It seems like we're seeing a conspiracy theory preemptively birthed in
real-time.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/gfumeebpn7s1bkw/BigLie.png?dl=0

I was told-- after Nov 2020, at least-- that undermining any confidence in
elections was a "big lie" not tolerated in polite society. I guess we're back
to the rules that were in place between 2016 and 2020 when undermining
confidence in elections was considered a sacred duty.

On 1/18/2022 8:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> It seems like we're seeing a conspiracy theory preemptively birthed in
> real-time.
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/gfumeebpn7s1bkw/BigLie.png?dl=0
>
> I was told-- after Nov 2020, at least-- that undermining any confidence in
> elections was a "big lie" not tolerated in polite society. I guess we're back
> to the rules that were in place between 2016 and 2020 when undermining
> confidence in elections was considered a sacred duty.

What Biden is campaigning against here is the overturning of elections
by open fiat, not by clandestine fraud (of which there's zero evidence).

On Jan 18, 2022 at 7:25:32 PM PST, "moviePig" <pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:

> On 1/18/2022 8:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>
>> It seems like we're seeing a conspiracy theory preemptively birthed in
>> real-time.
>>
>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/gfumeebpn7s1bkw/BigLie.png?dl=0
>>
>> I was told-- after Nov 2020, at least-- that undermining any confidence in
>> elections was a "big lie" not tolerated in polite society. I guess we're
>> back
>> to the rules that were in place between 2016 and 2020 when undermining
>> confidence in elections was considered a sacred duty.
>
> What Biden is campaigning against here is the overturning of elections
> by open fiat, not by clandestine fraud (of which there's zero evidence).

And since Biden and his party are predicted to be facing an historic
shellacking in November, this lays the groundwork for claiming it's all
tainted.

On 2022-01-18 6:00 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
> It seems like we're seeing a conspiracy theory preemptively birthed in
> real-time.
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/gfumeebpn7s1bkw/BigLie.png?dl=0
>
> I was told-- after Nov 2020, at least-- that undermining any confidence in
> elections was a "big lie" not tolerated in polite society. I guess we're back
> to the rules that were in place between 2016 and 2020 when undermining
> confidence in elections was considered a sacred duty.
>
>

No you weren't. You were told that claiming that the vote counts had
been fabricated to produce more than seven million false votes, Donald
Trump had won and was going to be restored to power any day now was a
"big lie". That's because it is.

No

On Tuesday, 18 January 2022 at 22:25:37 UTC-5, moviePig wrote:
> On 1/18/2022 8:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > It seems like we're seeing a conspiracy theory preemptively birthed in
> > real-time.
> >
> > https://www.dropbox.com/s/gfumeebpn7s1bkw/BigLie.png?dl=0
> >
> > I was told-- after Nov 2020, at least-- that undermining any confidence in
> > elections was a "big lie" not tolerated in polite society. I guess we're back
> > to the rules that were in place between 2016 and 2020 when undermining
> > confidence in elections was considered a sacred duty.
> What Biden is campaigning against here is the overturning of elections
> by open fiat, not by clandestine fraud (of which there's zero evidence).

Is that what the courts do today?

On 1/18/2022 10:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2022 at 7:25:32 PM PST, "moviePig" <pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:
>
>> On 1/18/2022 8:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>
>>> It seems like we're seeing a conspiracy theory preemptively birthed in
>>> real-time.
>>>
>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/gfumeebpn7s1bkw/BigLie.png?dl=0
>>>
>>> I was told-- after Nov 2020, at least-- that undermining any confidence in
>>> elections was a "big lie" not tolerated in polite society. I guess we're
>>> back
>>> to the rules that were in place between 2016 and 2020 when undermining
>>> confidence in elections was considered a sacred duty.
>>
>> What Biden is campaigning against here is the overturning of elections
>> by open fiat, not by clandestine fraud (of which there's zero evidence).
>
> And since Biden and his party are predicted to be facing an historic
> shellacking in November, this lays the groundwork for claiming it's all
> tainted.

Biden has nothing to do with the "Big Lie." Why don't you beg for the
subject to be changed? Or are you begging now?

On 1/18/2022 10:23 PM, RichA wrote:
> On Tuesday, 18 January 2022 at 22:25:37 UTC-5, moviePig wrote:
>> On 1/18/2022 8:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> It seems like we're seeing a conspiracy theory preemptively birthed in
>>> real-time.
>>>
>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/gfumeebpn7s1bkw/BigLie.png?dl=0
>>>
>>> I was told-- after Nov 2020, at least-- that undermining any confidence in
>>> elections was a "big lie" not tolerated in polite society. I guess we're back
>>> to the rules that were in place between 2016 and 2020 when undermining
>>> confidence in elections was considered a sacred duty.
>> What Biden is campaigning against here is the overturning of elections
>> by open fiat, not by clandestine fraud (of which there's zero evidence).
>
> Is that what the courts do today?

Well vegetable'd and anonyshitted!!

On 1/18/2022 9:25 PM, moviePig wrote:
> On 1/18/2022 8:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> It seems like we're seeing a conspiracy theory preemptively birthed in
>> real-time.
>>
>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/gfumeebpn7s1bkw/BigLie.png?dl=0
>>
>> I was told-- after Nov 2020, at least-- that undermining any
>> confidence in
>> elections was a "big lie" not tolerated in polite society. I guess
>> we're back
>> to the rules that were in place between 2016 and 2020 when undermining
>> confidence in elections was considered a sacred duty.
>
> What Biden is campaigning against here is the overturning of elections
> by open fiat, not by clandestine fraud (of which there's zero evidence).

Derpshit doesn't have the balls to discuss that.

On 1/18/2022 7:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> It seems like we're seeing a conspiracy theory preemptively birthed in
> real-time.
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/gfumeebpn7s1bkw/BigLie.png?dl=0
>
> I was told-- after Nov 2020, at least-- that undermining any confidence in
> elections was a "big lie"

No you weren't. Trump pretending the election was "stolen" was THE Big
Lie. However, you know that if you lie about this yourself you have an
audience that is stupid enough to respond. Hell, even I'm responding,
but I'm different in that it's only to tell you're a lying piece of trash.

On 1/18/2022 11:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2022 at 7:25:32 PM PST, "moviePig" <pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:
>
>> On 1/18/2022 8:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>
>>> It seems like we're seeing a conspiracy theory preemptively birthed in
>>> real-time.
>>>
>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/gfumeebpn7s1bkw/BigLie.png?dl=0
>>>
>>> I was told-- after Nov 2020, at least-- that undermining any confidence in
>>> elections was a "big lie" not tolerated in polite society. I guess we're
>>> back
>>> to the rules that were in place between 2016 and 2020 when undermining
>>> confidence in elections was considered a sacred duty.
>>
>> What Biden is campaigning against here is the overturning of elections
>> by open fiat, not by clandestine fraud (of which there's zero evidence).
>
> And since Biden and his party are predicted to be facing an historic
> shellacking in November, this lays the groundwork for claiming it's all
> tainted.

Except that *this* sort of "taint" would be open to view ...not
whispered-of darkly and flying in the face of all evidence.

atropos@mac.com wrote:

>It seems like we're seeing a conspiracy theory preemptively birthed in
>real-time.
>
>https://www.dropbox.com/s/gfumeebpn7s1bkw/BigLie.png?dl=0
>
>I was told-- after Nov 2020, at least-- that undermining any confidence in
>elections was a "big lie" not tolerated in polite society. I guess we're
>back to the rules that were in place between 2016 and 2020 when undermining
>confidence in elections was considered a sacred duty.

These are the same people who switched between declaring dissent to be
patriotic and being treasonous.

--
Let's go Brandon!

In article <z8VFJ.291418$ya3.259321@fx38.iad>,
moviePig <pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:

> On 1/18/2022 11:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > On Jan 18, 2022 at 7:25:32 PM PST, "moviePig" <pwallace@moviepig.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 1/18/2022 8:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>
> >>> It seems like we're seeing a conspiracy theory preemptively birthed in
> >>> real-time.
> >>>
> >>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/gfumeebpn7s1bkw/BigLie.png?dl=0
> >>>
> >>> I was told-- after Nov 2020, at least-- that undermining any confidence
> >>> in elections was a "big lie" not tolerated in polite society. I guess
> >>> we're back to the rules that were in place between 2016 and 2020 when
> >>> undermining confidence in elections was considered a sacred duty.
> >>
> >> What Biden is campaigning against here is the overturning of elections
> >> by open fiat, not by clandestine fraud (of which there's zero evidence).
> >
> > And since Biden and his party are predicted to be facing an historic
> > shellacking in November, this lays the groundwork for claiming it's all
> > tainted.
>
> Except that *this* sort of "taint" would be open to view ...not
> whispered-of darkly and flying in the face of all evidence.

I'm not sure you're living in the same reality as the rest of us if you
think Trump is even capable of whispering anything darkly, as if that's
some kind of significant distinction in the first place.

"We're undermining faith and confidence in American elections, but at
least we're not whispering it darkly!"

On 1/19/2022 11:54 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <z8VFJ.291418$ya3.259321@fx38.iad>,
> moviePig <pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:
>
>> On 1/18/2022 11:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> On Jan 18, 2022 at 7:25:32 PM PST, "moviePig" <pwallace@moviepig.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1/18/2022 8:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It seems like we're seeing a conspiracy theory preemptively birthed in
>>>>> real-time.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/gfumeebpn7s1bkw/BigLie.png?dl=0
>>>>>
>>>>> I was told-- after Nov 2020, at least-- that undermining any confidence
>>>>> in elections was a "big lie" not tolerated in polite society. I guess
>>>>> we're back to the rules that were in place between 2016 and 2020 when
>>>>> undermining confidence in elections was considered a sacred duty.
>>>>
>>>> What Biden is campaigning against here is the overturning of elections
>>>> by open fiat, not by clandestine fraud (of which there's zero evidence).
>>>
>>> And since Biden and his party are predicted to be facing an historic
>>> shellacking in November, this lays the groundwork for claiming it's all
>>> tainted.
>>
>> Except that *this* sort of "taint" would be open to view ...not
>> whispered-of darkly and flying in the face of all evidence.
>
> I'm not sure you're living in the same reality as the rest of us if you
> think Trump is even capable of whispering anything darkly, as if that's
> some kind of significant distinction in the first place.
>
> "We're undermining faith and confidence in American elections, but at
> least we're not whispering it darkly!"

You're right, it only becomes a whisper ...well, more of a mutter
....when proof is required.

On 1/19/2022 10:54 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <z8VFJ.291418$ya3.259321@fx38.iad>,
> moviePig <pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:
>
>> On 1/18/2022 11:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> On Jan 18, 2022 at 7:25:32 PM PST, "moviePig" <pwallace@moviepig.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1/18/2022 8:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It seems like we're seeing a conspiracy theory preemptively birthed in
>>>>> real-time.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/gfumeebpn7s1bkw/BigLie.png?dl=0
>>>>>
>>>>> I was told-- after Nov 2020, at least-- that undermining any confidence
>>>>> in elections was a "big lie" not tolerated in polite society. I guess
>>>>> we're back to the rules that were in place between 2016 and 2020 when
>>>>> undermining confidence in elections was considered a sacred duty.
>>>>
>>>> What Biden is campaigning against here is the overturning of elections
>>>> by open fiat, not by clandestine fraud (of which there's zero evidence).
>>>
>>> And since Biden and his party are predicted to be facing an historic
>>> shellacking in November, this lays the groundwork for claiming it's all
>>> tainted.
>>
>> Except that *this* sort of "taint" would be open to view ...not
>> whispered-of darkly and flying in the face of all evidence.
>
> I'm not sure you're living in the same reality as the rest of us if you
> think Trump is even capable of whispering anything darkly, as if that's
> some kind of significant distinction in the first place.

What are you claiming his part in the sedition was then?