On 7/1/2022 3:11 AM, RichA wrote:
> They won't even say what this woman said that upset the violent Muslims. That's how the threat of Muslim retaliation scares the Western media to death. So history is rendered incomplete, cowardice feeds the violent religiosity of the Muslim.
>
> https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-62006476

In fact when you say "they won't report the news" do they call in sick,
or just go on camera or microphone and not say anything? None of those
make a lick of sense, as if it was said by someone who doesn't have a
grasp on reality.

On 7/1/2022 6:38 PM, RichA wrote:
> On Friday, 1 July 2022 at 14:59:39 UTC-4, gmsin...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On 7/1/2022 3:11 AM, RichA wrote:
>>> They won't even say what this woman said that upset the violent Muslims. That's how the threat of Muslim retaliation scares the Western media to death. So history is rendered incomplete, cowardice feeds the violent religiosity of the Muslim.
>>>
>>> https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-62006476
>> In fact when you say "they won't report the news" do they call in sick,
>> or just go on camera or microphone and not say anything? None of those
>> make a lick of sense, as if it was said by someone who doesn't have a
>> grasp on reality.
>
> They purposely avoid mentioning what the woman who offended the Muslims said because THEY (the Anglo media) are TERRIFIED of Muslim reactions.
> The historical record is left blank, because they are cowards.

What does the "Anglo media" think the "Muslim reactions" will do to
them, write mean letters to the editor? And don't you think the "anglo
media" that give their real names in their bylines are a hell of a lot
braver than anonyshits such as yourself? Is that why you're whining?