novaBBS - rec.arts.drwho - Re: Dalek Wet Dream: Eve of the Daleks Spoilers

Re: Dalek Wet Dream: Eve of the Daleks Spoilers

<tnrt5b$l27p$4@dont-email.me>

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13792&group=rec.arts.drwho#13792

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Dalek Wet Dream: Eve of the Daleks Spoilers
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 19:53:02 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <tnrt5b$l27p$4@dont-email.me>
References: <415bb8d7-f2d3-496d-85d8-cbc10d384061n@googlegroups.com>
<2b3e18ab-95a2-43c6-83c2-25fb3029e0a6n@googlegroups.com>
<tjbg02$uhh$72@gallifrey.nk.ca>
<ed196369-05ec-450b-ac67-531f57ff6befn@googlegroups.com>
<tjgqv0$30ha$21@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 08:53:00 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="46798bd84b4a7f605245b57ee83ed516";
logging-data="690425"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18lH8sY+ogkWACp6LL7F+yAxVOP0oq5c0s="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:J/6zMbNoWZq8YjhjVlUTg8wwBGg=
In-Reply-To: <tjgqv0$30ha$21@gallifrey.nk.ca>

by: Daniel65 - Tue, 20 Dec 2022 08:53 UTC

The Doctor wrote on 29/10/22 2:02 am:
> In article <ed196369-05ec-450b-ac67-531f57ff6befn@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 7:25:08 AM UTC-7,
>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> In article <2b3e18ab-95a2-43c6...@googlegroups.com>,
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 5:40:32 AM UTC-7,
>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> In article <ea0c08f0-3486-40f9...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 2:04:49 PM UTC-7,
>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <415bb8d7-f2d3-496d...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> q a z x s w e d c v f r t g b n h y u j m
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Daleks got to kill the Doctor at least 8 times!
>>>>>>> Bogus!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Daleks didn't seem to think that JodieDoc was bogus!
>>>>> The whole Eve of the Daleks is BOGUS! Timtit!
>>>>
>>>> You Bogus was right underneath my statement about the Daleks
>>>> killing the Doctor 8 times, so I naturally thought that you
>>>> were specifically saying that the Daleks killing the Doctor was
>>>> bogus, or that their wet dream was bogus!
>>>
>>> The whole Eve of the Daleks is BOGUS! Timtit!
>>
>> Does that automatically make the Dalek desire to kill the Doctor
>> bogus?
>
> Ever since the Timeless Child.
>
But there has been no 'Doctor Who' since 'The Timeless Child", asswipe,
so this must have NEVER occurred (yet), asswipe!!
--
Daniel

Re: Dalek Wet Dream: Eve of the Daleks Spoilers

<to6oub$28v4k$1@dont-email.me>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13866&group=rec.arts.drwho#13866

copy link Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Dalek Wet Dream: Eve of the Daleks Spoilers
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 22:48:24 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <to6oub$28v4k$1@dont-email.me>
References: <415bb8d7-f2d3-496d-85d8-cbc10d384061n@googlegroups.com>
<2b3e18ab-95a2-43c6-83c2-25fb3029e0a6n@googlegroups.com>
<tjbg02$uhh$72@gallifrey.nk.ca>
<ed196369-05ec-450b-ac67-531f57ff6befn@googlegroups.com>
<tjgqv0$30ha$21@gallifrey.nk.ca> <tnrt5b$l27p$4@dont-email.me>
<ae71cae1-2d6e-424b-a31f-afb0e2c1dc2en@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 11:48:28 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="01ca07f0c710e74ba8ce45790fede1dd";
logging-data="2391188"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19XGniXtMYr2k4ati99+FVJ2tj7bijvQ/s="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:NVuTklBVDOsmqwMPJQz2ikDx3Qg=
In-Reply-To: <ae71cae1-2d6e-424b-a31f-afb0e2c1dc2en@googlegroups.com>

by: Daniel65 - Sat, 24 Dec 2022 11:48 UTC

tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 24/12/22 6:54 pm:
> On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 12:53:02 AM UTC-8, Daniel65 wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 29/10/22 2:02 am:
>>> In article <ed196369-05ec-450b...@googlegroups.com>,
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 7:25:08 AM UTC-7,
>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> In article <2b3e18ab-95a2-43c6...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 5:40:32 AM UTC-7,
>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <ea0c08f0-3486-40f9...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 2:04:49 PM UTC-7,
>>>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <415bb8d7-f2d3-496d...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> q a z x s w e d c v f r t g b n h y u j m
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The Daleks got to kill the Doctor at least 8
>>>>>>>>>> times!
>>>>>>>>> Bogus!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Daleks didn't seem to think that JodieDoc was
>>>>>>>> bogus!
>>>>>>> The whole Eve of the Daleks is BOGUS! Timtit!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You Bogus was right underneath my statement about the
>>>>>> Daleks killing the Doctor 8 times, so I naturally thought
>>>>>> that you were specifically saying that the Daleks killing
>>>>>> the Doctor was bogus, or that their wet dream was bogus!
>>>>>
>>>>> The whole Eve of the Daleks is BOGUS! Timtit!
>>>>
>>>> Does that automatically make the Dalek desire to kill the
>>>> Doctor bogus?
>>>
>>> Ever since the Timeless Child.
>>>
>> But there has been no 'Doctor Who' since 'The Timeless Child",
>> asswipe, so this must have NEVER occurred (yet), asswipe!!
>
> Yads kept saying that the regeneration was still in progress!
>
Yeah, but the asswipe is an idiot, Tim.

In EVERY regeneration scene that we've seen (prior to this latest one),
the OLD Doctor has disappeared and the NEW Doctor has appeared at the
same location.

If you want to do away with JodieDoc then the location where we lost
DoctorPeter and where we regained DoctorNewDavid should have been the same.

But they weren't!!
--
Daniel

Re: Dalek Wet Dream: Eve of the Daleks Spoilers

<to9a9o$2lgtv$1@dont-email.me>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13890&group=rec.arts.drwho#13890

copy link Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Dalek Wet Dream: Eve of the Daleks Spoilers
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 21:56:56 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 69
Message-ID: <to9a9o$2lgtv$1@dont-email.me>
References: <415bb8d7-f2d3-496d-85d8-cbc10d384061n@googlegroups.com>
<2b3e18ab-95a2-43c6-83c2-25fb3029e0a6n@googlegroups.com>
<tjbg02$uhh$72@gallifrey.nk.ca>
<ed196369-05ec-450b-ac67-531f57ff6befn@googlegroups.com>
<tjgqv0$30ha$21@gallifrey.nk.ca> <tnrt5b$l27p$4@dont-email.me>
<ae71cae1-2d6e-424b-a31f-afb0e2c1dc2en@googlegroups.com>
<to6oub$28v4k$1@dont-email.me>
<ff75de4e-36d5-4c23-bb57-7956f7f1ddfen@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 10:56:57 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="49b2a1d1c8e649352e9b4adda59e9774";
logging-data="2802623"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18MZF5SsXix1HRpTVltcjzsCPTAg4f9DqM="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IoQB7idtKQoDbq/BWvBHk4qv5Zs=
In-Reply-To: <ff75de4e-36d5-4c23-bb57-7956f7f1ddfen@googlegroups.com>

by: Daniel65 - Sun, 25 Dec 2022 10:56 UTC

tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 25/12/22 1:31 am:
> On Saturday, December 24, 2022 at 3:48:30 AM UTC-8, Daniel65 wrote:
>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 24/12/22 6:54 pm:
>>> On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 12:53:02 AM UTC-8, Daniel65
>>> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 29/10/22 2:02 am:
>>>>> In article <ed196369-05ec-450b...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 7:25:08 AM UTC-7,
>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <2b3e18ab-95a2-43c6...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 5:40:32 AM UTC-7,
>>>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <ea0c08f0-3486-40f9...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 2:04:49 PM UTC-7,
>>>>>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>> <415bb8d7-f2d3-496d...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> q a z x s w e d c v f r t g b n h y u j m
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Daleks got to kill the Doctor at least 8
>>>>>>>>>>>> times!
>>>>>>>>>>> Bogus!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The Daleks didn't seem to think that JodieDoc was
>>>>>>>>>> bogus!
>>>>>>>>> The whole Eve of the Daleks is BOGUS! Timtit!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You Bogus was right underneath my statement about the
>>>>>>>> Daleks killing the Doctor 8 times, so I naturally
>>>>>>>> thought that you were specifically saying that the
>>>>>>>> Daleks killing the Doctor was bogus, or that their wet
>>>>>>>> dream was bogus!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The whole Eve of the Daleks is BOGUS! Timtit!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does that automatically make the Dalek desire to kill the
>>>>>> Doctor bogus?
>>>>>
>>>>> Ever since the Timeless Child.
>>>>>
>>>> But there has been no 'Doctor Who' since 'The Timeless Child",
>>>> asswipe, so this must have NEVER occurred (yet), asswipe!!
>>>
>>> Yads kept saying that the regeneration was still in progress!
>>>
>> Yeah, but the asswipe is an idiot, Tim.
>>
>> In EVERY regeneration scene that we've seen (prior to this latest
>> one), the OLD Doctor has disappeared and the NEW Doctor has
>> appeared at the same location.
>>
>> If you want to do away with JodieDoc then the location where we
>> lost DoctorPeter and where we regained DoctorNewDavid should have
>> been the same.
>>
>> But they weren't!!
>
> Could it be that Chris Chibnall moved the regeneration to outside the
> TARDIS for the very purpose of making it impossible for Capaldi to
> have regenerated directly to Tennent?
>
No, Tim, in ClassicWho we saw Regenerations outside The TARDIS .... a
nothing special happened!
--
Daniel

Re: Dalek Wet Dream: Eve of the Daleks Spoilers

<to9ag1$2lihn$1@dont-email.me>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13891&group=rec.arts.drwho#13891

copy link Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Dalek Wet Dream: Eve of the Daleks Spoilers
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 22:00:16 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <to9ag1$2lihn$1@dont-email.me>
References: <415bb8d7-f2d3-496d-85d8-cbc10d384061n@googlegroups.com>
<tnrt5b$l27p$4@dont-email.me>
<ae71cae1-2d6e-424b-a31f-afb0e2c1dc2en@googlegroups.com>
<to6oub$28v4k$1@dont-email.me> <to74i9$29su$15@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 11:00:17 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="49b2a1d1c8e649352e9b4adda59e9774";
logging-data="2804279"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19/ptD4jvqsgfC/8NAnwHGSkx5WDcYZPLI="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Pc/+404nMmfqGjG4HadM7tSxZWo=
In-Reply-To: <to74i9$29su$15@gallifrey.nk.ca>

by: Daniel65 - Sun, 25 Dec 2022 11:00 UTC

The Doctor wrote on 25/12/22 2:06 am:
> In article <to6oub$28v4k$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 24/12/22 6:54 pm:
>>> On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 12:53:02 AM UTC-8, Daniel65
>>> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 29/10/22 2:02 am:
>>>>> In article <ed196369-05ec-450b...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 7:25:08 AM UTC-7,
>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:

<Snip>

>>>>>>> The whole Eve of the Daleks is BOGUS! Timtit!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does that automatically make the Dalek desire to kill the
>>>>>> Doctor bogus?
>>>>>
>>>>> Ever since the Timeless Child.
>>>>>
>>>> But there has been no 'Doctor Who' since 'The Timeless Child",
>>>> asswipe, so this must have NEVER occurred (yet), asswipe!!
>>>
>>> Yads kept saying that the regeneration was still in progress!
>>>
>> Yeah, but the asswipe is an idiot, Tim.
>>
>> In EVERY regeneration scene that we've seen (prior to this latest
>> one), the OLD Doctor has disappeared and the NEW Doctor has
>> appeared at the same location.
>>
>> If you want to do away with JodieDoc then the location where we
>> lost DoctorPeter and where we regained DoctorNewDavid should have
>> been the same.
>>
>> But they weren't!!

Nothing useful to add (as usual), asswipe, but had to post anyway (as
usual), asswipe!!
--
Daniel

Re: Dalek Wet Dream: Eve of the Daleks Spoilers

<to9akk$2lihn$2@dont-email.me>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=13892&group=rec.arts.drwho#13892

copy link Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@nomail.afraid.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Dalek Wet Dream: Eve of the Daleks Spoilers
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 22:02:46 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <to9akk$2lihn$2@dont-email.me>
References: <415bb8d7-f2d3-496d-85d8-cbc10d384061n@googlegroups.com>
<ae71cae1-2d6e-424b-a31f-afb0e2c1dc2en@googlegroups.com>
<to6oub$28v4k$1@dont-email.me>
<024108b2-abfa-4be9-b4c0-c97ff4d04b16n@googlegroups.com>
<to85gf$2bbe$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>
<a1eab462-c6a8-4b32-9fef-1d5e3f738b00n@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 11:02:44 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="49b2a1d1c8e649352e9b4adda59e9774";
logging-data="2804279"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+wE9xNkGBZ2f7urfOuLj0dzFnLiF0Q9T0="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.14
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mLlLcxaBDX0EQcd+jQ3gp1lEFdE=
In-Reply-To: <a1eab462-c6a8-4b32-9fef-1d5e3f738b00n@googlegroups.com>

by: Daniel65 - Sun, 25 Dec 2022 11:02 UTC

tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 25/12/22 12:49 pm:
> On Saturday, December 24, 2022 at 4:29:05 PM UTC-8, netk...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> In article <024108b2-abfa-4be9...@googlegroups.com>,
>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Saturday, December 24, 2022 at 3:48:30 AM UTC-8, Daniel65
>>> wrote:

<Snip>

>>>> In EVERY regeneration scene that we've seen (prior to this
>>>> latest one), the OLD Doctor has disappeared and the NEW Doctor
>>>> has appeared at the same location.
>>>>
>>>> If you want to do away with JodieDoc then the location where we
>>>> lost DoctorPeter and where we regained DoctorNewDavid should
>>>> have been the same.
>>>>
>>>> But they weren't!!
>>>
>>> How do you explain the above, Yads?
>> The Bogus does not exist!
>
> If Peter Capaldi regenerated into David Tennent, why did David
> Tennent appear at a location DIFFERENT from where Peter Capaldi
> disappeared?
>
Tim, that Question is too difficult for the asswipe to answer, Tim.
--
Daniel

Never look up when dragons fly overhead.

arts / rec.arts.drwho / Re: Dalek Wet Dream: Eve of the Daleks Spoilers

Subject	Author
Dalek Wet Dream: Eve of the Daleks Spoilers	Daniel65
Dalek Wet Dream: Eve of the Daleks Spoilers	Daniel65
Dalek Wet Dream: Eve of the Daleks Spoilers	Daniel65
Dalek Wet Dream: Eve of the Daleks Spoilers	Daniel65
Dalek Wet Dream: Eve of the Daleks Spoilers	Daniel65