On 6/26/2022 5:05 PM, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
> On 6/26/2022 4:31 PM, suzeeq wrote:
>> On 6/26/2022 3:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> On Jun 26, 2022 at 7:51:17 AM PDT, "Ed Stasiak"
>>> <edstasiak1067@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>   moviePig
>>>>>   > Ed Stasiak
>>>>>   >
>>>>>   > A friend's older sister did exactly that.
>>>>>
>>>>>   I lead a sheltered life...
>>>>
>>>> The "Sexual Revolution" has made unwed moms a major problem, as the
>>>> vast
>>>> majority of gals nowadays have jobs and feel they can dispense with
>>>> a husband
>>>> and father (though they still want his money...)
>>>>
>>>> https://i.postimg.cc/sDXHZRqX/Unwed-Mothers.png
>>>> https://ibb.co/vxVFTcn
>>>>
>>>>>   > Again, if a woman has a right to abort a kid she doesn't want,
>>>>> (and she
>>>>>> should)
>>>>>   > then it should be wholly the mom's responsibility to
>>>>> financially support
>>>>>> that kid
>>>>>   > if she _chooses on her own_ to give birth.
>>>>>
>>>>>   I agree ...unless they both know up front that [abortion] is, for
>>>>> whatever
>>>>> reason,
>>>>>   not an option.
>>>>
>>>> Without the option of abortion, you have to impose child support
>>>> payments
>>>> on the (DNA verified!) birth father, otherwise it would be unfair to
>>>> place
>>>> the
>>>> entire burden on the mom.
>>>>
>>>> After all, it takes two to tango.
>>>
>>> It took a couple of days for it to sink in, but the the pro-abortion
>>> crowd is
>>> losing its shit on the Twitters today. They're saying the most
>>> ridiculous
>>> things...
>>>
>>> "Okay, but what if there's a terrorist bombing and a man is blown
>>> apart and
>>> part of his testicle is launched 1000 feet into a 12-year-old girl
>>> who is
>>> confined to a wheelchair and she gets pregnant but a psychopath has
>>> threatened
>>> to murder her whole family if she gives birth? No abortion for her,
>>> either?!?!?!?!?
>>>
>>> "I don't want to live in a country where a child who just had her
>>> first period
>>> is forced by the state to give birth to an armless child with Down's
>>> syndrome
>>> if a Rube Goldberg device accidentally impregnates her!!!
>>>
>>> "And what if the baby is allergic to sunlight and everything else
>>> except the
>>> bark of a sycamore tree?!? Are *you* going to stay up all night
>>> illegally
>>> harvesting wood and handcrafting safe furniture for this nocturnal
>>> baby? Of
>>> course not, because you're a Republican and you just don't care!!"
>>>
>>> (Yes, that was an exaggerated parody of some of the crap I've seen
>>> but not by
>>> much.)
>>>
>>
>> Very exaggerated. But the new state laws make no exceptions for
>> preganancy through rape and incest, or for a fetus with abnormalities
>> who may not live more than a few days if the pregnnacy made it that
>> long. Women who have incomplete miscarriages may be prosecuted for
>> 'ending' a life, though one fourth of pregnancies are miscarried, and
>> if advanced enough, usually have to have a medical procedure to clear
>> out the remaining tissue or they're highly likely to get a severe
>> infection.
>> That's just a few of the risks to the woman or girl forced to carry a
>> pregnancy to term.
>
> Speaking of "losing one's shit" try to reconcile the "need" to force
> more children to be born by one part of the political spectrum with
> their belief that another part of the political spectrum that is
> fighting to allow abortions are all pedophiles....
>
Another good point.