The Rude Pundit
@rudepundit

Fuck you.

Family Research Council
@FRCdc
·
19h
Abortion is never medically necessary to save the life of a mother.
Show this thread
10:05 PM · Sep 12, 2022

The new normal is pretty weird, man. Just when you think Biden�s
America cannot get any stranger, he trots out an aging folk singer to
celebrate the passage of a multi-billion boondoggle climate change
chicanery bill known as the Inflation Reduction Act.

For some reason, Biden has spent all day boasting about the passage of
that bill. To mark the occasion, he promised a grand ol� party (not the
Republican kind) at the White House on Tuesday afternoon. Who has a
party mid-afternoon on a work day? A group of government staffers and
bureaucrats, that�s who.

What Americans didn�t realize is that James Taylor would be the opening
act for the soiree. Here is a snippet of the performance:

Biden's White House event celebrating the "Inflation Reduction
Act" is beginning with a performance by James Taylor of "Fire
and Rain" pic.twitter.com/CeVECkldOR

� Greg Price (@greg_price11) September 13, 2022

Taylor also used the occasion to spout off about climate change,
placing the threat it poses on par with the Nazis and Axis Powers in
World War II.

�Taylor compares WWII to the fight against �climate change�,� The
Heritage Foundation�s John Cooper noted. �More than ever before,
perhaps more than anything since the Second World War, the world needs
to get together and respond to the climate crisis,� Taylor told the
crowd of Biden staffers and reporters.

Taylor compares WWII to the fight against "climate change":
"More than ever before, perhaps more than anything since the
Second World War, the world needs to get together and respond
to the climate crisis." pic.twitter.com/kvEjRpXmTO

� John Cooper (@thejcoop) September 13, 2022

The Inflation Reduction Act will attempt to combat inflation by pumping
the economy with $370 billion or so toward climate change. That money,
believe it or not, will be steered by perennial Democratic hack John
Podesta. That�s right, Podesta will be picking the winners and losers
of the green energy economy. What a racket.

Beyond the peculiarity of Taylor�s progressive plucking is the fact
that Biden chose to celebrate the Inflation Reduction Act on the same
day that the Bureau of Labor Statistics announced the Consumer Price
Index rose 8.3% year-over-year. The president must have believed his
own press that inflation had peaked last December, otherwise, he must
have missed the memo that inflation is increasing � not reducing.

Regardless, Biden evidently hoped that Taylor would boost America�s
spirits. Maybe he got the idea from his current climate change czar,
John Kerry.

Kerry � one of Biden�s �dearest friends� � pulled a similar stunt with
Taylor in 2015.

Following the Islamic extremist attack on employees at the satirical
magazine Charlie Hebdo, Kerry � then serving as Secretary of State �
dragged Taylor overseas for an awkward rendition of �You�ve Got A
Friend.� It was supposed to give comfort to the French.

That cringe-worthy performance can be seen here:
https://youtu.be/-kATwwRomMs

You can just hear Biden saying to the First Lady, �C�mon man, what�s
more fun than an acoustic guitar? James Taylor, it�ll be like Paris
2015 all over again. No, I�m serious.�

The only appropriate reaction to such a statement is to copy Bluto from
Animal House:

https://youtu.be/8V_hCqO6UQs

Just in case Biden�s goons in the government think that is a serious
suggestion and evidence of the great MAGA threat, it�s a joke.

I suppose Americans should be thankful that Biden didn�t bring back the
cast of �Hamilton� like Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) did
for the January 6 one-year anniversary. We should also be glad he
didn�t read stanzas from Walt Whitman like Secretary of Energy Jennifer
Granholm did during Pride Month. Pelosi also read a poem from her
friend Bono to laud Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, but that
obviously wouldn�t get Americans amped up for big government spending.

No, what America needs at this moment is not a reduction in spending or
a serious economic plan beyond a wing and a prayer, what America needs,
in Biden�s mind anyway, is a little loving from Sweet Baby James.

In case you missed Taylor�s live performance because you were busy
slaving away while trying to keep up with the outrageous cost of food
and living, a replay of the entire oddity can be seen here:

Happening Now: President Biden and Vice President Harris
deliver remarks alongside the First Lady and Second Gentleman
at an event celebrating the Inflation Reduction Act.
https://t.co/uzMGb06g4t

� The White House (@WhiteHouse) September 13, 2022

--
Let's go Brandon!

RichA <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Tuesday, 13 September 2022 at 05:16:12 UTC-4, gmsin...@gmail.com wrote:

>>The Rude Pundit
>>@rudepundit

>>Fuck you.

>>Family Research Council
>>@FRCdc

>>19h
>>Abortion is never medically necessary to save the life of a mother.
>>Show this thread
>>10:05 PM Sep 12, 2022

>Almost never. Apparently, the abortion supporters confused threat to
>life with convenience.

How the hell did you conclude "almost never" based on looking up nothing
whatsoever?

Let's listen to a woman who states she's a Neonatologist. She's clearly
pro-life.

She actually sounds like she knows what she's talking about.

But.

This was recorded in 2019 while Roe v. Wade was still the law of the
land. The nation was a very different place with respect to this issue.

Here's the key point: She sticks with MEDICAL definitions of abortion
while she explains scenarios which endanger the health or life of the
pregnant woman that can result in miscarriage or require medical
intervention with pre-term delivery, surgical or vaginal.

She explains that pre-term deliveries ARE NOT abortions EVEN THOUGH the
baby may be delivered dead or may not survive.

If the baby's life isn't saved, can you understand that the surgical or
delivery terms can possibly be prosecuted under the laws in certain
states any scenario in which the foetus is removed from the womb that's
not to save the foetus but the mother has been criminalized?

That in states in which human life is legally defined to begin at
conception (I think this is still at the talking stage) means that a
morning-after pill is now an abortificant and criminalized, even though
the woman isn't yet pregnant?

Here's another opinion piece from a pro-life organization.

This quote, in discussing early delivery for the purpose of saving the
life or health of the mother, is very interesting:

"Preemie" survival rates are improving constantly. Even if a
delivery occurred at a time when the baby was likely not viable,
the fundamental difference is still the intent behind the act.
It is never morally permissible to intend an evil outcome, and
the death of an unborn child is most certainly an evil outcome
(more explanation of these moral principles here).

https://www.hli.org/resources/what-percentage-of-abortions-are-medically-necessary/

This was written in 2021, still while Roe v. Wade was law of the land.

If the baby did not survive early delivery, is intent to deliver the
baby even though continuing the pregnancy might have been in the best
interest of the foetus but not the mother, a criminal act prosecutable
under anti-abortion laws? The medical staff doesn't have a depraved
heart here even though the baby died. A choice was made for medical
science cannot save everybody.

Pro lifers always try to sound so reasonable but politicians in state
legislatures and grand-standing prosecutors will twist moral principles
into unrecognizeable shapes.

On 9/13/2022 9:51 PM, RichA wrote:
> On Tuesday, 13 September 2022 at 05:16:12 UTC-4, gmsin...@gmail.com wrote:
>> The Rude Pundit
>> @rudepundit
>>
>> Fuck you.
>>
>> Family Research Council
>> @FRCdc
>> ·
>> 19h
>> Abortion is never medically necessary to save the life of a mother.
>> Show this thread
>> 10:05 PM · Sep 12, 2022
>
> Almost never. Apparently, the abortion supporters confused threat to life with convenience.

Thank you, so you agree the "Family Research Council" is full of shit
too and should be told to go fuck themselves. Unfortunately, because
you're as stupid as a bag of dog shit, you think it's an either/or
proposition. It isn't. Every state has different laws, and some are
harboring state sanctioned murder by saying a woman can't abort a fetus
no matter what the circumstances. I've mentioned ectopic pregnancies
before as one example, and with your medical background that you don't
have the testicles to admit to you I'm sure you know the repercussions
there. Luckily the right wing has no law against aborting your manhood,
right Eunuch Rich?