On 6/12/2022 3:45 AM, RichA wrote:
> On Saturday, 11 June 2022 at 22:35:31 UTC-4, weary flake wrote:
>> Here's some Northern California stupid climate tricks. When there was heavy
>> rainfall for about a month here from mid October to Mid November last fall,
>> the heavy water flows were diverted from the reservoirs and kept in the rivers.
>> I learned this towards the end of October that none of the water entered the
>> reservoirs. The excuses of state water management was that it is unusual to
>> receive heavy rainfall at this time (not true by my memory) and that the little
>> rain, if any, had to stay in the rivers until Nov. 15 to help protect river
>> wildlife from drought. But at the end of October there was already about two
>> weeks of heavy rain and it was clear within days that river wildlife was
>> protected from drought yet the state was holding firm at the end of October
>> that no water may enter the reservoirs until Nov. 15, as stipulated by the
>> State's lawyers, and I don't know the followup if the state relented. In any
>> case the heaviest part of the rainy season was over about mid November and we
>> subsequently had another winter drought.
>>
>> So it's a bit galling to soon be told, once the raining stopped, that the
>> reservoirs are low and it's important to save water.
>>
>> Protecting river life from drought is a value, but must it be floodwater? I
>> haven't heard about flooding creeks and rivers as necessary to protect
>> waterlife from drought, so that may not be it. Is the state's stupid climate
>> trick an effort to reduce water usage by consumers by engineering shortages?
>> Or is it an effort by deliberate mismanagement to blame waterlife for what
>> was caused by the state's lawyers and environmental authorities?
>
> It's done purposely, to further the climate lies being perpetrated by the cabal.

Interesting. And what's the motive then? Go ahead, complete the lie.