unfounded ideology as
>>> facts instead of opinions.
>>
>> Yes, YOU *DO* seem to do that, Aggy!
>
> No don't. My arguments are based on science, logic, and reason,
> unlike the unfounded ideology of the woke which is based on political
> prejudices.

AHHHH!! YEAH!! RIGHT!!

>>> I am under no obligation to agree with them
>>
>> Of course you aren't Aggy, just as the rest of us are under no
>> obligation to agree with you, Aggy!!
>>
>> What a dull, DULL, world this would be if we all agreed with each
>> other all the time!!
>
> This it what the woke would turn the world into, by cancelling or
> extermination everyone with a differing opinion. Just look at
> Chairman Mao's sterile gray suits.

Whereas You and Your ilk would like EVERYONE to agree with YOUR opinion,
thereby "cancelling or exterminating differing" opinions!!
--
Daniel

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<nnd$696ebaff$1a1992b0@48633dbc3a36bdf7>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13095&group=rec.arts.drwho#13095

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: bluesh...@indigo.news (Blueshirt)
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nnd$7b4abf98$230ab6f2@83464cbc2e6a7592> <nnd$66fc7b1e$2c687ce6@2c65e5b887d822a2> <tl6rbf$12bc$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tl6rn2$2t0m$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Organization: XanaNews
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <nnd$696ebaff$1a1992b0@48633dbc3a36bdf7>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 12:01:12 +0100
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed.abavia.com!abe004.abavia.com!abp002.abavia.com!reader.xsusenet.com!not-for-mail
Lines: 6
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 12:01:12 +0100
Injection-Info: reader.xsusenet.com; mail-complaints-to="abuse@xsusenet.com"
X-Received-Bytes: 1032
 by: Blueshirt - Fri, 18 Nov 2022 11:01 UTC

The Doctor wrote:
>
> right now, anything I DVD from BBC is UHD compatiable.

More piracy!

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tl7reb$2u65p$3@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13104&group=rec.arts.drwho#13104

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 22:48:28 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <tl7reb$2u65p$3@dont-email.me>
References: <tkcsdg$108s$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tl2sor$1k2k$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>
<tl4t9p$2k875$4@dont-email.me> <tl4u7f$2kd79$1@dont-email.me>
<tl59kj$uor$27@gallifrey.nk.ca> <tl7ina$2the7$2@dont-email.me>
<tl7j4k$2tjqf$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 11:48:27 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4b2f6512fd1b1b3f722c2a9a81439e5e";
logging-data="3086521"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18QrpdTk0qU3hVaIxgLrlCA2AiHq+g3LcA="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Z6caVqXzYsiimn0a+6EQ0mlVJEQ=
In-Reply-To: <tl7j4k$2tjqf$1@dont-email.me>
 by: Daniel65 - Fri, 18 Nov 2022 11:48 UTC

solar penguin wrote on 18/11/22 8:26 pm:
> Daniel declared:
>> The Doctor wrote on 17/11/22 11:32 pm:
>>> In article <tl4u7f$2kd79$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Daniel declared:
>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 17/11/22 1:40 am:
>>>>>> In article <tl22q8$2a9u3$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm confused!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You are confused Idlehands-mouth Dannyboy!
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, asswipe, that's why I typed "I'm confused!!", asswipe!
>>>>
>>>> On the bright side, at least the asswipe managed to understand
>>>> a simple English sentence.
>>>
>>> Tlo Idlehands-mouth creatures thus spoke!
>>
>> "Tlo"??
>
> IIRC it’s Spanish for Uncle.
>
I'll believe you .... cause Google Translate fails miserably!!
--
Daniel

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tl7rnv$2u65p$4@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13105&group=rec.arts.drwho#13105

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 22:53:37 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <tl7rnv$2u65p$4@dont-email.me>
References: <tkcsdg$108s$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<nnd$5b244385$33934b71@abd8c187b08f83e7> <tkuqln$1snru$2@dont-email.me>
<nnd$3a2831be$2755bdb7@e44dd9b47d0194d2> <tl17v3$266e$23@gallifrey.nk.ca>
<tl7k5a$2tmek$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 11:53:35 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4b2f6512fd1b1b3f722c2a9a81439e5e";
logging-data="3086521"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19pioKGfd5gCtlzjqyOMxh2IrZENlnUAW0="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nN649VOrCjNAHC+0bm7AqxmTHhg=
In-Reply-To: <tl7k5a$2tmek$1@dont-email.me>
 by: Daniel65 - Fri, 18 Nov 2022 11:53 UTC

solar penguin wrote on 18/11/22 8:44 pm:
> The asswipe asserted:
>> In article <nnd$3a2831be$2755bdb7@e44dd9b47d0194d2>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>
>>> It's 2022, things have changed, Doctor Who will be
>>> on a streaming platform for international markets, ON
>>> DISNEY PLUS! - Build a bridge and get over it!
>>
>> He is back and He is for Real1 Waiting for 2023!
>
> Liar! Disney isn’t back! He’s still dead in his fridge!
>
Ah!! So the fridge is what counts as the '+', is it??
--
Daniel

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tl7rus$2u65p$5@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13106&group=rec.arts.drwho#13106

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 22:57:17 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <tl7rus$2u65p$5@dont-email.me>
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org> <xn0np8betikncqt002@nntp.aioe.org>
<tkmie0$v56j$1@dont-email.me> <xn0npbdil30xk18000@nntp.aioe.org>
<nnd$5b244385$33934b71@abd8c187b08f83e7>
<nnd$3a2831be$2755bdb7@e44dd9b47d0194d2>
<nnd$7b4abf98$230ab6f2@83464cbc2e6a7592>
<nnd$66fc7b1e$2c687ce6@2c65e5b887d822a2> <tl6rbf$12bc$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<nnd$0fe9e290$35afdfa4@5b702094315eaec7>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 11:57:16 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4b2f6512fd1b1b3f722c2a9a81439e5e";
logging-data="3086521"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19tX1nh74i9Uppw5eEZ3NAbeNPCF8VP3gA="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ULLCRuVqkv4N5bB3Qohs5G8NasE=
In-Reply-To: <nnd$0fe9e290$35afdfa4@5b702094315eaec7>
 by: Daniel65 - Fri, 18 Nov 2022 11:57 UTC

Blueshirt wrote on 18/11/22 9:59 pm:
> Your Name wrote:
>> On 2022-11-17 23:37:55 +0000, Blueshirt said:
>>>
>>> Why wouldn't you? You're gonna have Doctor Who in lovely UHD
>>> next year... 50" of crisp clear loveliness!
>>
>> That's assuming Doctor Who is filmed in UHD (or better) and that
>> Disney+ streams it in UHD (or better), and that you're insternet
>> connection can handle UHD streaming.
>
> Disney+ streams in UHD 4K and with Dolby Atmos sound

Ah!! No!! Not *ATMOS* !!

> ... only the content that has them though obviously, and of course my
> internet can handle it, it's 2022! Some of the modern films on
> Disney+ look - and sound - absolutely stunning on a big TV with 5.1
> sound... especially the Marvel ones.
>
> I don't know what Bad Wolf film Doctor Who in, but I'm sure it's not
> just HD anymore...
--
Daniel

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<nnd$2ada1b58$58bf2ac1@0a3f7b22739b55e0>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13107&group=rec.arts.drwho#13107

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: bluesh...@indigo.news (Blueshirt)
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
References: <tkcsdg$108s$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nnd$5b244385$33934b71@abd8c187b08f83e7> <tkuqln$1snru$2@dont-email.me> <nnd$3a2831be$2755bdb7@e44dd9b47d0194d2> <tl17v3$266e$23@gallifrey.nk.ca> <tl7k5a$2tmek$1@dont-email.me> <tl7rnv$2u65p$4@dont-email.me>
Organization: XanaNews
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <nnd$2ada1b58$58bf2ac1@0a3f7b22739b55e0>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 13:19:00 +0100
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed.abavia.com!abe004.abavia.com!abp001.abavia.com!reader.xsusenet.com!not-for-mail
Lines: 22
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 13:19:00 +0100
Injection-Info: reader.xsusenet.com; mail-complaints-to="abuse@xsusenet.com"
X-Received-Bytes: 1815
 by: Blueshirt - Fri, 18 Nov 2022 12:19 UTC

Daniel65 wrote:

> solar penguin wrote on 18/11/22 8:44 pm:
> > The asswipe asserted:
> > > In article <nnd$3a2831be$2755bdb7@e44dd9b47d0194d2>,
> >>Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It's 2022, things have changed, Doctor Who will be
> > > > on a streaming platform for international markets, ON
> > > > DISNEY PLUS! - Build a bridge and get over it!
> > >
> > > He is back and He is for Real1 Waiting for 2023!
> >
> > Liar! Disney isn’t back! He’s still dead in his fridge!
> >
> Ah!! So the fridge is what counts as the '+', is it??

That was all an urban myth... Walter wasn't frozen, he was cremated and he
deffo won't be coming back! Which is just as well for him as he'd only
have a heart attack and die again if he saw the Disney - and world - of
today!!!

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<nnd$43bf2765$65267f5e@c9175962e6387cd7>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13109&group=rec.arts.drwho#13109

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: bluesh...@indigo.news (Blueshirt)
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org> <xn0np8betikncqt002@nntp.aioe.org> <tkmie0$v56j$1@dont-email.me> <xn0npbdil30xk18000@nntp.aioe.org> <nnd$5b244385$33934b71@abd8c187b08f83e7> <nnd$3a2831be$2755bdb7@e44dd9b47d0194d2> <nnd$7b4abf98$230ab6f2@83464cbc2e6a7592> <nnd$66fc7b1e$2c687ce6@2c65e5b887d822a2> <tl6rbf$12bc$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nnd$0fe9e290$35afdfa4@5b702094315eaec7> <tl7rus$2u65p$5@dont-email.me>
Organization: XanaNews
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <nnd$43bf2765$65267f5e@c9175962e6387cd7>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 13:20:38 +0100
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.eu1.usenetexpress.com!94.232.112.245.MISMATCH!feed.abavia.com!abe005.abavia.com!abp001.abavia.com!reader.xsusenet.com!not-for-mail
Lines: 22
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 13:20:38 +0100
Injection-Info: reader.xsusenet.com; mail-complaints-to="abuse@xsusenet.com"
X-Received-Bytes: 1910
 by: Blueshirt - Fri, 18 Nov 2022 12:20 UTC

Daniel65 wrote:

> Blueshirt wrote on 18/11/22 9:59 pm:
> > Your Name wrote:
> > > On 2022-11-17 23:37:55 +0000, Blueshirt said:
> > > >
> > > > Why wouldn't you? You're gonna have Doctor Who in lovely UHD
> > > > next year... 50" of crisp clear loveliness!
> > >
> > > That's assuming Doctor Who is filmed in UHD (or better) and that
> > > Disney+ streams it in UHD (or better), and that you're insternet
> > > connection can handle UHD streaming.
> >
> > Disney+ streams in UHD 4K and with Dolby Atmos sound
>
> Ah!! No!! Not ATMOS !!

It's okay, but the room shakes and booms with big explosions! Which there
is a lot of in modern movies...

BOOM!

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tl8pgd$30rk2$2@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13118&group=rec.arts.drwho#13118

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: agamem...@hello.to.NO_SPAM (The True Doctor)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 20:21:33 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <tl8pgd$30rk2$2@dont-email.me>
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org> <xn0np8betikncqt002@nntp.aioe.org>
<tkmie0$v56j$1@dont-email.me> <xn0npbdil30xk18000@nntp.aioe.org>
<nnd$5b244385$33934b71@abd8c187b08f83e7>
<nnd$3a2831be$2755bdb7@e44dd9b47d0194d2>
<nnd$7b4abf98$230ab6f2@83464cbc2e6a7592>
<nnd$66fc7b1e$2c687ce6@2c65e5b887d822a2> <tl6rbf$12bc$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<nnd$0fe9e290$35afdfa4@5b702094315eaec7>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 20:21:33 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f72b1615f5e65d82f5d3a89042bd5d49";
logging-data="3174018"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Fq/lN0ysUxq+BugntazPIL/q8fteWTQ0="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.13.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mcpRsV3HYk1xvCM5VS9e/ErJDHI=
In-Reply-To: <nnd$0fe9e290$35afdfa4@5b702094315eaec7>
Content-Language: en-GB
 by: The True Doctor - Fri, 18 Nov 2022 20:21 UTC

On 18/11/2022 10:59, Blueshirt wrote:
> Your Name wrote:
>
>> On 2022-11-17 23:37:55 +0000, Blueshirt said:
>>>
>>> Why wouldn't you? You're gonna have Doctor Who in lovely UHD next
>>> year... 50" of crisp clear loveliness!
>>
>> That's assuming Doctor Who is filmed in UHD (or better) and that Disney+
>> streams it in UHD (or better), and that you're insternet connection can
>> handle UHD streaming.
>
> Disney+ streams in UHD 4K and with Dolby Atmos sound... only the content
> that has them though obviously, and of course my internet can handle it,
> it's 2022! Some of the modern films on Disney+ look - and sound -
> absolutely stunning on a big TV with 5.1 sound... especially the Marvel
> ones.
>
> I don't know what Bad Wolf film Doctor Who in, but I'm sure it's not just
> HD anymore...

The standard production format for Netflix and all other streaming
services has been 4K since at least 2017

Doctor Who has been filmed in 4K since Twice Upon A Time, but why does
anyone need it when 2K 1080p HD filmed using true 4:4:4 colour
sub-sampling looks far superior since there isn't any colour bleeding or
colour shift which is present in so called 4K video since it's allowed
to be filmed and broadcast using 4:2:0 colour sub-sampling which is
technically no better than standard definition of 1024x576 on a computer
monitor.

The H264 codec is more than capable of encoding full 4:4:4 colour which
has not been sub-sampled, and there is actually no reason whatsoever to
sub-sample colour at all using any modern codec since tests show that at
bitrates above 7 Mbps, full HD non-sub-sampled images look noticeably
superior to full HD images which are sub-sampled in either i420 or i420
format. i420 and i420 are absolute crap for recording gameplay and make
the text and huds almost completely unreadable if they use red or blue
lettering.

Netflix should have made 1080p i444 the default standard and broadcast
in that standard as default, not 4K using i420 sub-sampling. If a
production like a movie or TV show uses the bokeh effect then in order
for it to be noticeable 95% of the image would need to be blurred out
reducing the image quality to effectively standard definition, so
there's not point in even having a 4K TV to watch Doctor Who, especially
when people made do with B&W TVs to watch it even when it was being
broadcast in colour, and most people were still watching it in SD when a
decade after HD broadcasts began on BBC1, even if they had an HD TV.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tl8pmj$30ru6$2@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13119&group=rec.arts.drwho#13119

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: agamem...@hello.to.NO_SPAM (The True Doctor)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 20:24:51 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <tl8pmj$30ru6$2@dont-email.me>
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org> <xn0np8betikncqt002@nntp.aioe.org>
<tkmie0$v56j$1@dont-email.me> <xn0npbdil30xk18000@nntp.aioe.org>
<nnd$5b244385$33934b71@abd8c187b08f83e7>
<nnd$3a2831be$2755bdb7@e44dd9b47d0194d2>
<nnd$7b4abf98$230ab6f2@83464cbc2e6a7592>
<nnd$66fc7b1e$2c687ce6@2c65e5b887d822a2> <tl6rbf$12bc$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<nnd$0fe9e290$35afdfa4@5b702094315eaec7> <tl7rus$2u65p$5@dont-email.me>
<nnd$43bf2765$65267f5e@c9175962e6387cd7>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 20:24:51 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f72b1615f5e65d82f5d3a89042bd5d49";
logging-data="3174342"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+7/sTt2uLFknZ5j0Ydpi8Caul7ZzgHKZU="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.13.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:viazEg2xGLigBS8m9t4e+r+yLas=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <nnd$43bf2765$65267f5e@c9175962e6387cd7>
 by: The True Doctor - Fri, 18 Nov 2022 20:24 UTC

On 18/11/2022 12:20, Blueshirt wrote:
> Daniel65 wrote:
>
>> Blueshirt wrote on 18/11/22 9:59 pm:
>>> Your Name wrote:
>>>> On 2022-11-17 23:37:55 +0000, Blueshirt said:
>>>>>
>>>>> Why wouldn't you? You're gonna have Doctor Who in lovely UHD
>>>>> next year... 50" of crisp clear loveliness!
>>>>
>>>> That's assuming Doctor Who is filmed in UHD (or better) and that
>>>> Disney+ streams it in UHD (or better), and that you're insternet
>>>> connection can handle UHD streaming.
>>>
>>> Disney+ streams in UHD 4K and with Dolby Atmos sound
>>
>> Ah!! No!! Not ATMOS !!
>
> It's okay, but the room shakes and booms with big explosions! Which there
> is a lot of in modern movies...
>
> BOOM!

So does Dolby 5.1/7.1 which is why I can't watch anything with it going
through my surround system without annoying the neighbours if I turn the
sound up above a whisper, which makes dialogue difficult to make out
especially with the constant slurring in modern retarded woke movies, TV
shows and music.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tl8qdq$30tvm$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13120&group=rec.arts.drwho#13120

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: agamem...@hello.to.NO_SPAM (The True Doctor)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 20:37:13 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 141
Message-ID: <tl8qdq$30tvm$1@dont-email.me>
References: <tkcsdg$108s$1@gioia.aioe.org> <xn0np7sbthur72v000@nntp.aioe.org>
<tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org> <xn0np8betikncqt002@nntp.aioe.org>
<tklus1$t3de$2@dont-email.me> <tkmie0$v56j$1@dont-email.me>
<tkr9s2$1gftu$1@dont-email.me> <xn0npbdil30xk18000@nntp.aioe.org>
<tkrvr9$1ia80$2@dont-email.me> <nnd$5b244385$33934b71@abd8c187b08f83e7>
<tkuqln$1snru$2@dont-email.me> <nnd$3a2831be$2755bdb7@e44dd9b47d0194d2>
<tl34gk$2d3ou$2@dont-email.me> <tl50j9$2kic9$1@dont-email.me>
<tl5jge$2lver$2@dont-email.me> <tl7oj9$2u0m4$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 20:37:14 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f72b1615f5e65d82f5d3a89042bd5d49";
logging-data="3176438"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+/MCCklbs8FEmjYSXOET2nUNBSHhyk7HE="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.13.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IB829pLU3bREpfrUFFbmmAO6TeE=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <tl7oj9$2u0m4$1@dont-email.me>
 by: The True Doctor - Fri, 18 Nov 2022 20:37 UTC

On 18/11/2022 10:59, Daniel65 wrote:
> The True Doctor wrote on 18/11/22 2:20 am:
>> On 17/11/2022 09:58, Daniel65 wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote on 17/11/22 3:52 am:
>>>> On 15/11/2022 22:32, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>>> On 14/11/2022 22:04, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I love Disney+, I'm half-way through 'Andor' (nearly as
>>>>>>> good as The Mandalorian) and there's two more episodes of
>>>>>>> 'The Walking Dead' to be screened before that finishes for
>>>>>>> good, so I can't wait for them. There's also some fairly
>>>>>>> good Nazi documentaries on Disney+ too, which you'd
>>>>>>> probably find interesting ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You mean like showing how the the Nazis were far left
>>>>>> National Socialists whose divisive self-serving supremacist
>>>>>> ideology is still followed today by woke morons such as
>>>>>> feminists and transvestites who are now at war with each
>>>>>> other over whose form of socialism is best, just like Hitler
>>>>>> and Stalin.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, exactly like that... it's why I said you'd find it
>>>>> interesting. As it goes against the grain. Which is what you
>>>>> deliberately do all the time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've not been proven wrong, but you have. Your idea of how
>>>>>> the broadcast industry works is totally fallacious and naive.
>>>>>> You might wish it worked that way, but it does not. Doctor
>>>>>> Who is not and never has been co-produced with either
>>>>>> Netflix, Amazon, HBO, or Disney. It's currently produced by
>>>>>> Bad Wolf/Sony for the BBC which has sold (allegedly) the
>>>>>> finished product to Disney+.
>>>>>
>>>>> You've been proven wrong on many things time and time again on RADW
>>>>> but you are so thick you don't even realise it!
>>>>
>>>> I have never been proven wrong here the number of times you and
>>>> the woke retards have.
>>>
>>> Ah!! So you, Aggy, ARE admitting that you HAVE been proven wrong!
>>> Occasionally!! Well done!!
>>
>> Retarded fool.
>
> You shouldn't insult yourself like that, Aggy, I mean YOU did,

Anyone who can comprehend the English languages will recognise that I
was referring to you, thus you have proved my point.

> apparently, type "I have never been proven wrong here the number of
> times you and the woke retards have.", so admitting that YOU HAVE BEEN
> PROVEN WRONG at least once or twice!!
>
>> I said David Tennant was going to be doing 4 specials, when it's
>> actually 3, with the 4th special being Ncuti Gatwa's first episode at
>> Christmas, and I freely accepted the correction.
>
> I wasn't contesting this, so why did you include it, Aggy??
>

To show that I have accepted that I have made some mistakes.

>>>>> I've never claimed Doctor Who is co-produced by anyone, Bad
>>>>> Wolf Productions make Doctor Who... and will do so as long as
>>>>> the BBC are happy for them to do so. Your hate of a differing
>>>>> opinion twists things in your mind so you can't see straight...
>>>>> or read properly.
>>>>
>>>> It's the woke retards that hate differing opinions and those that
>>>>  voice them,
>>>
>>> Gee!! You, Aggy, seem to "hate differing opinions and those that
>>> voice them" ... so does that make YOU, Aggy, WOKE??
>>
>> I allow people to have differing opinions and don't try to suppress
>> peoples freedom to express them
>
> Yes, but then you continually try to convert "them" to your opinion!!
>

I have the right to teach people about their lack of knowledge and
understanding, and then they might be able to better themseves.

>> unlike the woke retards try to do to those they attack for
>> disagreeing with their lies
>
> Sorry!! Have you, Aggy, really never done this??
>

I am not a woke retard. I accept free speech, free thought, and free
expression.

>> and propaganda as if they were the absolute truth and not just
>> personal of political opinions.
>
> Aren't all political opinions "personal of political opinions"??
>

Political opinions by their very nature of being political come from
those who are uninformed. What you should follow instead a professional
opinions. You're not going to woke anti-capitalist retard like Greta
Thunberg to examine the health of your chest, so why would you listen to
this unqualified retarded truanting school child when she spews out
propaganda about climate change, of which she knows nothing about?

>>>> and attempt to present their opinions and unfounded ideology as
>>>> facts instead of opinions.
>>>
>>> Yes, YOU *DO* seem to do that, Aggy!
>>
>> No don't. My arguments are based on science, logic, and reason,
>> unlike the unfounded ideology of the woke which is based on political
>> prejudices.
>
> AHHHH!! YEAH!! RIGHT!!
>
>>>> I am under no obligation to agree with them
>>>
>>> Of course you aren't Aggy, just as the rest of us are under no
>>> obligation to agree with you, Aggy!!
>>>
>>> What a dull, DULL, world this would be if we all agreed with each
>>> other all the time!!
>>
>> This it what the woke would turn the world into, by cancelling or
>> extermination everyone with a differing opinion. Just look at
>> Chairman Mao's sterile gray suits.
>
> Whereas You and Your ilk would like EVERYONE to agree with YOUR opinion,
> thereby "cancelling or exterminating differing" opinions!!

Me and my ilk would like everyone to agree with the scientific facts,
thereby suppressing lies, propaganda, and misinformation.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<nnd$39c0df23$79eca03f@c610f3a2b33cc76c>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13121&group=rec.arts.drwho#13121

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: bluesh...@indigo.news (Blueshirt)
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org> <xn0np8betikncqt002@nntp.aioe.org> <tkmie0$v56j$1@dont-email.me> <xn0npbdil30xk18000@nntp.aioe.org> <nnd$5b244385$33934b71@abd8c187b08f83e7> <nnd$3a2831be$2755bdb7@e44dd9b47d0194d2> <nnd$7b4abf98$230ab6f2@83464cbc2e6a7592> <nnd$66fc7b1e$2c687ce6@2c65e5b887d822a2> <tl6rbf$12bc$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nnd$0fe9e290$35afdfa4@5b702094315eaec7> <tl8pgd$30rk2$2@dont-email.me>
Organization: XanaNews
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <nnd$39c0df23$79eca03f@c610f3a2b33cc76c>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 21:55:36 +0100
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed.abavia.com!abe004.abavia.com!abp003.abavia.com!reader.xsusenet.com!not-for-mail
Lines: 36
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 21:55:36 +0100
Injection-Info: reader.xsusenet.com; mail-complaints-to="abuse@xsusenet.com"
X-Received-Bytes: 3122
 by: Blueshirt - Fri, 18 Nov 2022 20:55 UTC

The True Doctor wrote:
>
> The standard production format for Netflix and all other streaming
> services has been 4K since at least 2017
>
> Doctor Who has been filmed in 4K since Twice Upon A Time, but why does
> anyone need it when 2K 1080p HD filmed using true 4:4:4 colour
> sub-sampling looks far superior since there isn't any colour bleeding or
> colour shift which is present in so called 4K video since it's allowed
> to be filmed and broadcast using 4:2:0 colour sub-sampling which is
> technically no better than standard definition of 1024x576 on a computer
> monitor.
>
> The H264 codec is more than capable of encoding full 4:4:4 colour which
> has not been sub-sampled, and there is actually no reason whatsoever to
> sub-sample colour at all using any modern codec since tests show that at
> bitrates above 7 Mbps, full HD non-sub-sampled images look noticeably
> superior to full HD images which are sub-sampled in either i420 or i420
> format. i420 and i420 are absolute crap for recording gameplay and make
> the text and huds almost completely unreadable if they use red or blue
> lettering.
>
> Netflix should have made 1080p i444 the default standard and broadcast
> in that standard as default, not 4K using i420 sub-sampling. If a
> production like a movie or TV show uses the bokeh effect then in order
> for it to be noticeable 95% of the image would need to be blurred out
> reducing the image quality to effectively standard definition, so
> there's not point in even having a 4K TV to watch Doctor Who, especially
> when people made do with B&W TVs to watch it even when it was being
> broadcast in colour, and most people were still watching it in SD when a
> decade after HD broadcasts began on BBC1, even if they had an HD TV.

Thank you for the technical specifications and explanation... being a
simple man I'll just say the stuff I stream from Prime Video, Netflix or
Disney+ looks good...

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<nnd$112ec9ec$6cb29539@c610f3a2b33cc76c>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13122&group=rec.arts.drwho#13122

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: bluesh...@indigo.news (Blueshirt)
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org> <xn0np8betikncqt002@nntp.aioe.org> <tkmie0$v56j$1@dont-email.me> <xn0npbdil30xk18000@nntp.aioe.org> <nnd$5b244385$33934b71@abd8c187b08f83e7> <nnd$3a2831be$2755bdb7@e44dd9b47d0194d2> <nnd$7b4abf98$230ab6f2@83464cbc2e6a7592> <nnd$66fc7b1e$2c687ce6@2c65e5b887d822a2> <tl6rbf$12bc$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nnd$0fe9e290$35afdfa4@5b702094315eaec7> <tl7rus$2u65p$5@dont-email.me> <nnd$43bf2765$65267f5e@c9175962e6387cd7> <tl8pmj$30ru6$2@dont-email.me>
Organization: XanaNews
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <nnd$112ec9ec$6cb29539@c610f3a2b33cc76c>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 21:55:37 +0100
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed.abavia.com!abe004.abavia.com!abp001.abavia.com!reader.xsusenet.com!not-for-mail
Lines: 21
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 21:55:37 +0100
Injection-Info: reader.xsusenet.com; mail-complaints-to="abuse@xsusenet.com"
X-Received-Bytes: 2022
 by: Blueshirt - Fri, 18 Nov 2022 20:55 UTC

The True Doctor wrote:

> On 18/11/2022 12:20, Blueshirt wrote:
> >
> > It's okay, but the room shakes and booms with big explosions! Which
> > there is a lot of in modern movies...
> >
> > BOOM!
>
> So does Dolby 5.1/7.1 which is why I can't watch anything with it going
> through my surround system without annoying the neighbours if I turn the
> sound up above a whisper, which makes dialogue difficult to make out
> especially with the constant slurring in modern retarded woke movies, TV
> shows and music.

Having no neighbours - just fields with cows - has it advantages!

I do find the constant up and down with volume buttons a bit annoying at
times though it has to be said. It is either very loud music or quiet
dialogue, there seems to be no happy medium.

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tl8rns$1bap$1@gioia.aioe.org>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13123&group=rec.arts.drwho#13123

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!Wy8FZNrzD6k8r00AqQdYHg.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: YourN...@YourISP.com (Your Name)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 09:59:40 +1300
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <tl8rns$1bap$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <tkmie0$v56j$1@dont-email.me> <tkmie0$v56j$2@dont-email.me> <tkoj7p$1721n$1@dont-email.me> <tkqda2$1e46f$1@dont-email.me> <tkseao$156s$2@gioia.aioe.org> <tkunfs$6ap$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tl22iu$2a9a9$1@dont-email.me> <tl3hhh$g54$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tl4tkm$2kbhs$2@dont-email.me> <tl68m5$sqb$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tl7j4s$2tjrl$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="44377"; posting-host="Wy8FZNrzD6k8r00AqQdYHg.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Your Name - Fri, 18 Nov 2022 20:59 UTC

On 2022-11-18 09:26:52 +0000, Daniel65 said:

> Your Name wrote on 18/11/22 8:22 am:
>> On 2022-11-17 09:07:35 +0000, Daniel65 said:
>>> Your Name wrote on 17/11/22 7:34 am:
>>>> On 2022-11-16 07:13:31 +0000, Daniel65 said:
>>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 16/11/2022 1:33 am:
>>>>>> On 15/11/2022 00:45, Your Name wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2022-11-15 00:29:13 +0000, The True Doctor said:
>>>>>>>> On 14/11/2022 03:57, Your Name wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As wells as breasts babies can see hills and can see the
>>>>>>>>>> horizon. If you can see the horizon, especially on a hill or
>>>>>>>>>> on the coast you know the world is a globe.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Babies don't have the cognitive intelligence to connect those
>>>>>>>>> two things, let alone even know what a "globe", "hill" or
>>>>>>>>> "horizon" are.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes they do, because they know how not to fall out of a cot or a
>>>>>>>> bed and that also implies a knowledge of gravity. Knowing the
>>>>>>>> world is a globe is hardwired into their neural network. There's
>>>>>>>> no information they could possibly sense that would lead them to
>>>>>>>> the conclusion the world is flat.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Babies don't fall out of the cot because most cots have barriers to
>>>>>>> purposely stop them doing that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope. The baby can stay in it's cot without barriers. What the
>>>>>> barriers are actually for is to stop people bumping into the cot and
>>>>>> thereby knocking the baby out, or to stop autistic babies from
>>>>>> falling out. A baby knows how to sleep on a raised platform without
>>>>>> falling off it otherwise there would be no such things a bunk beds
>>>>>> for small children.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Babies have zero understanding of gravity, falling, danger, or *anything* else.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wrong on all counts. They're hard wired to understand all of them.
>>>>>> Why do you think baby birds don't all climb out of their nests before
>>>>>> their wings have fledged and fall onto the ground?
>>>>>
>>>>> Please, Please, PLEASE, tell me you don't have any children, Aggie, Please!!
>>>>
>>>> Well, he did, but they fell out of his self-built barrier-less cot and died.
>>>
>>> ;-) Hmm!! Should we be sad .... or happy for them?? ;-)
>>
>> We should be sad for the baby/babies, but happy for the world's gene
>> pool and higher average IQ.  ;-)
>>
> I was also thinking, maybe, we should be happy, as well as sad, for the
> babies that they don't have to be raised by Aggy!!

True, although in any civilised country the government's child services
would have removed the babies due to parental neglect / endangerment
and the babies would go to foster homes instead.

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tl8rv6$1eaf$1@gioia.aioe.org>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13125&group=rec.arts.drwho#13125

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!Wy8FZNrzD6k8r00AqQdYHg.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: YourN...@YourISP.com (Your Name)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 10:03:34 +1300
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <tl8rv6$1eaf$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <tkmie0$v56j$1@dont-email.me> <xn0npbdil30xk18000@nntp.aioe.org> <nnd$5b244385$33934b71@abd8c187b08f83e7> <nnd$3a2831be$2755bdb7@e44dd9b47d0194d2> <tl7k5a$2tmek$1@dont-email.me> <tl7rnv$2u65p$4@dont-email.me> <nnd$2ada1b58$58bf2ac1@0a3f7b22739b55e0>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="47439"; posting-host="Wy8FZNrzD6k8r00AqQdYHg.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Your Name - Fri, 18 Nov 2022 21:03 UTC

On 2022-11-18 12:19:00 +0000, Blueshirt said:
> Daniel65 wrote:
>> solar penguin wrote on 18/11/22 8:44 pm:
>>> The asswipe asserted:
>>>> In article <nnd$3a2831be$2755bdb7@e44dd9b47d0194d2>,
>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> It's 2022, things have changed, Doctor Who will be
>>>>> on a streaming platform for international markets, ON
>>>>> DISNEY PLUS! - Build a bridge and get over it!
>>>>
>>>> He is back and He is for Real1 Waiting for 2023!
>>>
>>> Liar! Disney isn’t back! He’s still dead in his fridge!
>>>
>> Ah!! So the fridge is what counts as the '+', is it??
>
> That was all an urban myth... Walter wasn't frozen, he was cremated and he
> deffo won't be coming back! Which is just as well for him as he'd only
> have a heart attack and die again if he saw the Disney - and world - of
> today!!!

Walt Disney could still come back. They could find a hair in one of his
old combs and then clone him. Or even idiotic, they could make an
AI-robot version of him.

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tl8sc9$1k8n$1@gioia.aioe.org>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13126&group=rec.arts.drwho#13126

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!Wy8FZNrzD6k8r00AqQdYHg.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: YourN...@YourISP.com (Your Name)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 10:10:34 +1300
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <tl8sc9$1k8n$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <tkmie0$v56j$1@dont-email.me> <xn0npbdil30xk18000@nntp.aioe.org> <nnd$5b244385$33934b71@abd8c187b08f83e7> <nnd$3a2831be$2755bdb7@e44dd9b47d0194d2> <nnd$17334c5e$69ec198b@90b4fda8117fcf05> <37a8264d-b5be-4b9f-97c5-7c88914dad21n@googlegroups.com> <nnd$538e96fa$02187b38@dce6f16827ed92ad> <tl6qkl$rn9$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tl7klj$2tmvf$2@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="53527"; posting-host="Wy8FZNrzD6k8r00AqQdYHg.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Your Name - Fri, 18 Nov 2022 21:10 UTC

On 2022-11-18 09:52:52 +0000, Daniel65 said:

> Your Name wrote on 18/11/22 1:28 pm:
>> On 2022-11-17 23:05:43 +0000, Blueshirt said:
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 4:13:23 PM UTC-8, netk...@gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Care to speculate about David Tennant 2023?
>>>>
>>>> David for Prime Minister!
>>>
>>> He couldn't do any worse then the ones they've had over there lately!
>>
>> A dead donkey would do better than most politicians (and business
>> managers) around the world.  :-(
>
> https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0098781/
>
> "Drop the Dead Donkey"
>
> Very funny!!

I don't think I've seen that UK comedy. I'll have a look for some clips
to see if we should dig it up from somewhere to watch. :-)

This one isn't dead, but there really was a donkey up for mayoral
election in Canada last month:

Lobo the donkey's mayoral campaign has B.C. city buzzing

<https://bc.ctvnews.ca/lobo-the-donkey-s-mayoral-campaign-has-b-c-city-buzzing-1.6056459>

That's not the first time an non-human has been nominated for mayor /
city council somewhere on the planet ... a few of them have even won
the election!

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tl8siq$1msl$1@gioia.aioe.org>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13127&group=rec.arts.drwho#13127

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!Wy8FZNrzD6k8r00AqQdYHg.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: YourN...@YourISP.com (Your Name)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 10:14:02 +1300
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <tl8siq$1msl$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <tkmie0$v56j$1@dont-email.me> <xn0npbdil30xk18000@nntp.aioe.org> <nnd$5b244385$33934b71@abd8c187b08f83e7> <nnd$3a2831be$2755bdb7@e44dd9b47d0194d2> <nnd$7b4abf98$230ab6f2@83464cbc2e6a7592> <nnd$66fc7b1e$2c687ce6@2c65e5b887d822a2> <tl6rbf$12bc$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nnd$0fe9e290$35afdfa4@5b702094315eaec7> <tl7rus$2u65p$5@dont-email.me> <nnd$43bf2765$65267f5e@c9175962e6387cd7>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="56213"; posting-host="Wy8FZNrzD6k8r00AqQdYHg.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Your Name - Fri, 18 Nov 2022 21:14 UTC

On 2022-11-18 12:20:38 +0000, Blueshirt said:
> Daniel65 wrote:
>> Blueshirt wrote on 18/11/22 9:59 pm:
>>> Your Name wrote:
>>>> On 2022-11-17 23:37:55 +0000, Blueshirt said:
>>>>>
>>>>> Why wouldn't you? You're gonna have Doctor Who in lovely UHD
>>>>> next year... 50" of crisp clear loveliness!
>>>>
>>>> That's assuming Doctor Who is filmed in UHD (or better) and that
>>>> Disney+ streams it in UHD (or better), and that you're insternet
>>>> connection can handle UHD streaming.
>>>
>>> Disney+ streams in UHD 4K and with Dolby Atmos sound
>>
>> Ah!! No!! Not ATMOS !!
>
> It's okay, but the room shakes and booms with big explosions! Which there
> is a lot of in modern movies...
>
> BOOM!

American movies anyway (and TV shows) ... they're always full of gun
fights, explosions, car chases, and fist fights. :-\

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tl96ab$1d7i$1@gioia.aioe.org>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13134&group=rec.arts.drwho#13134

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!Wy8FZNrzD6k8r00AqQdYHg.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: YourN...@YourISP.com (Your Name)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 13:00:12 +1300
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <tl96ab$1d7i$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <tkmo60$vnc2$1@dont-email.me> <nnd$112ec9ec$6cb29539@c610f3a2b33cc76c>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="46322"; posting-host="Wy8FZNrzD6k8r00AqQdYHg.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Your Name - Sat, 19 Nov 2022 00:00 UTC

On 2022-11-18 20:55:37 +0000, Blueshirt said:
> The True Doctor wrote:
>> On 18/11/2022 12:20, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>
>>> It's okay, but the room shakes and booms with big explosions! Which
>>> there is a lot of in modern movies...
>>>
>>> BOOM!
>>
>> So does Dolby 5.1/7.1 which is why I can't watch anything with it going
>> through my surround system without annoying the neighbours if I turn the
>> sound up above a whisper, which makes dialogue difficult to make out
>> especially with the constant slurring in modern retarded woke movies, TV
>> shows and music.
>
> Having no neighbours - just fields with cows - has it advantages!

Unless your choice of music curdles the milk. ;-)

> I do find the constant up and down with volume buttons a bit annoying at
> times though it has to be said. It is either very loud music or quiet
> dialogue, there seems to be no happy medium.

On some devices the sound settings can fix that to some degree by
enhancing the speech.

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tlac13$3765b$2@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13141&group=rec.arts.drwho#13141

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 21:43:49 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <tlac13$3765b$2@dont-email.me>
References: <tkcsdg$108s$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tl4t06$2k875$2@dont-email.me>
<tl58qm$uor$19@gallifrey.nk.ca> <tl7ih1$2the7$1@dont-email.me>
<tl83p2$1kra$30@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 10:43:47 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="36a002fb9b76a78e977fd33b2ed3bc02";
logging-data="3381419"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19CZWn1d1j/BqFTDFUY9ne0129JFf+rBd4="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rl9DP8BhCA3ckrNPzLNVPV+/5I8=
In-Reply-To: <tl83p2$1kra$30@gallifrey.nk.ca>
 by: Daniel65 - Sat, 19 Nov 2022 10:43 UTC

The Doctor wrote on 19/11/22 1:10 am:
> In article <tl7ih1$2the7$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 17/11/22 11:18 pm:
>>> In article <tl4t06$2k875$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 17/11/22 1:31 am:
>>>>> In article <tl21ot$2a6vo$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 16/11/2022 2:49 am:
>>>>>>> In article <tkvnvs$21m3d$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh!! Goodo! Let's all go back 2,400 years to work out
>>>>>>>> how we should be behaving today!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nothing new under the sun!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But YOU, asswipe, had to quote 87 lines of it ..... just
>>>>>> to tack YOUR five word contribution on at the end!!
>>>>>
>>>>> It is called keeping contaxt intact Idlehands-mouth
>>>>> DannyBoy!
>>>>
>>>> How is YOUR 150-line Bible quotation relevant to this
>>>> discussion, asswipe??
>>>
>>> It is called not losing the context Idlehadns-mouth Dannyboy!
>>
>> Sorry!! How is YOUR 150+ line Bible Quote "not losing the context"
>> when this newsgroup is supposed to be about "Doctor Who" content,
>> asswipe??
>
> Obvious you are not familiar with the Old Testament Idlehands-mouth
> Dannboy!

How often has any of The Old Testament been quoted in "Doctor Who".
asswipe??
--
Daniel

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tlacbe$3781i$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13142&group=rec.arts.drwho#13142

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 21:49:17 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 67
Message-ID: <tlacbe$3781i$1@dont-email.me>
References: <tkmie0$v56j$1@dont-email.me> <tkmie0$v56j$2@dont-email.me>
<tkoj7p$1721n$1@dont-email.me> <tkqda2$1e46f$1@dont-email.me>
<tkseao$156s$2@gioia.aioe.org> <tkunfs$6ap$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<tl22iu$2a9a9$1@dont-email.me> <tl3hhh$g54$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<tl4tkm$2kbhs$2@dont-email.me> <tl68m5$sqb$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<tl7j4s$2tjrl$1@dont-email.me> <tl8rns$1bap$1@gioia.aioe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 10:49:19 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="36a002fb9b76a78e977fd33b2ed3bc02";
logging-data="3383346"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18u5FIcei18FdFwLA1Jz2gHjlY9elRU2kM="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fie492QdpZ1qDeyp6fO7vKvqM5I=
In-Reply-To: <tl8rns$1bap$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 by: Daniel65 - Sat, 19 Nov 2022 10:49 UTC

Your Name wrote on 19/11/22 7:59 am:
> On 2022-11-18 09:26:52 +0000, Daniel65 said:
>
>> Your Name wrote on 18/11/22 8:22 am:
>>> On 2022-11-17 09:07:35 +0000, Daniel65 said:
>>>> Your Name wrote on 17/11/22 7:34 am:
>>>>> On 2022-11-16 07:13:31 +0000, Daniel65 said:
>>>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 16/11/2022 1:33 am:
>>>>>>> On 15/11/2022 00:45, Your Name wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2022-11-15 00:29:13 +0000, The True Doctor said:
>>>>>>>>> On 14/11/2022 03:57, Your Name wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> As wells as breasts babies can see hills and can see the
>>>>>>>>>>> horizon. If you can see the horizon, especially on a hill or
>>>>>>>>>>> on the coast you know the world is a globe.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Babies don't have the cognitive intelligence to connect those
>>>>>>>>>> two things, let alone even know what a "globe", "hill" or
>>>>>>>>>> "horizon" are.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes they do, because they know how not to fall out of a cot or a
>>>>>>>>> bed and that also implies a knowledge of gravity. Knowing the
>>>>>>>>> world is a globe is hardwired into their neural network. There's
>>>>>>>>> no information they could possibly sense that would lead them to
>>>>>>>>> the conclusion the world is flat.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Babies don't fall out of the cot because most cots have barriers to
>>>>>>>> purposely stop them doing that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope. The baby can stay in it's cot without barriers. What the
>>>>>>> barriers are actually for is to stop people bumping into the cot and
>>>>>>> thereby knocking the baby out, or to stop autistic babies from
>>>>>>> falling out. A baby knows how to sleep on a raised platform without
>>>>>>> falling off it otherwise there would be no such things a bunk beds
>>>>>>> for small children.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Babies have zero understanding of gravity, falling, danger, or
>>>>>>>> *anything* else.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wrong on all counts. They're hard wired to understand all of them.
>>>>>>> Why do you think baby birds don't all climb out of their nests
>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>> their wings have fledged and fall onto the ground?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please, Please, PLEASE, tell me you don't have any children,
>>>>>> Aggie, Please!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, he did, but they fell out of his self-built barrier-less cot
>>>>> and died.
>>>>
>>>> ;-) Hmm!! Should we be sad .... or happy for them?? ;-)
>>>
>>> We should be sad for the baby/babies, but happy for the world's gene
>>> pool and higher average IQ.  ;-)
>>>
>> I was also thinking, maybe, we should be happy, as well as sad, for
>> the babies that they don't have to be raised by Aggy!!
>
> True, although in any civilised country the government's child services
> would have removed the babies due to parental neglect / endangerment and
> the babies would go to foster homes instead.
>
Ah!! Of course! ;-)
--
Daniel

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tlaco4$3781i$2@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13143&group=rec.arts.drwho#13143

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 21:56:06 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <tlaco4$3781i$2@dont-email.me>
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<15c8315e-1282-419e-8857-6e62b06d1dbfn@googlegroups.com>
<tl7310$no$9@gallifrey.nk.ca> <tl7ktl$2to9m$1@dont-email.me>
<tl84fq$1kra$41@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 10:56:04 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="36a002fb9b76a78e977fd33b2ed3bc02";
logging-data="3383346"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ph26RyPwqznjsQf4OXHP9QQ9qvlXRMX4="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:C04tJS17BI1nzi591Jo3LpwM/w8=
In-Reply-To: <tl84fq$1kra$41@gallifrey.nk.ca>
 by: Daniel65 - Sat, 19 Nov 2022 10:56 UTC

The Doctor wrote on 19/11/22 1:22 am:
> In article <tl7ktl$2to9m$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 18/11/22 3:51 pm:
>>> In article <15c8315e-1282-419e-8857-6e62b06d1dbfn@googlegroups.com>,
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 6:38:24 PM UTC-8,
>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> In article <tl6qii$pp0$1...@gioia.aioe.org>, Your Name
>>>>> <Your...@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2022-11-17 22:57:35 +0000, Blueshirt said:
>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>>>>>>> Care to speculate about David Tennant 2023?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can do more than speculate; David Tennant will be in three
>>>>>>> special episodes next year and then [somehow] Ncuti Gatwa
>>>>>>> will become the next Doctor.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If this does not happen I will be complaining to the BBC...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If Gatwa does NOT become the new Doctor, there will be a lot of
>>>>>> people celebrating. Even more so if Tennant stays on after the
>>>>>> 'specials'.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Gatwa is after this ?Tennant.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can someone tell me wnat the Hell is Going on?
>>
>> "?Tennant"?? "wnat"??
>>
>>>> Is Your Name part of the anti-Gatwa movement?
>>>
>>> I would like to know myself!
>>>
>> ... and YOU, asswipe, would just about be the only person who would like
>> to know yourself, asswipe!!
>
> He is back and He is for real IDlehands-mouth Dannyboy!

Who is back, asswipe, and why should we care, asswipe??
--
Daniel

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tlacul$3781i$3@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13144&group=rec.arts.drwho#13144

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 21:59:36 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <tlacul$3781i$3@dont-email.me>
References: <tkcsdg$108s$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tl503s$2khb7$1@dont-email.me>
<tl59s2$uor$31@gallifrey.nk.ca> <tl7l41$2toum$1@dont-email.me>
<tl84i4$1kra$42@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 10:59:34 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="36a002fb9b76a78e977fd33b2ed3bc02";
logging-data="3383346"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18f4AnATSCrVH//1K0zXd/5/ZAK6bxZSeM="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PIc5zkwYHw8QINId0wxr2Kei2mw=
In-Reply-To: <tl84i4$1kra$42@gallifrey.nk.ca>
 by: Daniel65 - Sat, 19 Nov 2022 10:59 UTC

The Doctor wrote on 19/11/22 1:24 am:
> In article <tl7l41$2toum$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 17/11/22 11:36 pm:
>>> In article <tl503s$2khb7$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 17/11/22 11:15 am:
>>>>> In article <nnd$095eae5f$39588972@e3b988afcf5f4928>, Blueshirt
>>>>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>> On 15/11/2022 22:32, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>>>>> There is no allegedly about the Disney deal, it's a fact,
>>>>>>>> a fact your tiny
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There has been no official confirmation of such a deal and
>>>>>>> therefore it is just allegedly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wrong! It was officially announced on the BBC website and RTD
>>>>>> even commented on it! Why would RTD talk about "Doctor Who and
>>>>>> Disney together" if it was fake?
>>>>
>> https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/2022/doctor-who-bbc-and-disney-branded-television
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, once again, proven wrong!>
>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>
>>>> Sorry!! Are YOU, asswipe, thanking Blueshirt for shooting down
>>>> YOUR bestest Buddy, Agamemnon??
>>>>
>>>> I'm confused .... So confused!! ;-)
>>
>> So WHAT, asswipe?? Nothing to contribute but had to post in any case to
>> increase YOUR Precious Post Count!!
>
> Looks like you hate URLs IDlehands-mouth Dannyboy!

What URL, asswipe??
--
Daniel

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tlad8p$3781i$4@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13145&group=rec.arts.drwho#13145

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 22:04:59 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <tlad8p$3781i$4@dont-email.me>
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<nnd$7b4abf98$230ab6f2@83464cbc2e6a7592>
<nnd$66fc7b1e$2c687ce6@2c65e5b887d822a2> <tl6rbf$12bc$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<tl6rn2$2t0m$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <nnd$696ebaff$1a1992b0@48633dbc3a36bdf7>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 11:04:57 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="36a002fb9b76a78e977fd33b2ed3bc02";
logging-data="3383346"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/aFwDeQzlAq9fOqt/Z4eEqsGoGjS2VdPE="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:kyUgka5nkv8OtG0DdqMLDige2+w=
In-Reply-To: <nnd$696ebaff$1a1992b0@48633dbc3a36bdf7>
 by: Daniel65 - Sat, 19 Nov 2022 11:04 UTC

Blueshirt wrote on 18/11/22 10:01 pm:
> The Doctor wrote:
>>
>> right now, anything I DVD from BBC is UHD compatiable.
>
> More piracy!
>
I thought the asswipe's gobble-de-gook meant his mum brought the BBC
DVD's for him!!
--
Daniel

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tladd0$3781i$5@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13146&group=rec.arts.drwho#13146

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 22:07:14 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <tladd0$3781i$5@dont-email.me>
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org> <xn0np8betikncqt002@nntp.aioe.org>
<tkmie0$v56j$1@dont-email.me> <xn0npbdil30xk18000@nntp.aioe.org>
<nnd$5b244385$33934b71@abd8c187b08f83e7>
<nnd$3a2831be$2755bdb7@e44dd9b47d0194d2>
<nnd$7b4abf98$230ab6f2@83464cbc2e6a7592>
<nnd$66fc7b1e$2c687ce6@2c65e5b887d822a2> <tl6rbf$12bc$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<nnd$0fe9e290$35afdfa4@5b702094315eaec7> <tl7rus$2u65p$5@dont-email.me>
<nnd$43bf2765$65267f5e@c9175962e6387cd7>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 11:07:12 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="36a002fb9b76a78e977fd33b2ed3bc02";
logging-data="3383346"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Q8OWIgxIj7b7oYRcPiMfB1FlKGqd76j8="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3VIEBpNVz2ha4HPlarvG/Sh7ruY=
In-Reply-To: <nnd$43bf2765$65267f5e@c9175962e6387cd7>
 by: Daniel65 - Sat, 19 Nov 2022 11:07 UTC

Blueshirt wrote on 18/11/22 11:20 pm:
> Daniel65 wrote:
>> Blueshirt wrote on 18/11/22 9:59 pm:
>>> Your Name wrote:
>>>> On 2022-11-17 23:37:55 +0000, Blueshirt said:
>>>>>
>>>>> Why wouldn't you? You're gonna have Doctor Who in lovely UHD
>>>>> next year... 50" of crisp clear loveliness!
>>>>
>>>> That's assuming Doctor Who is filmed in UHD (or better) and that
>>>> Disney+ streams it in UHD (or better), and that you're insternet
>>>> connection can handle UHD streaming.
>>>
>>> Disney+ streams in UHD 4K and with Dolby Atmos sound
>>
>> Ah!! No!! Not ATMOS !!
>
> It's okay, but the room shakes and booms with big explosions! Which there
> is a lot of in modern movies...
>
> BOOM!
>
Did my "ATMOS" reference go over your head, Blueshirt??

Think Car exhaust!! ;-P
--
Daniel

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<nnd$4af061b2$5c6dcc96@2366b5aef87e379a>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13149&group=rec.arts.drwho#13149

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: bluesh...@indigo.news (Blueshirt)
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nnd$43bf2765$65267f5e@c9175962e6387cd7> <tl8pmj$30ru6$2@dont-email.me> <nnd$112ec9ec$6cb29539@c610f3a2b33cc76c> <tl9660$dda$29@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Organization: XanaNews
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <nnd$4af061b2$5c6dcc96@2366b5aef87e379a>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 12:22:45 +0100
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.eu1.usenetexpress.com!94.232.112.244.MISMATCH!feed.abavia.com!abe004.abavia.com!abp001.abavia.com!reader.xsusenet.com!not-for-mail
Lines: 12
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 12:22:45 +0100
Injection-Info: reader.xsusenet.com; mail-complaints-to="abuse@xsusenet.com"
 by: Blueshirt - Sat, 19 Nov 2022 11:22 UTC

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <nnd$112ec9ec$6cb29539@c610f3a2b33cc76c>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> >
> > Having no neighbours - just fields with cows - has it advantages!
> >
>
> You farm Fenric?

Don't be silly, they are not my cows... or my fields.

Pages:12345678910111213
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.7
clearnet tor