Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Rotten wood cannot be carved. -- Confucius, "Analects", Book 5, Ch. 9


arts / rec.arts.tv / Re: What Did You Watch? 2022-06-16 (Friday)

SubjectAuthor
o Re: What Did You Watch? 2022-06-16 (Friday)Arthur Lipscomb

1
Re: What Did You Watch? 2022-06-16 (Friday)

<t8mbrm$1c3$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=143090&group=rec.arts.tv#143090

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: art...@alum.calberkeley.org (Arthur Lipscomb)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2022-06-16 (Friday)
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 22:23:01 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <t8mbrm$1c3$1@dont-email.me>
References: <t8kvcv$vba$1@dont-email.me>
<745071934.677266151.652306.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
<t8m6oq$51d$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2022 05:23:02 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="6ccc400ceb59fcb71ea8b3ccc9340e06";
logging-data="1411"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Du2WyW8flaxFia+WGIHAl9sJx6LpovuU="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.10.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:x2UCewRHKeOh8DMVJmbb6yaY84A=
In-Reply-To: <t8m6oq$51d$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Arthur Lipscomb - Sun, 19 Jun 2022 05:23 UTC

On 6/18/2022 8:56 PM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
> On 2022-06-19 02:45:53 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
>
>> Ian J. Ball <IJBall@mac.invalid> wrote:
>>>
snip
>>
>> Seriously if they actually do this remake of FIREFLY they keep talking
>> about they should definitely be talking to her.
>
> I checked the "No Time To Die" Wiki article, and was shocked that there
> was no talk at all of a spinoff flick based around de Armas - it seems
> like a total no brainer.
>

Have they ever done any spin off from James Bond?

>>> Beyond that, this film kills off pretty much everyone associated
>>> with this particular Bond film series that they can get away with (I'm
>>> not sure how the current M survived!!), and introduce a "new" "007"
>>> (Lashana Lynch, from "Captain Marvel" and the short-lived "Still
>>> Star-Crossed" TV series).
>>> I noticed the scene Arthur referenced - there is clearly a portrait
>>> of Dame Judy Dench "M", and then another portrait of another "M", which
>>> I guess is of the 1970s-era "M".
>>> The flick ends with "James Bond Will Return" - I'll believe it when
>>> I see it!  ;p
>>
>> That really really really really really should have said “007 will
>> return”
>
> That, or they should have explicitly set up that there are *multiple*
> different "James Bonds" over the years, in the same way that I want the
> "Transporter" franchise to acknowledge that there are multiple different
> "Frank Martins"!
>

I was not aware of that. I like to think James Bond is actually a Time
Lord. That's why over the years the other actors got older while he
simply regenerated.

>>> What did you watch?
>>

I'll do a two-day tomorrow.

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor