Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Go to a movie tonight. Darkness becomes you.


arts / rec.arts.tv / Re: Pro-choicers picket Pelosi's house, claim Democrats are "complicit" in potential overhaul of Roe v. Wade

SubjectAuthor
o Re: Pro-choicers picket Pelosi's house, claim Democrats aresuzeeq

1
Re: Pro-choicers picket Pelosi's house, claim Democrats are "complicit" in potential overhaul of Roe v. Wade

<t5mcai$fk6e$1@solani.org>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=142504&group=rec.arts.tv#142504

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: suz...@imbris.com (suzeeq)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Pro-choicers picket Pelosi's house, claim Democrats are
"complicit" in potential overhaul of Roe v. Wade
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 12:42:08 -0700
Message-ID: <t5mcai$fk6e$1@solani.org>
References: <atropos-542858.10574511052022@news.giganews.com>
<atropos-F4EE71.11410513052022@news.giganews.com>
<5r9t7hhcng93krukblct2sladbk0lfajkr@4ax.com>
<atropos-580000.12132013052022@news.giganews.com>
<t5mbt8$afl$2@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 19:42:11 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
logging-data="512206"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.12.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4nr9bYA0Onyih8l6JSLUcKp4aM4=
X-User-ID: eJwFwYEBwCAIA7CXUGhx5wyw/59gAudiZxAMCJJ3YW7ylEmjydswh6ziLk3UPtg1ZFb//B5ASBIp
In-Reply-To: <t5mbt8$afl$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: suzeeq - Fri, 13 May 2022 19:42 UTC

On 5/13/2022 12:35 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 13 May 2022 11:41:05 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>> moviePig <pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 5/13/2022 1:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>
>>>>>>> . . .
>
>>>>>> Because they won't be able to. A bunch religious nutcases in Georgia
>>>>>> can't ban pills nationwide and since anyone can leave Georgia and bring
>>>>>> them back, it'd be folly for them to even try.
>
>>>>> You think they can't ban "bringing them back"?
>
>>>> How would they?
>
>>> I would expect there would be people who bulk buy and then try to help
>>> out young women by providing the pills under the counter. Such people
>>> could be found to be in possession of 'illegal contraband' and then
>>> subject to what ever legal penalties there may be.
>
>> Sure, if found in possession it could be enforced, but that's not what I
>> asked. I asked how they could stop people from bringing them in from
>> other states.
>
>> Keep in mind that state police forces do not enjoy the ability to run
>> border checkpoints and search vehicles the way the federal police do in
>> the "Constitution-free zone" at the national border. Any attempt to do
>> that would be patently illegal.
>
> Would you mind explaining that to Greg Abbott, please? He has taken
> steps to slow down trade with Mexico. Texas hasn't been a republic since
> 1846.
>
I thought he lifted inspections at the border?

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.7
clearnet tor