Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

The reward for working hard is more hard work.


arts / rec.arts.tv / Re: Pelosi Claims SCOTUS Draft Does Violence To Constitution

SubjectAuthor
o Re: Pelosi Claims SCOTUS Draft Does Violence To ConstitutionmoviePig

1
Re: Pelosi Claims SCOTUS Draft Does Violence To Constitution

<55cfK.7579$pqKf.6920@fx12.iad>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=142474&group=rec.arts.tv#142474

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx12.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.8.0
Subject: Re: Pelosi Claims SCOTUS Draft Does Violence To Constitution
Content-Language: en-US
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <t5dtf3$so1$8@dont-email.me>
<atropos-621E5A.09341410052022@news.giganews.com>
<t5e5an$otg$6@dont-email.me> <gsel7hl40c96v5ltqatins9utis3qtmqr9@4ax.com>
<atropos-9C6A8F.09375111052022@news.giganews.com>
<u35o7hd7j33q8h6ners9ku79e440hbdqvi@4ax.com>
<atropos-226C01.13375511052022@news.giganews.com>
<nn7o7hhtr6sdbugpaqstj8b0gnhcuok5e2@4ax.com>
<atropos-1147E1.13595911052022@news.giganews.com>
<obWeK.969$i7Ab.702@fx05.iad> <fcgq7htjdu0612fjmdnci3t2p56emdt6im@4ax.com>
From: pwall...@moviepig.com (moviePig)
In-Reply-To: <fcgq7htjdu0612fjmdnci3t2p56emdt6im@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <55cfK.7579$pqKf.6920@fx12.iad>
X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 18:11:13 UTC
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 14:11:12 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 2177
 by: moviePig - Thu, 12 May 2022 18:11 UTC

On 5/12/2022 1:21 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2022 17:49:07 -0400, moviePig <pwallace@moviepig.com>
> wrote:
>
>>> No, it doesn't. As I just said, Loving v. Virginia protects the right to
>>> marry interracially.
>>>
>>> Overturning Roe has no effect on Loving.
>>
>> Well, there's likely to be less of it...
>
> Hardy har har.
>
> On the other hand, perhaps it could encourage more interest in
> effective birth control - too often folks climb into bed and think
> with their genitals rather than their brains.
>
> The missus and I were fairly attentive on this during our early years
> to this but once we had all the kids we were sure we wanted took more
> permanent steps.

Although one can never argue with "too often", I'd be surprised if a
relatively ready availability of abortion -- an onerous procedure --
contributes significantly to careless sex. I think it has always had
the status of a "backup plan" -- now just more inconvenient/dangerous.

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor