A Friend wrote:
>Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

I've cut the crosspost to newsgroups that Ubi the shithead doesn't read.

Ubi the shithead didn't write this. He plagarized. Here's a URL.

https://mustreadalaska.com/media-gave-11-times-the-coverage-to-the-attack-on-paul-pelosi-than-it-gave-attempted-assassination-of-kavanaugh/

>>With less than a week until Election Day, the liberal media is milking
>>the attack on Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband, Paul Pelosi, for all it's
>>worth, one researcher has discovered. NewsBusters, a project of the
>>Media Research Center, found that the first five days after the attack
>>on Paul Pelosi garnered 11 times the coverage on major networks, such
>>as ABC, CBS, and NBC, than the news organizations had given over the
>>same period following the attempted assassination of Supreme Court
>>Justice Brett Kavanaugh on June 8.

>The suspect in the Kavanaugh case was arrested near the Kavanaugh home.
>The suspect in the Pelosi case actually attacked and injured Paul
>Pelosi. Too bad some morons can't see the difference.

The proper comparison would have been to the coverage of the 2017 attack
on the practice session for the Congressional baseball game in which
Steve Scalise and four others were seriously injured.

On 2022-11-06 10:06 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> A Friend wrote:
>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>
> I've cut the crosspost to newsgroups that Ubi the shithead doesn't read.
>
> Ubi the shithead didn't write this. He plagarized. Here's a URL.
>
> https://mustreadalaska.com/media-gave-11-times-the-coverage-to-the-attack-on-paul-pelosi-than-it-gave-attempted-assassination-of-kavanaugh/
>
>>> With less than a week until Election Day, the liberal media is milking
>>> the attack on Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband, Paul Pelosi, for all it's
>>> worth, one researcher has discovered. NewsBusters, a project of the
>>> Media Research Center, found that the first five days after the attack
>>> on Paul Pelosi garnered 11 times the coverage on major networks, such
>>> as ABC, CBS, and NBC, than the news organizations had given over the
>>> same period following the attempted assassination of Supreme Court
>>> Justice Brett Kavanaugh on June 8.
>
>> The suspect in the Kavanaugh case was arrested near the Kavanaugh home.
>> The suspect in the Pelosi case actually attacked and injured Paul
>> Pelosi. Too bad some morons can't see the difference.
>
Kavanaugh is a sitting justice on the Supreme Court, a body whose
rulings can change people's lives dramatically. Paul Pelosi is the
*SPOUSE* of a prominent Congresscritter but not one himself. Who has
more significance in the greater scheme of things?

> The proper comparison would have been to the coverage of the 2017 attack
> on the practice session for the Congressional baseball game in which
> Steve Scalise and four others were seriously injured.

--
Rhino

In article <tk9ci2$3arnp$1@dont-email.me>, Rhino
<no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

> On 2022-11-06 10:06 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> > A Friend wrote:
> >> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
> >
> > I've cut the crosspost to newsgroups that Ubi the shithead doesn't read.
> >
> > Ubi the shithead didn't write this. He plagarized. Here's a URL.
> >
> >
> > https://mustreadalaska.com/media-gave-11-times-the-coverage-to-the-attack-on-
> > paul-pelosi-than-it-gave-attempted-assassination-of-kavanaugh/
> >
> >>> With less than a week until Election Day, the liberal media is milking
> >>> the attack on Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband, Paul Pelosi, for all it's
> >>> worth, one researcher has discovered. NewsBusters, a project of the
> >>> Media Research Center, found that the first five days after the attack
> >>> on Paul Pelosi garnered 11 times the coverage on major networks, such
> >>> as ABC, CBS, and NBC, than the news organizations had given over the
> >>> same period following the attempted assassination of Supreme Court
> >>> Justice Brett Kavanaugh on June 8.
> >
> >> The suspect in the Kavanaugh case was arrested near the Kavanaugh home.
> >> The suspect in the Pelosi case actually attacked and injured Paul
> >> Pelosi. Too bad some morons can't see the difference.
> >
> Kavanaugh is a sitting justice on the Supreme Court, a body whose
> rulings can change people's lives dramatically. Paul Pelosi is the
> *SPOUSE* of a prominent Congresscritter but not one himself. Who has
> more significance in the greater scheme of things?

Again, Kavanaugh was not assaulted, while Paul Pelosi was hit in the
head with a hammer. Brent Bozell, who's always been great at prying
money from suckers, is claiming that the coverage about this has been
biased, even though they are not the same story nor did they have the
same outcome. Bozell has offered no examples of this bias, likely
because there aren't any.

I presume by "prominent Congresscritter" you mean the Speaker of the
House.

> > The proper comparison would have been to the coverage of the 2017 attack
> > on the practice session for the Congressional baseball game in which
> > Steve Scalise and four others were seriously injured.

Not at all the same thing.

A Friend wrote:
>>On 2022-11-06 10:06 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:

>>>The proper comparison would have been to the coverage of the 2017 attack
>>>on the practice session for the Congressional baseball game in which
>>>Steve Scalise and four others were seriously injured.

>Not at all the same thing.

I have no idea why that's not the proper comparison. That got a ton of
media coverage.

In article <tk9fp5$3b80j$1@dont-email.me>, Adam H. Kerman
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

> A Friend wrote:
> >>On 2022-11-06 10:06 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>
> >>>The proper comparison would have been to the coverage of the 2017 attack
> >>>on the practice session for the Congressional baseball game in which
> >>>Steve Scalise and four others were seriously injured.
>
> >Not at all the same thing.
>
> I have no idea why that's not the proper comparison. That got a ton of
> media coverage.

It did indeed. I thought we were supposed to be comparing the
offenses, not the coverage. If not, my bad.

On 11/6/22 4:55 PM, A Friend wrote:
> In article <tk9ci2$3arnp$1@dont-email.me>, Rhino
> <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2022-11-06 10:06 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>> A Friend wrote:
>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> I've cut the crosspost to newsgroups that Ubi the shithead doesn't read.
>>>
>>> Ubi the shithead didn't write this. He plagarized. Here's a URL.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://mustreadalaska.com/media-gave-11-times-the-coverage-to-the-attack-on-
>>> paul-pelosi-than-it-gave-attempted-assassination-of-kavanaugh/
>>>
>>>>> With less than a week until Election Day, the liberal media is milking
>>>>> the attack on Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband, Paul Pelosi, for all it's
>>>>> worth, one researcher has discovered. NewsBusters, a project of the
>>>>> Media Research Center, found that the first five days after the attack
>>>>> on Paul Pelosi garnered 11 times the coverage on major networks, such
>>>>> as ABC, CBS, and NBC, than the news organizations had given over the
>>>>> same period following the attempted assassination of Supreme Court
>>>>> Justice Brett Kavanaugh on June 8.
>>>
>>>> The suspect in the Kavanaugh case was arrested near the Kavanaugh home.
>>>> The suspect in the Pelosi case actually attacked and injured Paul
>>>> Pelosi. Too bad some morons can't see the difference.
>>>
>> Kavanaugh is a sitting justice on the Supreme Court, a body whose
>> rulings can change people's lives dramatically. Paul Pelosi is the
>> *SPOUSE* of a prominent Congresscritter but not one himself. Who has
>> more significance in the greater scheme of things?
>
>
> Again, Kavanaugh was not assaulted, while Paul Pelosi was hit in the
> head with a hammer. Brent Bozell, who's always been great at prying
> money from suckers, is claiming that the coverage about this has been
> biased, even though they are not the same story nor did they have the
> same outcome. Bozell has offered no examples of this bias, likely
> because there aren't any.
>
> I presume by "prominent Congresscritter" you mean the Speaker of the
> House.

Rhino gives fucked up Canadian dipshits a bad name.

On 11/6/22 9:08 PM, A Friend wrote:
> In article <tk9fp5$3b80j$1@dont-email.me>, Adam H. Kerman
> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>
>> A Friend wrote:
>>>> On 2022-11-06 10:06 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>
>>>>> The proper comparison would have been to the coverage of the 2017 attack
>>>>> on the practice session for the Congressional baseball game in which
>>>>> Steve Scalise and four others were seriously injured.
>>
>>> Not at all the same thing.
>>
>> I have no idea why that's not the proper comparison. That got a ton of
>> media coverage.
>
>
> It did indeed. I thought we were supposed to be comparing the
> offenses, not the coverage. If not, my bad.

It's unclear if the amount of coverage is the only comparison Verman
made. He hangs out with shitposters too much and has trouble making
sense now. He's always been an asshole but previously was such a vague,
goofy one.