tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 9/5/23 6:12 pm:
> On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 4:48:41 PM UTC-7, Blueshirt wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <nnd$449d8f45$03c843b8@1808a94a90621239>, Blueshirt
>>> <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article <b985d176-85fa-490e...@googlegroups.com>, solar
>>>>> penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sunday, 7 May 2023 at 20:40:19 UTC+1, The True Doctor
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...a load of word salad.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Something's wrong with your meds, Aggy. Try to remember
>>>>>> that even though they both begin with the same letter, this
>>>>>> doesn't mean LSD can be used as a substitute for your
>>>>>> lithium.
>>>>>
>>>>> Idlehands-mouth Solar Penguin thus squawked!
>>>>
>>>> We're all on meds Dave, don't try to pretend you ain't... we
>>>> know you are!
>>>
>>> Well I do not do pharmaseudicals
>> Well I don't know what they are, but assuming you meant
>> pharmaceuticals, I'd find it strange to believe that your Usenet
>> posting is not influenced by some sort of substance.
>
> A few months ago, Yads thought that my postings were influenced by
> alcohol, so called me a bar drunk!
>
We've all been there, Tim!! ;-P
--
Daniel

tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 8/5/23 9:37 pm:
> On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 10:07:05 PM UTC-7, The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <u39ogb$3ogmn$1...@dont-email.me>,
>> The True Doctor <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>> On 08/05/2023 03:55, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:

<Snip>

>>>> Have you seen memos from progressives who oppose Whittaker?
>>>
>>> They wokies are retards, the exact opposite of being progressive.
>>>
>> And tim is very woke!
>
> Often at night.
>
I would have hoped that it was something you did, more often, in the
morning, Tim. ;-P
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 9/5/23 12:47 am:
> In article <u3ajgf$3rq4h$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 8/5/23 3:05 pm:
>>> In article
>>> <ae8691ed-5590-443a-864c-b4e5029d8d6cn@googlegroups.com>,
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 5:30:55 PM UTC-7, The Doctor
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> In article <b9fca645-148a-4055...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 2:19:45 PM UTC-7, The True
>>>>>> Doctor wrote:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>>>>>> After Chibnall and the Timeless Child monster no one
>>>>>>> gives a stuff about Doctor Who any more.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why didn't the wokist Coronation Committee make sure to
>>>>>> include a wokist Whittaker at the Coronation?
>>>>> Are you that stupid tim Bruening?
>>>>
>>>> Have you seen memos from progressives who oppose Whittaker?
>>>
>>> What is the connection timwit?
>>>
>> YOU *HATE* Tim, don't YOU, asswipe?? He can do nothing right, can
>> he, asswipe??
>>
>> Why don't YOU, asswipe, just kill-file him .... to save the rest of
>> us from having to continue reading YOUR incessant BITCHING about
>> Tim, asswipe??
>>
>> Oh!! Right!! Of course!! If YOU, asswipe, were to kill-file Tim,
>> that'd break the Internet, wouldn't it, asswipe??
>
> So Idlehands-mouth Dannyboy, you amd me both!

"amd"?? Are they a Computer CPU developer or something??

Sorry, asswipe, "you amd me both" .... WHAT, asswipe??

Why don't YOU, asswipe, just kill-file him .... to save the rest of us
from having to continue reading YOUR incessant BITCHING about Tim, asswipe??

Oh!! Right!! Of course!! If YOU, asswipe, were to kill-file Tim, that'd
break the Internet, wouldn't it, asswipe??
--
Daniel

Blueshirt wrote on 9/5/23 4:56 am:
> The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <nnd$5e64cdcb$1406bad5@667009c469a4b195>, Blueshirt
>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>> On 07/05/2023 22:27, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> How will the BBC KNOW why you are boycotting them if you
>>>>> don't send them a letter?
>>>>
>>>> Did you bother to read what I said? The BBC will know just
>>>> like Gillette which lost $5 billion, and just like Disney which
>>>> has seen its shares tumbling.
>>>
>>> Well... if just one person out of the UK population of 65
>>> million didn't watch the BBC I'm not sure the BBC would either
>>> know or care.
>>>
>>> Unless the person running the BBC is a psychic...
>>
>> Depends on the profit and loss sheet!
>
> Yes Dave, I understand that, but you clearly don't understand what I
> said. (Do you ever comprehend anything in plain English, I wonder?)

"plain English" ... there's your problem .... The asswipe doesn't use
"plain English", he uses Yank English!!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <u3d741$80h6$2@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
> > tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 9/5/23 6:12 pm:
> >>
> >> A few months ago, Yads thought that my postings were influenced by
> >> alcohol, so called me a bar drunk!
> >>
> > We've all been there, Tim!! ;-P
>
> Become teetotalers!

Tea is great, even more so with a tot of Whiskey added ... !

solar penguin wrote:

> On Monday, 8 May 2023 at 20:08:18 UTC+1, Blueshirt wrote:
> > The Doctor wrote:
> >
> > > In article <b985d176-85fa-490e...@googlegroups.com>,
> > > solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, 7 May 2023 at 20:40:19 UTC+1, The True Doctor wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ...a load of word salad.
> > > >
> > > > Something's wrong with your meds, Aggy. Try to remember that
> > > > even though they both begin with the same letter, this doesn't
> > > > mean LSD can be used as a substitute for your lithium.
> > >
> > > Idlehands-mouth Solar Penguin thus squawked!
> >
> > We're all on meds Dave, don't try to pretend you ain't... we know
> > you are!
>
> If he's not, then he should be!

Oh, he is. Most definitely!

tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:

> On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 4:48:41 PM UTC-7, Blueshirt wrote:
> > The Doctor wrote:
> >
> > > In article <nnd$449d8f45$03c843b8@1808a94a90621239>,
> > > Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > We're all on meds Dave, don't try to pretend you ain't... we
> > > > know you are!
> > >
> > > Well I do not do pharmaseudicals
> >
> > Well I don't know what they are, but assuming you meant
> > pharmaceuticals, I'd find it strange to believe that your Usenet
> > posting is not influenced by some sort of substance.
>
> A few months ago, Yads thought that my postings were influenced by
> alcohol, so called me a bar drunk!

Dave is very good at calling people names... I reckon it's all based on
his own experiences. So I think he is at home what he accuses others of
being!

Deflecting is what Dave does.

The Doctor wrote on 10/05/2023 12:11 am:
> In article <u3d741$80h6$2@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 9/5/23 6:12 pm:
>>> On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 4:48:41 PM UTC-7, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article <nnd$449d8f45$03c843b8@1808a94a90621239>, Blueshirt
>>>>> <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <b985d176-85fa-490e...@googlegroups.com>, solar
>>>>>>> penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sunday, 7 May 2023 at 20:40:19 UTC+1, The True Doctor
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...a load of word salad.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Something's wrong with your meds, Aggy. Try to remember
>>>>>>>> that even though they both begin with the same letter, this
>>>>>>>> doesn't mean LSD can be used as a substitute for your
>>>>>>>> lithium.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Idlehands-mouth Solar Penguin thus squawked!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We're all on meds Dave, don't try to pretend you ain't... we
>>>>>> know you are!
>>>>>
>>>>> Well I do not do pharmaseudicals
>>>> Well I don't know what they are, but assuming you meant
>>>> pharmaceuticals, I'd find it strange to believe that your Usenet
>>>> posting is not influenced by some sort of substance.
>>>
>>> A few months ago, Yads thought that my postings were influenced by
>>> alcohol, so called me a bar drunk!
>>>
>> We've all been there, Tim!! ;-P
>
> Become teetotalers!

Why do YOU, asswipe, want us all to become Golfers, asswipe??
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 10/05/2023 12:10 pm:
> In article <969260f5-623f-4355-8f70-8151dff33e28n@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tuesday, May 9, 2023 at 7:02:21 AM UTC-7, The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <01f9fd3e-0c93-400b...@googlegroups.com>,
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 4:48:41 PM UTC-7, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>> The Doctor wrote:

<Snip>

>>>>>> Well I do not do pharmaseudicals
>>>>> Well I don't know what they are, but assuming you meant
>>>>> pharmaceuticals, I'd find it strange to believe that your
>>>>> Usenet posting is not influenced by some sort of substance.
>>>>
>>>> A few months ago, Yads thought that my postings were influenced
>>>> by alcohol, so called me a bar drunk!
>>> And they still are!
>>
>> How can you tell?
>
> By the way you disregards tohers in rec.arts.drwho .
>
"tohers"?? Spell-checker, asswipe, spell-checker!!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 10/05/2023 12:14 am:
> In article <u3d7ut$80h6$5@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> Blueshirt wrote on 9/5/23 4:56 am:

<Snip>

>>> Yes Dave, I understand that, but you clearly don't understand
>>> what I said. (Do you ever comprehend anything in plain English, I
>>> wonder?)
>>
>> "plain English" ... there's your problem .... The asswipe doesn't
>> use "plain English", he uses Yank English!!
>
> Spell labour correctly IDlehands-mouth Dannyboy!

In what context, asswipe??

You can *labour* the point, asswipe, if YOU, asswipe, wanted, but if
YOU, asswipe, were to join the Australian *Labor* Party it wouldn't
matter, asswipe!!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 11/5/23 12:57 am:
> In article <u3foiu$l403$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 10/05/2023 12:11 am:
>>> In article <u3d741$80h6$2@dont-email.me>,
>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 9/5/23 6:12 pm:
>>>>> On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 4:48:41 PM UTC-7, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <nnd$449d8f45$03c843b8@1808a94a90621239>, Blueshirt
>>>>>>> <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <b985d176-85fa-490e...@googlegroups.com>, solar
>>>>>>>>> penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, 7 May 2023 at 20:40:19 UTC+1, The True Doctor
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ...a load of word salad.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Something's wrong with your meds, Aggy. Try to remember
>>>>>>>>>> that even though they both begin with the same letter, this
>>>>>>>>>> doesn't mean LSD can be used as a substitute for your
>>>>>>>>>> lithium.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Idlehands-mouth Solar Penguin thus squawked!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We're all on meds Dave, don't try to pretend you ain't... we
>>>>>>>> know you are!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well I do not do pharmaseudicals
>>>>>> Well I don't know what they are, but assuming you meant
>>>>>> pharmaceuticals, I'd find it strange to believe that your Usenet
>>>>>> posting is not influenced by some sort of substance.
>>>>>
>>>>> A few months ago, Yads thought that my postings were influenced by
>>>>> alcohol, so called me a bar drunk!
>>>>>
>>>> We've all been there, Tim!! ;-P
>>>
>>> Become teetotalers!
>>
>> Why do YOU, asswipe, want us all to become Golfers, asswipe??
>
> Golfers Idlehands-mouth Dannyboy?

Yes, asswipe, ..... who else would use a 'tee', asswipe??
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 11/5/23 12:57 am:
> In article <u3forf$l403$2@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 10/05/2023 12:10 pm:
>>> In article <969260f5-623f-4355-8f70-8151dff33e28n@googlegroups.com>,
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, May 9, 2023 at 7:02:21 AM UTC-7, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article <01f9fd3e-0c93-400b...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 4:48:41 PM UTC-7, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>>>>>>> Well I do not do pharmaseudicals
>>>>>>> Well I don't know what they are, but assuming you meant
>>>>>>> pharmaceuticals, I'd find it strange to believe that your
>>>>>>> Usenet posting is not influenced by some sort of substance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A few months ago, Yads thought that my postings were influenced
>>>>>> by alcohol, so called me a bar drunk!
>>>>> And they still are!
>>>>
>>>> How can you tell?
>>>
>>> By the way you disregards tohers in rec.arts.drwho .
>>>
>> "tohers"?? Spell-checker, asswipe, spell-checker!!
>> --
>> Daniel
>
> Or eyes sharp Idlehands-mouth Dannyboy!
>
Gobble-de-gook .... AGAIN!!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 11/5/23 12:58 am:
> In article <u3fpvd$la3l$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 10/05/2023 12:14 am:
>>> In article <u3d7ut$80h6$5@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> Blueshirt wrote on 9/5/23 4:56 am:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>>>> Yes Dave, I understand that, but you clearly don't understand
>>>>> what I said. (Do you ever comprehend anything in plain English, I
>>>>> wonder?)
>>>>
>>>> "plain English" ... there's your problem .... The asswipe doesn't
>>>> use "plain English", he uses Yank English!!
>>>
>>> Spell labour correctly IDlehands-mouth Dannyboy!
>>
>> In what context, asswipe??
>>
>> You can *labour* the point, asswipe, if YOU, asswipe, wanted, but if
>> YOU, asswipe, were to join the Australian *Labor* Party it wouldn't
>> matter, asswipe!!
>
> So much for spelling Idlehands-mouth Dannyboy!

Yes, asswipe, "spelling" .... something else YOU, asswipe, fail at
miserably, asswipe!!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 11/5/23 9:42 pm:
> In article <u3igrh$12oqt$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 11/5/23 12:57 am:
>>> In article <u3foiu$l403$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 10/05/2023 12:11 am:
>>>>> In article <u3d741$80h6$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 9/5/23 6:12 pm:

<Snip>

>>>>>>> A few months ago, Yads thought that my postings were
>>>>>>> influenced by alcohol, so called me a bar drunk!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> We've all been there, Tim!! ;-P
>>>>>
>>>>> Become teetotalers!
>>>>
>>>> Why do YOU, asswipe, want us all to become Golfers, asswipe??
>>>
>>> Golfers Idlehands-mouth Dannyboy?
>>
>> Yes, asswipe, ..... who else would use a 'tee', asswipe??
>
> You must be drunk to say that Idlehands-mouth Dannyboy!

Well, of course I was not drunk, asswipe ..... as I didn't say a word
whilst I was typing my last post, asswipe!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 11/5/23 9:43 pm:
> In article <u3ih1j$12oqt$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 11/5/23 12:58 am:
>>> In article <u3fpvd$la3l$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 10/05/2023 12:14 am:
>>>>> In article <u3d7ut$80h6$5@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Blueshirt wrote on 9/5/23 4:56 am:
>>>>
>>>> <Snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes Dave, I understand that, but you clearly don't
>>>>>>> understand what I said. (Do you ever comprehend anything
>>>>>>> in plain English, I wonder?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "plain English" ... there's your problem .... The asswipe
>>>>>> doesn't use "plain English", he uses Yank English!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Spell labour correctly IDlehands-mouth Dannyboy!
>>>>
>>>> In what context, asswipe??
>>>>
>>>> You can *labour* the point, asswipe, if YOU, asswipe, wanted,
>>>> but if YOU, asswipe, were to join the Australian *Labor* Party
>>>> it wouldn't matter, asswipe!!
>>>
>>> So much for spelling Idlehands-mouth Dannyboy!
>>
>> Yes, asswipe, "spelling" .... something else YOU, asswipe, fail at
>> miserably, asswipe!!
>
> As I was saying about misspelling LAbour Idlehands-mouth Dannyboy!

I give up, asswipe, as I've never knowingly heard YOU, asswipe, say a
single word, asswipe!!
--
Daniel

tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 12/5/23 9:58 pm:
> On Wednesday, May 10, 2023 at 3:00:17 AM UTC-7, Daniel65 wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 10/05/2023 12:14 am:
>>> In article <u3d7ut$80h6$5...@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <dani...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> Blueshirt wrote on 9/5/23 4:56 am:
>> <Snip>
>>>>> Yes Dave, I understand that, but you clearly don't understand
>>>>> what I said. (Do you ever comprehend anything in plain English, I
>>>>> wonder?)
>>>>
>>>> "plain English" ... there's your problem .... The asswipe doesn't
>>>> use "plain English", he uses Yank English!!
>>>
>>> Spell labour correctly IDlehands-mouth Dannyboy!
>> In what context, asswipe??
>>
>> You can *labour* the point, asswipe, if YOU, asswipe, wanted, but if
>> YOU, asswipe, were to join the Australian *Labor* Party it wouldn't
>> matter, asswipe!!
>
> Why does Yads want to join the Australian Labor Party?
>
I don't know, Tim, and what's more, I could care less!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 13/5/23 8:05 am:
> In article <ed9749d2-1fb9-477e-8095-1df388621848n@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Friday, May 12, 2023 at 7:12:28 AM UTC-7, The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <73f34b3d-fa5e-495e...@googlegroups.com>,
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, May 10, 2023 at 3:00:17 AM UTC-7, Daniel65
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 10/05/2023 12:14 am:
>>>>>> In article <u3d7ut$80h6$5...@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>>> <dani...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> Blueshirt wrote on 9/5/23 4:56 am:
>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>>> Yes Dave, I understand that, but you clearly don't
>>>>>>>> understand what I said. (Do you ever comprehend
>>>>>>>> anything in plain English, I wonder?)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "plain English" ... there's your problem .... The asswipe
>>>>>>> doesn't use "plain English", he uses Yank English!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Spell labour correctly IDlehands-mouth Dannyboy!
>>>>> In what context, asswipe??
>>>>>
>>>>> You can *labour* the point, asswipe, if YOU, asswipe, wanted,
>>>>> but if YOU, asswipe, were to join the Australian *Labor*
>>>>> Party it wouldn't matter, asswipe!!
>>>>
>>>> Why does Yads want to join the Australian Labor Party?
>>> Never! No to socialism!
>>
>> What procedures do you undertake when you need health care?
>
> We got it as part of th citizn's package!
>
"th"?? "citizn"??

Would that be as part of CANADIAN citizn (sp??) or as part of
English/British citizn (sp??) package, asswipe??
--
Daniel

Daniel65 wrote on 13/5/23 9:52 pm:
> The Doctor wrote on 13/5/23 8:05 am:
>> In article <ed9749d2-1fb9-477e-8095-1df388621848n@googlegroups.com>,
>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Friday, May 12, 2023 at 7:12:28 AM UTC-7, The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <73f34b3d-fa5e-495e...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Wednesday, May 10, 2023 at 3:00:17 AM UTC-7, Daniel65
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 10/05/2023 12:14 am:
>>>>>>> In article <u3d7ut$80h6$5...@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>>>> <dani...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Blueshirt wrote on 9/5/23 4:56 am:
>>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>>>> Yes Dave, I understand that, but you clearly don't
>>>>>>>>> understand what I said. (Do you ever comprehend
>>>>>>>>> anything in plain English, I wonder?)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "plain English" ... there's your problem .... The asswipe
>>>>>>>> doesn't use "plain English", he uses Yank English!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Spell labour correctly IDlehands-mouth Dannyboy!
>>>>>> In what context, asswipe??
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can *labour* the point, asswipe, if YOU, asswipe, wanted,
>>>>>> but if YOU, asswipe, were to join the Australian *Labor*
>>>>>> Party it wouldn't matter, asswipe!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Why does Yads want to join the Australian Labor Party?
>>>> Never! No to socialism!
>>>
>>> What procedures do you undertake when you need health care?
>>
>> We got it as part of th citizn's package!
>>
> "th"?? "citizn"??
>
> Would that be as part of CANADIAN citizn (sp??) or as part of
> English/British citizn (sp??) package, asswipe??

Waiting!!~ Waiting!
--
Daniel

tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 15/5/23 7:15 pm:
> On Sunday, May 14, 2023 at 3:55:57 PM UTC-7, The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <ea15b7aa-5856-4348...@googlegroups.com>,
>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 4:05:08 PM UTC-7, The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <ceee89a7-6b12-46e6...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:

<Snip>

>>>>> What do you do when you visit the doctor's office? Do you present
>>>>> anything to the office personnel? Do you fork over any cash? Do you
>>>>> present any cards? Do you present any credit cards?
>>>> Just your health care card!
>>>
>>> So no money needed?
>> Correct!
>
> How is that trick managed?
>
I'm guessing it's all covered by Taxes, etc., Tim. Here, in Australia,
we have a similar situation (System call 'Medicare'
[https://www.health.gov.au/topics/medicare] ) where all the basic
medical costs are covered by our Federal Government .... but if you want
something over and above the basics (going to a particular Doctor,
advanced surgery, etc.), then you can expect to have to pay more. Or
your private Medical Insurance company pays the costs for you ... after
you've paid their monthly/yearly fees!!
--
Daniel

tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:

> On Monday, May 15, 2023 at 3:26:53 AM UTC-7, Daniel65 wrote:
> > I'm guessing it's all covered by Taxes, etc., Tim. Here, in
> > Australia, we have a similar situation (System call 'Medicare'
> > [https://www.health.gov.au/topics/medicare] ) where all the basic
> > medical costs are covered by our Federal Government .... but if you
> > want something over and above the basics (going to a particular
> > Doctor, advanced surgery, etc.), then you can expect to have to pay
> > more. Or your private Medical Insurance company pays the costs for
> > you ... after you've paid their monthly/yearly fees!!
>
> So Yads benefits from socialized medicine?

There's definitely medicine involved somewhere...

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <u3tskd$34cav$1@dont-email.me>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> On Monday, May 15, 2023 at 3:26:53 AM UTC-7, Daniel65 wrote:
> >> > I'm guessing it's all covered by Taxes, etc., Tim. Here, in
> >> > Australia, we have a similar situation (System call 'Medicare'
> >> > [https://www.health.gov.au/topics/medicare] ) where all the basic
> >> > medical costs are covered by our Federal Government .... but if you
> >> > want something over and above the basics (going to a particular
> >> > Doctor, advanced surgery, etc.), then you can expect to have to pay
> >> > more. Or your private Medical Insurance company pays the costs for
> >> > you ... after you've paid their monthly/yearly fees!!
> >>
> >> So Yads benefits from socialized medicine?
> >
> > There's definitely medicine involved somewhere...
>
> And in Ireland?

Please don't come here. EVER!

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <nnd$6a1ec433$29db982c@fa5367967c4e824c>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > The Doctor wrote:
> >>
> >> And in Ireland?
> >
> > Please don't come here. EVER!
>
> NI seems to have settled down!

Ireland is the whole Island...

So please don't come to any of it!

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <nnd$6d99095b$12eed629@e12bf2c44c180e30>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > The Doctor wrote:
> >
> >> In article <nnd$6a1ec433$29db982c@fa5367967c4e824c>,
> >> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> >> > The Doctor wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> And in Ireland?
> >> >
> >> > Please don't come here. EVER!
> >>
> >> NI seems to have settled down!
> >
> > Ireland is the whole Island...
> >
> > So please don't come to any of it!
>
> At least border guards exist between the North and the rest.

Clearly you are very well educated... <rolls eyes>

There is no physical border and there is no guards.

Blueshirt wrote on 17/05/2023 12:54 am:
> Daniel65 wrote:
>> Blueshirt wrote on 16/5/23 10:20 am:
>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <nnd$6d99095b$12eed629@e12bf2c44c180e30>, Blueshirt
>>>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NI seems to have settled down!
>>>>>
>>>>> Ireland is the whole Island...
>>>>>
>>>>> So please don't come to any of it!
>>>>
>>>> At least border guards exist between the North and the rest.
>>>
>>> Clearly you are very well educated... <rolls eyes>
>>>
>>> There is no physical border and there are no guards.
>>>
>> .... and there by part of the Brexit problem!! ;-P
>
> There's no problem... give us our country back and Brexit will work
> fine. The sea makes a perfect boundary.
>
So that would make you a Unionist, wouldn't it, Blueshirt?? ;-P
--
Daniel

Daniel65 wrote:

> Blueshirt wrote on 17/05/2023 12:54 am:
> > Daniel65 wrote:
> > > Blueshirt wrote on 16/5/23 10:20 am:
> > > >
> > > > There is no physical border and there are no guards.
> > > >
> > > .... and there by part of the Brexit problem!! ;-P
> >
> > There's no problem... give us our country back and Brexit will work
> > fine. The sea makes a perfect boundary.
> >
> So that would make you a Unionist, wouldn't it, Blueshirt?? ;-P

Of course, an Irish Unionist...

Anyone in Ireland who wants to be British can go over to Great Britain and
live, it's a separate island!