We have been treated to the latest addition of Sulzbach 'art', that of a deformed woman with odd hands and arms that remind one of thalidomide problem's, a face of distorted 'like me please' that only a mother could possibly love.

The image is torn from some spiral dirty notebook, where paint has no business being and paint it isn't.

So we can put the two side by side, the first of 'the lady' against this one I'll call 'Dirty girl' and the difference is staggering. I suspect wine produced this second attempt and forgery the first.

Sulzbach is left with no credentials, artistically, but many as a homeless bum hanging outside the closed library that houses his only way to communicate his need to be loved.

Thank you.

On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 12:06:23 PM UTC, blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> We have been treated to the latest addition of Sulzbach 'art', that of a deformed woman with odd hands and arms that remind one of thalidomide problem's, a face of distorted 'like me please' that only a mother could possibly love.
Also, as someone else pointed out, signs of meth addiction. George Sulzbach is not talented enough to be able to show emotion in his subjects (and also because they are monkeys), but 'like me please' is a good description.
>
> The image is torn from some spiral dirty notebook, where paint has no business being and paint it isn't.
Marker, maybe?
>
> So we can put the two side by side, the first of 'the lady' against this one I'll call 'Dirty girl' and the difference is staggering. I suspect wine produced this second attempt and forgery the first.
Yes, you are right. Faces on all of George Sulzbach's verified paintings are the same (monkey-meth).
>
> Sulzbach is left with no credentials, artistically, but many as a homeless bum hanging outside the closed library that houses his only way to communicate his need to be loved.
We have heard that, as a public service and a favor to UseNet, the Columbus Libraries will be permanently closed and burned.
>
> Thank you.
You're welcome.

On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 8:06:23 AM UTC-4, blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> We have been treated to the latest addition of Sulzbach 'art', that of a deformed woman with odd hands and arms that remind one of thalidomide problem's, a face of distorted 'like me please' that only a mother could possibly love.
>
> The image is torn from some spiral dirty notebook, where paint has no business being and paint it isn't.
>
> So we can put the two side by side, the first of 'the lady' against this one I'll call 'Dirty girl' and the difference is staggering. I suspect wine produced this second attempt and forgery the first.
>
> Sulzbach is left with no credentials, artistically, but many as a homeless bum hanging outside the closed library that houses his only way to communicate his need to be loved.
>
> Thank you.

That's not nice. In fact this is horrible, hideous, distasteful, appalling, odious, dreadful, and that's just a few of the adjectives that come to mind when I look at my online thesaurus. Did you ever stop to think Lady J could be retarded and George Sulzbach is a wonderful painter?

On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 8:06:23 AM UTC-4, blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> We have been treated to the latest addition of Sulzbach 'art', that of a deformed woman with odd hands and arms that remind one of thalidomide problem's, a face of distorted 'like me please' that only a mother could possibly love.
>
> The image is torn from some spiral dirty notebook, where paint has no business being and paint it isn't.
>
> So we can put the two side by side, the first of 'the lady' against this one I'll call 'Dirty girl' and the difference is staggering. I suspect wine produced this second attempt and forgery the first.
>
> Sulzbach is left with no credentials, artistically, but many as a homeless bum hanging outside the closed library that houses his only way to communicate his need to be loved.
>
> Thank you.

Is there a link for Dirty Girl?

I'm afraid I would have blocked any art-related thread (unopened) as spam.

On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 4:06:04 PM UTC, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 8:06:23 AM UTC-4, blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> > We have been treated to the latest addition of Sulzbach 'art', that of a deformed woman with odd hands and arms that remind one of thalidomide problem's, a face of distorted 'like me please' that only a mother could possibly love.
> >
> > The image is torn from some spiral dirty notebook, where paint has no business being and paint it isn't.
> >
> > So we can put the two side by side, the first of 'the lady' against this one I'll call 'Dirty girl' and the difference is staggering. I suspect wine produced this second attempt and forgery the first.
> >
> > Sulzbach is left with no credentials, artistically, but many as a homeless bum hanging outside the closed library that houses his only way to communicate his need to be loved.
> >
> > Thank you.
> Is there a link for Dirty Girl?
>
> I'm afraid I would have blocked any art-related thread (unopened) as spam.
Check your email, Michael. We sent it to you.

On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 2:38:55 PM UTC-4, NancyGene wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 4:06:04 PM UTC, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 8:06:23 AM UTC-4, blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> > > We have been treated to the latest addition of Sulzbach 'art', that of a deformed woman with odd hands and arms that remind one of thalidomide problem's, a face of distorted 'like me please' that only a mother could possibly love.
> > >
> > > The image is torn from some spiral dirty notebook, where paint has no business being and paint it isn't.
> > >
> > > So we can put the two side by side, the first of 'the lady' against this one I'll call 'Dirty girl' and the difference is staggering. I suspect wine produced this second attempt and forgery the first.
> > >
> > > Sulzbach is left with no credentials, artistically, but many as a homeless bum hanging outside the closed library that houses his only way to communicate his need to be loved.
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > Is there a link for Dirty Girl?
> >
> > I'm afraid I would have blocked any art-related thread (unopened) as spam.
> Check your email, Michael. We sent it to you.

Thanks, NancyGene.

I'll refrain from commenting on the quality of the piece, however I will say that it appears to be by the same painter who did the other Lady painting.

On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 11:58:03 AM UTC-4, jdcha...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 8:06:23 AM UTC-4, blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> > We have been treated to the latest addition of Sulzbach 'art', that of a deformed woman with odd hands and arms that remind one of thalidomide problem's, a face of distorted 'like me please' that only a mother could possibly love.
> >
> > The image is torn from some spiral dirty notebook, where paint has no business being and paint it isn't.
> >
> > So we can put the two side by side, the first of 'the lady' against this one I'll call 'Dirty girl' and the difference is staggering. I suspect wine produced this second attempt and forgery the first.
> >
> > Sulzbach is left with no credentials, artistically, but many as a homeless bum hanging outside the closed library that houses his only way to communicate his need to be loved.
> >
> > Thank you.
> That's not nice. In fact this is horrible, hideous, distasteful, appalling, odious, dreadful, and that's just a few of the adjectives that come to mind when I look at my online thesaurus. Did you ever stop to think Lady J could be retarded and George Sulzbach is a wonderful painter?

No. I never did.

I do wonder how he would render your Peyronie's disease, given the opportunity.

On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 6:59:54 PM UTC, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 2:38:55 PM UTC-4, NancyGene wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 4:06:04 PM UTC, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 8:06:23 AM UTC-4, blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> > > > We have been treated to the latest addition of Sulzbach 'art', that of a deformed woman with odd hands and arms that remind one of thalidomide problem's, a face of distorted 'like me please' that only a mother could possibly love.
> > > >
> > > > The image is torn from some spiral dirty notebook, where paint has no business being and paint it isn't.
> > > >
> > > > So we can put the two side by side, the first of 'the lady' against this one I'll call 'Dirty girl' and the difference is staggering. I suspect wine produced this second attempt and forgery the first.
> > > >
> > > > Sulzbach is left with no credentials, artistically, but many as a homeless bum hanging outside the closed library that houses his only way to communicate his need to be loved.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you.
> > > Is there a link for Dirty Girl?
> > >
> > > I'm afraid I would have blocked any art-related thread (unopened) as spam.
> > Check your email, Michael. We sent it to you.
> Thanks, NancyGene.
>
> I'll refrain from commenting on the quality of the piece, however I will say that it appears to be by the same painter who did the other Lady painting.

We think that it is an attempt to "copy" the other painting, but Mr. Sulzbach does not have the talent to do so. Even the background in the "Lady J" painting is inferior. Did you see the monkey in the upper center?

We will repeat our unbiased previous comments here, as we have at least 1000 times more art education, talent, and knowledge than Mr. Donkey:

Our thoughts:

Lady J obviously has simian ancestors. George Sulzbach actually has a monkey face painted toward the top (middle, in the background). There is also a brontosaurus up there.

Sulzbach has no grasp of anatomy. The subject's left arm has an unusually elongated humerus but then the lower arm is heavily muscled. Her right arm is stunted. Her left shoulder is hunched in an impossible way. Her chin comes to a point.

There is a worm crawling on her forehead. Her left eye appears to be at least an inch lower than her right eye and is rheumy. Her eyebrows don't match.. She looks like she is pregnant. Her left hand is huge and her right hand is tiny. She appears to have stigmata. Her mouth extends almost from one ear to the other.

How does one "paint" on a spiral bound piece of paper? As Edward Rochester just stated, it is a hideous mutation.