Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

It's interesting to think that many quite distinguished people have bodies similar to yours.


arts / rec.arts.drwho / Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

SubjectAuthor
* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
||`- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|+- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreWouter Valentijn
| `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|  `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreWouter Valentijn
+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| +* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| ||`- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| | `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| +* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| | `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |  `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   +* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   |+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   ||+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   |||+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   ||||+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   |||||+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget andThe Last Doctor
|| |   ||||||`- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget andThe Last Doctor
|| |   |||||+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   ||||||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   |||||| +* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||| |`- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreIdlehands
|| |   |||||| `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   ||||||  `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   |||||+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   ||||||`- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||+- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   ||||||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||| `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   ||||||  `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   ||||||   +- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   ||||||   `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   |||||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   ||||| `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   |||||  `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||   `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    +* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||    |+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget andThe Last Doctor
|| |   |||||    ||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||    || `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget andThe Last Doctor
|| |   |||||    ||  `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||    ||   +- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreIdlehands
|| |   |||||    ||   `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget andThe Last Doctor
|| |   |||||    ||    `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||    ||     `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget andThe Last Doctor
|| |   |||||    ||      +* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||    ||      |+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget andThe Last Doctor
|| |   |||||    ||      ||+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||    ||      |||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||      ||| +* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||    ||      ||| |`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||      ||| | `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||      ||| |  `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreIdlehands
|| |   |||||    ||      ||| +* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   |||||    ||      ||| |`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||      ||| | `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   |||||    ||      ||| `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||      |||  `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||      |||   +- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreIdlehands
|| |   |||||    ||      |||   `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||      |||    `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||      |||     `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||      ||+- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreIdlehands
|| |   |||||    ||      ||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget andsolar penguin
|| |   |||||    ||      || `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   |||||    ||      ||  `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||      ||   `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||      ||    `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||      |`- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget andsolar penguin
|| |   |||||    ||      `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    |+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   |||||    ||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||    || `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   |||||    ||  +* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||    ||  |+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||  ||+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   |||||    ||  |||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||  ||| `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   |||||    ||  |||  `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||  |||   `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   |||||    ||  |||    `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||  ||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   |||||    ||  || `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreIdlehands
|| |   |||||    ||  ||  `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   |||||    ||  |`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||  | +* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   |||||    ||  | |+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||  | ||`- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||  | |`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   |||||    ||  | `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    ||  `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   |||||    |`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   |||||    `* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   ||||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsBlueshirt
|| |   |||+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   |||`- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|| |   ||+* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   ||`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offsYour Name
|| |   |`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| |   `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreThe True Doctor
|| `- [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
|`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65
`* [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and moreDaniel65

Pages:12345678910111213
Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<nnd$42526fc6$344134b0@2366b5aef87e379a>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13150&group=rec.arts.drwho#13150

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: bluesh...@indigo.news (Blueshirt)
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nnd$0fe9e290$35afdfa4@5b702094315eaec7> <tl8pgd$30rk2$2@dont-email.me> <nnd$39c0df23$79eca03f@c610f3a2b33cc76c> <tl965d$dda$28@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Organization: XanaNews
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <nnd$42526fc6$344134b0@2366b5aef87e379a>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 12:22:45 +0100
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed.abavia.com!abe004.abavia.com!abp003.abavia.com!reader.xsusenet.com!not-for-mail
Lines: 26
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 12:22:45 +0100
Injection-Info: reader.xsusenet.com; mail-complaints-to="abuse@xsusenet.com"
X-Received-Bytes: 2119
 by: Blueshirt - Sat, 19 Nov 2022 11:22 UTC

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <nnd$39c0df23$79eca03f@c610f3a2b33cc76c>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > The True Doctor wrote:
> >>
> >> Netflix should have made 1080p i444 the default standard and broadcast
> >> in that standard as default, not 4K using i420 sub-sampling. If a
> >> production like a movie or TV show uses the bokeh effect then in order
> >> for it to be noticeable 95% of the image would need to be blurred out
> >> reducing the image quality to effectively standard definition, so
> >> there's not point in even having a 4K TV to watch Doctor Who,
> >> especially when people made do with B&W TVs to watch it even when it
> >> was being broadcast in colour, and most people were still watching it
> >> in SD when a decade after HD broadcasts began on BBC1, even if they
> >> had an HD TV.
> >
> > Thank you for the technical specifications and explanation... being a
> > simple man I'll just say the stuff I stream from Prime Video, Netflix
> > or Disney+ looks good...
>
> As you like it!

That is how I like it, and you don't have to reply to every post here if
you are not going to actually join in the discussion.

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<nnd$0d963603$192eef19@fccc8759dc2ca411>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13151&group=rec.arts.drwho#13151

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: bluesh...@indigo.news (Blueshirt)
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
References: <tkmo60$vnc2$1@dont-email.me> <nnd$112ec9ec$6cb29539@c610f3a2b33cc76c> <tl96ab$1d7i$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Organization: XanaNews
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <nnd$0d963603$192eef19@fccc8759dc2ca411>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 12:26:24 +0100
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!peer02.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed.abavia.com!abe004.abavia.com!abp002.abavia.com!reader.xsusenet.com!not-for-mail
Lines: 21
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 12:26:24 +0100
Injection-Info: reader.xsusenet.com; mail-complaints-to="abuse@xsusenet.com"
X-Received-Bytes: 1610
 by: Blueshirt - Sat, 19 Nov 2022 11:26 UTC

Your Name wrote:

> On 2022-11-18 20:55:37 +0000, Blueshirt said:
> >
> > Having no neighbours - just fields with cows - has it advantages!
>
> Unless your choice of music curdles the milk. ;-)

They don't seem to mind a bit of Metallica anyway...
> > I do find the constant up and down with volume buttons a bit annoying
> > at times though it has to be said. It is either very loud music or
> > quiet dialogue, there seems to be no happy medium.
>
> On some devices the sound settings can fix that to some degree by
> enhancing the speech.

Yeah, we have a good mix for most of the time... but then there will be a
big BOOM! in a movie or an advert that is a lot louder than normal and you
reach for the buttons again.

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tlaelv$37cvq$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13153&group=rec.arts.drwho#13153

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 22:29:03 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 159
Message-ID: <tlaelv$37cvq$1@dont-email.me>
References: <tkcsdg$108s$1@gioia.aioe.org> <xn0np7sbthur72v000@nntp.aioe.org>
<tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org> <xn0np8betikncqt002@nntp.aioe.org>
<tklus1$t3de$2@dont-email.me> <tkmie0$v56j$1@dont-email.me>
<tkr9s2$1gftu$1@dont-email.me> <xn0npbdil30xk18000@nntp.aioe.org>
<tkrvr9$1ia80$2@dont-email.me> <nnd$5b244385$33934b71@abd8c187b08f83e7>
<tkuqln$1snru$2@dont-email.me> <nnd$3a2831be$2755bdb7@e44dd9b47d0194d2>
<tl34gk$2d3ou$2@dont-email.me> <tl50j9$2kic9$1@dont-email.me>
<tl5jge$2lver$2@dont-email.me> <tl7oj9$2u0m4$1@dont-email.me>
<tl8qdq$30tvm$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 11:29:04 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="36a002fb9b76a78e977fd33b2ed3bc02";
logging-data="3388410"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/9YUPXAM58qDrfQeXPszjcnDLfjib50tY="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nJ2fR5BvdL5lGGhvysgals0aFCo=
In-Reply-To: <tl8qdq$30tvm$1@dont-email.me>
 by: Daniel65 - Sat, 19 Nov 2022 11:29 UTC

The True Doctor wrote on 19/11/22 7:37 am:
> On 18/11/2022 10:59, Daniel65 wrote:
>> The True Doctor wrote on 18/11/22 2:20 am:
>>> On 17/11/2022 09:58, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 17/11/22 3:52 am:
>>>>> On 15/11/2022 22:32, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>> On 14/11/2022 22:04, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I love Disney+, I'm half-way through 'Andor' (nearly as
>>>>>>>> good as The Mandalorian) and there's two more episodes of
>>>>>>>> 'The Walking Dead' to be screened before that finishes for
>>>>>>>> good, so I can't wait for them. There's also some fairly
>>>>>>>> good Nazi documentaries on Disney+ too, which you'd
>>>>>>>> probably find interesting ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You mean like showing how the the Nazis were far left
>>>>>>> National Socialists whose divisive self-serving supremacist
>>>>>>> ideology is still followed today by woke morons such as
>>>>>>> feminists and transvestites who are now at war with each
>>>>>>> other over whose form of socialism is best, just like Hitler
>>>>>>> and Stalin.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, exactly like that... it's why I said you'd find it
>>>>>> interesting. As it goes against the grain. Which is what you
>>>>>> deliberately do all the time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've not been proven wrong, but you have. Your idea of how
>>>>>>> the broadcast industry works is totally fallacious and naive.
>>>>>>> You might wish it worked that way, but it does not. Doctor
>>>>>>> Who is not and never has been co-produced with either
>>>>>>> Netflix, Amazon, HBO, or Disney. It's currently produced by
>>>>>>> Bad Wolf/Sony for the BBC which has sold (allegedly) the
>>>>>>> finished product to Disney+.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You've been proven wrong on many things time and time again on
>>>>>> RADW but you are so thick you don't even realise it!
>>>>>
>>>>> I have never been proven wrong here the number of times you and
>>>>> the woke retards have.
>>>>
>>>> Ah!! So you, Aggy, ARE admitting that you HAVE been proven wrong!
>>>> Occasionally!! Well done!!
>>>
>>> Retarded fool.
>>
>> You shouldn't insult yourself like that, Aggy, I mean YOU did,
>
> Anyone who can comprehend the English languages will recognise that I
> was referring to you, thus you have proved my point.
>
>> apparently, type "I have never been proven wrong here the number of
>> times you and the woke retards have.", so admitting that YOU HAVE BEEN
>> PROVEN WRONG at least once or twice!!
>>
>>> I said David Tennant was going to be doing 4 specials, when it's
>>> actually 3, with the 4th special being Ncuti Gatwa's first episode at
>>> Christmas, and I freely accepted the correction.
>>
>> I wasn't contesting this, so why did you include it, Aggy??
>>
>
> To show that I have accepted that I have made some mistakes.
>
>>>>>> I've never claimed Doctor Who is co-produced by anyone, Bad
>>>>>> Wolf Productions make Doctor Who... and will do so as long as
>>>>>> the BBC are happy for them to do so. Your hate of a differing
>>>>>> opinion twists things in your mind so you can't see straight...
>>>>>> or read properly.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's the woke retards that hate differing opinions and those that
>>>>>  voice them,
>>>>
>>>> Gee!! You, Aggy, seem to "hate differing opinions and those that
>>>> voice them" ... so does that make YOU, Aggy, WOKE??
>>>
>>> I allow people to have differing opinions and don't try to suppress
>>> peoples freedom to express them
>>
>> Yes, but then you continually try to convert "them" to your opinion!!
>
> I have the right to teach people about their lack of knowledge and
> understanding,

Ah!! So this would be part of your "don't try to suppress peoples
freedom to express them", would it??

> and then they might be able to better themseves.

"better themselves" .... by agreeing with you, Aggy!!

>>> unlike the woke retards try to do to those they attack for
>>> disagreeing with their lies
>>
>> Sorry!! Have you, Aggy, really never done this??
>
> I am not a woke retard. I accept free speech, free thought, and free
> expression.

You accept free speech .... and then go on and on, trying to convert
people to your thought-train!!

>>> and propaganda as if they were the absolute truth and not just
>>> personal of political opinions.
>>
>> Aren't all political opinions "personal of political opinions"??
>
> Political opinions by their very nature of being political come from
> those who are uninformed.

SAY WHAT?? Anybody that has a Political Opinion doesn't know what they
are talking about!!

Really??

> What you should follow instead a professional
> opinions.

Sorry! Is this you, Aggy, suggesting people shouldn't think for
themselves .... they should just follow people like yourself, Aggy??

> You're not going to woke anti-capitalist retard like Greta
> Thunberg to examine the health of your chest, so why would you listen to
> this unqualified retarded truanting school child when she spews out
> propaganda about climate change, of which she knows nothing about?
>
>>>>> and attempt to present their opinions and unfounded ideology as
>>>>> facts instead of opinions.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, YOU *DO* seem to do that, Aggy!
>>>
>>> No don't. My arguments are based on science, logic, and reason,
>>> unlike the unfounded ideology of the woke which is based on political
>>> prejudices.
>>
>> AHHHH!! YEAH!! RIGHT!!
>>
>>>>> I am under no obligation to agree with them
>>>>
>>>> Of course you aren't Aggy, just as the rest of us are under no
>>>> obligation to agree with you, Aggy!!
>>>>
>>>> What a dull, DULL, world this would be if we all agreed with each
>>>> other all the time!!
>>>
>>> This it what the woke would turn the world into, by cancelling or
>>> extermination everyone with a differing opinion. Just look at
>>> Chairman Mao's sterile gray suits.
>>
>> Whereas You and Your ilk would like EVERYONE to agree with YOUR opinion,
>> thereby "cancelling or exterminating differing" opinions!!
>
> Me and my ilk would like everyone to agree with the scientific facts,
> thereby suppressing lies, propaganda, and misinformation.
>
Sorry!! What about "Doctor Who", the topic we are supposed to be
discussing here, falls under your "scientific facts" requirement, Aggy??
--
Daniel

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<nnd$5e699ebf$76da58d2@c1b0e8dbbb46d6f0>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13157&group=rec.arts.drwho#13157

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: bluesh...@indigo.news (Blueshirt)
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org> <xn0np8betikncqt002@nntp.aioe.org> <tkmie0$v56j$1@dont-email.me> <xn0npbdil30xk18000@nntp.aioe.org> <nnd$5b244385$33934b71@abd8c187b08f83e7> <nnd$3a2831be$2755bdb7@e44dd9b47d0194d2> <nnd$7b4abf98$230ab6f2@83464cbc2e6a7592> <nnd$66fc7b1e$2c687ce6@2c65e5b887d822a2> <tl6rbf$12bc$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nnd$0fe9e290$35afdfa4@5b702094315eaec7> <tl7rus$2u65p$5@dont-email.me> <nnd$43bf2765$65267f5e@c9175962e6387cd7> <tladd0$3781i$5@dont-email.me>
Organization: XanaNews
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <nnd$5e699ebf$76da58d2@c1b0e8dbbb46d6f0>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 12:42:05 +0100
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.uzoreto.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!94.232.112.246.MISMATCH!feed.abavia.com!abe006.abavia.com!abp003.abavia.com!reader.xsusenet.com!not-for-mail
Lines: 33
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 12:42:05 +0100
Injection-Info: reader.xsusenet.com; mail-complaints-to="abuse@xsusenet.com"
 by: Blueshirt - Sat, 19 Nov 2022 11:42 UTC

Daniel65 wrote:

> Blueshirt wrote on 18/11/22 11:20 pm:
> > Daniel65 wrote:
> > > Blueshirt wrote on 18/11/22 9:59 pm:
> > > > Your Name wrote:
> > > > > On 2022-11-17 23:37:55 +0000, Blueshirt said:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why wouldn't you? You're gonna have Doctor Who in lovely UHD
> > > > > > next year... 50" of crisp clear loveliness!
> > > > >
> > > > > That's assuming Doctor Who is filmed in UHD (or better) and that
> > > > > Disney+ streams it in UHD (or better), and that you're insternet
> > > > > connection can handle UHD streaming.
> > > >
> > > > Disney+ streams in UHD 4K and with Dolby Atmos sound
> > >
> > > Ah!! No!! Not ATMOS !!
> >
> > It's okay, but the room shakes and booms with big explosions! Which
> > there is a lot of in modern movies...
> >
> > BOOM!
> >
> Did my "ATMOS" reference go over your head, Blueshirt??

Possibly!
> Think Car exhaust!! ;-P

As in, yes! :-)

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tlaibr$37i9u$2@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13160&group=rec.arts.drwho#13160

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 23:31:58 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <tlaibr$37i9u$2@dont-email.me>
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<nnd$0fe9e290$35afdfa4@5b702094315eaec7> <tl8pgd$30rk2$2@dont-email.me>
<nnd$39c0df23$79eca03f@c610f3a2b33cc76c> <tl965d$dda$28@gallifrey.nk.ca>
<nnd$42526fc6$344134b0@2366b5aef87e379a>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 12:31:56 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="36a002fb9b76a78e977fd33b2ed3bc02";
logging-data="3393854"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Cmv1OfTFU1N5D9d8+S+5Qk2z3MXMiepM="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2VcrU/teXu6/w/DxNqnDUGyE2CM=
In-Reply-To: <nnd$42526fc6$344134b0@2366b5aef87e379a>
 by: Daniel65 - Sat, 19 Nov 2022 12:31 UTC

Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/22 10:22 pm:
> The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <nnd$39c0df23$79eca03f@c610f3a2b33cc76c>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Netflix should have made 1080p i444 the default standard and broadcast
>>>> in that standard as default, not 4K using i420 sub-sampling. If a
>>>> production like a movie or TV show uses the bokeh effect then in order
>>>> for it to be noticeable 95% of the image would need to be blurred out
>>>> reducing the image quality to effectively standard definition, so
>>>> there's not point in even having a 4K TV to watch Doctor Who,
>>>> especially when people made do with B&W TVs to watch it even when it
>>>> was being broadcast in colour, and most people were still watching it
>>>> in SD when a decade after HD broadcasts began on BBC1, even if they
>>>> had an HD TV.
>>>
>>> Thank you for the technical specifications and explanation... being a
>>> simple man I'll just say the stuff I stream from Prime Video, Netflix
>>> or Disney+ looks good...
>>
>> As you like it!
>
> That is how I like it, and you don't have to reply to every post here if
> you are not going to actually join in the discussion.
>
Correct .... he doesn't have to ...... but he will in any case! Gotta
get those Precious Post Count numbers up somehow!!
--
Daniel

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<nnd$7fce5f90$31a3b871@bd0b34d014033afe>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13165&group=rec.arts.drwho#13165

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: bluesh...@indigo.news (Blueshirt)
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nnd$112ec9ec$6cb29539@c610f3a2b33cc76c> <tl9660$dda$29@gallifrey.nk.ca> <nnd$4af061b2$5c6dcc96@2366b5aef87e379a> <tlapnt$16o2$53@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Organization: XanaNews
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <nnd$7fce5f90$31a3b871@bd0b34d014033afe>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 16:53:08 +0100
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed.abavia.com!abe005.abavia.com!abp003.abavia.com!reader.xsusenet.com!not-for-mail
Lines: 14
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 16:53:08 +0100
Injection-Info: reader.xsusenet.com; mail-complaints-to="abuse@xsusenet.com"
X-Received-Bytes: 1398
 by: Blueshirt - Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:53 UTC

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <nnd$4af061b2$5c6dcc96@2366b5aef87e379a>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> >
> > Don't be silly, they are not my cows... or my fields.
>
> Well Andrew you must be rich to own such an isolated area!

The only Andrew I know of is in hiding in England, stripped of his
Royal duties... and if something isn't mine, clearly I don't own it!

But most places here are isolated areas... hence all the green.

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<nnd$7519b514$3fb0a3c7@bd0b34d014033afe>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13166&group=rec.arts.drwho#13166

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: bluesh...@indigo.news (Blueshirt)
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nnd$39c0df23$79eca03f@c610f3a2b33cc76c> <tl965d$dda$28@gallifrey.nk.ca> <nnd$42526fc6$344134b0@2366b5aef87e379a> <tlapoj$16o2$54@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Organization: XanaNews
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <nnd$7519b514$3fb0a3c7@bd0b34d014033afe>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 16:53:09 +0100
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed.abavia.com!abe004.abavia.com!abp002.abavia.com!reader.xsusenet.com!not-for-mail
Lines: 19
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 16:53:09 +0100
Injection-Info: reader.xsusenet.com; mail-complaints-to="abuse@xsusenet.com"
X-Received-Bytes: 1488
 by: Blueshirt - Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:53 UTC

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <nnd$42526fc6$344134b0@2366b5aef87e379a>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> >
> > That is how I like it, and you don't have to reply to every post
> > here if you are not going to actually join in the discussion.
>
> LOL!
>
> BTW no to Disney+ here!

Piracy for you next year's Doctor Who episodes so... you really are a
good Christian!

But I don't care whether you ever watch Disney+ or not... DIS is not
part of my stock portfolio. Watch it, don't watch it, <shrugs> it's up
to you.

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<nnd$799b9ed2$7d959e9f@7745c8284f0b5802>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13167&group=rec.arts.drwho#13167

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: bluesh...@indigo.news (Blueshirt)
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nnd$43bf2765$65267f5e@c9175962e6387cd7> <tladd0$3781i$5@dont-email.me> <nnd$5e699ebf$76da58d2@c1b0e8dbbb46d6f0> <tlaq3m$16o2$60@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Organization: XanaNews
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <nnd$799b9ed2$7d959e9f@7745c8284f0b5802>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 16:55:44 +0100
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed.abavia.com!abe005.abavia.com!abp002.abavia.com!reader.xsusenet.com!not-for-mail
Lines: 20
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 16:55:44 +0100
Injection-Info: reader.xsusenet.com; mail-complaints-to="abuse@xsusenet.com"
X-Received-Bytes: 1300
 by: Blueshirt - Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:55 UTC

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <nnd$5e699ebf$76da58d2@c1b0e8dbbb46d6f0>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > Daniel65 wrote:
> >> >
> >> Did my "ATMOS" reference go over your head, Blueshirt??
> >
> > Possibly!
> >
> >> Think Car exhaust!! ;-P
> >
> > As in, yes! :-)
>
> sontarans in action!

:-)

Yes, I got it eventually!

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tlb4pc$3928r$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13169&group=rec.arts.drwho#13169

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hidefr...@hushmail.com (Idlehands)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 10:46:14 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <tlb4pc$3928r$1@dont-email.me>
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<nnd$39c0df23$79eca03f@c610f3a2b33cc76c> <tl965d$dda$28@gallifrey.nk.ca>
<nnd$42526fc6$344134b0@2366b5aef87e379a> <tlapoj$16o2$54@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 17:46:20 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="be240b24a6f99639fd09f9d7224bd9ef";
logging-data="3442971"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/CUeHzkxNmt3O0LxPfQO0GX40ZzBA3cfY="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.5.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CUAL6cbbjJZXiNlOX2/kdrtyHPY=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <tlapoj$16o2$54@gallifrey.nk.ca>
 by: Idlehands - Sat, 19 Nov 2022 17:46 UTC

On 2022-11-19 7:38 a.m., The Doctor wrote:
> In article <nnd$42526fc6$344134b0@2366b5aef87e379a>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> In article <nnd$39c0df23$79eca03f@c610f3a2b33cc76c>,
>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Netflix should have made 1080p i444 the default standard and broadcast
>>>>> in that standard as default, not 4K using i420 sub-sampling. If a
>>>>> production like a movie or TV show uses the bokeh effect then in order
>>>>> for it to be noticeable 95% of the image would need to be blurred out
>>>>> reducing the image quality to effectively standard definition, so
>>>>> there's not point in even having a 4K TV to watch Doctor Who,
>>>>> especially when people made do with B&W TVs to watch it even when it
>>>>> was being broadcast in colour, and most people were still watching it
>>>>> in SD when a decade after HD broadcasts began on BBC1, even if they
>>>>> had an HD TV.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for the technical specifications and explanation... being a
>>>> simple man I'll just say the stuff I stream from Prime Video, Netflix
>>>> or Disney+ looks good...
>>>
>>> As you like it!
>>
>> That is how I like it, and you don't have to reply to every post here if
>> you are not going to actually join in the discussion.
>
> LOL!
>
> BTW no to Disney+ here!

Do you think anyone cares asswipe? Not even Disney.

Why did Daddy have to buy the new TV, why didn't you? Oh that's right,
leeches don't spend their own money.

--
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."
- Benjamin Franklin

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tlb4tb$3928r$2@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13170&group=rec.arts.drwho#13170

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hidefr...@hushmail.com (Idlehands)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 10:48:21 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 55
Message-ID: <tlb4tb$3928r$2@dont-email.me>
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<15c8315e-1282-419e-8857-6e62b06d1dbfn@googlegroups.com>
<tl7310$no$9@gallifrey.nk.ca> <tl7ktl$2to9m$1@dont-email.me>
<tl84fq$1kra$41@gallifrey.nk.ca> <tlaco4$3781i$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 17:48:27 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="be240b24a6f99639fd09f9d7224bd9ef";
logging-data="3442971"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/yYuj5qFii48sEL8NTm3N1ZrkUwuNwJl8="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.5.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wNsJxFCL6wlsIaHU72koDl7f3x8=
In-Reply-To: <tlaco4$3781i$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-GB
 by: Idlehands - Sat, 19 Nov 2022 17:48 UTC

On 2022-11-19 3:56 a.m., Daniel65 wrote:
> The Doctor wrote on 19/11/22 1:22 am:
>> In article <tl7ktl$2to9m$1@dont-email.me>,
>> Daniel65  <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote on 18/11/22 3:51 pm:
>>>> In article <15c8315e-1282-419e-8857-6e62b06d1dbfn@googlegroups.com>,
>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 6:38:24 PM UTC-8,
>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> In article <tl6qii$pp0$1...@gioia.aioe.org>, Your Name
>>>>>> <Your...@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2022-11-17 22:57:35 +0000, Blueshirt said:
>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>
>>> <Snip>
>>>
>>>>>>>>> Care to speculate about David Tennant 2023?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I can do more than speculate; David Tennant will be in three
>>>>>>>> special episodes next year and then [somehow] Ncuti Gatwa
>>>>>>>> will become the next Doctor.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If this does not happen I will be complaining to the BBC...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If Gatwa does NOT become the new Doctor, there will be a lot of
>>>>>>> people celebrating. Even more so if Tennant stays on after the
>>>>>>> 'specials'.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gatwa is after this ?Tennant.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can someone tell me wnat the Hell is Going on?
>>>
>>> "?Tennant"?? "wnat"??
>>>
>>>>> Is Your Name part of the anti-Gatwa movement?
>>>>
>>>> I would like to know myself!
>>>>
>>> ... and YOU, asswipe, would just about be the only person who would like
>>> to know yourself, asswipe!!
>>
>> He is back and He is for real IDlehands-mouth Dannyboy!
>
> Who is back, asswipe, and why should we care, asswipe??

He seems to "think" the Doctor is real, which explains a lot about the
little world he seems to live in.

The asswipe can't separate a fictional character in a TV show from
actual reality.

--
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."
- Benjamin Franklin

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<jtt499Fu02jU1@mid.individual.net>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13176&group=rec.arts.drwho#13176

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: lia...@valentijn.nu (Wouter Valentijn)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 23:39:37 +0100
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <jtt499Fu02jU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <tkcsdg$108s$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tl2sor$1k2k$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>
<tl4t9p$2k875$4@dont-email.me> <tl4u7f$2kd79$1@dont-email.me>
<tl59kj$uor$27@gallifrey.nk.ca> <tl7ina$2the7$2@dont-email.me>
<tl7j4k$2tjqf$1@dont-email.me> <tl7reb$2u65p$3@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net +2oy3gpGSleLIrhXymi+LQ1JPP5m7y9a75Uur1CP+QWw0WkdVj
Cancel-Lock: sha1:c7De47PpZUbnQs5aW6P10fXpkX0=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.5.0
Content-Language: nl, en-US
In-Reply-To: <tl7reb$2u65p$3@dont-email.me>
 by: Wouter Valentijn - Sat, 19 Nov 2022 22:39 UTC

Op 18-11-2022 om 12:48 schreef Daniel65:
> solar penguin wrote on 18/11/22 8:26 pm:
>> Daniel declared:
>>> The Doctor wrote on 17/11/22 11:32 pm:
>>>> In article <tl4u7f$2kd79$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> solar penguin  <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Daniel declared:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 17/11/22 1:40 am:
>>>>>>> In article <tl22q8$2a9u3$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> Daniel65  <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm confused!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are confused Idlehands-mouth Dannyboy!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, asswipe, that's why I typed "I'm confused!!", asswipe!
>>>>>
>>>>> On the bright side, at least the asswipe managed to understand
>>>>> a simple English sentence.
>>>>
>>>> Tlo Idlehands-mouth creatures thus spoke!
>>>
>>> "Tlo"??
>>
>> IIRC it’s Spanish for Uncle.
>>
> I'll believe you .... cause Google Translate fails miserably!!

Tio?

I use this one often:

https://www.deepl.com/translator

--
Wouter Valentijn

Kirk: "No beach to walk on..."
Star Trek (s01e07): The Naked Time

http://www.nksf.nl/

liam=mail

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tld0qb$3gg4o$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13184&group=rec.arts.drwho#13184

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 21:50:53 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <tld0qb$3gg4o$1@dont-email.me>
References: <tkcsdg$108s$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tl7ih1$2the7$1@dont-email.me>
<tl83p2$1kra$30@gallifrey.nk.ca> <tlac13$3765b$2@dont-email.me>
<tlap8a$16o2$44@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 10:50:51 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4330d2a9b5c169fc656fb399fbd08f7b";
logging-data="3686552"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX198YmHSBBXJmfutO85YO1Cb0+7OVolHE/w="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MDoqHYZ3C4dCpFoNRX+cOJRH1NE=
In-Reply-To: <tlap8a$16o2$44@gallifrey.nk.ca>
 by: Daniel65 - Sun, 20 Nov 2022 10:50 UTC

The Doctor wrote on 20/11/22 1:29 am:
> In article <tlac13$3765b$2@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 19/11/22 1:10 am:
>>> In article <tl7ih1$2the7$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 17/11/22 11:18 pm:
>>>>> In article <tl4t06$2k875$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 17/11/22 1:31 am:
>>>>>>> In article <tl21ot$2a6vo$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

<Snip>

>>>>>>>> But YOU, asswipe, had to quote 87 lines of it ..... just
>>>>>>>> to tack YOUR five word contribution on at the end!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is called keeping contaxt intact Idlehands-mouth
>>>>>>> DannyBoy!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How is YOUR 150-line Bible quotation relevant to this
>>>>>> discussion, asswipe??
>>>>>
>>>>> It is called not losing the context Idlehadns-mouth Dannyboy!
>>>>
>>>> Sorry!! How is YOUR 150+ line Bible Quote "not losing the context"
>>>> when this newsgroup is supposed to be about "Doctor Who" content,
>>>> asswipe??
>>>
>>> Obvious you are not familiar with the Old Testament Idlehands-mouth
>>> Dannboy!
>>
>> How often has any of The Old Testament been quoted in "Doctor Who".
>> asswipe??

Failure to answer question asked, NOTED, but YOU, asswipe, had to post
just to increase YOUR Precious Post Count!!
--
Daniel

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tld11e$3gh3q$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13185&group=rec.arts.drwho#13185

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 21:54:38 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <tld11e$3gh3q$1@dont-email.me>
References: <tkcsdg$108s$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tl2sor$1k2k$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>
<tl4t9p$2k875$4@dont-email.me> <tl4u7f$2kd79$1@dont-email.me>
<tl59kj$uor$27@gallifrey.nk.ca> <tl7ina$2the7$2@dont-email.me>
<tl7j4k$2tjqf$1@dont-email.me> <tl7reb$2u65p$3@dont-email.me>
<jtt499Fu02jU1@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 10:54:39 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4330d2a9b5c169fc656fb399fbd08f7b";
logging-data="3687546"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/h83JqMMZerjSVB59CH51pyaf4gaLXNL0="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+ZKqFdHAdbSEURWRZ6MHgNghdtU=
In-Reply-To: <jtt499Fu02jU1@mid.individual.net>
 by: Daniel65 - Sun, 20 Nov 2022 10:54 UTC

Wouter Valentijn wrote on 20/11/22 9:39 am:
> Op 18-11-2022 om 12:48 schreef Daniel65:
>> solar penguin wrote on 18/11/22 8:26 pm:
>>> Daniel declared:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 17/11/22 11:32 pm:
>>>>> In article <tl4u7f$2kd79$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin  <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Daniel declared:
>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 17/11/22 1:40 am:
>>>>>>>> In article <tl22q8$2a9u3$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>> Daniel65  <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm confused!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You are confused Idlehands-mouth Dannyboy!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, asswipe, that's why I typed "I'm confused!!", asswipe!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On the bright side, at least the asswipe managed to understand
>>>>>> a simple English sentence.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tlo Idlehands-mouth creatures thus spoke!
>>>>
>>>> "Tlo"??
>>>
>>> IIRC it’s Spanish for Uncle.
>>>
>> I'll believe you .... cause Google Translate fails miserably!!
>
> Tio?
>
> I use this one often:
>
> https://www.deepl.com/translator
> Yeah, I know there are others. What's the one that stemmed from "The
Hitch-hiker's Guide to the Galaxy"??
--
Daniel

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tld1b2$3gh3q$2@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13186&group=rec.arts.drwho#13186

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 21:59:48 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <tld1b2$3gh3q$2@dont-email.me>
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<15c8315e-1282-419e-8857-6e62b06d1dbfn@googlegroups.com>
<tl7310$no$9@gallifrey.nk.ca> <tl7ktl$2to9m$1@dont-email.me>
<tl84fq$1kra$41@gallifrey.nk.ca> <tlaco4$3781i$2@dont-email.me>
<tlb4tb$3928r$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 10:59:46 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4330d2a9b5c169fc656fb399fbd08f7b";
logging-data="3687546"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+2KV5iVqZfNZdQYbofyKlaI5ddb0iUJoI="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:sKBVkogWQcleiS45/045HU5fVVM=
In-Reply-To: <tlb4tb$3928r$2@dont-email.me>
 by: Daniel65 - Sun, 20 Nov 2022 10:59 UTC

Idlehands wrote on 20/11/22 4:48 am:
> On 2022-11-19 3:56 a.m., Daniel65 wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 19/11/22 1:22 am:
>>> In article <tl7ktl$2to9m$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 18/11/22 3:51 pm:
>>>>> In article
>>>>> <15c8315e-1282-419e-8857-6e62b06d1dbfn@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 6:38:24 PM UTC-8,
>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <tl6qii$pp0$1...@gioia.aioe.org>, Your Name
>>>>>>> <Your...@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2022-11-17 22:57:35 +0000, Blueshirt said:
>>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <Snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Care to speculate about David Tennant 2023?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I can do more than speculate; David Tennant will be
>>>>>>>>> in three special episodes next year and then
>>>>>>>>> [somehow] Ncuti Gatwa will become the next Doctor.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If this does not happen I will be complaining to the
>>>>>>>>> BBC...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If Gatwa does NOT become the new Doctor, there will be
>>>>>>>> a lot of people celebrating. Even more so if Tennant
>>>>>>>> stays on after the 'specials'.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gatwa is after this ?Tennant.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can someone tell me wnat the Hell is Going on?
>>>>
>>>> "?Tennant"?? "wnat"??
>>>>
>>>>>> Is Your Name part of the anti-Gatwa movement?
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to know myself!
>>>>>
>>>> ... and YOU, asswipe, would just about be the only person who
>>>> would like to know yourself, asswipe!!
>>>
>>> He is back and He is for real IDlehands-mouth Dannyboy!
>>
>> Who is back, asswipe, and why should we care, asswipe??
>
> He seems to "think" the Doctor is real, which explains a lot about
> the little world he seems to live in.
>
> The asswipe can't separate a fictional character in a TV show from
> actual reality.
>
Perhaps "The Doctor" is one of the myriad voices in the asswipe's head!!
--
Daniel

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tld1hm$3gh3q$3@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13187&group=rec.arts.drwho#13187

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 22:03:20 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <tld1hm$3gh3q$3@dont-email.me>
References: <tkmo60$vnc2$1@dont-email.me>
<nnd$112ec9ec$6cb29539@c610f3a2b33cc76c> <tl96ab$1d7i$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<nnd$0d963603$192eef19@fccc8759dc2ca411> <tlappi$16o2$55@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 11:03:19 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4330d2a9b5c169fc656fb399fbd08f7b";
logging-data="3687546"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19SdW5xJGbbA/fUZHLAuZKA+K9GtbplhxU="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PrbkVz1qmP0WjAeyHGDHpNBpDOE=
In-Reply-To: <tlappi$16o2$55@gallifrey.nk.ca>
 by: Daniel65 - Sun, 20 Nov 2022 11:03 UTC

The Doctor wrote on 20/11/22 1:38 am:
> In article <nnd$0d963603$192eef19@fccc8759dc2ca411>, Blueshirt
> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> Your Name wrote:
>>> On 2022-11-18 20:55:37 +0000, Blueshirt said:
>>>>
>>>> Having no neighbours - just fields with cows - has it
>>>> advantages!
>>>
>>> Unless your choice of music curdles the milk. ;-)
>>
>> They don't seem to mind a bit of Metallica anyway...
>>
>>>> I do find the constant up and down with volume buttons a bit
>>>> annoying at times though it has to be said. It is either very
>>>> loud music or quiet dialogue, there seems to be no happy
>>>> medium.
>>>
>>> On some devices the sound settings can fix that to some degree
>>> by enhancing the speech.
>>
>> Yeah, we have a good mix for most of the time... but then there
>> will be a big BOOM! in a movie or an advert that is a lot louder
>> than normal and you reach for the buttons again.
>
> And then you could get poor audio and goo sound effects!
>
Why would anyone want goo sound effects .... unless, of course, you are
watching goo!!
--
Daniel

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tld1qc$3gh3q$4@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13188&group=rec.arts.drwho#13188

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 22:07:58 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <tld1qc$3gh3q$4@dont-email.me>
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tl965d$dda$28@gallifrey.nk.ca>
<nnd$42526fc6$344134b0@2366b5aef87e379a> <tlaibr$37i9u$2@dont-email.me>
<tlaqa6$16o2$63@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 11:07:56 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4330d2a9b5c169fc656fb399fbd08f7b";
logging-data="3687546"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ffvBaVKHkN3qpxfMFy7LcurVrhAg5eFA="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4rWS1VQukIlbMOVGZWLWhkoDZiM=
In-Reply-To: <tlaqa6$16o2$63@gallifrey.nk.ca>
 by: Daniel65 - Sun, 20 Nov 2022 11:07 UTC

The Doctor wrote on 20/11/22 1:47 am:
> In article <tlaibr$37i9u$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/22 10:22 pm:

<Snip>

>>> That is how I like it, and you don't have to reply to every post
>>> here if you are not going to actually join in the discussion.
>>>
>> Correct .... he doesn't have to ...... but he will in any case!
>> Gotta get those Precious Post Count numbers up somehow!!
>
> Are you counting on Tim to spamfllod you out of rec.arts.drwho,
> Daniel?

"spamfllod"??
--
Daniel

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tld20n$3gh3q$5@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13189&group=rec.arts.drwho#13189

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 22:11:21 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <tld20n$3gh3q$5@dont-email.me>
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<nnd$42526fc6$344134b0@2366b5aef87e379a> <tlapoj$16o2$54@gallifrey.nk.ca>
<nnd$7519b514$3fb0a3c7@bd0b34d014033afe> <tlc3hu$30se$6@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 11:11:19 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4330d2a9b5c169fc656fb399fbd08f7b";
logging-data="3687546"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/GA0NajPKCWNpCe2WPoI2qp12zYBgRyk4="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:crw/aPF5mqpDgNM95ZVH7Xf3SXY=
In-Reply-To: <tlc3hu$30se$6@gallifrey.nk.ca>
 by: Daniel65 - Sun, 20 Nov 2022 11:11 UTC

The Doctor wrote on 20/11/22 1:31 pm:
> In article <nnd$7519b514$3fb0a3c7@bd0b34d014033afe>, Blueshirt
> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <nnd$42526fc6$344134b0@2366b5aef87e379a>, Blueshirt
>>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> That is how I like it, and you don't have to reply to every
>>>> post here if you are not going to actually join in the
>>>> discussion.
>>>
>>> LOL!
>>>
>>> BTW no to Disney+ here!
>>
>> Piracy for you next year's Doctor Who episodes so... you really are
>> a good Christian!
>>
>> But I don't care whether you ever watch Disney+ or not... DIS is
>> not part of my stock portfolio. Watch it, don't watch it, <shrugs>
>> it's up to you.
>
> Legit subscribed to International TV for me.
>
Is Disney+ carried (free) by International TV, asswipe??
--
Daniel

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<nnd$0ccfccb1$281a00f3@d695e7200eff5934>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13196&group=rec.arts.drwho#13196

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: bluesh...@indigo.news (Blueshirt)
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nnd$42526fc6$344134b0@2366b5aef87e379a> <tlapoj$16o2$54@gallifrey.nk.ca> <nnd$7519b514$3fb0a3c7@bd0b34d014033afe> <tlc3hu$30se$6@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Organization: XanaNews
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <nnd$0ccfccb1$281a00f3@d695e7200eff5934>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 12:49:50 +0100
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed.abavia.com!abe004.abavia.com!abp001.abavia.com!reader.xsusenet.com!not-for-mail
Lines: 21
Injection-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 12:49:50 +0100
Injection-Info: reader.xsusenet.com; mail-complaints-to="abuse@xsusenet.com"
X-Received-Bytes: 1593
 by: Blueshirt - Sun, 20 Nov 2022 11:49 UTC

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <nnd$7519b514$3fb0a3c7@bd0b34d014033afe>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > The Doctor wrote:
> >>
> >> BTW no to Disney+ here!
> >
> > Piracy for you next year's Doctor Who episodes so... you really are
> > a good Christian!
> >
> > But I don't care whether you ever watch Disney+ or not...
>
> Legit subscribed to International TV for me.

International TV sounds legit alright... I wonder how much of your
subscription fee reaches the BBC?

But will International TV have a deal with Disney+ for streaming Doctor
Who next year though?

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tld531$3gqej$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13198&group=rec.arts.drwho#13198

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: mik...@xenocyte.com (The Last Doctor)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and
more spin-offs
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 12:03:45 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <tld531$3gqej$1@dont-email.me>
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<nnd$42526fc6$344134b0@2366b5aef87e379a>
<tlapoj$16o2$54@gallifrey.nk.ca>
<nnd$7519b514$3fb0a3c7@bd0b34d014033afe>
<tlc3hu$30se$6@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 12:03:45 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="93a7638f73015a25fb2e28c7e884aecb";
logging-data="3697107"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+/ObqxGPQKLpnPVn7F3wHb"
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:0n5LrTXP/NW44bXD5BL5ox/ilyI=
sha1:4ynrjcjfIAcDcBzS9BMQnRNpAew=
 by: The Last Doctor - Sun, 20 Nov 2022 12:03 UTC

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <nnd$7519b514$3fb0a3c7@bd0b34d014033afe>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> In article <nnd$42526fc6$344134b0@2366b5aef87e379a>,
>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> That is how I like it, and you don't have to reply to every post
>>>> here if you are not going to actually join in the discussion.
>>>
>>> LOL!
>>>
>>> BTW no to Disney+ here!
>>
>> Piracy for you next year's Doctor Who episodes so... you really are a
>> good Christian!
>>
>> But I don't care whether you ever watch Disney+ or not... DIS is not
>> part of my stock portfolio. Watch it, don't watch it, <shrugs> it's up
>> to you.
>
> Legit subscribed to International TV for me.

What is “International TV” Dave? I sincerely doubt it has a licence to
serve BBC content to you that has been sold exclusively to other
broadcasters or streaming services. You might be “legitimately” subscribed
to it - but does it have a “legitimate” right to the content you get from
it? It’s the Roku argument, you know, the one that regularly gets Roku
servers shut down.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tld5fv$3gpdl$2@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13201&group=rec.arts.drwho#13201

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 23:10:41 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <tld5fv$3gpdl$2@dont-email.me>
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<nnd$42526fc6$344134b0@2366b5aef87e379a> <tlapoj$16o2$54@gallifrey.nk.ca>
<nnd$7519b514$3fb0a3c7@bd0b34d014033afe> <tlc3hu$30se$6@gallifrey.nk.ca>
<tld531$3gqej$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 12:10:39 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4330d2a9b5c169fc656fb399fbd08f7b";
logging-data="3696053"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+CuS1pZwaYUDeDFCg3dlARpKBMnaDYV4o="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:NleDqIONDgIocaohv/58Ov5Eja0=
In-Reply-To: <tld531$3gqej$1@dont-email.me>
 by: Daniel65 - Sun, 20 Nov 2022 12:10 UTC

The Last Doctor wrote on 20/11/22 11:03 pm:
> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> In article <nnd$7519b514$3fb0a3c7@bd0b34d014033afe>, Blueshirt
>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <nnd$42526fc6$344134b0@2366b5aef87e379a>, Blueshirt
>>>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> That is how I like it, and you don't have to reply to every
>>>>> post here if you are not going to actually join in the
>>>>> discussion.
>>>>
>>>> LOL!
>>>>
>>>> BTW no to Disney+ here!
>>>
>>> Piracy for you next year's Doctor Who episodes so... you really
>>> are a good Christian!
>>>
>>> But I don't care whether you ever watch Disney+ or not... DIS is
>>> not part of my stock portfolio. Watch it, don't watch it,
>>> <shrugs> it's up to you.
>>
>> Legit subscribed to International TV for me.
>
> What is “International TV” Dave? I sincerely doubt it has a licence
> to serve BBC content to you that has been sold exclusively to other
> broadcasters or streaming services. You might be “legitimately”
> subscribed to it - but does it have a “legitimate” right to the
> content you get from it? It’s the Roku argument, you know, the one
> that regularly gets Roku servers shut down.
>
Oh!! No!! Don't tell me the asswipe gets his T.V. from "The Dark Web"!!
--
Daniel

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<nnd$555ee76f$7f441610@f88059406e241f19>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13207&group=rec.arts.drwho#13207

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: bluesh...@indigo.news (Blueshirt)
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nnd$7519b514$3fb0a3c7@bd0b34d014033afe> <tlc3hu$30se$6@gallifrey.nk.ca> <tld531$3gqej$1@dont-email.me> <tldaub$2ln$73@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Organization: XanaNews
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <nnd$555ee76f$7f441610@f88059406e241f19>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 15:00:14 +0100
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.eu1.usenetexpress.com!94.232.112.244.MISMATCH!feed.abavia.com!abe004.abavia.com!abp001.abavia.com!reader.xsusenet.com!not-for-mail
Lines: 24
Injection-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 15:00:14 +0100
Injection-Info: reader.xsusenet.com; mail-complaints-to="abuse@xsusenet.com"
 by: Blueshirt - Sun, 20 Nov 2022 14:00 UTC

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <tld531$3gqej$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
> >The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> >>
> >> Legit subscribed to International TV for me.
> >
> > What is “International TV” Dave? I sincerely doubt it has a licence
> > to serve BBC content to you that has been sold exclusively to other
> > broadcasters or streaming services. You might be “legitimately”
> > subscribed to it - but does it have a “legitimate” right to the
> > content you get from it? It’s the Roku argument, you know, the one
> > that regularly gets Roku servers shut down.
>
> Well then who carries BBC One outside the UK?

BBC1 is not supposed to be carried outside of the UK... the BBC are
funded by the UK TV licence. The BBC has external services for it's
shows overseas, like BBC America (etc.) which has adverts to raise
income. BBC1 can be accessed outside of the UK obviously, but I'm
guessing 'International TV' are not official partners of the BBC for
the distribution of BBC1 in Edmonton, AL, Canada!

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tldqdt$3ij6k$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13209&group=rec.arts.drwho#13209

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: mik...@xenocyte.com (The Last Doctor)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and
more spin-offs
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 18:07:57 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <tldqdt$3ij6k$1@dont-email.me>
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<tld531$3gqej$1@dont-email.me>
<tldaub$2ln$73@gallifrey.nk.ca>
<nnd$555ee76f$7f441610@f88059406e241f19>
<tldcfu$5fs$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 18:07:57 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e4c9cce37212f94cb3dec778759aac15";
logging-data="3755220"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19iRP3TeGeFX28owQMgmTGl"
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8RafRwhZlklPpGEh44JnKzUo4sg=
sha1:j+a0fsDdA078hLzznZkAvRIwxNY=
 by: The Last Doctor - Sun, 20 Nov 2022 18:07 UTC

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <nnd$555ee76f$7f441610@f88059406e241f19>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> In article <tld531$3gqej$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Legit subscribed to International TV for me.
>>>>
>>>> What is “International TV” Dave? I sincerely doubt it has a licence
>>>> to serve BBC content to you that has been sold exclusively to other
>>>> broadcasters or streaming services. You might be “legitimately”
>>>> subscribed to it - but does it have a “legitimate” right to the
>>>> content you get from it? It’s the Roku argument, you know, the one
>>>> that regularly gets Roku servers shut down.
>>>
>>> Well then who carries BBC One outside the UK?
>>
>> BBC1 is not supposed to be carried outside of the UK... the BBC are
>> funded by the UK TV licence. The BBC has external services for it's
>> shows overseas, like BBC America (etc.) which has adverts to raise
>> income. BBC1 can be accessed outside of the UK obviously, but I'm
>> guessing 'International TV' are not official partners of the BBC for
>> the distribution of BBC1 in Edmonton, AL, Canada!
>
> This is not the 20th Century!

That’s right Dave, it’s the 21st century. The international rights to show
TV are now a very valuable IP and broadcasters protect them fiercely. The
value of the BBC’s sales to BBCA, Space, HBO Max and now Disney (to name
just 4) would be undermined by “grey” channels delivering BBC content
without legal agreement, and by subscribing to services that do that you
are actually jeopardising the BBC’s income stream and therefore putting
programming at risk.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tle0bh$1cgh$1@gioia.aioe.org>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13214&group=rec.arts.drwho#13214

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!RAbeKjt3yFegtqcUpNMAnA.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: YourN...@YourISP.com (Your Name)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 08:49:05 +1300
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <tle0bh$1cgh$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <tkruio$1i7n5$1@dont-email.me> <nnd$5b244385$33934b71@abd8c187b08f83e7> <nnd$3a2831be$2755bdb7@e44dd9b47d0194d2> <nnd$7b4abf98$230ab6f2@83464cbc2e6a7592> <nnd$66fc7b1e$2c687ce6@2c65e5b887d822a2> <tl6rbf$12bc$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nnd$0fe9e290$35afdfa4@5b702094315eaec7> <tl7rus$2u65p$5@dont-email.me> <nnd$43bf2765$65267f5e@c9175962e6387cd7> <nnd$112ec9ec$6cb29539@c610f3a2b33cc76c> <tl96ab$1d7i$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nnd$0d963603$192eef19@fccc8759dc2ca411> <tld1hm$3gh3q$3@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="45585"; posting-host="RAbeKjt3yFegtqcUpNMAnA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Your Name - Sun, 20 Nov 2022 19:49 UTC

On 2022-11-20 11:03:20 +0000, Daniel65 said:

> The Doctor wrote on 20/11/22 1:38 am:
>> In article <nnd$0d963603$192eef19@fccc8759dc2ca411>, Blueshirt
>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> Your Name wrote:
>>>> On 2022-11-18 20:55:37 +0000, Blueshirt said:
>>>>>
>>>>> Having no neighbours - just fields with cows - has it
>>>>> advantages!
>>>>
>>>> Unless your choice of music curdles the milk. ;-)
>>>
>>> They don't seem to mind a bit of Metallica anyway...
>>>
>>>>> I do find the constant up and down with volume buttons a bit
>>>>> annoying at times though it has to be said. It is either very
>>>>> loud music or quiet dialogue, there seems to be no happy
>>>>> medium.
>>>>
>>>> On some devices the sound settings can fix that to some degree
>>>> by enhancing the speech.
>>>
>>> Yeah, we have a good mix for most of the time... but then there
>>> will be a big BOOM! in a movie or an advert that is a lot louder
>>> than normal and you reach for the buttons again.
>>
>> And then you could get poor audio and goo sound effects!
>>
> Why would anyone want goo sound effects .... unless, of course, you are
> watching goo!!

Maybe hearing the plopping / dripping of goo is one of those soothing
sound effects people use to help them go to sleep. ;-)

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tlfjr5$3pieu$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13228&group=rec.arts.drwho#13228

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 21:27:52 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <tlfjr5$3pieu$1@dont-email.me>
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<nnd$7519b514$3fb0a3c7@bd0b34d014033afe> <tlc3hu$30se$6@gallifrey.nk.ca>
<nnd$0ccfccb1$281a00f3@d695e7200eff5934> <tldasr$2ln$72@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 10:27:49 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="3eae333ee2e61835b400f24835d6f33c";
logging-data="3983838"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19qIDVIAMngcarHulI5sC4C+KaIHRz8sCQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:s3/dTznXDgNJHJb0sY9YPXuxZ1g=
In-Reply-To: <tldasr$2ln$72@gallifrey.nk.ca>
 by: Daniel65 - Mon, 21 Nov 2022 10:27 UTC

The Doctor wrote on 21/11/22 12:42 am:
> In article <nnd$0ccfccb1$281a00f3@d695e7200eff5934>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <nnd$7519b514$3fb0a3c7@bd0b34d014033afe>,
>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW no to Disney+ here!
>>>>
>>>> Piracy for you next year's Doctor Who episodes so... you really are
>>>> a good Christian!
>>>>
>>>> But I don't care whether you ever watch Disney+ or not...
>>>
>>> Legit subscribed to International TV for me.
>>
>> International TV sounds legit alright... I wonder how much of your
>> subscription fee reaches the BBC?
>>
>> But will International TV have a deal with Disney+ for streaming Doctor
>> Who next year though?
>
> Exactly!

What sort of an answer is "Exactly" to the Question Blueshirt asked,
asswipe??

> I am not impressed with Disney plus myself!
>
Well don't subscribe to Disney+, then, asswipe!!
--
Daniel

Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more spin-offs

<tlfk5k$3pieu$2@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13229&group=rec.arts.drwho#13229

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [Rumour] Disney+ to mean bigger Doctor Who budget and more
spin-offs
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 21:33:28 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <tlfk5k$3pieu$2@dont-email.me>
References: <tkklqu$118m$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<nnd$555ee76f$7f441610@f88059406e241f19> <tldcfu$5fs$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>
<tldqdt$3ij6k$1@dont-email.me> <tle9uf$1ob4$27@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 10:33:25 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="3eae333ee2e61835b400f24835d6f33c";
logging-data="3983838"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19qfxQM8+7nCsx/WxQHSYXbk8iTiNghdF8="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MGIFP/zrwmc9Sb+9nEouHeAP1yk=
In-Reply-To: <tle9uf$1ob4$27@gallifrey.nk.ca>
 by: Daniel65 - Mon, 21 Nov 2022 10:33 UTC

The Doctor wrote on 21/11/22 9:32 am:
> In article <tldqdt$3ij6k$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
> <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> In article <nnd$555ee76f$7f441610@f88059406e241f19>, Blueshirt
>>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article <tld531$3gqej$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
>>>>> <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Legit subscribed to International TV for me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is “International TV” Dave? I sincerely doubt it
>>>>>> has a licence to serve BBC content to you that has been
>>>>>> sold exclusively to other broadcasters or streaming
>>>>>> services. You might be “legitimately” subscribed to it
>>>>>> - but does it have a “legitimate” right to the content
>>>>>> you get from it? It’s the Roku argument, you know, the
>>>>>> one that regularly gets Roku servers shut down.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well then who carries BBC One outside the UK?
>>>>
>>>> BBC1 is not supposed to be carried outside of the UK... the BBC
>>>> are funded by the UK TV licence. The BBC has external services
>>>> for it's shows overseas, like BBC America (etc.) which has
>>>> adverts to raise income. BBC1 can be accessed outside of the UK
>>>> obviously, but I'm guessing 'International TV' are not official
>>>> partners of the BBC for the distribution of BBC1 in Edmonton,
>>>> AL, Canada!
>>>
>>> This is not the 20th Century!
>>
>> That’s right Dave, it’s the 21st century. The international
>> rights to show TV are now a very valuable IP and broadcasters
>> protect them fiercely. The value of the BBC’s sales to BBCA,
>> Space, HBO Max and now Disney (to name just 4) would be undermined
>> by “grey” channels delivering BBC content without legal
>> agreement, and by subscribing to services that do that you are
>> actually jeopardising the BBC’s income stream and therefore
>> putting programming at risk.
>
> That is what you get when you go digital!

That is what YOU, asswipe, can get when YOUR parents go out and buy YOU,
asswipe, a big-arse digital T.V., asswipe!
--
Daniel

Pages:12345678910111213
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.7
clearnet tor