It can see further back in time, and found galaxies only
half a milliard years old, but cosmological doctrine says
it took 2 milliard years to form a galaxy the size of
Milky Way. Now the A-list astrophysicists are pooping
their pants. THEY WERE WRONG!
Big Bang Theory is fucken bullshit!
Why is mainsteam media not reporting this?

On 4/16/2023 07:54, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> It can see further back in time, and found galaxies only
> half a milliard years old, but cosmological doctrine says
> it took 2 milliard years to form a galaxy the size of
> Milky Way. Now the A-list astrophysicists are pooping
> their pants. THEY WERE WRONG!
> Big Bang Theory is fucken bullshit!
> Why is mainsteam media not reporting this?
>

Okay, since mainstream media is not reporting this, where did you find
the information so that I can go read the material myself?

--

Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan

In article <46d30eebdb3859b2cf218ef1f705d6a7@dizum.com>,
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> It can see further back in time, and found galaxies only
> half a milliard years old, but cosmological doctrine says
> it took 2 milliard years to form a galaxy the size of
> Milky Way. Now the A-list astrophysicists are pooping
> their pants. THEY WERE WRONG!
> Big Bang Theory is bull!
> Why is mainsteam media not reporting this?

So it took 2 Billion years to form a galaxy and that galaxy has been
around for half a Billion years!!

In the Maths I did at Secondary School (or even In the Arithmetic I did
at Primary School), that totals 2.5 Billion years and, as the Universe
is approx 13.75 Billion years old, the problem is ............??
--
Daniel

Daniel65 wrote:
>
> So it took 2 Billion years to form a galaxy and that galaxy has been
> around for half a Billion years!!
>
> In the Maths I did at Secondary School (or even In the Arithmetic I
> did at Primary School), that totals 2.5 Billion years and, as the
> Universe is approx 13.75 Billion years old, the problem is
> ............??

Somebody is bad at maths?

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <91ae8a08-8c42-44e8-a8d0-33e597cf755en@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Nomen was using units of milliards, which I believe equal 10,000
> > years.
>
> milliards is another word for billions.

Well done Dave, it sure is... or was. As I haven't heard the word
milliards for years!

tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 17/4/23 8:57 pm:
> On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 7:48:22 PM UTC-7, The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <91ae8a08-8c42-44e8...@googlegroups.com>,
>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 4:29:48 PM UTC-7, The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <3ccf26df-9c9e-42bc...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 5:54:19 AM UTC-7, Nomen Nescio
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> It can see further back in time, and found galaxies only
>>>>>> half a milliard years old, but cosmological doctrine says
>>>>>> it took 2 milliard years to form a galaxy the size of Milky
>>>>>> Way. Now the A-list astrophysicists are pooping their
>>>>>> pants. THEY WERE WRONG! Big Bang Theory is bull! Why is
>>>>>> mainsteam media not reporting this?
>>>>>
>>>>> So we have galaxies just 5,000 years old?????? And the Milky
>>>>> Way took 20,000 years?
>>>> OH?
>>>
>>> Nomen was using units of milliards, which I believe equal 10,000
>>> years.
>> milliards is another word for billions.
>
> Which scientists use milliards? Has Doctor Who ever used that term?
>
Tim, from Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1%2C000%2C000%2C000

Quote
The term milliard can also be used to refer to 1,000,000,000; whereas
"milliard" is rarely used in English,[5] variations on this name often
appear in other languages.
End Quote
--
Daniel

Blueshirt wrote on 17/4/23 10:33 pm:
> The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <91ae8a08-8c42-44e8-a8d0-33e597cf755en@googlegroups.com>,
>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Nomen was using units of milliards, which I believe equal 10,000
>>> years.
>>
>> milliards is another word for billions.
>
> Well done Dave, it sure is... or was. As I haven't heard the word
> milliards for years!
>
Hmm! I've NEVER heard the word!
--
Daniel

Blueshirt wrote on 17/4/23 10:23 pm:
> Daniel65 wrote:
>>
>> So it took 2 Billion years to form a galaxy and that galaxy has been
>> around for half a Billion years!!
>>
>> In the Maths I did at Secondary School (or even In the Arithmetic I
>> did at Primary School), that totals 2.5 Billion years and, as the
>> Universe is approx 13.75 Billion years old, the problem is
>> ............??
>
> Somebody is bad at maths?
>
Sorry!! I was expecting an ANSWER ..... not a question!!
--
Daniel

On 4/18/2023 05:04, Daniel65 wrote:
> Blueshirt wrote on 17/4/23 10:33 pm:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <91ae8a08-8c42-44e8-a8d0-33e597cf755en@googlegroups.com>,
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Nomen was using units of milliards, which I believe equal 10,000
>>>> years.
>>>
>>> milliards is another word for billions.
>>
>> Well done Dave, it sure is... or was. As I haven't heard the word
>> milliards for years!
>>
> Hmm! I've NEVER heard the word!

It's used in French, and the only reason I know is that I took 3 years
of French in high school....30+ years ago. Other than that, I think
that's the only language that uses the word.

--

Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan

Daniel65 wrote:

> Blueshirt wrote on 17/4/23 10:23 pm:
> > Daniel65 wrote:
> > >
> > > So it took 2 Billion years to form a galaxy and that galaxy has
> > > been around for half a Billion years!!
> > >
> > > In the Maths I did at Secondary School (or even In the Arithmetic
> > > I did at Primary School), that totals 2.5 Billion years and, as
> > > the Universe is approx 13.75 Billion years old, the problem is
> > > ............??
> >
> > Somebody is bad at maths?
> >
> Sorry!! I was expecting an ANSWER ..... not a question!!

Okay,

"Somebody is bad at maths!!!!" :-)

Daniel65 wrote:

> Blueshirt wrote on 17/4/23 10:33 pm:
> > The Doctor wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <91ae8a08-8c42-44e8-a8d0-33e597cf755en@googlegroups.com>,
> >>tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Nomen was using units of milliards, which I believe equal 10,000
> > > > years.
> > >
> > > milliards is another word for billions.
> >
> > Well done Dave, it sure is... or was. As I haven't heard the word
> > milliards for years!
> >
> Hmm! I've NEVER heard the word!

You have now! Go and impress your friends and never say 'Billions'
again!

The Doctor wrote on 19/04/2023 12:15 am:
> In article <u1lptn$3g57i$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 17/4/23 8:57 pm:

<Snip>

>>> Which scientists use milliards? Has Doctor Who ever used that term?
>>>
>> Tim, from Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1%2C000%2C000%2C000
>>
>> Quote
>> The term milliard can also be used to refer to 1,000,000,000; whereas
>> "milliard" is rarely used in English,[5] variations on this name often
>> appear in other languages.
>> End Quote
>
> Thnak you!!
>
"Thnak"??
--
Daniel

Hornplayer9599 wrote on 19/04/2023 12:06 am:
> On 4/18/2023 05:04, Daniel65 wrote:
>> Blueshirt wrote on 17/4/23 10:33 pm:
>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <91ae8a08-8c42-44e8-a8d0-33e597cf755en@googlegroups.com>,
>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Nomen was using units of milliards, which I believe equal 10,000
>>>>> years.
>>>>
>>>> milliards is another word for billions.
>>>
>>> Well done Dave, it sure is... or was. As I haven't heard the word
>>> milliards for years!
>>>
>> Hmm! I've NEVER heard the word!
>
> It's used in French, and the only reason I know is that I took 3 years
> of French in high school....30+ years ago.  Other than that, I think
> that's the only language that uses the word.
>
Ah!! Well, you beat me.

1 year of French in high school .... 50+ years ago

That one year of French and Latin was used to determine if we followed a
"Languages Stream" or a "Maths/Science Stream".

Guess which way I went!! ;-P
--
Daniel

Blueshirt wrote on 19/04/2023 3:34 am:
> Daniel65 wrote:
>> Blueshirt wrote on 17/4/23 10:33 pm:
>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article
>>>> <91ae8a08-8c42-44e8-a8d0-33e597cf755en@googlegroups.com>,
>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Nomen was using units of milliards, which I believe equal 10,000
>>>>> years.
>>>>
>>>> milliards is another word for billions.
>>>
>>> Well done Dave, it sure is... or was. As I haven't heard the word
>>> milliards for years!
>>>
>> Hmm! I've NEVER heard the word!
>
> You have now! Go and impress your friends and never say 'Billions'
> again!
>
HEARD!! No, never!! READ!! Yes! ;-P
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 19/04/2023 12:16 am:
> In article <u1lqbm$3g57i$3@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> Blueshirt wrote on 17/4/23 10:23 pm:
>>> Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>
>>>> So it took 2 Billion years to form a galaxy and that galaxy has been
>>>> around for half a Billion years!!
>>>>
>>>> In the Maths I did at Secondary School (or even In the Arithmetic I
>>>> did at Primary School), that totals 2.5 Billion years and, as the
>>>> Universe is approx 13.75 Billion years old, the problem is
>>>> ............??
>>>
>>> Somebody is bad at maths?
>>>
>> Sorry!! I was expecting an ANSWER ..... not a question!!
>
> Well NN started this thread in the milliards!

No, I've not seen 'NN' (or anyone with the initials 'NN') in this thread
what-so-ever, asswipe!!
--
Daniel

Blueshirt wrote on 19/04/2023 3:34 am:
> Daniel65 wrote:
>> Blueshirt wrote on 17/4/23 10:23 pm:
>>> Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>
>>>> So it took 2 Billion years to form a galaxy and that galaxy has
>>>> been around for half a Billion years!!
>>>>
>>>> In the Maths I did at Secondary School (or even In the Arithmetic
>>>> I did at Primary School), that totals 2.5 Billion years and, as
>>>> the Universe is approx 13.75 Billion years old, the problem is
>>>> ............??
>>>
>>> Somebody is bad at maths?
>>>
>> Sorry!! I was expecting an ANSWER ..... not a question!!
>
> Okay,
>
> "Somebody is bad at maths!!!!" :-)
>
Thank you ..... but that incites another question ... "WHO is bad at
maths??" ;-P (Just so I know you don't think it's ME that is bad at
Maths!! ;-P )
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 19/4/23 10:45 pm:
> In article <u1o7ce$3vco7$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 19/04/2023 12:16 am:
>>> In article <u1lqbm$3g57i$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> Blueshirt wrote on 17/4/23 10:23 pm:
>>>>> Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So it took 2 Billion years to form a galaxy and that galaxy
>>>>>> has been around for half a Billion years!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the Maths I did at Secondary School (or even In the
>>>>>> Arithmetic I did at Primary School), that totals 2.5
>>>>>> Billion years and, as the Universe is approx 13.75 Billion
>>>>>> years old, the problem is ............??
>>>>>
>>>>> Somebody is bad at maths?
>>>>>
>>>> Sorry!! I was expecting an ANSWER ..... not a question!!
>>>
>>> Well NN started this thread in the milliards!
>>
>> No, I've not seen 'NN' (or anyone with the initials 'NN') in this
>> thread what-so-ever, asswipe!!
>
> Look for the OP Idlehands-mouth Dannyboy!

Sure, asswipe, that would be the post by Hornplayer9599 back on 16th Apr
2023, would it, asswipe??
--
Daniel

tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 19/4/23 9:37 pm:
> On Wednesday, April 19, 2023 at 1:05:37 AM UTC-7, Daniel65 wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 19/04/2023 12:16 am:
>>> In article <u1lqbm$3g57i$3...@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <dani...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> Blueshirt wrote on 17/4/23 10:23 pm:
>>>>> Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So it took 2 Billion years to form a galaxy and that galaxy
>>>>>> has been around for half a Billion years!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the Maths I did at Secondary School (or even In the
>>>>>> Arithmetic I did at Primary School), that totals 2.5
>>>>>> Billion years and, as the Universe is approx 13.75 Billion
>>>>>> years old, the problem is ............??
>>>>>
>>>>> Somebody is bad at maths?
>>>>>
>>>> Sorry!! I was expecting an ANSWER ..... not a question!!
>>>
>>> Well NN started this thread in the milliards!
>> No, I've not seen 'NN' (or anyone with the initials 'NN') in this
>> thread what-so-ever, asswipe!!
>
> Doesn't Nomen Nescio qualify as an "NN"?
>
Yes, Tim, ..... but has Nomen posted in this thread, Tim??

I'm thinking ...... *NO* !!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <u1o74j$3vco7$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
> >
> > That one year of French and Latin was used to determine if we
> > followed a "Languages Stream" or a "Maths/Science Stream".
> >
> > Guess which way I went!! ;-P
>
> Un an de francais il y a 50 ans deja?

Speak English or Die!

Daniel65 wrote:

> Blueshirt wrote on 19/04/2023 3:34 am:
> > Daniel65 wrote:
> > > Blueshirt wrote on 17/4/23 10:23 pm:
> > > > Daniel65 wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > So it took 2 Billion years to form a galaxy and that galaxy
> > > > > has been around for half a Billion years!!
> > > > >
> > > > > In the Maths I did at Secondary School (or even In the
> > > > > Arithmetic I did at Primary School), that totals 2.5 Billion
> > > > > years and, as the Universe is approx 13.75 Billion years old,
> > > > > the problem is ............??
> > > >
> > > > Somebody is bad at maths?
> > > >
> > > Sorry!! I was expecting an ANSWER ..... not a question!!
> >
> > Okay,
> >
> > "Somebody is bad at maths!!!!" :-)
> >
> Thank you ..... but that incites another question ... "WHO is bad at
> maths??" ;-P (Just so I know you don't think it's ME that is bad
> at Maths!! ;-P )

Not you!

Either the people with the big long telescope (ooh err missus) or the
people who composed the "cosmological doctrine"... but if they were
anything like the people who composed religious doctrine, then it's
most certainly them!

Daniel65 wrote:

> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 19/4/23 9:37 pm:
> > On Wednesday, April 19, 2023 at 1:05:37 AM UTC-7, Daniel65 wrote:
> > > No, I've not seen 'NN' (or anyone with the initials 'NN') in this
> > > thread what-so-ever, asswipe!!
> >
> > Doesn't Nomen Nescio qualify as an "NN"?
> >
> Yes, Tim, ..... but has Nomen posted in this thread, Tim??

Er... funnily enough, he has.

> I'm thinking ...... NO !!

I'm thinking YES! In fact, I think he was the one that started the
thread! :-)

On Wednesday, 19 April 2023 at 23:52:04 UTC+1, the asswipe
asserted:

> Let's check again!

....by Chubby Twister?

The Doctor wrote on 20/4/23 9:00 am:
> In article <u1ph9f$607h$1@dont-email.me>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <u1o74j$3vco7$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> That one year of French and Latin was used to determine if we
>>>> followed a "Languages Stream" or a "Maths/Science Stream".
>>>>
>>>> Guess which way I went!! ;-P
>>>
>>> Un an de francais il y a 50 ans deja?
>>
>> Speak English or Die!
>
> Do you know a word of Irish Gaelic?
>
How is 'Irish' 'English', asswipe??
--
Daniel

tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 20/4/23 6:03 am:
> On Wednesday, April 19, 2023 at 6:36:32 AM UTC-7, Daniel65 wrote:
>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 19/4/23 9:37 pm:
>>> On Wednesday, April 19, 2023 at 1:05:37 AM UTC-7, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 19/04/2023 12:16 am:
>>>>> In article <u1lqbm$3g57i$3...@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>> <dani...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Blueshirt wrote on 17/4/23 10:23 pm:
>>>>>>> Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So it took 2 Billion years to form a galaxy and that galaxy
>>>>>>>> has been around for half a Billion years!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In the Maths I did at Secondary School (or even In the
>>>>>>>> Arithmetic I did at Primary School), that totals 2.5
>>>>>>>> Billion years and, as the Universe is approx 13.75 Billion
>>>>>>>> years old, the problem is ............??
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Somebody is bad at maths?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry!! I was expecting an ANSWER ..... not a question!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Well NN started this thread in the milliards!
>>>> No, I've not seen 'NN' (or anyone with the initials 'NN') in this
>>>> thread what-so-ever, asswipe!!
>>>
>>> Doesn't Nomen Nescio qualify as an "NN"?
>>>
>> Yes, Tim, ..... but has Nomen posted in this thread, Tim??
>
> He started this thread, so by definition, he has posted in it!
>
As I've replied elsewhere in this thread, Tim, I see *NO* evidence of
Nomen having posted anywhere in this thread, Tim.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 20/4/23 8:51 am:
> In article <u1oqj8$2ban$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 19/4/23 10:45 pm:
>>> In article <u1o7ce$3vco7$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 19/04/2023 12:16 am:
>>>>> In article <u1lqbm$3g57i$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Blueshirt wrote on 17/4/23 10:23 pm:
>>>>>>> Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So it took 2 Billion years to form a galaxy and that
>>>>>>>> galaxy has been around for half a Billion years!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In the Maths I did at Secondary School (or even In the
>>>>>>>> Arithmetic I did at Primary School), that totals 2.5
>>>>>>>> Billion years and, as the Universe is approx 13.75
>>>>>>>> Billion years old, the problem is ............??
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Somebody is bad at maths?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry!! I was expecting an ANSWER ..... not a question!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Well NN started this thread in the milliards!
>>>>
>>>> No, I've not seen 'NN' (or anyone with the initials 'NN') in
>>>> this thread what-so-ever, asswipe!!
>>>
>>> Look for the OP Idlehands-mouth Dannyboy!
>>
>> Sure, asswipe, that would be the post by Hornplayer9599 back on
>> 16th Apr 2023, would it, asswipe??
>
> Or was it NN Idlehands-mouth Dannyboy!

Gee!! Let me check ..... Yes, OP made by Hornplayer9599 back on 16th Apr
2023 .... i.e. ....

Quote
Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!peer03.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx03.ams4.POSTED!not-for-mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0)
Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.10.0
Subject: Re: James Webb Telescope has just disproved 'science' tenets
Content-Language: en-US
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
References: <46d30eebdb3859b2cf218ef1f705d6a7@dizum.com>
From: Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <46d30eebdb3859b2cf218ef1f705d6a7@dizum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <bhS_L.4497889$WRz3.3604576@fx03.ams4>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@eweka.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2023 12:57:43 UTC
Organization: Eweka Internet Services
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2023 07:57:43 -0500
X-Received-Bytes: 1392
Xref: news.eternal-september.org rec.arts.drwho:732817
End Quote

Mind you, in that post, Hornplayer9599 did quote a message from Nomen
..... but Nomen's message did not appear in this newsgroup .... to the
best of my knowledge!!
--
Daniel