But this time, she's apparently running to Columbia University where she's co-teaching a course on foreign policy based in part on her extensive time in the Situation Room (the one in the White House, not the one on CNN):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT8mseQyL8c

I suppose she'll do less immediate harm in a university classroom than in the actual Situation Room but who knows what delayed harm she is going to do with her guidance to students who may one day be decision makers in the Situation Room?

On 3/31/2023 9:30 AM, Rhino2 wrote:
> But this time, she's apparently running to Columbia University where she's co-teaching a course on foreign policy based in part on her extensive time in the Situation Room (the one in the White House, not the one on CNN):
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT8mseQyL8c
>
> I suppose she'll do less immediate harm in a university classroom than in the actual Situation Room but who knows what delayed harm she is going to do with her guidance to students who may one day be decision makers in the Situation Room?
>
Maybe her students will actually learn something, unlike those in Florida.

On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 09:47:16 -0700, suzeeq <suzee@imbris.com> wrote:

>On 3/31/2023 9:30 AM, Rhino2 wrote:
>> But this time, she's apparently running to Columbia University where she's co-teaching a course on foreign policy based in part on her extensive time in the Situation Room (the one in the White House, not the one on CNN):
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT8mseQyL8c
>>
>> I suppose she'll do less immediate harm in a university classroom than in the actual Situation Room but who knows what delayed harm she is going to do with her guidance to students who may one day be decision makers in the Situation Room?
>>
>Maybe her students will actually learn something, unlike those in Florida.

Lots of people do fine in the classroom that you'd never want near the
Oval Office - Hillary was on a first name basis with Henry Kissinger
and had to have swapped stories with him (who I wouldn't want behind
the HMS Resolute desk either)

On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 09:47:16 -0700, suzeeq <suzee@imbris.com> wrote:

>On 3/31/2023 9:30 AM, Rhino2 wrote:
>> But this time, she's apparently running to Columbia University where she's co-teaching a course on foreign policy based in part on her extensive time in the Situation Room (the one in the White House, not the one on CNN):
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT8mseQyL8c
>>
>> I suppose she'll do less immediate harm in a university classroom than in the actual Situation Room but who knows what delayed harm she is going to do with her guidance to students who may one day be decision makers in the Situation Room?
>>
>Maybe her students will actually learn something, unlike those in Florida.

Would she teach them how commit treasonous crimes against their country yet
remaining one of the media's chosen few?

On 3/31/2023 11:59 AM, EGK wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 09:47:16 -0700, suzeeq <suzee@imbris.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/31/2023 9:30 AM, Rhino2 wrote:
>>> But this time, she's apparently running to Columbia University where she's co-teaching a course on foreign policy based in part on her extensive time in the Situation Room (the one in the White House, not the one on CNN):
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT8mseQyL8c
>>>
>>> I suppose she'll do less immediate harm in a university classroom than in the actual Situation Room but who knows what delayed harm she is going to do with her guidance to students who may one day be decision makers in the Situation Room?
>>>
>> Maybe her students will actually learn something, unlike those in Florida.
>
> Would she teach them how commit treasonous crimes against their country yet
> remaining one of the media's chosen few?

ROFL!!

On 3/31/23 11:47 AM, suzeeq wrote:
> On 3/31/2023 9:30 AM, Rhino2 wrote:
>> But this time, she's apparently running to Columbia University where
>> she's co-teaching a course on foreign policy based in part on her
>> extensive time in the Situation Room (the one in the White House, not
>> the one on CNN):
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT8mseQyL8c
>>
>> I suppose she'll do less immediate harm in a university classroom than
>> in the actual Situation Room but who knows what delayed harm she is
>> going to do with her guidance to students who may one day be decision
>> makers in the Situation Room?
>>
> Maybe her students will actually learn something, unlike those in Florida.

Holy fuck, Rhino is so fucking stupid that he doesn't know she was
Secretary of State? "So what, she was a secretary" the dumb
motherfucker will probably say. Right wing assholes, so much time, so
few brain cells.

On 3/31/23 1:59 PM, EGK wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 09:47:16 -0700, suzeeq <suzee@imbris.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/31/2023 9:30 AM, Rhino2 wrote:
>>> But this time, she's apparently running to Columbia University where she's co-teaching a course on foreign policy based in part on her extensive time in the Situation Room (the one in the White House, not the one on CNN):
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT8mseQyL8c
>>>
>>> I suppose she'll do less immediate harm in a university classroom than in the actual Situation Room but who knows what delayed harm she is going to do with her guidance to students who may one day be decision makers in the Situation Room?
>>>
>> Maybe her students will actually learn something, unlike those in Florida.
>
> Would she teach them how commit treasonous crimes

I wonder what the "treasonous legal actions" are all about.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Didn't Rhino2 let Egregiously Gay Klansman use the
brain cell this time?

against their country yet
> remaining one of the media's chosen few?

In article <185f9d5a-f477-4f35-9daa-355143d52b83n@googlegroups.com>,
Rhino2 <hughmunguscan@gmail.com> wrote:

> But this time, she's apparently running to Columbia University where she's
> co-teaching a course on foreign policy based in part on her extensive time in
> the Situation Room (the one in the White House, not the one on CNN):

You're about a day early for April fools aren't you.

Hillary is a contented private citizen who probably takes no pleasure in
the havoc Donald Trump has caused the country even though she'd be
justified.

On 3/31/23 7:01 PM, super70s wrote:
> In article <185f9d5a-f477-4f35-9daa-355143d52b83n@googlegroups.com>,
> Rhino2 <hughmunguscan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> But this time, she's apparently running to Columbia University where she's
>> co-teaching a course on foreign policy based in part on her extensive time in
>> the Situation Room (the one in the White House, not the one on CNN):
>
> You're about a day early for April fools aren't you.
>
> Hillary is a contented private citizen who probably takes no pleasure in
> the havoc Donald Trump has caused the country even though she'd be
> justified.

The Rhinos are year 'round fools.

On 2023-03-31 8:01 PM, super70s wrote:
> In article <185f9d5a-f477-4f35-9daa-355143d52b83n@googlegroups.com>,
> Rhino2 <hughmunguscan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> But this time, she's apparently running to Columbia University where she's
>> co-teaching a course on foreign policy based in part on her extensive time in
>> the Situation Room (the one in the White House, not the one on CNN):
>
> You're about a day early for April fools aren't you.
>
> Hillary is a contented private citizen who probably takes no pleasure in
> the havoc Donald Trump has caused the country even though she'd be
> justified.

Apparently, you didn't watch the linked video to see why I phrased it
the way I did....

--
Rhino

On Saturday, April 1, 2023 at 11:14:29 AM UTC-4, Rhino wrote:
> On 2023-03-31 8:01 PM, super70s wrote:
> > In article <185f9d5a-f477-4f35...@googlegroups.com>,
> > Rhino2 <hughmu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> But this time, she's apparently running to Columbia University where she's
> >> co-teaching a course on foreign policy based in part on her extensive time in
> >> the Situation Room (the one in the White House, not the one on CNN):
> >
> > You're about a day early for April fools aren't you.
> >
> > Hillary is a contented private citizen who probably takes no pleasure in
> > the havoc Donald Trump has caused the country even though she'd be
> > justified.
>
> Apparently, you didn't watch the linked video to see why I phrased it
> the way I did....

At least spell her name right, OK?

super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>Rhino2 <hughmunguscan@gmail.com> wrote:

>>But this time, she's apparently running to Columbia University where
s>>he's co-teaching a course on foreign policy based in part on her
>>extensive time in the Situation Room (the one in the White House,
>>not the one on CNN):

>You're about a day early for April fools aren't you.

>Hillary is a contented private citizen who probably takes no pleasure in
>the havoc Donald Trump has caused the country even though she'd be
>justified.

The Democrats have largely shut the fuck up and aren't contributing to
Trump publicity. It's probably the right strategy.

Furthermore, the likely Trump indictment has nothing whatsoever to do
with Hillary, so you're wrong that Hillary would be justified. If you
cast your mind back to that presidential race, Hillary was slammed
multiple times by the FBI for the emails, while Trump's Russia ties were
not given the same level of publicity. Nothing about Michael Cohen's
payoff of Stormy Daniels had anything to do with Hillary.

Did you care to discuss anything actually related to Hillary in this
thread about Hillary?

In article <u09qus$20h6b$4@dont-email.me>,
"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

> super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
> >Rhino2 <hughmunguscan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>But this time, she's apparently running to Columbia University where
> >>she's co-teaching a course on foreign policy based in part on her
> >>extensive time in the Situation Room (the one in the White House,
> >>not the one on CNN):
>
> >You're about a day early for April fools aren't you.
>
> >Hillary is a contented private citizen who probably takes no pleasure in
> >the havoc Donald Trump has caused the country even though she'd be
> >justified.
>
> The Democrats have largely shut the fuck up and aren't contributing to
> Trump publicity. It's probably the right strategy.
>
> Furthermore, the likely Trump indictment has nothing whatsoever to do
> with Hillary, so you're wrong that Hillary would be justified.

Where did I ever say the Trump indictment had anything to do with
Hillary?

I said she'd be justified in gloating about what Trump has done to
country if after it rejected her and picked him but she isn't that type.

> If you cast your mind back to that presidential race, Hillary was slammed
> multiple times by the FBI for the emails, while Trump's Russia ties were
> not given the same level of publicity. Nothing about Michael Cohen's
> payoff of Stormy Daniels had anything to do with Hillary.

Thank you, Capt. Obvious.

> Did you care to discuss anything actually related to Hillary in this
> thread about Hillary?

I've noticed you have a bug up your ass about the Clintons for some
reason so it wouldn't be constructive.

super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>>>Rhino2 <hughmunguscan@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>But this time, she's apparently running to Columbia University where
>>>>she's co-teaching a course on foreign policy based in part on her
>>>>extensive time in the Situation Room (the one in the White House,
>>>>not the one on CNN):

>>>You're about a day early for April fools aren't you.

>>>Hillary is a contented private citizen who probably takes no pleasure in
>>>the havoc Donald Trump has caused the country even though she'd be
>>>justified.

>>The Democrats have largely shut the fuck up and aren't contributing to
>>Trump publicity. It's probably the right strategy.

>>Furthermore, the likely Trump indictment has nothing whatsoever to do
>>with Hillary, so you're wrong that Hillary would be justified.

>Where did I ever say the Trump indictment had anything to do with
>Hillary?

>I said she'd be justified in gloating about what Trump has done to
>country if after it rejected her and picked him but she isn't that type.

Ok

>>If you cast your mind back to that presidential race, Hillary was slammed
>>multiple times by the FBI for the emails, while Trump's Russia ties were
>>not given the same level of publicity. Nothing about Michael Cohen's
>>payoff of Stormy Daniels had anything to do with Hillary.

>Thank you, Capt. Obvious.

>>Did you care to discuss anything actually related to Hillary in this
>>thread about Hillary?

>I've noticed you have a bug up your ass about the Clintons for some
>reason so it wouldn't be constructive.

Project much?

You just refuse to discuss the thread's topic under any circumstances.
It wasn't about Trump. It wasn't about Bill Clinton.

On Sat, 01 Apr 2023 16:58:16 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

>I've noticed you have a bug up your ass about the Clintons for some
>reason so it wouldn't be constructive.

Perhaps but one can say "I'm all for the right women being elected
president but don't think Hillary was the right woman" without being
thought pathological.

Now I >DO< think far more people voted against rather than for a
president in 2016 than is healthy but that's my opinion. (That's also
true in 2020 but for different reasons)