On 4/30/2022 11:27 AM, Ed Stasiak wrote:
>> Micky DuPree
>>> shawn
>>>
>>> The seat of government was stormed by a mob on Jan 6. It was bent
>>> on death and destruction. Please tell us what's FAR worse than that.
>>
>> It wasn't just a mob. It was a planned overthrow of a legitimately
>> elected government.
>
> Absolute nonsense. At no point was the government in any conceivable
> danger of being “overthrown!” by a handful of goofballs taking selfies
> in the Capitol.
>
> https://i.postimg.cc/9f5sD8zz/1609977722609.jpg
> https://ibb.co/0tYv7xH

Who cares about selfie-snapping goofballs? Are you claiming there was
no planned overthrow?

On 4/30/2022 12:17 PM, Ed Stasiak wrote:
>> moviePig
>>> Ed Stasiak
>>>
>>> Absolute nonsense. At no point was the government in any conceivable
>>> danger of being “overthrown!” by a handful of goofballs taking selfies
>>> in the Capitol.
>>
>> Who cares about selfie-snapping goofballs?
>
> Micky DuPree, the Dems and the Wall Street owned Mainstream Media,
> who would never propagate misinformation, right?…
>
> https://i.postimg.cc/R0SjBPFt/1648589712727.jpg
> https://ibb.co/Swbf5vc
>
>> Are you claiming there was no planned overthrow?
>
> If by “planned” you mean a handful of goofballs ranting on Facebook,
> then sure.
>
> But like the “plot” to kidnap Michigan governor Witless, I wouldn’t put
> it past the FBI/CIA to have engineered it via agent provocateurs, or are
> you suggesting that out of all the world’s governments throughout history,
> America is somehow immune to fraud and political shenanigans?

Apparently (iirc from Bill Maher), some of the current GOP leadership
phoned Mark Meadows on Jan. 6 to urge declaration of martial law. If
true, would you not find it disturbing?

On 5/15/2022 3:36 AM, trotsky wrote:
> On 5/14/2022 4:47 PM, moviePig wrote:
>> On 5/14/2022 5:25 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <bpUfK.624$Xbo6.30@fx35.iad>,
>>>   moviePig <pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/14/2022 3:43 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 14 May 2022 08:14:33 +0000 (UTC),
>>>>> MDuPree@theworld.com.snip.to.reply (Micky DuPree) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 19:14:54 -0500, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If ten people start a fire while 1000 people are peaceful, it's
>>>>>> still a
>>>>>> mostly peaceful protest.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wouldn't. If I went to a NASCAR race and there was a fatal crash but
>>>>> the other 39 drivers safely finished the race I wouldn't call it a
>>>>> "mostly safe race" since 97.5% of the drivers finished in perfect
>>>>> health.
>>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> 'Mostly safe' suggests different thresholds depending on the
>>>> activity in
>>>> question.  1-in-40 might be considered a 'mostly safe' risk for, say, a
>>>> complex surgical procedure -- less so for a drive in the country.
>>>>
>>>> I'd think a 'mostly peaceful protest' is one where damage is minimal,
>>>> and owes to outliers who are at odds with the protest's principles.
>>>> That may seem a lot to pack into a short phrase, but it is what it is.
>>>
>>> All you have to do to expose the bullshit in the 'mostly peaceful' media
>>> lie is ask yourself if you honestly believe those same media outlets
>>> would describe a pro-Trump march or protest as 'mostly peaceful' if it
>>> ended up with blocks of the city on fire, dozens of stores smashed and
>>> looted, and/or several deaths.
>>
>> Yes, Trump is despicable, and it distorts people's thinking/speaking.
>
>
> Are you really claiming the media is distorting reporting on Trump and
> his band of beatoffs?  Derp is just regurgitating Oath Keeper talking
> points.

When I read any news about Trump, it's with the expectation of a yet
another 'Operation Asshole'. We can debate the fairness of that, but
not the fact.