We can now interpose the face of dead actors onto anybody.
So just make the next Doctor William Hartnell!
Make DW great again!

tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:

> On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 7:17:06 PM UTC-7, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> > We can now interpose the face of dead actors onto anybody.
> > So just make the next Doctor William Hartnell!
> > Make DW great again!
>
> A Yads plot: Its revealed that aliens used AI to make the Doctor LOOK
> like Jodie Whittaker, without in fact having turned into a woman!

What about if every Doctor had been played by a female, not just the 13th
Doctor (and the Fugitive Doctor), and the BBC used technology to make them
all look like men?

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <346651df99457bec23eb6563d7045b29@dizum.com>,
> Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> > We can now interpose the face of dead actors onto anybody.
> > So just make the next Doctor William Hartnell!
> > Make DW great again!
> >
>
> Sounds like Star Wars!

If only it was!

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <nnd$244e91f7$6df29118@79814194d8f5fb31>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 7:17:06 PM UTC-7, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> >> > We can now interpose the face of dead actors onto anybody.
> >> > So just make the next Doctor William Hartnell!
> >> > Make DW great again!
> >>
> >> A Yads plot: Its revealed that aliens used AI to make the Doctor LOOK
> >> like Jodie Whittaker, without in fact having turned into a woman!
> >
> > What about if every Doctor had been played by a female, not just the
> > 13th Doctor (and the Fugitive Doctor), and the BBC used technology to
> > make them all look like men?
>
> Good question!

I had a mental bet with myself that your reply to that one would be...
"Bogus!"

Well done!

Tim typed:

> On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 10:05:04 PM UTC-7, The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <f316c936-06c6-4e76...@googlegroups.com>,
>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> A Yads plot: Its revealed that aliens used AI to make
>>> the Doctor LOOK like Jodie Whittaker, without in fact
>>> having turned into a woman!
>>
>> Tim is extremely Evil!
>
> But my Yads plot renders the Timeless Child non-existent!
>

Not quite. It renders the Timeless Child existent but
in the form of an AI.

The asswipe wants everything about the Whittaker era
to have never happened at all in any form whatsoever.

He’s too much of an asswipe to accept any compromise.

--
solar penguin

The asswipe asserted:

> In article <u82h2s$cdju$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Tim typed:
>>
>>> On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 10:05:04 PM UTC-7, The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <f316c936-06c6-4e76...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A Yads plot: Its revealed that aliens used AI to make
>>>>> the Doctor LOOK like Jodie Whittaker, without
>>>>> in fact having turned into a woman!
>>>>
>>>> Tim is extremely Evil!
>>>
>>> But my Yads plot renders the Timeless Child non-existent!
>>>
>>
>> Not quite. It renders the Timeless Child existent but
>> in the form of an AI.
>>
>> The asswipe wants everything about the Whittaker
>> era to have never happened at all in any form whatsoever.
>>
>> He’s too much of an asswipe to accept any compromise.
>>
>
> No compromise on a terribl and wretched Era!
>

Thanks for demonstrating my point so well.

--
solar penguin

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <u83amg$ffgv$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > The asswipe asserted:
> >>
> >> No compromise on a terrible and wretched Era!
> >
> > Thanks for demonstrating my point so well.
>
> Because the Timeless Child is very anti-Doctor-Who
> that it destroys Doctor Who!

No Dave, The Timeless Child IS Doctor Who, so it expands the
possibilities within Doctor Who going forward.

It's the low IQ imbeciles that think Doctor Who should be made for them
and their misogynist views that are destroying Doctor Who.

The asswipe asserted:

> In article <u83amg$ffgv$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The asswipe asserted:
>>
>>> In article <u82h2s$cdju$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Tim typed:
>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 10:05:04 PM UTC-7,
>>>>>The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>> In article <f316c936-06c6-4e76...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A Yads plot: Its revealed that aliens used AI to
>>>>>>> make the Doctor LOOK like Jodie Whittaker,
>>>>>>> without in fact having turned into a woman!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tim is extremely Evil!
>>>>>
>>>>> But my Yads plot renders the Timeless Child non-existent!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Not quite. It renders the Timeless Child existent
>>>> but in the form of an AI.
>>>>
>>>> The asswipe wants everything about the Whittaker
>>>> era to have never happened at all in any form whatsoever.
>>>>
>>>> He’s too much of an asswipe to accept any compromise.
>>>>
>>>
>>> No compromise on a terrible and wretched Era!
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for demonstrating my point so well.
>
> Because the Timeless Child is very anti-Doctor-Who
> that it destroys Doctor Who!
>

WHOOOOSH!!!

--
solar penguin

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <nnd$57076864$3027b707@4f054a89dc273c11>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > The Doctor wrote:
> >>
> >> Because the Timeless Child is very anti-Doctor-Who
> >> that it destroys Doctor Who!
> >
> > No Dave, The Timeless Child IS Doctor Who, so it expands the
> > possibilities within Doctor Who going forward.
> >
> > It's the low IQ imbeciles that think Doctor Who should be made for
> > them and their misogynist views that are destroying Doctor Who.
>
> That is where you are worng and I call you out for living
> and isolated live!

I am worng am I? Well I've been called many things in my time so just
another random word doesn't really mean a lot. <shrugs>

You can call me out, call me in, call me whatever you want... just don't
call me early.

On 2023-07-05 5:27 p.m., The Doctor wrote:
> In article <nnd$57076864$3027b707@4f054a89dc273c11>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> In article <u83amg$ffgv$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The asswipe asserted:
>>>>>
>>>>> No compromise on a terrible and wretched Era!
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for demonstrating my point so well.
>>>
>>> Because the Timeless Child is very anti-Doctor-Who
>>> that it destroys Doctor Who!
>>
>> No Dave, The Timeless Child IS Doctor Who, so it expands the
>> possibilities within Doctor Who going forward.
>>
>> It's the low IQ imbeciles that think Doctor Who should be made for them
>> and their misogynist views that are destroying Doctor Who.
>
> That is where you are worng and I call you out for living
> and isolated live!

Gibberish....

--
"He who establishes his argument by noise and command shows that his
reason is weak." Michel Eyquem de Montaigne

The asswipe asserted:

> In article <u84g95$jqpq$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The asswipe asserted:
>>
>>> In article <u83amg$ffgv$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The asswipe asserted:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <u82h2s$cdju$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The asswipe wants everything about the Whittaker
>>>>>> era to have never happened at all in any form
>>>>>> whatsoever.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He’s too much of an asswipe to accept any compromise.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No compromise on a terrible and wretched Era!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for demonstrating my point so well.
>>>
>>> Because the Timeless Child is very anti-Doctor-Who
>>> that it destroys Doctor Who!
>>>
>>
>> WHOOOOSH!!!
>>
>
> So Idlehands-mouth SP Are you a pro-Timeless-Child
> Anti-DoctorWho Troll?

WHOOOOSH again!!!

--
solar penguin

The asswipe asked:

> In article <u85j16$r2fl$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The asswipe asserted:
>>
>>>
>>> So Idlehands-mouth SP Are you a pro-Timeless-Child
>>> Anti-DoctorWho Troll?
>>
>> WHOOOOSH again!!!
>>
>
> You either a Doctor Who Fan or a Timeless Child fan
> Idlehands-mouth Solar Penguin! EXCLUSIVE or!!!
>

Liar! Being a fan/not a fan isn’t a binary choice. It’s a spectrum.

I think the Timeless Child idea had the potential to be a
great story, but was totally let down by being badly
implemented. That puts me at the “disappointed” part
of the spectrum. Not really a fan but not really hating it
either.

--

solar penguin

solar penguin wrote:

>
> The asswipe asked:
> >
> > You either a Doctor Who Fan or a Timeless Child fan
> > Idlehands-mouth Solar Penguin! EXCLUSIVE or!!!
> >
>
> Liar! Being a fan/not a fan isn’t a binary choice. It’s a spectrum.
>
> I think the Timeless Child idea had the potential to be a
> great story, but was totally let down by being badly
> implemented. That puts me at the “disappointed” part
> of the spectrum. Not really a fan but not really hating it
> either.

People are free to like or dislike something but this constant "... must
be retconned" because it doesn't fit in with their idea of how Doctor Who
should be, is just arrogant entitled nonsense.

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <nnd$4a37e526$3fde7f5a@f572db1624afba85>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> >
> > People are free to like or dislike something but this constant "...
> > must be retconned" because it doesn't fit in with their idea of how
> > Doctor Who should be, is just arrogant entitled nonsense.
>
> No it is not!

Yes it is. Bigoted entitled nonsense. Which pretty much defines your
beliefs on everything. But it's a free world so carry on with your
arrogant delusions that your opinions count for anything.

> Care for a full day of retcon the Timeless Child BS?

There will be no retcon. You will be laid out in your oblong box and the
Timeless Child will still live on as part of Doctor Who.

The asswipe asserted:

> In article <u888qo$1818m$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The asswipe asserted:
>>
>>>
>>> You either a Doctor Who Fan or a Timeless Child fan
>>> Idlehands-mouth Solar Penguin! EXCLUSIVE or!!!
>>>
>>
>> Liar! Being a fan/not a fan isn’t a binary choice. It’s
>> a spectrum.
>>
>> I think the Timeless Child idea had the potential to be
>> a great story, but was totally let down by being badly
>> implemented. That puts me at the “disappointed” part
>> of the spectrum. Not really a fan but not really hating
>> it either.
>>
>
> The Timeless Child was such an extreme disappointment
> that it deserves retconning unlike the 7th Doctor Era
> there Idlehands-mouth SP!
>
> So this is a binary choice Idlehands-mouth Solar Penguin!!
>

Like I said, you’re too much of an asswipe to compromise.

--

solar penguin

On 2023-07-07 4:50 p.m., The Doctor wrote:
> In article <u8a2nb$1f3aa$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The asswipe asserted:
>>
>>> In article <u888qo$1818m$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The asswipe asserted:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You either a Doctor Who Fan or a Timeless Child fan
>>>>> Idlehands-mouth Solar Penguin! EXCLUSIVE or!!!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Liar! Being a fan/not a fan isn’t a binary choice. It’s
>>>> a spectrum.
>>>>
>>>> I think the Timeless Child idea had the potential to be
>>>> a great story, but was totally let down by being badly
>>>> implemented. That puts me at the “disappointed” part
>>>> of the spectrum. Not really a fan but not really hating
>>>> it either.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The Timeless Child was such an extreme disappointment
>>> that it deserves retconning unlike the 7th Doctor Era
>>> there Idlehands-mouth SP!
>>>
>>> So this is a binary choice Idlehands-mouth Solar Penguin!!
>>>
>>
>> Like I said, you’re too much of an asswipe to compromise.
>>
>
> I am not alone Idlehands-mouth Solar Penguin!!

Yes you are and you huddle in mummy's basement while spewing your
entitled nonsense like it actually means anything.

Once an asswipe, always an asswipe.

--
"He who establishes his argument by noise and command shows that his
reason is weak." Michel Eyquem de Montaigne

The asswipe asserted:

> In article <u8a2nb$1f3aa$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Like I said, you’re too much of an asswipe to compromise.
>>
>
> I am not alone Idlehands-mouth Solar Penguin!!
>

Yeah, all the other asswipes are asswipes too.

--

solar penguin