On 2022-05-18 5:22 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> A mother in Clark County reads to the school board from a sexually graphic
> assignment her daughter was required to memorize, then perform before the
> class. The mother's mic then gets cut off because the school board found
> the language and content to be inappropriate for a public discussion.
>
> Grown adults can't handle hearing this content yet they readily give it to
> kids in school. Make it make sense.
>
> https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1526401955311984641?s=21
>
> What is with the current obsession 'educators' have with forcing graphic
> sexuality on minors? Not to get moviePig worked up again but... sounds like
> grooming.

This clip is so heavily edited (i.e. all the "problematic" language is
muted) so that it is impossible to even guess what was said by either
the mother or the other person in the audience. Do the Victorians at
Twitter do the same when a "progressive" uses gutter language?

What ever happened to trigger warnings? Couldn't they warn of harsh
language and then play what was actually said? It looks very much like a
"progressive" editor wanted to make sure no one heard what the daughter
was actually made to say in front of her class for fear of embarrassing
the teacher/administration....

--
Rhino

On 5/18/2022 7:28 AM, anim8rfsk wrote:
> Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
>> On 2022-05-18 5:22 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> A mother in Clark County reads to the school board from a sexually graphic
>>> assignment her daughter was required to memorize, then perform before the
>>> class. The mother's mic then gets cut off because the school board found
>>> the language and content to be inappropriate for a public discussion.
>>>
>>> Grown adults can't handle hearing this content yet they readily give it to
>>> kids in school. Make it make sense.
>>>
>>> https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1526401955311984641?s=21
>>>
>>> What is with the current obsession 'educators' have with forcing graphic
>>> sexuality on minors? Not to get moviePig worked up again but... sounds like
>>> grooming.
>>
>> This clip is so heavily edited (i.e. all the "problematic" language is
>> muted) so that it is impossible to even guess what was said by either
>> the mother or the other person in the audience. Do the Victorians at
>> Twitter do the same when a "progressive" uses gutter language?
>>
>> What ever happened to trigger warnings? Couldn't they warn of harsh
>> language and then play what was actually said? It looks very much like a
>> "progressive" editor wanted to make sure no one heard what the daughter
>> was actually made to say in front of her class for fear of embarrassing
>> the teacher/administration....
>>
>
> This says it has the full text but I haven’t found a click yet
>
> https://networkinvegas.com/ccsd-schools-promoting-kids-turn-gay-and-making-kids-read-graphics-sexual-materials-in-class/
>
> Apparently the word that both the mother and the board considered
> pornographic is “dick”

Like kids aren't already saying that to each other...

On 5/18/2022 8:50 AM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
> On 2022-05-18 15:28:06 +0000, suzeeq said:
>
>> On 5/18/2022 7:28 AM, anim8rfsk wrote:
>>> Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2022-05-18 5:22 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> A mother in Clark County reads to the school board from a sexually
>>>>> graphic
>>>>> assignment her daughter was required to memorize, then perform
>>>>> before the
>>>>> class. The mother's mic then gets cut off because the school board
>>>>> found
>>>>> the language and content to be inappropriate for a public discussion.
>>>>>
>>>>> Grown adults can't handle hearing this content yet they readily
>>>>> give it to
>>>>> kids in school. Make it make sense.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1526401955311984641?s=21
>>>>>
>>>>> What is with the current obsession 'educators' have with forcing
>>>>> graphic
>>>>> sexuality on minors? Not to get moviePig worked up again but...
>>>>> sounds like
>>>>> grooming.
>>>>
>>>> This clip is so heavily edited (i.e. all the "problematic" language is
>>>> muted) so that it is impossible to even guess what was said by either
>>>> the mother or the other person in the audience. Do the Victorians at
>>>> Twitter do the same when a "progressive" uses gutter language?
>>>>
>>>> What ever happened to trigger warnings? Couldn't they warn of harsh
>>>> language and then play what was actually said? It looks very much
>>>> like a
>>>> "progressive" editor wanted to make sure no one heard what the daughter
>>>> was actually made to say in front of her class for fear of embarrassing
>>>> the teacher/administration....
>>>>
>>>
>>> This says it has the full text but I haven’t found a click yet
>>>
>>> https://networkinvegas.com/ccsd-schools-promoting-kids-turn-gay-and-making-kids-read-graphics-sexual-materials-in-class/
>>>
>>>
>>> Apparently the word that both the mother and the board considered
>>> pornographic is “dick”
>>
>> Like kids aren't already saying that to each other...
>
> Oh, well then that make it OK.

No, I'm saying it's not pornographic.

On 5/18/2022 11:28 AM, suzeeq wrote:
> On 5/18/2022 7:28 AM, anim8rfsk wrote:
>> Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
>>> On 2022-05-18 5:22 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> A mother in Clark County reads to the school board from a sexually
>>>> graphic
>>>> assignment her daughter was required to memorize, then perform
>>>> before the
>>>> class. The mother's mic then gets cut off because the school board
>>>> found
>>>> the language and content to be inappropriate for a public discussion.
>>>>
>>>> Grown adults can't handle hearing this content yet they readily give
>>>> it to
>>>> kids in school. Make it make sense.
>>>>
>>>> https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1526401955311984641?s=21
>>>>
>>>> What is with the current obsession 'educators' have with forcing
>>>> graphic
>>>> sexuality on minors? Not to get moviePig worked up again but...
>>>> sounds like
>>>> grooming.
>>>
>>> This clip is so heavily edited (i.e. all the "problematic" language is
>>> muted) so that it is impossible to even guess what was said by either
>>> the mother or the other person in the audience. Do the Victorians at
>>> Twitter do the same when a "progressive" uses gutter language?
>>>
>>> What ever happened to trigger warnings? Couldn't they warn of harsh
>>> language and then play what was actually said? It looks very much like a
>>> "progressive" editor wanted to make sure no one heard what the daughter
>>> was actually made to say in front of her class for fear of embarrassing
>>> the teacher/administration....
>>>
>>
>> This says it has the full text but I haven’t found a click yet
>>
>> https://networkinvegas.com/ccsd-schools-promoting-kids-turn-gay-and-making-kids-read-graphics-sexual-materials-in-class/
>>
>>
>> Apparently the word that both the mother and the board considered
>> pornographic is “dick”
>
> Like kids aren't already saying that to each other...

Dick isn't...

On 2022-05-18 10:28 AM, anim8rfsk wrote:
> Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
>> On 2022-05-18 5:22 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> A mother in Clark County reads to the school board from a sexually graphic
>>> assignment her daughter was required to memorize, then perform before the
>>> class. The mother's mic then gets cut off because the school board found
>>> the language and content to be inappropriate for a public discussion.
>>>
>>> Grown adults can't handle hearing this content yet they readily give it to
>>> kids in school. Make it make sense.
>>>
>>> https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1526401955311984641?s=21
>>>
>>> What is with the current obsession 'educators' have with forcing graphic
>>> sexuality on minors? Not to get moviePig worked up again but... sounds like
>>> grooming.
>>
>> This clip is so heavily edited (i.e. all the "problematic" language is
>> muted) so that it is impossible to even guess what was said by either
>> the mother or the other person in the audience. Do the Victorians at
>> Twitter do the same when a "progressive" uses gutter language?
>>
>> What ever happened to trigger warnings? Couldn't they warn of harsh
>> language and then play what was actually said? It looks very much like a
>> "progressive" editor wanted to make sure no one heard what the daughter
>> was actually made to say in front of her class for fear of embarrassing
>> the teacher/administration....
>>
>
> This says it has the full text but I haven’t found a click yet

>
> https://networkinvegas.com/ccsd-schools-promoting-kids-turn-gay-and-making-kids-read-graphics-sexual-materials-in-class/

I think maybe what you're looking for is the text-image directly below
this sentence in the linked article:
=========================================================================
The full text that the Mother was trying to read, before being told she
was not allowed to use profanity in front of the board is here…
=========================================================================
>
> Apparently the word that both the mother and the board considered
> pornographic is “dick”
>
>

--
Rhino

On 5/18/2022 10:02 AM, Rhino wrote:
> On 2022-05-18 10:28 AM, anim8rfsk wrote:
>> Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
>>> On 2022-05-18 5:22 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> A mother in Clark County reads to the school board from a sexually
>>>> graphic
>>>> assignment her daughter was required to memorize, then perform
>>>> before the
>>>> class. The mother's mic then gets cut off because the school board
>>>> found
>>>> the language and content to be inappropriate for a public discussion.
>>>>
>>>> Grown adults can't handle hearing this content yet they readily give
>>>> it to
>>>> kids in school. Make it make sense.
>>>>
>>>> https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1526401955311984641?s=21
>>>>
>>>> What is with the current obsession 'educators' have with forcing
>>>> graphic
>>>> sexuality on minors? Not to get moviePig worked up again but...
>>>> sounds like
>>>> grooming.
>>>
>>> This clip is so heavily edited (i.e. all the "problematic" language is
>>> muted) so that it is impossible to even guess what was said by either
>>> the mother or the other person in the audience. Do the Victorians at
>>> Twitter do the same when a "progressive" uses gutter language?
>>>
>>> What ever happened to trigger warnings? Couldn't they warn of harsh
>>> language and then play what was actually said? It looks very much like a
>>> "progressive" editor wanted to make sure no one heard what the daughter
>>> was actually made to say in front of her class for fear of embarrassing
>>> the teacher/administration....
>>>
>>
>> This says it has the full text but I haven’t found a click yet
>
>>
>> https://networkinvegas.com/ccsd-schools-promoting-kids-turn-gay-and-making-kids-read-graphics-sexual-materials-in-class/
>>
>
> I think maybe what you're looking for is the text-image directly below
> this sentence in the linked article:
> =========================================================================
> The full text that the Mother was trying to read, before being told she
> was not allowed to use profanity in front of the board is here…
> =========================================================================
>>
>> Apparently the word that both the mother and the board considered
>> pornographic is “dick”

And in Louisville, middle school students at the christian academy there
were given a homework assignment to write a letter to “a homosexual
friend” explaining why their “lifestyle” is wrong.