Message-ID:

Delta: The kids will love our inflatable slides. -- David Letterman

arts / rec.arts.tv / Re: Notice how climate queers always illustrate CO2 emissions using visible smoke-stack smoke?

Re: Notice how climate queers always illustrate CO2 emissions using visible smoke-stack smoke?

<t9nbru$139$1@gioia.aioe.org>

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=144177&group=rec.arts.tv#144177

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!McHqRVjNt60KvcCsZTZCVA.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: gmsi...@email.com (trotsky)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Notice how climate queers always illustrate CO2 emissions using
visible smoke-stack smoke?
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 12:45:34 -0500
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <t9nbru$139$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <fe29ca2b-8a90-4056-b8e9-f581c9652563n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="1129"; posting-host="McHqRVjNt60KvcCsZTZCVA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.11.0
Content-Language: en-US
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2

by: trotsky - Fri, 1 Jul 2022 17:45 UTC

On 7/1/2022 1:39 AM, RichA wrote:
> Even though CO2 is odorless, colourless? That is what is called "propaganda."
> Visible emissions from smokestacks come from sulfur dioxides, soot, fly-ash. You know, REAL pollutants, which the kooks have caused to become more prevalent by their ridiculous emphasis on CO2.

So you feel a gas that only plants can breathe isn't a pollutant? Why
are you constantly phishing to be called a stupid fuck?

Re: Notice how climate queers always illustrate CO2 emissions using visible smoke-stack smoke?

<t9ooi5$1emi$5@gioia.aioe.org>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=144267&group=rec.arts.tv#144267

copy link Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!TbM+6cZ+lnO1T3ZbIhEK8Q.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: gmsi...@email.com (trotsky)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Notice how climate queers always illustrate CO2 emissions using
visible smoke-stack smoke?
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2022 01:28:20 -0500
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <t9ooi5$1emi$5@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <fe29ca2b-8a90-4056-b8e9-f581c9652563n@googlegroups.com>
<t9nbru$139$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<7f41bd2f-ec1d-4ac8-8345-5ce6c3e94e86n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="47826"; posting-host="TbM+6cZ+lnO1T3ZbIhEK8Q.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.11.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Content-Language: en-US

by: trotsky - Sat, 2 Jul 2022 06:28 UTC

On 7/1/2022 5:55 PM, RichA wrote:
> On Friday, 1 July 2022 at 13:45:39 UTC-4, gmsin...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On 7/1/2022 1:39 AM, RichA wrote:
>>> Even though CO2 is odorless, colourless? That is what is called "propaganda."
>>> Visible emissions from smokestacks come from sulfur dioxides, soot, fly-ash. You know, REAL pollutants, which the kooks have caused to become more prevalent by their ridiculous emphasis on CO2.
>> So you feel a gas that only plants can breathe isn't a pollutant? Why
>> are you constantly phishing to be called a stupid fuck?
>
> We can't breath nitrogen exclusively either, but it comprises about 70% of the gas in our atmosphere.

Hey, that's cool your comment is just as irrelevant as you!

Subject	Author
Re: Notice how climate queers always illustrate CO2 emissions using	trotsky
Re: Notice how climate queers always illustrate CO2 emissions using	trotsky