From https://www.tvzoneuk.com/post/drwho-071222

Russell T. Davies has revealed new details on Series 14 and hinted at his
plans for the future of the long-running BBC sci-fi series.

Russell confirmed that Series 14, the first series with Ncuti Gatwa as the
title role, will be eight episodes long. "Okay, that's fewer episodes than
the last full season. But give us time. We have plans, and that's a
promise!"

Accompanying the eight-episode series every year will be an annual
"Christmas special". Russell reveals in Doctor Who Magazine: "For the first
time ever, I'm writing a Christmas Special... at Christmas! And this isn't
for next year, no, the 2023 script has been long since signed-off. The new
one is for end-of-year 2024!"

Davies also addresses the extended gap of 13 months between the last
episode and the first 60th Anniversary special: "It takes a while to get
the empire in shape, but that's a serious plan: annual Doctor Who, no gap
years, lots of content, on and on."

Eight episodes doesn’t sound great but - there might be more specials in
future - 8 episodes a year, every year, plus specials is the same pace as
two seasons of 12 episodes over three years, which is roughy what we’ve
been getting for the last decade - no gap years means a smoother transition
between Doctors and a more consistent schedule - the slightly lower
workload might prevent burnout so soon from the actors. Maybe we might get
a Doctor willing to play more than three seasons - especially if the
reduced schedule gives them time for side projects to ensure they don’t
become defined by their role as the Doctor?

Time will tell.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Last Doctor wrote on 8/12/22 12:37 am:
> From https://www.tvzoneuk.com/post/drwho-071222
>
>
> Russell T. Davies has revealed new details on Series 14 and hinted at
> his plans for the future of the long-running BBC sci-fi series.
>
> Russell confirmed that Series 14, the first series with Ncuti Gatwa
> as the title role, will be eight episodes long. "Okay, that's fewer
> episodes than the last full season. But give us time. We have plans,
> and that's a promise!"
>
> Accompanying the eight-episode series every year will be an annual
> "Christmas special". Russell reveals in Doctor Who Magazine: "For the
> first time ever, I'm writing a Christmas Special... at Christmas! And
> this isn't for next year, no, the 2023 script has been long since
> signed-off. The new one is for end-of-year 2024!"
>
> Davies also addresses the extended gap of 13 months between the last
> episode and the first 60th Anniversary special: "It takes a while to
> get the empire in shape, but that's a serious plan: annual Doctor
> Who, no gap years, lots of content, on and on."
>
>
> Eight episodes doesn’t sound great but - there might be more specials
> in future - 8 episodes a year, every year, plus specials is the same
> pace as two seasons of 12 episodes over three years, which is roughy
> what we’ve been getting for the last decade - no gap years means a
> smoother transition between Doctors and a more consistent schedule -
> the slightly lower workload might prevent burnout so soon from the
> actors.

Hang on!! We haven't even seen the next Doctor actor in situ and you're
already seeing him gone!!

> Maybe we might get a Doctor willing to play more than three
> seasons - especially if the reduced schedule gives them time for side
> projects to ensure they don’t become defined by their role as the
> Doctor?
>
> Time will tell.
>
Yeap!! ;-P
--
Daniel

The Idiot wrote:

> I look foward to Doctor Who after a 4 to 5 year absense.

So are you living in 1993-1994? Or 1999-2000?

If the former, don’t expect too much of next year’s promised offering, and
I confidently predict nothing will come of it afterwards.

If the latter, I’m afraid you still have another 4-5 years to wait.

I’m quite surprised that UseNet has become temporally unstuck in this way.

Idiot

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Doctor wrote:
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The Last Doctor wrote:

>>> I’m quite surprised that UseNet has become temporally unstuck in this way.
>>
>> How were you expecting Usenet to become unstuck?
>
> @ fools at each others throats.

Yes, that’s what I’d expect for a non-temporal “unstuck”.

However of the three fools frequenting this newsgroup:

one is mainly “at the throat” of the entire universe for not agreeing with
him, but ignores the other two fools completely (he has you killfiled, for
a start),

one just wanders off on bizarre and often dull tangents,

and the third just posts incomprehensible idiocy in short sub-sentence
fragments and fails to go “for the throat” of anyone, though you do try
occasionally.

Incoherent copy and paste tracts of insults aimed at Tim aren’t very
effective - and he doesn’t respond in kind - and you don’t attack Aggie
(and even if you did he’d never see it) so thankfully, here at least, we
are spared “fools at each others throats”.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Idiot wrote:
> The Last Doctor wrote:
>> The Idiot wrote:
>>
>>> I look foward to Doctor Who after a 4 to 5 year absense.
>>
>> So are you living in 1993-1994? Or 1999-2000?
>>
>> If the former, don’t expect too much of next year’s promised offering, and
>> I confidently predict nothing will come of it afterwards.
>>
>> If the latter, I’m afraid you still have another 4-5 years to wait.
>>
>> I’m quite surprised that UseNet has become temporally unstuck in this way.
>>
>> Idiot
>
> Doctor Who stopped airing on 25 Dec 2022!

Not only temporally unstuck (posting from the future) but from a parallel
universe where we get a Christmas special this year!)

In THIS Universe, Dave, the last episode of 2022 aired on 23 October, not
25 December. Mind you Google’s Knowledge Graph is also apparently from a
parallel dimension, as Google’s self generated “top search result” claims
the the Power of the Doctor was Series 13, episode 1,397 … much as I love
the show, I’m sure I don’t want an extra 1,388 episodes of Flux.

> Doctor Who is back with the 2nd coming of David Tennant.

No, it will be back with the return of Tennant in the lead role for three
one-hour specials.

To refer to that as “the second coming” is offensive to Christians as it
mocks their religion, Dave.

Anti-Christian Idiot.

>> There are some corners of the universe
>> which have bred the most terrible things.
>> Things which act against everything we believe in.
>>
>> They must be /fought/.
>
> The pro-Chibnall pro-TimelessChild anti-DoctorWho forces must be /fought/!

You can’t fight things that don’t exist, Dave.

Idiot.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, December 8, 2022 at 8:56:39 AM UTC-8, The Last Doctor wrote:
>> The Idiot wrote:
>>
>>> I look foward to Doctor Who after a 4 to 5 year absense.
>> So are you living in 1993-1994? Or 1999-2000?
>>
>> If the former, don’t expect too much of next year’s promised offering, and
>> I confidently predict nothing will come of it afterwards.
>>
>> If the latter, I’m afraid you still have another 4-5 years to wait.
>>
>> I’m quite surprised that UseNet has become temporally unstuck in this way.
>
> How were you expecting Usenet to become unstuck?
>

Temporally? It usually becomes a bit unstuck when some fool posts a
response out of the blue to a thread that died 10, 20 or even 30 years ago.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Idiot wrote:
> The Last Doctor wrote:
>> Tim wrote:
>>> The Last Doctor wrote:

>>>> I’m quite surprised that UseNet has become temporally unstuck in this way.
>>>
>>> How were you expecting Usenet to become unstuck?
>>
>> Temporally? It usually becomes a bit unstuck when some fool posts a
>> response out of the blue to a thread that died 10, 20 or even 30 years ago.
>
> 2 fools at each other throats!

Well yes Dave, when you respond to him. And you’re incapable of ignoring
him even when he does this, which is what all sensible people do.

Idiot.

> The Pro-Chiball pro-Timelesschild anti-DoctorWho forces must be /fought/!

There are no such forces.

Idiot.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Idiot wrote:
> The Last Doctor wrote:
>> The Idiot wrote:
>>> Doctor Who is back with the 2nd coming of David Tennant.
>>
>> No, it will be back with the return of Tennant in the lead role for three
>> one-hour specials.
>>
>> To refer to that as “the second coming” is offensive to Christians as it
>> mocks their religion, Dave.
>>
>> Anti-Christian Idiot.
>
> Lying revision MM noted!
>
YOU were the one who referred to the return of Tennant as “the second
coming”. I expanded “2nd” to “second”, which is neither a revision nor a
lie.

Christians refer to the promised return of Jesus as “the second coming”.
This is neither a revision nor a lie.

Christians do not like to see “the second coming” trivialised by using it
to refer to other things. This is neither a revision nor a lie.

So where is my “lying revision”, Dave?

Anti-Christian lying idiot.

>>> The pro-Chibnall pro-TimelessChild anti-DoctorWho forces must be /fought/!
>>
>> You can’t fight things that don’t exist, Dave.
>>
>> Idiot.
>>
>
> The Timeless Child is anti-DoctorWho!

That’s not what you said. You said “The pro-Chibnall pro-TimelessChild
anti-DoctorWho forces must be /fought/!” There are no such forces.

Idiot.

>
> You are eith pro-doctorWho and Anti-TimelessChild anti-Chibnall
>
> or
>
> Pro-Chibnall Pro-timlessChild anti-DoctorWho .
>
> There is no middle ground!

Liar. I suspect the vast majority of Doctor Who fans are in precisely such
a middle ground:

They are pro Doctor Who. (Otherwise they wouldn’t like the show - this is
axiomatic.)

They have opinions about Chibnall’s era varying from “disappointing”
through “OK” to “quite good”. I myself am at the “disappointed” end of this
spectrum.

They have opinions about the Timeless Child varying from “it shouldn’t have
been done (but it has) through “it was an OK concept poorly executed” (this
includes people who would have liked a closer variant of the Cartmel
Masterplan, a group which includes me) through “this was a great new
twist”.

None of those opinions requires them to rail against it in infantile
frustration or to idiotically pretend that the whole era doesn’t exist.

So in short, you’re a:

Lying idiot.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Idiot wrote:
> The Last Doctor wrote:
>> The Idiot wrote:

>>>
>>> @ fools at each others throats.
>>
>> Yes, that’s what I’d expect for a non-temporal “unstuck”.
>>
>> However of the three fools frequenting this newsgroup:
>>
>> one is mainly “at the throat” of the entire universe for not agreeing with
>> him, but ignores the other two fools completely (he has you killfiled, for
>> a start),
>>
>> one just wanders off on bizarre and often dull tangents,
>>
>> and the third just posts incomprehensible idiocy in short sub-sentence
>> fragments and fails to go “for the throat” of anyone, though you do try
>> occasionally.
>>
>> Incoherent copy and paste tracts of insults aimed at Tim aren’t very
>> effective - and he doesn’t respond in kind - and you don’t attack Aggie
>> (and even if you did he’d never see it) so thankfully, here at least, we
>> are spared “fools at each others throats”.
>>
>
> The 2 fools I refer to are TB and TLD aka MM!

You referred to “@“ fools, not 2. Your lack of self awareness about your
own status in such a set is not my problem.

The general consensus in this newsgroup is that there are three principal
fools, The Idiot (that’s you, Dave), The Spammer (that’s Tim) and the
Wholly Greek (that’s the frothing ball of insanity known as Aggie),
collectively known as the unholy trinity of radw. Other “definitions”
exist, but as they are usually promulgated by one of the Three Fools, they
can safely be disregarded.

Idiot.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Idiot lied:
> The Last Doctor wrote:
>> The Idiot wrote:
>>>
>>> 2 fools at each other throats!
>>
>> Well yes Dave, when you respond to him. And you’re incapable of ignoring
>> him even when he does this, which is what all sensible people do.
>>
>> Idiot.
>
> The 2 fools are TB and TLD/MM !

If only that were true, however by comparison, this could only be the case
in a universe that does not contain you as the definitive personification
of The Fool.

>>> The Pro-Chiball pro-Timelesschild anti-DoctorWho forces must be /fought/!
>>
>> There are no such forces.
>>
>> Idiot.
>
> Said the pro-Chibnall pro-Timelesschild anti-DoctorWho TLD/MM.

Another lie. idiot.

[Idiotic repetitive lie from the Idiot snipped].

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

On 07/12/2022 13:37, The Last Doctor wrote:
> From https://www.tvzoneuk.com/post/drwho-071222
>
>
> Russell T. Davies has revealed new details on Series 14 and hinted at his
> plans for the future of the long-running BBC sci-fi series.
>
> Russell confirmed that Series 14, the first series with Ncuti Gatwa as the
> title role, will be eight episodes long. "Okay, that's fewer episodes than
> the last full season. But give us time. We have plans, and that's a
> promise!"

So much for all the lies about Disney+ paying £100 million for Series 14
and £10 million to be spent on each episode. There's not even 10 of
them. LOL!!!!!!!!

RTD's Disney+ deal is all fake rumours and exaggerations just like
Moffat's China deal.

>
> Accompanying the eight-episode series every year will be an annual
> "Christmas special". Russell reveals in Doctor Who Magazine: "For the first
> time ever, I'm writing a Christmas Special... at Christmas! And this isn't
> for next year, no, the 2023 script has been long since signed-off. The new
> one is for end-of-year 2024!"
>
> Davies also addresses the extended gap of 13 months between the last
> episode and the first 60th Anniversary special: "It takes a while to get
> the empire in shape, but that's a serious plan: annual Doctor Who, no gap
> years, lots of content, on and on."
>

Empire? He's living delusions of grandeur. He wants to be a despotic
dictator. It's the same tyrannic ideology with all of the woke far left.

>
> Eight episodes doesn’t sound great but - there might be more specials in
> future - 8 episodes a year, every year, plus specials is the same pace as
> two seasons of 12 episodes over three years, which is roughy what we’ve
> been getting for the last decade - no gap years means a smoother transitio
So, not one single penny of the non-existent money from Disney+ is going
to be spent on making more Doctor Who. The less the BBC can spend on
actual episodes of Doctor Who the more it can spend on lining its own
pockets by paying employees to do nothing.

> between Doctors and a more consistent schedule - the slightly lower
> workload might prevent burnout so soon from the actors. Maybe we might get

Burnout bullshit. How about these overpaid so-called entertainers work
330 days a year like everyone else has to?

> a Doctor willing to play more than three seasons - especially if the
> reduced schedule gives them time for side projects to ensure they don’t
> become defined by their role as the Doctor?

It doesn't work that way. The longer they stay in the role the more
people will associate them with only that type of character. Just look
at Gatwa himself who has no dramatic range whatsoever since the only
kind of character he has ever played is an effeminate homosexual. Talk
about RTD type casting, saying only a homosexual can play a homosexual
character on stage, film or TV. How much more bigoted can you get than
that?

>
> Time will tell.
>

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

The Doctor wrote on 10/12/22 7:34 am:
> In article <tmvnsa$17e7c$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
> <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> The Idiot wrote:
>>> The Last Doctor wrote:
>>>> The Idiot wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> @ fools at each others throats.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, that’s what I’d expect for a non-temporal
>>>> “unstuck”.
>>>>
>>>> However of the three fools frequenting this newsgroup:
>>>>
>>>> one is mainly “at the throat” of the entire universe for
>>>> not agreeing with him, but ignores the other two fools
>>>> completely (he has you killfiled, for a start),
>>>>
>>>> one just wanders off on bizarre and often dull tangents,
>>>>
>>>> and the third just posts incomprehensible idiocy in short
>>>> sub-sentence fragments and fails to go “for the throat” of
>>>> anyone, though you do try occasionally.
>>>>
>>>> Incoherent copy and paste tracts of insults aimed at Tim
>>>> aren’t very effective - and he doesn’t respond in kind -
>>>> and you don’t attack Aggie (and even if you did he’d never
>>>> see it) so thankfully, here at least, we are spared “fools
>>>> at each others throats”.
>>>
>>> The 2 fools I refer to are TB and TLD aka MM!
>>
>> You referred to “@“ fools, not 2. Your lack of self awareness
>> about your own status in such a set is not my problem.
>>
>> The general consensus in this newsgroup is that there are three
>> principal fools, The Idiot (that’s you, Dave), The Spammer
>> (that’s Tim) and the Wholly Greek (that’s the frothing ball of
>> insanity known as Aggie), collectively known as the unholy trinity
>> of radw. Other “definitions” exist, but as they are usually
>> promulgated by one of the Three Fools, they can safely be
>> disregarded.
>>
>> Idiot.
>
> No worries, every one laughs when MM and TiSaBr goes head to head.

Umm! When have MM and Tim EVER gone head-to-head, asswipe??

Evidence, asswipe, EVIDENCE!!
--
Daniel

The Last Doctor wrote on 9/12/22 6:48 pm:
> The Idiot wrote:

<Snip>

>> Doctor Who is back with the 2nd coming of David Tennant.
>
> No, it will be back with the return of Tennant in the lead role for three
> one-hour specials.
>
> To refer to that as “the second coming” is offensive to Christians as it
> mocks their religion, Dave.

Incorrect, Mike, sort of.

The asswipe *CLAIMS* to be a Christian, so the asswipe would be mocking
*HIS OWN* religion not "their religion"!!

> Anti-Christian Idiot.

Yeah, well, the asswipe doesn't display *ANY* of the traits one might
expect of ANY REAL Christian, does he??
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 10/12/22 7:33 am:
> In article <tmvnkh$17c8q$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
> <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> The Idiot wrote:

<Snip>

>>> The Timeless Child is anti-DoctorWho!
>>
>> That’s not what you said. You said “The pro-Chibnall
>> pro-TimelessChild anti-DoctorWho forces must be /fought/!”.
>
> And That is what you are. There are no such forces.

If "There are no such forces." then how could Mike possible be such a
force, asswipe??

Oh, and by-the-way, asswipe, your font is stuffing up the quoted
material, asswipe!!
--
Daniel

The True Doctor wrote on 10/12/22 5:30 am:
> On 07/12/2022 13:37, The Last Doctor wrote:

<Snip>

>> between Doctors and a more consistent schedule - the slightly lower
>> workload might prevent burnout so soon from the actors. Maybe we might
>> get
>
> Burnout bullshit. How about these overpaid so-called entertainers work
> 330 days a year like everyone else has to?

SORRY!! "330 days a year like everyone else has to"!! How many work 330
days a year??

Most years have 365 days and even if a worker just got Sundays off each
week, that would bring the 'days worked a year' down below 320 days.

Add Saturdays off and Public Holidays off and Annual Leave and that
'days worked a year' number falls below 250!!
--
Daniel

On 10/12/2022 11:26, Daniel65 wrote:
> The True Doctor wrote on 10/12/22 5:30 am:
>> On 07/12/2022 13:37, The Last Doctor wrote:
>
> <Snip>
>
>>> between Doctors and a more consistent schedule - the slightly lower
>>> workload might prevent burnout so soon from the actors. Maybe we
>>> might get
>>
>> Burnout bullshit. How about these overpaid so-called entertainers work
>> 330 days a year like everyone else has to?
>
> SORRY!! "330 days a year like everyone else has to"!! How many work 330
> days a year??
>
> Most years have 365 days and even if a worker just got Sundays off each
> week, that would bring the 'days worked a year' down below 320 days.
>
> Add Saturdays off and Public Holidays off and Annual Leave and that
> 'days worked a year' number falls below 250!!

Whatever. These overpaid entertainers don't even work 250.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 11/12/22 1:30 am:
> On Saturday, December 10, 2022 at 2:56:46 AM UTC-8, Daniel65 wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 10/12/22 7:34 am:
>>> In article <tmvnsa$17e7c$1...@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
>>> <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>> The Idiot wrote:
>>>>> The Last Doctor wrote:
>>>>>> The Idiot wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @ fools at each others throats.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, that’s what I’d expect for a non-temporal
>>>>>> “unstuck†.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However of the three fools frequenting this newsgroup:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> one is mainly “at the throat†of the entire universe for
>>>>>> not agreeing with him, but ignores the other two fools
>>>>>> completely (he has you killfiled, for a start),
>>>>>>
>>>>>> one just wanders off on bizarre and often dull tangents,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and the third just posts incomprehensible idiocy in short
>>>>>> sub-sentence fragments and fails to go “for the throat†of
>>>>>> anyone, though you do try occasionally.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Incoherent copy and paste tracts of insults aimed at Tim
>>>>>> aren’t very effective - and he doesn’t respond in kind -
>>>>>> and you don’t attack Aggie (and even if you did he’d never
>>>>>> see it) so thankfully, here at least, we are spared “fools
>>>>>> at each others throats†.
>>>>>
>>>>> The 2 fools I refer to are TB and TLD aka MM!
>>>>
>>>> You referred to “@“ fools, not 2. Your lack of self awareness
>>>> about your own status in such a set is not my problem.
>>>>
>>>> The general consensus in this newsgroup is that there are three
>>>> principal fools, The Idiot (that’s you, Dave), The Spammer
>>>> (that’s Tim) and the Wholly Greek (that’s the frothing ball of
>>>> insanity known as Aggie), collectively known as the unholy trinity
>>>> of radw. Other “definitions†exist, but as they are usually
>>>> promulgated by one of the Three Fools, they can safely be
>>>> disregarded.
>>>>
>>>> Idiot.
>>>
>>> No worries, every one laughs when MM and TiSaBr goes head to head.
>> Umm! When have MM and Tim EVER gone head-to-head, asswipe??
>
> I do remember commenting on his fan fiction in this group!
>
"his fan fiction"!! NOTE *his* !! *SINGULAR* so *NOT* "MM and TiSaBr
goes head to head", so the asswipe lies yet again!!
--
Daniel

The True Doctor wrote on 11/12/22 9:24 am:
> On 10/12/2022 11:26, Daniel65 wrote:
>> The True Doctor wrote on 10/12/22 5:30 am:
>>> On 07/12/2022 13:37, The Last Doctor wrote:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>>> between Doctors and a more consistent schedule - the slightly
>>>> lower workload might prevent burnout so soon from the actors.
>>>> Maybe we might get
>>>
>>> Burnout bullshit. How about these overpaid so-called entertainers
>>> work 330 days a year like everyone else has to?
>>
>> SORRY!! "330 days a year like everyone else has to"!! How many work
>> 330 days a year??
>>
>> Most years have 365 days and even if a worker just got Sundays off
>> each week, that would bring the 'days worked a year' down below
>> 320 days.
>>
>> Add Saturdays off and Public Holidays off and Annual Leave and that
>> 'days worked a year' number falls below 250!!
>
> Whatever. These overpaid entertainers don't even work 250.
>
If YOU were overpaid, would YOU work for longer than you needed, Aggy??
--
Daniel

On 11/12/2022 09:21, Daniel65 wrote:
> The True Doctor wrote on 11/12/22 9:24 am:
>> On 10/12/2022 11:26, Daniel65 wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote on 10/12/22 5:30 am:
>>>> On 07/12/2022 13:37, The Last Doctor wrote:
>>>
>>> <Snip>
>>>
>>>>> between Doctors and a more consistent schedule - the slightly
>>>>> lower workload might prevent burnout so soon from the actors.
>>>>> Maybe we might get
>>>>
>>>> Burnout bullshit. How about these overpaid so-called entertainers
>>>>  work 330 days a year like everyone else has to?
>>>
>>> SORRY!! "330 days a year like everyone else has to"!! How many work
>>> 330 days a year??
>>>
>>> Most years have 365 days and even if a worker just got Sundays off
>>>  each week, that would bring the 'days worked a year' down below
>>> 320 days.
>>>
>>> Add Saturdays off and Public Holidays off and Annual Leave and that
>>>  'days worked a year' number falls below 250!!
>>
>> Whatever. These overpaid entertainers don't even work 250.
>>
> If YOU were overpaid, would YOU work for longer than you needed, Aggy??

Then why are they complaining about the shows being too long?

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

On Sunday, December 11, 2022 at 2:15:07 AM UTC-8, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, December 10, 2022 at 3:26:07 AM UTC-8, Daniel65 wrote:
> > The True Doctor wrote on 10/12/22 5:30 am:
> > > On 07/12/2022 13:37, The Last Doctor wrote:
> > <Snip>
> > >> between Doctors and a more consistent schedule - the slightly lower
> > >> workload might prevent burnout so soon from the actors. Maybe we might
> > >> get
> > >
> > > Burnout bullshit. How about these overpaid so-called entertainers work
> > > 330 days a year like everyone else has to?
> > SORRY!! "330 days a year like everyone else has to"!! How many work 330
> > days a year??
> >
> > Most years have 365 days and even if a worker just got Sundays off each
> > week, that would bring the 'days worked a year' down below 320 days.
> >
> > Add Saturdays off and Public Holidays off and Annual Leave and that
> > 'days worked a year' number falls below 250!!
> Annual Leave? What's that?

PISHER !!!

The True Doctor wrote on 11/12/22 10:16 pm:
> On 11/12/2022 09:21, Daniel65 wrote:
>> The True Doctor wrote on 11/12/22 9:24 am:
>>> On 10/12/2022 11:26, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 10/12/22 5:30 am:
>>>>> On 07/12/2022 13:37, The Last Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <Snip>
>>>>
>>>>>> between Doctors and a more consistent schedule - the
>>>>>> slightly lower workload might prevent burnout so soon from
>>>>>> the actors. Maybe we might get
>>>>>
>>>>> Burnout bullshit. How about these overpaid so-called
>>>>> entertainers work 330 days a year like everyone else has to?
>>>>
>>>> SORRY!! "330 days a year like everyone else has to"!! How many
>>>> work 330 days a year??
>>>>
>>>> Most years have 365 days and even if a worker just got Sundays
>>>> off each week, that would bring the 'days worked a year' down
>>>> below 320 days.
>>>>
>>>> Add Saturdays off and Public Holidays off and Annual Leave and
>>>> that 'days worked a year' number falls below 250!!
>>>
>>> Whatever. These overpaid entertainers don't even work 250.
>>>
>> If YOU were overpaid, would YOU work for longer than you needed,
>> Aggy??
>
> Then why are they complaining about the shows being too long?
>
Sorry! Who are complaining?? Ah!! Are you referring to the "Burnout
bullshit" up above?? Can't say I've heard/read any of it.
--
Daniel

tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 11/12/22 9:15 pm:
> On Saturday, December 10, 2022 at 3:26:07 AM UTC-8, Daniel65 wrote:
>> The True Doctor wrote on 10/12/22 5:30 am:
>>> On 07/12/2022 13:37, The Last Doctor wrote:
>> <Snip>
>>>> between Doctors and a more consistent schedule - the slightly lower
>>>> workload might prevent burnout so soon from the actors. Maybe we might
>>>> get
>>>
>>> Burnout bullshit. How about these overpaid so-called entertainers work
>>> 330 days a year like everyone else has to?
>> SORRY!! "330 days a year like everyone else has to"!! How many work 330
>> days a year??
>>
>> Most years have 365 days and even if a worker just got Sundays off each
>> week, that would bring the 'days worked a year' down below 320 days.
>>
>> Add Saturdays off and Public Holidays off and Annual Leave and that
>> 'days worked a year' number falls below 250!!
>
> Annual Leave? What's that?
>
Don't you get Annual Leave, Tim?? An amount of Holidays you can take
when you want .... children's school holidays or whatever.
--
Daniel

tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 12/12/22 11:19 pm:
> On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 1:11:10 AM UTC-8, Daniel65 wrote:
>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 11/12/22 9:15 pm:
>>> On Saturday, December 10, 2022 at 3:26:07 AM UTC-8, Daniel65
>>> wrote:
>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 10/12/22 5:30 am:
>>>>> On 07/12/2022 13:37, The Last Doctor wrote:
>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>> between Doctors and a more consistent schedule - the
>>>>>> slightly lower workload might prevent burnout so soon from
>>>>>> the actors. Maybe we might get
>>>>>
>>>>> Burnout bullshit. How about these overpaid so-called
>>>>> entertainers work 330 days a year like everyone else has to?
>>>> SORRY!! "330 days a year like everyone else has to"!! How many
>>>> work 330 days a year??
>>>>
>>>> Most years have 365 days and even if a worker just got Sundays
>>>> off each week, that would bring the 'days worked a year' down
>>>> below 320 days.
>>>>
>>>> Add Saturdays off and Public Holidays off and Annual Leave and
>>>> that 'days worked a year' number falls below 250!!
>>>
>>> Annual Leave? What's that?
>>>
>> Don't you get Annual Leave, Tim?? An amount of Holidays you can
>> take when you want .... children's school holidays or whatever.
>
> I haven't yet made the attempt, so I am hazy on AG vacation
> policies.
>
"AG vacation"?? WHAT??
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 14/12/2022 3:37 am:
> In article <tn9flg$2fren$2@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 12/12/22 11:19 pm:
>>> On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 1:11:10 AM UTC-8, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 11/12/22 9:15 pm:
>>>>> On Saturday, December 10, 2022 at 3:26:07 AM UTC-8, Daniel65
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 10/12/22 5:30 am:
>>>>>>> On 07/12/2022 13:37, The Last Doctor wrote:
>>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>>> between Doctors and a more consistent schedule - the
>>>>>>>> slightly lower workload might prevent burnout so soon from
>>>>>>>> the actors. Maybe we might get
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Burnout bullshit. How about these overpaid so-called
>>>>>>> entertainers work 330 days a year like everyone else has to?
>>>>>> SORRY!! "330 days a year like everyone else has to"!! How many
>>>>>> work 330 days a year??
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Most years have 365 days and even if a worker just got Sundays
>>>>>> off each week, that would bring the 'days worked a year' down
>>>>>> below 320 days.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Add Saturdays off and Public Holidays off and Annual Leave and
>>>>>> that 'days worked a year' number falls below 250!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Annual Leave? What's that?
>>>>>
>>>> Don't you get Annual Leave, Tim?? An amount of Holidays you can
>>>> take when you want .... children's school holidays or whatever.
>>>
>>> I haven't yet made the attempt, so I am hazy on AG vacation
>>> policies.
>>>
>> "AG vacation"?? WHAT?? >
> AG or AL?
>
"AL"?? Do YOU, asswipe, mean "Annual Leave"??
--
Daniel

On Wednesday, 14 December 2022 at 15:06:57 UTC, the
asswipe asked:

>
> Wht is AG Timwit?
>

Gibberish!