General-Zod wrote:

> Will Dockery wrote:

>> Michael Pendragon wrote:

>>> On Thursday, November 10, 2022 at 12:04:12 AM UTC-5, Will Dockery wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 11:50:53 PM UTC-5, fake Conley Brothers forged:
>>>> > On Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 3:42:49 PM UTC-5, Zod wrote:
>>>> > > On Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 8:16:29 AM UTC-5, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>>>> > > > On 2022-11-04 7:04 p.m., ME wrote:
>>>> > > > > On Wednesday, 2 November 2022 at 08:33:34 UTC-4, NancyGene wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > >> "Inspired by stories from his grandfather, his “Battle of Lovell’s Pond” appeared in the Portland Gazette in 1820 when he was 13."
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >> None of the contestants guessed the correct "answer." Guesses were: Who is Pendragon, who is NancyGene, and who is Benders.
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >> No Googling! We will know and you will be disqualified.
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > Good morning NG.
>>>> > > > > I didn’t chime in on this one. I wanted to give the others a chance to win.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > So why didn't you send NG an "email," like you claimed to do for the
>>>> > > > "Jonathan Swift" question? Did you forget that you could do that?
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Your story is not believable.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > <snip>
>>>> > > That is the purpose of the anonymous troll, they can pretend to do or be anything they want to pretend to do or be...!
>>>> > That hasn't helped you, has it "Zod"? We all know you are xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> xxxxxxxxxxxx LIES deleted xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

>>>> Lie much, forging fool?

>>> Where's the lie

>> Everything posted in the quote above, little monkey.

>> HTH and HAND.

> Exactly, FAKE Conley is a lying fool....!

At least fake Conley proves he's not a real Conley Brother, spewing such lies.

On Thursday, 10 November 2022 at 23:38:41 UTC-5, Will Dockery wrote:
> General-Zod wrote:
> > Will Dockery wrote:
>
> >> Michael Pendragon wrote:
>
> >>> On Thursday, November 10, 2022 at 12:04:12 AM UTC-5, Will Dockery wrote:
> >>>> On Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 11:50:53 PM UTC-5, fake Conley Brothers forged:
> >>>> > On Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 3:42:49 PM UTC-5, Zod wrote:
> >>>> > > On Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 8:16:29 AM UTC-5, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >>>> > > > On 2022-11-04 7:04 p.m., ME wrote:
> >>>> > > > > On Wednesday, 2 November 2022 at 08:33:34 UTC-4, NancyGene wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > >> "Inspired by stories from his grandfather, his “Battle of Lovell’s Pond” appeared in the Portland Gazette in 1820 when he was 13."
> >>>> > > > >>
> >>>> > > > >> None of the contestants guessed the correct "answer." Guesses were: Who is Pendragon, who is NancyGene, and who is Benders.
> >>>> > > > >>
> >>>> > > > >> No Googling! We will know and you will be disqualified.
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > Good morning NG.
> >>>> > > > > I didn’t chime in on this one. I wanted to give the others a chance to win.
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > So why didn't you send NG an "email," like you claimed to do for the
> >>>> > > > "Jonathan Swift" question? Did you forget that you could do that?
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > Your story is not believable.
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > <snip>
> >>>> > > That is the purpose of the anonymous troll, they can pretend to do or be anything they want to pretend to do or be...!
> >>>> > That hasn't helped you, has it "Zod"? We all know you are xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > xxxxxxxxxxxx LIES deleted xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> Lie much, forging fool?
>
> >>> Where's the lie
> >> Everything posted in the quote above, little monkey.
>
> >> HTH and HAND.
> > Exactly, FAKE Conley is a lying fool....!
> At least fake Conley proves he's not a real Conley Brother, spewing such lies.

Then one of the “real” Conley brothers can come here and dispute them.
Until then , will, shut the fuck up.

The REAL Conley Brothers:

https://youtu.be/SvfVuep0VX0

On Thursday, 10 November 2022 at 23:52:35 UTC-5, ME wrote:
> On Thursday, 10 November 2022 at 23:38:41 UTC-5, Will Dockery wrote:
> > General-Zod wrote:
> > > Will Dockery wrote:
> >
> > >> Michael Pendragon wrote:
> >
> > >>> On Thursday, November 10, 2022 at 12:04:12 AM UTC-5, Will Dockery wrote:
> > >>>> On Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 11:50:53 PM UTC-5, fake Conley Brothers forged:
> > >>>> > On Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 3:42:49 PM UTC-5, Zod wrote:
> > >>>> > > On Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 8:16:29 AM UTC-5, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > >>>> > > > On 2022-11-04 7:04 p.m., ME wrote:
> > >>>> > > > > On Wednesday, 2 November 2022 at 08:33:34 UTC-4, NancyGene wrote:
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > > >> "Inspired by stories from his grandfather, his “Battle of Lovell’s Pond” appeared in the Portland Gazette in 1820 when he was 13."
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >> None of the contestants guessed the correct "answer." Guesses were: Who is Pendragon, who is NancyGene, and who is Benders.
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >> No Googling! We will know and you will be disqualified.
> > >>>> > > > >
> > >>>> > > > >
> > >>>> > > > > Good morning NG.
> > >>>> > > > > I didn’t chime in on this one. I wanted to give the others a chance to win.
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > So why didn't you send NG an "email," like you claimed to do for the
> > >>>> > > > "Jonathan Swift" question? Did you forget that you could do that?
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > Your story is not believable.
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > <snip>
> > >>>> > > That is the purpose of the anonymous troll, they can pretend to do or be anything they want to pretend to do or be...!
> > >>>> > That hasn't helped you, has it "Zod"? We all know you are xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > > xxxxxxxxxxxx LIES deleted xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>>> Lie much, forging fool?
> >
> > >>> Where's the lie
> > >> Everything posted in the quote above, little monkey.
> >
> > >> HTH and HAND.
> > > Exactly, FAKE Conley is a lying fool....!
> > At least fake Conley proves he's not a real Conley Brother, spewing such lies.
> Then one of the “real” Conley brothers can come here and dispute them.
> Until then , will, shut the fuck up.

George J. Dance wrote:

> On 2022-11-04 11:26 a.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
>> On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 11:09:47 AM UTC-4, Spam-I-Am wrote:
>>> On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 11:05:04 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>>>> On 2022-11-02 7:44 p.m., NancyGene wrote:
>>>>> On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 11:35:27 PM UTC, Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
>>>>>> NancyGene <nancygene...@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>> news:b2e76db2-49e5-4209...@googlegroups.com:
>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 11:24:10 PM UTC, Cujo DeSockpuppet
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> NancyGene <nancygene...@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:26de32ca-3d06-408f...@googlegroups.com:
>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 10:13:32 PM UTC, Cujo
>>>>>>>>> DeSockpuppet wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> NancyGene <nancygene...@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> news:5e52f80a-d653-429b...@googlegroups.com:
>>>>>>>>>>> "Inspired by stories from his grandfather, his “Battle of Lo
>>>>>>> vel
>>>>>>>>> l’s
>>>>>>>>>>> Pond” appeared in the Portland Gazette in 1820 when he was 1
>>>>>>> 3."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You mean to tell me that of all the distinguished poets like Dance,
>>>>>> Dreckweasel and The Drunk hadn't gotten the answer?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I iz teh shockiest.
>>>>>
>>>>> Spam-I-Am could have won but he dared not say the name. Dance, Dreckweasel and The Drunk would not be able to answer anything unless they Wikipediaed or Googled the answer, so they could then quote it. There is no knowledge repository in the gang of three.
>>>> You're lying again, NastyGene. In fact I have an excellent 'knowledge
>>>> repository' in the form of Penny's Poetry Pages, and the "answer" is
>>>> right there.
>>>>> Dance would not have known unless the answer was George Dance.
>>>> In fact, I knew the correct answer, but I didn't comment because I knew
>>>> the thread was just an excuse for a Team Monkey attack on "Team Donkey."
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for confirming that I was right about that, too.
>>> Jesus fuck, George, wtf is your problem?
>>
>> Lo7!!!
>> It seems that the tat armchair master's ass seems to be tat sore and burning for another game of tatting asses...

> It seems that another Team Monkey member in denial has decided to come
> in and defend NG.

Or, rather, spew gibberish.

>> Alas! The ignominy of this impasse
>> Of someone having to act like an ass
>> Braying so boldly and behaving so crass
>> A jack ass so smug in his house of glass
>> And those his ass editor rate as low class
>> he harasses to create a hypocritical morass
>> a "real poetry" shitsty that shows "real class"
>> in shit slinging by a "victim", yet crass as ass

> And, as usual, the Ashtroll's response has nothing to do with the
> subject, but is just ad hom attack (though he'll probably pretend he was
> "making fun").

Poor little guy seems to have a one track mind.

🙂

On Friday, November 11, 2022 at 5:42:50 AM UTC-5, Will Dockery wrote:
> George J. Dance wrote:
>
> > On 2022-11-04 11:26 a.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
> >> On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 11:09:47 AM UTC-4, Spam-I-Am wrote:
> >>> On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 11:05:04 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >>>> On 2022-11-02 7:44 p.m., NancyGene wrote:
> >>>>> On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 11:35:27 PM UTC, Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
> >>>>>> NancyGene <nancygene...@gmail.com> wrote in
> >>>>>> news:b2e76db2-49e5-4209...@googlegroups.com:
> >>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 11:24:10 PM UTC, Cujo DeSockpuppet
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> NancyGene <nancygene...@gmail.com> wrote in
> >>>>>>>> news:26de32ca-3d06-408f...@googlegroups.com:
> >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 10:13:32 PM UTC, Cujo
> >>>>>>>>> DeSockpuppet wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> NancyGene <nancygene...@gmail.com> wrote in
> >>>>>>>>>> news:5e52f80a-d653-429b...@googlegroups.com:
> >>>>>>>>>>> "Inspired by stories from his grandfather, his “Battle of Lo
> >>>>>>> vel
> >>>>>>>>> l’s
> >>>>>>>>>>> Pond” appeared in the Portland Gazette in 1820 when he was 1
> >>>>>>> 3."
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You mean to tell me that of all the distinguished poets like Dance,
> >>>>>> Dreckweasel and The Drunk hadn't gotten the answer?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I iz teh shockiest.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Spam-I-Am could have won but he dared not say the name. Dance, Dreckweasel and The Drunk would not be able to answer anything unless they Wikipediaed or Googled the answer, so they could then quote it. There is no knowledge repository in the gang of three.
> >>>> You're lying again, NastyGene. In fact I have an excellent 'knowledge
> >>>> repository' in the form of Penny's Poetry Pages, and the "answer" is
> >>>> right there.
> >>>>> Dance would not have known unless the answer was George Dance.
> >>>> In fact, I knew the correct answer, but I didn't comment because I knew
> >>>> the thread was just an excuse for a Team Monkey attack on "Team Donkey."
> >>>>
> >>>> Thank you for confirming that I was right about that, too.
> >>> Jesus fuck, George, wtf is your problem?
> >>
> >> Lo7!!!
> >> It seems that the tat armchair master's ass seems to be tat sore and burning for another game of tatting asses...
>
> > It seems that another Team Monkey member in denial has decided to come
> > in and defend NG.
>
> Or, rather, spew gibberish.
>
>
> >> Alas! The ignominy of this impasse
> >> Of someone having to act like an ass
> >> Braying so boldly and behaving so crass
> >> A jack ass so smug in his house of glass
> >> And those his ass editor rate as low class
> >> he harasses to create a hypocritical morass
> >> a "real poetry" shitsty that shows "real class"
> >> in shit slinging by a "victim", yet crass as ass
>
>
> > And, as usual, the Ashtroll's response has nothing to do with the
> > subject, but is just ad hom attack (though he'll probably pretend he was
> > "making fun").

Ash's response is a comment on how the Donkey and his socks have turned a discussion thread into their usual morass of trolling, whining, and hypocritically attacking others for their own behavior. That he included you among the shit-makers, should inspire you to take stock of your hand in the Donkiness.

Michael Pendragon wrote:

> On Friday, November 11, 2022 at 5:42:50 AM UTC-5, Will Dockery wrote:
>> George J. Dance wrote:
>>
>> > On 2022-11-04 11:26 a.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
>> >> On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 11:09:47 AM UTC-4, Spam-I-Am wrote:
>> >>> On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 11:05:04 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> >>>> On 2022-11-02 7:44 p.m., NancyGene wrote:
>> >>>>> On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 11:35:27 PM UTC, Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
>> >>>>>> NancyGene <nancygene...@gmail.com> wrote in
>> >>>>>> news:b2e76db2-49e5-4209...@googlegroups.com:
>> >>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 11:24:10 PM UTC, Cujo DeSockpuppet
>> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> NancyGene <nancygene...@gmail.com> wrote in
>> >>>>>>>> news:26de32ca-3d06-408f...@googlegroups.com:
>> >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 10:13:32 PM UTC, Cujo
>> >>>>>>>>> DeSockpuppet wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>> NancyGene <nancygene...@gmail.com> wrote in
>> >>>>>>>>>> news:5e52f80a-d653-429b...@googlegroups.com:
>> >>>>>>>>>>> "Inspired by stories from his grandfather, his “Battle of Lo
>> >>>>>>> vel
>> >>>>>>>>> l’s
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Pond” appeared in the Portland Gazette in 1820 when he was 1
>> >>>>>>> 3."
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> You mean to tell me that of all the distinguished poets like Dance,
>> >>>>>> Dreckweasel and The Drunk hadn't gotten the answer?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I iz teh shockiest.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Spam-I-Am could have won but he dared not say the name. Dance, Dreckweasel and The Drunk would not be able to answer anything unless they Wikipediaed or Googled the answer, so they could then quote it. There is no knowledge repository in the gang of three.
>> >>>> You're lying again, NastyGene. In fact I have an excellent 'knowledge
>> >>>> repository' in the form of Penny's Poetry Pages, and the "answer" is
>> >>>> right there.
>> >>>>> Dance would not have known unless the answer was George Dance.
>> >>>> In fact, I knew the correct answer, but I didn't comment because I knew
>> >>>> the thread was just an excuse for a Team Monkey attack on "Team Donkey."
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thank you for confirming that I was right about that, too.
>> >>> Jesus fuck, George, wtf is your problem?
>> >>
>> >> Lo7!!!
>> >> It seems that the tat armchair master's ass seems to be tat sore and burning for another game of tatting asses...
>>
>> > It seems that another Team Monkey member in denial has decided to come
>> > in and defend NG.
>>
>> Or, rather, spew gibberish.
>>
>>
>> >> Alas! The ignominy of this impasse
>> >> Of someone having to act like an ass
>> >> Braying so boldly and behaving so crass
>> >> A jack ass so smug in his house of glass
>> >> And those his ass editor rate as low class
>> >> he harasses to create a hypocritical morass
>> >> a "real poetry" shitsty that shows "real class"
>> >> in shit slinging by a "victim", yet crass as ass
>>
>>
>> > And, as usual, the Ashtroll's response has nothing to do with the
>> > subject, but is just ad hom attack (though he'll probably pretend he was
>> > "making fun").

> Ash's response is

Is a typical example of Ash's lying, trolling gibberish.

HTH and HAND.

On 2022-11-06 2:00 p.m., Spam-I-Am wrote:
> On Sunday, November 6, 2022 at 10:10:14 AM UTC-5, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> On 2022-11-05 4:27 a.m., Spam-I-Am wrote:
>>> On Saturday, November 5, 2022 at 2:41:24 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>>>> On 2022-11-05 1:14 a.m., Spam-I-Am wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, November 5, 2022 at 12:31:30 AM UTC-4,
>>>> george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>>>>>> On 2022-11-04 4:12 p.m., W-Dockery wrote:
>>>>>>> Spam-I-Am wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 1:43:34 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2022-11-04 12:58 p.m., Spam-I-Am wrote:
>>>>> On Friday, November 4,
>>>>>>>>> 2022 at 12:52:07 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> I’m not attacking you, George. >>
>>>>>>>>> Wrong. You resorted to an ad hom attack. >>> I’m making fun of you.
>>>>>>>>> See? >> So you decided to act like a smug asshole, rather than deal
>>>>>>>>> with the >> facts. No surprise there. > > Your facts aren’t factual.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I’m sorry you perceive > me as a smug asshole.
>>>>>>>>> That's unfortunate. Learning how others perceive your behavior can be
>>>>>>>>> an opportunity to change, not just to feel sorry for yourself.
>>>>>>>>>> We could be having fun.
>>>>>>>>> So let's have fun.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why do you think you come across as a smug asshole?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You previously perceived me as a homophobe and anti-Semite
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I missed that, can you post a link to that thread?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Years ago, when Corey was writing and posting "poetry" about my having
>>>>>> gay sex with you and a Jew, I told him that posting that stuff made him
>>>>>> look homophobic and antisemitic. That seemed to have the right effect
>>>>>> because, even if he's kept writing that shit, he hasn't posted any more
>>>>>> of it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually, you never told me that.
>>>> Actually, I fucking well did. You may have forgotten, but that's no
>>>> reason to make up false stories.
>>>>
>>>> <quote>
>>>> George Dance
>>>> 12/9/17
>>>> to
>>>> On Saturday, December 9, 2017 at 6:41:26 AM UTC-5, hierony...@gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> I think he was being facetious, George.
>>>>> This isn't worth saving for posterity
>>>>
>>>> Au contraire, old chap. It speaks volumes about the author - tells us
>>>> he's a homophobe and an anti-Semite - and, who knows, that might some
>>>> day be of interest to someone.
>>>>
>>>> , and
>>>>> it certainly isn't an excellent work.
>>>>
>>>> To put it mildly. But Col. Burke, Lord Penis, and the like will love it;
>>>> so at least you've found an audience.
>>>>
>>>>> It took
>>>>> all of five minutes to write
>>>>
>>>> Par for the course.
>>>>
>>>>> , just for fun.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Whatever floats your boat. If you have fun imagining me and Will as
>>>> big-nosed Jews who have gay sex, go for it. I'll do my best to help
>>>> archive it.
>>>> </q>
>>>>> You went outside the group,
>>>>> and posted that to a friend’s blog
>>>> No, that's not true either. You've posted all the comments from that
>>>> blog here, your "friend's" as well as mine, so you should know that.
>>>>> as well as your own,
>>>> I told you I was going to help promote your poem on my wiki.
>>>>
>>>> <quote>
>>>> George Dance
>>>> 12/9/17
>>>> to
>>>> On Saturday, December 9, 2017 at 7:33:28 AM UTC-5, hierony...@gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Actually, I'm having fun imagining
>>>>> what motivates you to write stuff
>>>>> like that this early in the morning.
>>>>
>>>>> I'm very surprised you think I'm an
>>>>> anti-Semitic homophobe, George.
>>>>
>>>> People can read your poem about the huge-nosed Jews being fags and judge
>>>> for themselves, anti-Semitic homophobe. That's why it's now archived on
>>>> the web, and linked on my wiki article on you.
>>>>
>>>> I'll also be adding a quote from me, which I'd better get written, so I
>>>> can quote it - I'll also have to post it in a new thread, so it will be
>>>> easier to link).
>>>> </q>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't remember your response, and you deleted it; you probably
>>>> threatened to sue me, but I don't remember and don't care.
>>>>> because
>>>>> that’s the type of person everyone knows you are, George.
>>>> I do have a low tolerance for racism and homophobia (among other
>>>> things), and especially for people who consider that stuff "fun".
>>>
>>> To be specific, we’ve never spoken.
>>
>>
>> I'm aware of that. Why are you telling me things I already know? To
>> pretend I don't know them?
>>
>>
>>> You never told me anything.
>>
>>
>> I just quoted what I'd told you. Why are you ignoring that?
>>
>>
>>> You got upset at something I posted here in fun, and responded.
>>
>>
>> So you saw my response, and all you got from it was the idea that you'd
>> managed to "upset" me. It sounds to me like you just didn't bother to
>> read it.
>>
>>
>>> I’m sorry that you were upset by my writing about you. My bad.
>>
>>
>> Are you really sorry because you think you upset me? (It doesn't sound
>> that way; it sounds like you're rather proud of it.) Or are you sorry
>> that I perceived you as an anti-semite and a homophobe?
>
> I’m sorry that I don’t enjoy reading you more than I do. My bad entirely.
>

You're feeling sorry for myself because you don't enjoy reading my
posts. Why should I care? Why should I have to do anything about that?
If you don't enjoy my posts, then "skip and ignore" -- don't read them
and don't reply to them. Just fuck off already.

> Plonk.
>

Better late than never, I suppose.

On 2022-11-06 3:02 p.m., General-Zod wrote:
> W.Dockery wrote:
>
>
>> "Skip and ignore", a good idea for both sides.
>
> Yep, then both sides don't have to deal with each other...!

But if Team Monkey didn't deal with "Team Donkey", they wouldn't be able
to troll "Team Donkey". Then what would they do?

On 2022-11-09 9:01 a.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 8:16:29 AM UTC-5, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> On 2022-11-04 7:04 p.m., ME wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 2 November 2022 at 08:33:34 UTC-4, NancyGene wrote:
>>>> "Inspired by stories from his grandfather, his “Battle of Lovell’s Pond” appeared in the Portland Gazette in 1820 when he was 13."
>>>>
>>>> None of the contestants guessed the correct "answer." Guesses were: Who is Pendragon, who is NancyGene, and who is Benders.
>>>>
>>>> No Googling! We will know and you will be disqualified.
>>>
>>>
>>> Good morning NG.
>>> I didn’t chime in on this one. I wanted to give the others a chance to win.
>>
>>
>> So why didn't you send NG an "email," like you claimed to do for the
>> "Jonathan Swift" question? Did you forget that you could do that?
>>
>> Your story is not believable.
>>
>> <snip>
>
> I'd believe ME over George Dance any day.

All you have to believe is that the MEatpuppet was able to email
NastyGene; and you don't have to take my word for it; both the
MEatpuppet and NastyGene have already admitted it.

On 2022-11-09 12:31 p.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 8:16:29 AM UTC-5, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> On 2022-11-04 7:04 p.m., ME wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 2 November 2022 at 08:33:34 UTC-4, NancyGene wrote:
>>>> "Inspired by stories from his grandfather, his “Battle of Lovell’s Pond” appeared in the Portland Gazette in 1820 when he was 13."
>>>>
>>>> None of the contestants guessed the correct "answer." Guesses were: Who is Pendragon, who is NancyGene, and who is Benders.
>>>>
>>>> No Googling! We will know and you will be disqualified.
>>>
>>>
>>> Good morning NG.
>>> I didn’t chime in on this one. I wanted to give the others a chance to win.
>>
>>
>> So why didn't you send NG an "email," like you claimed to do for the
>> "Jonathan Swift" question? Did you forget that you could do that?
>>
>> Your story is not believable.
>
> Dance: "Your story is not believable."
> This from a conspiracy theorist, what a hoot.

It's not a "conspiracy theory" that the MEatpuppet can mail NastyGene,
silly troll. That's a fact on record.
> At least you didn't try to call it fake news or propaganda!

No, the MEatpuppet's claim that they knew the answer but couldn't let
NastyGene know that is exactly what I said it was, "not believable".

It's not "fake news" because (unlike you or the Chimp), the MEatpuppet
wasn't claiming that was "news", and it's certainly not "propaganda" if
she makes that claim once.

> Stop huffing the bleach...

Poor Ashtroll; he came here because he was interested in poetry, drank
the Team Monkey KoolAid, and died from it (but only from the neck up).

George J. Dance wrote:

> On 2022-11-09 12:31 p.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
>> On Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 8:16:29 AM UTC-5, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>>> On 2022-11-04 7:04 p.m., ME wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, 2 November 2022 at 08:33:34 UTC-4, NancyGene wrote:
>>>>> "Inspired by stories from his grandfather, his “Battle of Lovell’s Pond” appeared in the Portland Gazette in 1820 when he was 13."
>>>>>
>>>>> None of the contestants guessed the correct "answer." Guesses were: Who is Pendragon, who is NancyGene, and who is Benders.
>>>>>
>>>>> No Googling! We will know and you will be disqualified.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Good morning NG.
>>>> I didn’t chime in on this one. I wanted to give the others a chance to win.
>>>
>>>
>>> So why didn't you send NG an "email," like you claimed to do for the
>>> "Jonathan Swift" question? Did you forget that you could do that?
>>>
>>> Your story is not believable.
>>
>> Dance: "Your story is not believable."
>> This from a conspiracy theorist, what a hoot.

> It's not a "conspiracy theory" that the MEatpuppet can mail NastyGene,
> silly troll. That's a fact on record.
> > At least you didn't try to call it fake news or propaganda!

> No, the MEatpuppet's claim that they knew the answer but couldn't let
> NastyGene know that is exactly what I said it was, "not believable".

> It's not "fake news" because (unlike you or the Chimp), the MEatpuppet
> wasn't claiming that was "news", and it's certainly not "propaganda" if
> she makes that claim once.

>> Stop huffing the bleach...

> Poor Ashtroll; he came here because he was interested in poetry, drank
> the Team Monkey KoolAid, and died from it (but only from the neck up).

Ash tries so hard.

🙂

On Friday, November 11, 2022 at 3:03:09 PM UTC-5, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> On 2022-11-06 3:02 p.m., General-Zod wrote:
> > W.Dockery wrote:
> >
> >
> >> "Skip and ignore", a good idea for both sides.
> >
> > Yep, then both sides don't have to deal with each other...!
>
>
> But if Team Monkey didn't deal with "Team Donkey", they wouldn't be able
> to troll "Team Donkey". Then what would they do?

Assuming for the sake of argument that "Team Monkey" is actually a team, we would post original poetry, comment on and discuss poetry, and express our opinions on various literary topics. Much as we are currently doing in threads regarding Longfellow, Poe, Rand, Homer, etc.

In case you haven't noticed, most of us are skipping and ignoring (and/or reporting and blocking) all or most of the posts Will Donkey makes.

For my part, I have unsuccessfully tried to 1) integrate Will into the group, and 2) to drive Will out of the group. I shall be wasting precious little of my time on him from here on in.

On Friday, November 11, 2022 at 3:15:22 PM UTC-5, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> On 2022-11-09 9:01 a.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
> > On Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 8:16:29 AM UTC-5, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >> On 2022-11-04 7:04 p.m., ME wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, 2 November 2022 at 08:33:34 UTC-4, NancyGene wrote:
> >>>> "Inspired by stories from his grandfather, his “Battle of Lovell’s Pond” appeared in the Portland Gazette in 1820 when he was 13."
> >>>>
> >>>> None of the contestants guessed the correct "answer." Guesses were: Who is Pendragon, who is NancyGene, and who is Benders.
> >>>>
> >>>> No Googling! We will know and you will be disqualified.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Good morning NG.
> >>> I didn’t chime in on this one. I wanted to give the others a chance to win.
> >>
> >>
> >> So why didn't you send NG an "email," like you claimed to do for the
> >> "Jonathan Swift" question? Did you forget that you could do that?
> >>
> >> Your story is not believable.
> >>
> >> <snip>
> >
> > I'd believe ME over George Dance any day.
> All you have to believe is that the MEatpuppet was able to email
> NastyGene; and you don't have to take my word for it; both the
> MEatpuppet and NastyGene have already admitted it.

They admitted to exchanging emails regarding the "Jonathan Swift" question. The fact that they'd exchanged emails regarding one Jeopardy question does not mean that they must always exchange emails regarding Jeopardy questions.

Michael Pendragon wrote:

> On Friday, November 11, 2022 at 3:03:09 PM UTC-5, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> On 2022-11-06 3:02 p.m., General-Zod wrote:
>> > W.Dockery wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> "Skip and ignore", a good idea for both sides.
>> >
>> > Yep, then both sides don't have to deal with each other...!
>>
>>
>> But if Team Monkey didn't deal with "Team Donkey", they wouldn't be able
>> to troll "Team Donkey". Then what would they do?

>

> For my part, I have unsuccessfully tried to 1) integrate Will into the group, and 2) to drive Will out of the group. I shall be wasting precious little of my time on him from here on in.

That's a good start.

🙂