"60 Minutes Australia" posted a teaser for a Sunday segment about parents
raising "theybies," and it's garnering a big reaction online.

The program's official Twitter account restricted commenting on the post,
which they shared Wednesday, but plenty of outraged people were retweeting
the clip and providing their reactions anyway.

The video caption says, "Meet the 'theybies'. Not baby boys, not baby girls.
SUNDAY on #60Mins, the new parenting trend letting young children choose
their own gender." In the accompanying clip, multiple parents can be heard
defending their decision to ignore their baby's sex and raise them with
"they/them" pronouns, which the show dubbed "gender creative parenting."

One parent said in the clip, "We didn't assign a gender at birth. ... We're
not trying to eliminate gender, we're just really helping kids find their own
path to it."

"I'm letting this little person be who they want to be," another interviewee
from the preview said.

Twitter users reacted strongly to the tweet, which as of Thursday morning had
more than 7.1 million views.

Meet the 'theybies'. Not baby boys, not baby girls. SUNDAY on
#60Mins, the new parenting trend letting young children choose
their own gender.
pic.twitter.com/wPLc4w4ql8

-- 60 Minutes Australia (@60Mins) March 29, 2023

"Meet the parents who think their 'theybies' are gender-neutral playthings,
to abuse & confuse, no doubt leaving them mentally ill for life. Obviously,
the replies have been switched off ...," U.K.-based journalist Martin Daubney
wrote.

"This is what a cult looks like," another person observed.

"Munchausen syndrome by proxy is a mental illness and a form of child abuse,"
a third commenter noted. "The caretaker of a child, either makes up fake
symptoms or causes real symptoms to make it look like the child is sick."

"This is a form of child abuse," Lila Rose wrote. "Parents relentlessly
denying basic reality to a young, impressionable child, which can lead to
extreme lifelong confusion and social trauma."

Raising gender-neutral babies, dubbed "theybies," has been a parenting
"trend" since 2018, as The Daily Wire previously reported. These parents
often can't maintain the gender-free existence they're pursuing once the
child begins attending school or interacting with people in other social
settings.

"Once your child meets the outer world, which may be day care, or preschool,
or grandparents -- it's pretty much impossible to maintain a gender-free
state," a professor told NBC of the trend. "And depending on how conventional
your community is, you could be setting your child up for bullying or
exclusion."

--
Let's go Brandon!

In article <u045fo$t91b$1@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

> "60 Minutes Australia" posted a teaser for a Sunday segment about parents
> raising "theybies," and it's garnering a big reaction online.
>
> The program's official Twitter account restricted commenting on the post,
> which they shared Wednesday, but plenty of outraged people were retweeting
> the clip and providing their reactions anyway.
>
> The video caption says, "Meet the 'theybies'. Not baby boys, not baby girls.
> SUNDAY on #60Mins, the new parenting trend letting young children choose
> their own gender." In the accompanying clip, multiple parents can be heard
> defending their decision to ignore their baby's sex and raise them with
> "they/them" pronouns, which the show dubbed "gender creative parenting".
>
> One parent said in the clip, "We didn't assign a gender at birth. ... We're
> not trying to eliminate gender, we're just really helping kids find their own
> path to it."
>
> "I'm letting this little person be who they want to be," another interviewee
> from the preview said.
>
> Twitter users reacted strongly to the tweet, which as of Thursday morning had
> more than 7.1 million views.
>
> "Meet the parents who think their 'theybies' are gender-neutral playthings,
> to abuse & confuse, no doubt leaving them mentally ill for life. Obviously,
> the replies have been switched off ...," U.K.-based journalist Martin Daubney
> wrote.
>
> "This is what a cult looks like," another person observed.
>
> "Munchausen syndrome by proxy is a mental illness and a form of child abuse,"
> a third commenter noted. "The caretaker of a child, either makes up fake
> symptoms or causes real symptoms to make it look like the child is sick."
>
> "This is a form of child abuse," Lila Rose wrote. "Parents relentlessly
> denying basic reality to a young, impressionable child, which can lead to
> extreme lifelong confusion and social trauma."
>
> Raising gender-neutral babies, dubbed "theybies," has been a parenting
> "trend" since 2018

It's a trend now but sometime in the not-to-distant future it'll be a
government requirement which you will break at your own peril. It will
become child abuse to raise your child as a boy or a girl. That's where
this shit is going. Mark my words.

On 3/30/2023 12:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <u045fo$t91b$1@dont-email.me>,
> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>
>> "60 Minutes Australia" posted a teaser for a Sunday segment about parents
>> raising "theybies," and it's garnering a big reaction online.
>>
>> The program's official Twitter account restricted commenting on the post,
>> which they shared Wednesday, but plenty of outraged people were retweeting
>> the clip and providing their reactions anyway.
>>
>> The video caption says, "Meet the 'theybies'. Not baby boys, not baby girls.
>> SUNDAY on #60Mins, the new parenting trend letting young children choose
>> their own gender." In the accompanying clip, multiple parents can be heard
>> defending their decision to ignore their baby's sex and raise them with
>> "they/them" pronouns, which the show dubbed "gender creative parenting".
>>
>> One parent said in the clip, "We didn't assign a gender at birth. ... We're
>> not trying to eliminate gender, we're just really helping kids find their own
>> path to it."
>>
>> "I'm letting this little person be who they want to be," another interviewee
>> from the preview said.
>>
>> Twitter users reacted strongly to the tweet, which as of Thursday morning had
>> more than 7.1 million views.
>>
>> "Meet the parents who think their 'theybies' are gender-neutral playthings,
>> to abuse & confuse, no doubt leaving them mentally ill for life. Obviously,
>> the replies have been switched off ...," U.K.-based journalist Martin Daubney
>> wrote.
>>
>> "This is what a cult looks like," another person observed.
>>
>> "Munchausen syndrome by proxy is a mental illness and a form of child abuse,"
>> a third commenter noted. "The caretaker of a child, either makes up fake
>> symptoms or causes real symptoms to make it look like the child is sick."
>>
>> "This is a form of child abuse," Lila Rose wrote. "Parents relentlessly
>> denying basic reality to a young, impressionable child, which can lead to
>> extreme lifelong confusion and social trauma."
>>
>> Raising gender-neutral babies, dubbed "theybies," has been a parenting
>> "trend" since 2018
>
> It's a trend now but sometime in the not-to-distant future it'll be a
> government requirement which you will break at your own peril. It will
> become child abuse to raise your child as a boy or a girl. That's where
> this shit is going. Mark my words.

That won't happen, because parents ultimately believe science. But if
it did, lots of religions would be naming "gender-rearing" a sacrament.

> moviePig
> > BTR1701
> > > Ubiquitous
> > >
> > > Raising gender-neutral babies, dubbed "theybies," has been a parenting
> > > "trend" since 2018
> >
> > It's a trend now but sometime in the not-to-distant future it'll be a
> > government requirement which you will break at your own peril. It will
> > become child abuse to raise your child as a boy or a girl. That's where
> > this shit is going. Mark my words.
>
> That won't happen,

https://i.postimg.cc/7Z0LwsVS/1549083619111.jpg

On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 3:22:26 PM UTC-4, moviePig wrote:
> On 3/30/2023 12:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <u045fo$t91b$1...@dont-email.me>,
> > Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
> >
> >> "60 Minutes Australia" posted a teaser for a Sunday segment about parents
> >> raising "theybies," and it's garnering a big reaction online.

> > It's a trend now but sometime in the not-to-distant future it'll be a
> > government requirement which you will break at your own peril. It will
> > become child abuse to raise your child as a boy or a girl. That's where
> > this shit is going. Mark my words.

> That won't happen, because parents ultimately believe science. But if

The vast majority of human parents across the globe believe a Sky God messiah who created them in its image is going to save them despite the lack of any empirical scientific data.

> it did, lots of religions would be naming "gender-rearing" a sacrament.

The vast majority of human parents across the globe have never really read or studied their holy text, but goddamnit they watch a lot of television and read a lot of social media.

-------------

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkXNEmtf9tk

On 3/30/2023 3:36 PM, Ed Stasiak wrote:
>> moviePig
>>> BTR1701
>>>> Ubiquitous
>>>>
>>>> Raising gender-neutral babies, dubbed "theybies," has been a parenting
>>>> "trend" since 2018
>>>
>>> It's a trend now but sometime in the not-to-distant future it'll be a
>>> government requirement which you will break at your own peril. It will
>>> become child abuse to raise your child as a boy or a girl. That's where
>>> this shit is going. Mark my words.
>>
>> That won't happen,
>
> https://i.postimg.cc/7Z0LwsVS/1549083619111.jpg

Yes, but *this* the government would have to do *openly*.

On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 4:33:25 PM UTC-4, moviePig wrote:
> On 3/30/2023 3:36 PM, Ed Stasiak wrote:
> >> moviePig
> >>> BTR1701
> >>>> Ubiquitous
> >>>>
> >>>> Raising gender-neutral babies, dubbed "theybies," has been a parenting
> >>>> "trend" since 2018
> >>>
> >>> It's a trend now but sometime in the not-to-distant future it'll be a
> >>> government requirement which you will break at your own peril. It will
> >>> become child abuse to raise your child as a boy or a girl. That's where
> >>> this shit is going. Mark my words.
> >>
> >> That won't happen,
> >
> > https://i.postimg.cc/7Z0LwsVS/1549083619111.jpg

> Yes, but *this* the government would have to do *openly*.

By openly you mean like for 4 years on social media and MSM news repeating Russian interference in US election until nearly everyone believed and acted like it was true, when the reality was, the Israelis were the ones interfering?

Openly, like that?

On 3/30/2023 3:41 PM, chromebook test wrote:
> On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 3:22:26 PM UTC-4, moviePig wrote:
>> On 3/30/2023 12:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <u045fo$t91b$1...@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
>>> <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "60 Minutes Australia" posted a teaser for a Sunday segment
>>>> about parents raising "theybies," and it's garnering a big
>>>> reaction online.
>
>
>>> It's a trend now but sometime in the not-to-distant future it'll
>>> be a government requirement which you will break at your own
>>> peril. It will become child abuse to raise your child as a boy or
>>> a girl. That's where this shit is going. Mark my words.
>
>
>> That won't happen, because parents ultimately believe science. But
>> if
>
> The vast majority of human parents across the globe believe a Sky God
> messiah who created them in its image is going to save them despite
> the lack of any empirical scientific data.
>
>> it did, lots of religions would be naming "gender-rearing" a
>> sacrament.
>
> The vast majority of human parents across the globe have never really
> read or studied their holy text, but goddamnit they watch a lot of
> television and read a lot of social media.

But, despite all the Woke-Watchers on this n.g., parents (and everyone
who spends time with kids) know that true "gender dysphoria" is a really
long-shot diagnosis, and they'll take all reasonable measures to allow
little Riley to start with the bathroom that Nature apparently intended.

On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 4:47:49 PM UTC-4, moviePig wrote:
> On 3/30/2023 3:41 PM, chromebook test wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 3:22:26 PM UTC-4, moviePig wrote:
> >> On 3/30/2023 12:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> In article <u045fo$t91b$1...@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
> >>> <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> "60 Minutes Australia" posted a teaser for a Sunday segment
> >>>> about parents raising "theybies," and it's garnering a big
> >>>> reaction online.
> >
> >
> >>> It's a trend now but sometime in the not-to-distant future it'll
> >>> be a government requirement which you will break at your own
> >>> peril. It will become child abuse to raise your child as a boy or
> >>> a girl. That's where this shit is going. Mark my words.
> >
> >
> >> That won't happen, because parents ultimately believe science. But
> >> if
> >
> > The vast majority of human parents across the globe believe a Sky God
> > messiah who created them in its image is going to save them despite
> > the lack of any empirical scientific data.
> >
> >> it did, lots of religions would be naming "gender-rearing" a
> >> sacrament.
> >
> > The vast majority of human parents across the globe have never really
> > read or studied their holy text, but goddamnit they watch a lot of
> > television and read a lot of social media.

> But, despite all the Woke-Watchers on this n.g., parents (and everyone
> who spends time with kids) know that true "gender dysphoria" is a really
> long-shot diagnosis, and they'll take all reasonable measures to allow
> little Riley to start with the bathroom that Nature apparently intended.

When believers realize during the rapture, their dick will essentially fall off, many believers will say, hell no we won't go. (1) (2) (3)

Course, the promise of free virgins in paradise does have a certain appeal.

1) sex outside marriage is a sin

2) no marriage in heaven

3) a new body, and a new dick ?

4) and war broke out in heaven

tags: I'm rambling and laughing !

On 3/30/2023 4:55 PM, chromebook test wrote:
> On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 4:47:49 PM UTC-4, moviePig wrote:
>> On 3/30/2023 3:41 PM, chromebook test wrote:
>>> On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 3:22:26 PM UTC-4, moviePig wrote:
>>>> On 3/30/2023 12:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <u045fo$t91b$1...@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
>>>>> <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "60 Minutes Australia" posted a teaser for a Sunday segment
>>>>>> about parents raising "theybies," and it's garnering a big
>>>>>> reaction online.
>>>
>>>
>>>>> It's a trend now but sometime in the not-to-distant future it'll
>>>>> be a government requirement which you will break at your own
>>>>> peril. It will become child abuse to raise your child as a boy or
>>>>> a girl. That's where this shit is going. Mark my words.
>>>
>>>
>>>> That won't happen, because parents ultimately believe science. But
>>>> if
>>>
>>> The vast majority of human parents across the globe believe a Sky God
>>> messiah who created them in its image is going to save them despite
>>> the lack of any empirical scientific data.
>>>
>>>> it did, lots of religions would be naming "gender-rearing" a
>>>> sacrament.
>>>
>>> The vast majority of human parents across the globe have never really
>>> read or studied their holy text, but goddamnit they watch a lot of
>>> television and read a lot of social media.
>
>
>
>> But, despite all the Woke-Watchers on this n.g., parents (and everyone
>> who spends time with kids) know that true "gender dysphoria" is a really
>> long-shot diagnosis, and they'll take all reasonable measures to allow
>> little Riley to start with the bathroom that Nature apparently intended.
>
>
> When believers realize during the rapture, their dick will essentially fall off, many believers will say, hell no we won't go. (1) (2) (3)
>
> Course, the promise of free virgins in paradise does have a certain appeal.
>
>
>
> 1) sex outside marriage is a sin
>
> 2) no marriage in heaven
>
> 3) a new body, and a new dick ?
>
> 4) and war broke out in heaven
>
>
> tags: I'm rambling and laughing !

I'm wondering if 'virgins in paradise" is a tautology or an oxymoron...

In article <00984a3d-9c4a-49c4-816b-47a055b89cebn@googlegroups.com>,
chromebook test <chromiumtest56@gmail.com> wrote:

> When believers realize during the rapture, their dick will essentially fall
> off, many believers will say, hell no we won't go. (1) (2) (3)
>
> Course, the promise of free virgins in paradise does have a certain appeal.

Never could understand why the Islamists would want a bunch of virgins,
who are by definition women with no experience and don't know what
they're doing in bed.

I mean, this is paradise we're talking about, so you're not looking to
marry them or have kids with them, so why would virginity be a goal?

I'd much rather be gifted a harem of gorgeous women with some miles
under their belt who really know how to rock your world.

On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 5:27:55 PM UTC-4, moviePig wrote:
> On 3/30/2023 4:55 PM, chromebook test wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 4:47:49 PM UTC-4, moviePig wrote:
> >> On 3/30/2023 3:41 PM, chromebook test wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 3:22:26 PM UTC-4, moviePig wrote:
> >>>> On 3/30/2023 12:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>> In article <u045fo$t91b$1...@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
> >>>>> <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> "60 Minutes Australia" posted a teaser for a Sunday segment
> >>>>>> about parents raising "theybies," and it's garnering a big
> >>>>>> reaction online.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> It's a trend now but sometime in the not-to-distant future it'll
> >>>>> be a government requirement which you will break at your own
> >>>>> peril. It will become child abuse to raise your child as a boy or
> >>>>> a girl. That's where this shit is going. Mark my words.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> That won't happen, because parents ultimately believe science. But
> >>>> if
> >>>
> >>> The vast majority of human parents across the globe believe a Sky God
> >>> messiah who created them in its image is going to save them despite
> >>> the lack of any empirical scientific data.
> >>>
> >>>> it did, lots of religions would be naming "gender-rearing" a
> >>>> sacrament.
> >>>
> >>> The vast majority of human parents across the globe have never really
> >>> read or studied their holy text, but goddamnit they watch a lot of
> >>> television and read a lot of social media.
> >
> >
> >
> >> But, despite all the Woke-Watchers on this n.g., parents (and everyone
> >> who spends time with kids) know that true "gender dysphoria" is a really
> >> long-shot diagnosis, and they'll take all reasonable measures to allow
> >> little Riley to start with the bathroom that Nature apparently intended.
> >
> >
> > When believers realize during the rapture, their dick will essentially fall off, many believers will say, hell no we won't go. (1) (2) (3)
> >
> > Course, the promise of free virgins in paradise does have a certain appeal.
> >
> >
> >
> > 1) sex outside marriage is a sin
> >
> > 2) no marriage in heaven
> >
> > 3) a new body, and a new dick ?
> >
> > 4) and war broke out in heaven

> > tags: I'm rambling and laughing !

> I'm wondering if 'virgins in paradise" is a tautology or an oxymoron...

Without a weenie, it doesn't even matter, except that eternal life without a dick, will mean heaven won't rapidly become overcrowded in a thousand years of nothing but singing hymns of praise.

On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 14:35:39 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

>In article <00984a3d-9c4a-49c4-816b-47a055b89cebn@googlegroups.com>,
> chromebook test <chromiumtest56@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> When believers realize during the rapture, their dick will essentially fall
>> off, many believers will say, hell no we won't go. (1) (2) (3)
>>
>> Course, the promise of free virgins in paradise does have a certain appeal.
>
>Never could understand why the Islamists would want a bunch of virgins,
>who are by definition women with no experience and don't know what
>they're doing in bed.
>
>I mean, this is paradise we're talking about, so you're not looking to
>marry them or have kids with them, so why would virginity be a goal?
>
>I'd much rather be gifted a harem of gorgeous women with some miles
>under their belt who really know how to rock your world.

Given the whole honor killing thing it seems to be a concentration on
purity for the wives. The husbands, on the other hand, can be with as
many women as they like but the wives can only be with one man or
else.

On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 5:38:37 PM UTC-4, shawn wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 14:35:39 -0700, BTR1701 <atr...@mac.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <00984a3d-9c4a-49c4...@googlegroups.com>,
> > chromebook test <chromiu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> When believers realize during the rapture, their dick will essentially fall
> >> off, many believers will say, hell no we won't go. (1) (2) (3)
> >>
> >> Course, the promise of free virgins in paradise does have a certain appeal.
> >
> >Never could understand why the Islamists would want a bunch of virgins,
> >who are by definition women with no experience and don't know what
> >they're doing in bed.
> >
> >I mean, this is paradise we're talking about, so you're not looking to
> >marry them or have kids with them, so why would virginity be a goal?
> >
> >I'd much rather be gifted a harem of gorgeous women with some miles
> >under their belt who really know how to rock your world.

> Given the whole honor killing thing it seems to be a concentration on
> purity for the wives. The husbands, on the other hand, can be with as
> many women as they like but the wives can only be with one man or
> else.

It's religious dogma used for political propaganda, to shape human psychology in order to control human behavior, ... like television.

It's not an accident that 15 minutes in front of a TV set and a hypnotic-like trance is induced.

Now, go, and watch Will and Grace, and embrace your inner non-binary self.

tags: i exaggerate only slightly

In article <atropos-934876.14353930032023@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
<atropos@mac.com> wrote:

> In article <00984a3d-9c4a-49c4-816b-47a055b89cebn@googlegroups.com>,
> chromebook test <chromiumtest56@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > When believers realize during the rapture, their dick will essentially fall
> > off, many believers will say, hell no we won't go. (1) (2) (3)
> >
> > Course, the promise of free virgins in paradise does have a certain appeal.
>
> Never could understand why the Islamists would want a bunch of virgins,
> who are by definition women with no experience and don't know what
> they're doing in bed.

However, some of them try very hard. It's endearing.

> I mean, this is paradise we're talking about, so you're not looking to
> marry them or have kids with them, so why would virginity be a goal?

Male insecurity. The guys want the women to be inexperienced so they
don't know how bad the guys might be at it. BTW the virgins in
paradise are perpetually virgin, so they have to be broken in every
single time you bag one. This does not sound very much like paradise
to me.

I also want to say that sex is not part of Catholic Heaven, but it
might be a big component of Catholic Hell.

> I'd much rather be gifted a harem of gorgeous women with some miles
> under their belt who really know how to rock your world.

On 3/30/2023 3:10 PM, A Friend wrote:
> In article <atropos-934876.14353930032023@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <00984a3d-9c4a-49c4-816b-47a055b89cebn@googlegroups.com>,
>> chromebook test <chromiumtest56@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> When believers realize during the rapture, their dick will essentially fall
>>> off, many believers will say, hell no we won't go. (1) (2) (3)
>>>
>>> Course, the promise of free virgins in paradise does have a certain appeal.
>>
>> Never could understand why the Islamists would want a bunch of virgins,
>> who are by definition women with no experience and don't know what
>> they're doing in bed.
>
>
> However, some of them try very hard. It's endearing.
>
>
>> I mean, this is paradise we're talking about, so you're not looking to
>> marry them or have kids with them, so why would virginity be a goal?
>
>
> Male insecurity. The guys want the women to be inexperienced so they
> don't know how bad the guys might be at it. BTW the virgins in
> paradise are perpetually virgin, so they have to be broken in every
> single time you bag one. This does not sound very much like paradise
> to me.
>
Not for the women, no. But Islam isn't concerned about what the women
want or think since they aren't supposed to do either.

> I also want to say that sex is not part of Catholic Heaven, but it
> might be a big component of Catholic Hell.
>

--
I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
dirty old man.

On 3/30/2023 3:10 PM, A Friend wrote:
> In article <atropos-934876.14353930032023@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <00984a3d-9c4a-49c4-816b-47a055b89cebn@googlegroups.com>,
>> chromebook test <chromiumtest56@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> When believers realize during the rapture, their dick will essentially fall
>>> off, many believers will say, hell no we won't go. (1) (2) (3)
>>>
>>> Course, the promise of free virgins in paradise does have a certain appeal.
>>
>> Never could understand why the Islamists would want a bunch of virgins,
>> who are by definition women with no experience and don't know what
>> they're doing in bed.
>
>
> However, some of them try very hard. It's endearing.
>
>
>> I mean, this is paradise we're talking about, so you're not looking to
>> marry them or have kids with them, so why would virginity be a goal?
>
>
> Male insecurity. The guys want the women to be inexperienced so they
> don't know how bad the guys might be at it. BTW the virgins in
> paradise are perpetually virgin, so they have to be broken in every
> single time you bag one. This does not sound very much like paradise
> to me.
>
And what if they're all young men...?

> I also want to say that sex is not part of Catholic Heaven, but it
> might be a big component of Catholic Hell.
>
>
>> I'd much rather be gifted a harem of gorgeous women with some miles
>> under their belt who really know how to rock your world.

On Mar 30, 2023 at 6:27:17 PM PDT, "suzeeq" <suzee@imbris.com> wrote:

> On 3/30/2023 3:10 PM, A Friend wrote:
>> In article <atropos-934876.14353930032023@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <00984a3d-9c4a-49c4-816b-47a055b89cebn@googlegroups.com>,
>>> chromebook test <chromiumtest56@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> When believers realize during the rapture, their dick will essentially fall
>>>> off, many believers will say, hell no we won't go. (1) (2) (3)
>>>>
>>>> Course, the promise of free virgins in paradise does have a certain appeal.
>>>
>>> Never could understand why the Islamists would want a bunch of virgins,
>>> who are by definition women with no experience and don't know what
>>> they're doing in bed.
>>
>> However, some of them try very hard. It's endearing.
>>
>>> I mean, this is paradise we're talking about, so you're not looking to
>>> marry them or have kids with them, so why would virginity be a goal?
>>
>> Male insecurity. The guys want the women to be inexperienced so they
>> don't know how bad the guys might be at it. BTW the virgins in
>> paradise are perpetually virgin, so they have to be broken in every
>> single time you bag one. This does not sound very much like paradise
>> to me.
>>
> And what if they're all young men...?
>
Or what if they misinterpreted things and instead of 72 virgins, they get to
the afterlife and find they only get one 72-year-old virgin?

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>chromebook test <chromiumtest56@gmail.com> wrote:

>>When believers realize during the rapture, their dick will essentially fall
>>off, many believers will say, hell no we won't go. (1) (2) (3)

>>Course, the promise of free virgins in paradise does have a certain appeal.

>Never could understand why the Islamists would want a bunch of virgins,
>who are by definition women with no experience and don't know what
>they're doing in bed.

>I mean, this is paradise we're talking about, so you're not looking to
>marry them or have kids with them, so why would virginity be a goal?

Even if you were going to marry, unless they're in the royal business
where job number one is reproduction and there is no job number two, who
cares?

>I'd much rather be gifted a harem of gorgeous women with some miles
>under their belt who really know how to rock your world.

The Sadder but Wiser Girl
Meredith Willson
Track 8 on
The Music Man (Original Soundtrack)

Featuring
Robert Preston

Produced by
Morton DaCosta

Release Date
1962

The Sadder but Wiser Girl Lyrics
[Hill, spoken]
No wide-eyed, eager, wholesome, innocent
Sunday-school teacher for me
That kinda gal spins webs no spider ever... now, listen boy...
A gal who trades on all that purity
Merely wants to trade my independence for her security

[Sung]
The only affirmative she will file
Refers to marching down the aisle
No golden, glorious, gleaming pristine goddess, no sir!
For no Diana do I play faun, I can tell you that right now
I snarl, I hiss, how can ignorance be compared to bliss?
I spark, I fizz, for the lady who knows what time it is
I cheer, I rave, for the virtue I'm too late to save
The sadder but wiser girl for me

No bright-eyed, blushing, breathless baby-doll baby, no sir!
That kinda child ties knots no sailor ever knew
I prefer to take a chance on a more adult romance
No dewy young miss who keeps resisting
All the time she keeps insisting

No bright-eyed, wholesome, innocent female, no sir!
Why, she's the fisherman, I'm the fish, you see? Plop!
I flinch, I shy when the lass with the delicate air walks by
I smile, I grin when the gal with a touch of sin walks in
I hope, and I pray for Hester to win just one more 'A'
The sadder but wiser girl's the girl for me
The sadder but wiser girl for me

shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 14:35:39 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>chromebook test <chromiumtest56@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>When believers realize during the rapture, their dick will essentially fall
>>>off, many believers will say, hell no we won't go. (1) (2) (3)

>>>Course, the promise of free virgins in paradise does have a certain appeal.

>>Never could understand why the Islamists would want a bunch of virgins,
>>who are by definition women with no experience and don't know what
>>they're doing in bed.

>>I mean, this is paradise we're talking about, so you're not looking to
>>marry them or have kids with them, so why would virginity be a goal?

>>I'd much rather be gifted a harem of gorgeous women with some miles
>>under their belt who really know how to rock your world.

>Given the whole honor killing thing it seems to be a concentration on
>purity for the wives. The husbands, on the other hand, can be with as
>many women as they like but the wives can only be with one man or
>else.

Honor killing has no religious basis. It's just murder.

A Friend wrote:

>>. . .

>Male insecurity. The guys want the women to be inexperienced so they
>don't know how bad the guys might be at it. BTW the virgins in
>paradise are perpetually virgin, so they have to be broken in every
>single time you bag one. This does not sound very much like paradise
>to me.

>I also want to say that sex is not part of Catholic Heaven, but it
>might be a big component of Catholic Hell.

You Catholics. Always trying to scare the rest of us. Your religion
truly lends itself to horror.

>>. . .

On 3/30/2023 6:40 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Mar 30, 2023 at 6:27:17 PM PDT, "suzeeq" <suzee@imbris.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/30/2023 3:10 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>> In article <atropos-934876.14353930032023@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
>>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <00984a3d-9c4a-49c4-816b-47a055b89cebn@googlegroups.com>,
>>>> chromebook test <chromiumtest56@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> When believers realize during the rapture, their dick will essentially fall
>>>>> off, many believers will say, hell no we won't go. (1) (2) (3)
>>>>>
>>>>> Course, the promise of free virgins in paradise does have a certain appeal.
>>>>
>>>> Never could understand why the Islamists would want a bunch of virgins,
>>>> who are by definition women with no experience and don't know what
>>>> they're doing in bed.
>>>
>>> However, some of them try very hard. It's endearing.
>>>
>>>> I mean, this is paradise we're talking about, so you're not looking to
>>>> marry them or have kids with them, so why would virginity be a goal?
>>>
>>> Male insecurity. The guys want the women to be inexperienced so they
>>> don't know how bad the guys might be at it. BTW the virgins in
>>> paradise are perpetually virgin, so they have to be broken in every
>>> single time you bag one. This does not sound very much like paradise
>>> to me.
>>>
>> And what if they're all young men...?
>>
> Or what if they misinterpreted things and instead of 72 virgins, they get to
> the afterlife and find they only get one 72-year-old virgin?
>
>
Ah, that would be rich!

In article <u05l38$18edq$3@dont-email.me>, Adam H. Kerman
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

> A Friend wrote:
>
> >>. . .
>
> >Male insecurity. The guys want the women to be inexperienced so they
> >don't know how bad the guys might be at it. BTW the virgins in
> >paradise are perpetually virgin, so they have to be broken in every
> >single time you bag one. This does not sound very much like paradise
> >to me.
>
> >I also want to say that sex is not part of Catholic Heaven, but it
> >might be a big component of Catholic Hell.
>
> You Catholics. Always trying to scare the rest of us. Your religion
> truly lends itself to horror.

I haven't been Catholic since sometime in high school, and I've never
needed Catholicism to horrify anybody.

On 3/30/2023 8:44 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 14:35:39 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>> chromebook test <chromiumtest56@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>> When believers realize during the rapture, their dick will essentially fall
>>>> off, many believers will say, hell no we won't go. (1) (2) (3)
>
>>>> Course, the promise of free virgins in paradise does have a certain appeal.
>
>>> Never could understand why the Islamists would want a bunch of virgins,
>>> who are by definition women with no experience and don't know what
>>> they're doing in bed.
>
>>> I mean, this is paradise we're talking about, so you're not looking to
>>> marry them or have kids with them, so why would virginity be a goal?
>
>>> I'd much rather be gifted a harem of gorgeous women with some miles
>>> under their belt who really know how to rock your world.
>
>> Given the whole honor killing thing it seems to be a concentration on
>> purity for the wives. The husbands, on the other hand, can be with as
>> many women as they like but the wives can only be with one man or
>> else.
>
> Honor killing has no religious basis. It's just murder.

Its a religion on its own, making it its own basis.

--
I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
dirty old man.

> Adam H. Kerman
> > shawn
> >
> > Given the whole honor killing thing it seems to be a concentration on
> > purity for the wives. The husbands, on the other hand, can be with as
> > many women as they like but the wives can only be with one man or
> > else.
>
> Honor killing has no religious basis. It's just murder.

There's an evolutionary biological basis, from which the later religious/cultural aspect derives.

Male lions for example, will kill any cubs in the pride that have been fathered by the previous
male pride leader, so that THEIR genetics are passed on to future generations.

I've mentioned the book "Them + Us" by Danny Vendramini before, that proposes the theory
of Neanderthal Predation having naturally selected humans for what we are today in reaction
to attacks, cannibalism and rape by stronger hyper-aggressive Neanderthals and one element
of this is human males killing off any (easily identified) mixed-breed kids of these unions.