New reparations proposal before the California Assembly Task Force: $200
million to every black person

https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1655067739348770817/pu/vid/640x360/ph_yJlFOxOFuihmp.mp4?tag=12

On Mon, 08 May 2023 02:19:11 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

>New reparations proposal before the California Assembly Task Force: $200
>million to every black person
>
>
>https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1655067739348770817/pu/vid/640x360/ph_yJlFOxOFuihmp.mp4?tag=12
>

Um, so he chose 40 acres in Bel Air as his basis instead of 40 acres
in upper North Dakota. Wonder why he made such a choice.

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> New reparations proposal before the California Assembly Task Force: $200
million to every black person
>
>
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1655067739348770817/pu/vid/640x360/ph_yJlFOxOFuihmp.mp4?tag=12
>

He’s not using the word black, he’s saying “African-American”.

Maybe this is why Kamala Harris is pretending?

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

On Mon, 08 May 2023 02:19:11 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

>New reparations proposal before the California Assembly Task Force: $200
>million to every black person
>
>
>https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1655067739348770817/pu/vid/640x360/ph_yJlFOxOFuihmp.mp4?tag=12
>
As if California was ever a slave state....

On Sun, 7 May 2023 23:51:13 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
wrote:

>BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>> New reparations proposal before the California Assembly Task Force: $200
>million to every black person
>>
>>
>https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1655067739348770817/pu/vid/640x360/ph_yJlFOxOFuihmp.mp4?tag=12
>>
>
>He’s not using the word black, he’s saying “African-American”.
>
>Maybe this is why Kamala Harris is pretending?

So presumably Barack Obama is "eligible" even though no black ancestor
of his was ever an American citizen and some of those who were were
slave holders. Uh huh.

On 5/7/23 9:19 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> New reparations proposal before the California Assembly Task Force: $200
> million to every black person
>
>
> https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1655067739348770817/pu/vid/640x360/ph_yJlFOxOFuihmp.mp4?tag=12

Oath Keeper "humor" is the best!

lcraver@home.ca wrote:
> anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

>>> New reparations proposal before the California Assembly Task Force: $200
>>> million to every black person
>>
>>He�s not using the word black, he�s saying �African-American�.
>>
>>Maybe this is why Kamala Harris is pretending?
>
>So presumably Barack Obama is "eligible" even though no black ancestor
>of his was ever an American citizen and some of those who were were
>slave holders. Uh huh.

California never had slaves. It was a "free territory".

--
Let's go Brandon!

In article <tL-dnSYjYp2CwcX5nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>,
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

> New reparations proposal before the California Assembly Task Force: $200
> million to every black person
>
>
> https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1655067739348770817/pu/vid/
> 640x360/ph_yJlFOxOFuihmp.mp4?tag=12

Don't miss out, move there and claim you're one of those rare
white-skinned Blacks.

They may get suspicious when they find out you're a registered
Republican though.

super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
> In article <tL-dnSYjYp2CwcX5nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> New reparations proposal before the California Assembly Task Force: $200
>> million to every black person
>>
>> https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1655067739348770817/pu/vid/
>> 640x360/ph_yJlFOxOFuihmp.mp4?tag=12
>
> Don't miss out, move there and claim you're one of those rare
> white-skinned Blacks.

Why not? I mean, if you can have a penis, a beard, and an Adam's apple and
the government and society has to ignore reality and treat you as a woman
just because you say you're one, why can't I "identify" as black regardless
of whether I actually am or not?

> They may get suspicious when they find out you're a registered
> Republican though.

There's plenty of actual black Republicans out there. I wouldn't be
surprised, however, if California made that a disqualifying factor to
receive the money.

On Mon, 08 May 2023 04:30:49 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
wrote:

>lcraver@home.ca wrote:
>> anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
>>>> New reparations proposal before the California Assembly Task Force: $200
>>>> million to every black person
>>>
>>>He’s not using the word black, he’s saying “African-American”.
>>>
>>>Maybe this is why Kamala Harris is pretending?
>>
>>So presumably Barack Obama is "eligible" even though no black ancestor
>>of his was ever an American citizen and some of those who were were
>>slave holders. Uh huh.
>
>California never had slaves. It was a "free territory".

Obviously I know that and also know it was a minimum of 1000 miles
from anywhere where slavery was ever legal.

On Tue, 09 May 2023 04:56:21 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

>In article <tL-dnSYjYp2CwcX5nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> New reparations proposal before the California Assembly Task Force: $200
>> million to every black person
>>
>>
>> https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1655067739348770817/pu/vid/
>> 640x360/ph_yJlFOxOFuihmp.mp4?tag=12
>
>Don't miss out, move there and claim you're one of those rare
>white-skinned Blacks.
>
>They may get suspicious when they find out you're a registered
>Republican though.

If the same standard applies that applies to gender it's all a matter
of how you identify based on nothing more than your feelings right?

On Tue, 09 May 2023 14:08:34 +0000, BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid>
wrote:

>> Don't miss out, move there and claim you're one of those rare
>> white-skinned Blacks.
>
>Why not? I mean, if you can have a penis, a beard, and an Adam's apple and
>the government and society has to ignore reality and treat you as a woman
>just because you say you're one, why can't I "identify" as black regardless
>of whether I actually am or not?
>
>> They may get suspicious when they find out you're a registered
>> Republican though.
>
>There's plenty of actual black Republicans out there. I wouldn't be
>surprised, however, if California made that a disqualifying factor to
>receive the money.

You mean nobody ever lies about how or if they voted?

Boy that would be a first!

On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 10:19:25 PM UTC-4, BTR1701 wrote:
> New reparations proposal before the California Assembly Task Force: $200
> million to every black person

Sounds fair to me and it should be paid by every white person
in California who voted for a Democrat.

Irish Mike

On 5/9/23 9:08 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>> In article <tL-dnSYjYp2CwcX5nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>,
>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>> New reparations proposal before the California Assembly Task Force: $200
>>> million to every black person
>>>
>>> https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1655067739348770817/pu/vid/
>>> 640x360/ph_yJlFOxOFuihmp.mp4?tag=12
>>
>> Don't miss out, move there and claim you're one of those rare
>> white-skinned Blacks.
>
> Why not? I mean, if you can have a penis, a beard, and an Adam's apple and
> the government and society has to ignore reality and treat you as a woman
> just because you say you're one, why can't I "identify" as black regardless
> of whether I actually am or not?
>
>> They may get suspicious when they find out you're a registered
>> Republican though.
>
> There's plenty of actual black Republicans out there.

Actual? As opposed to what, ones in black face when you and your
buddies play dress up?

I wouldn't be
> surprised, however, if California made that a disqualifying factor to
> receive the money.

irishranger317@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 10:19:25 PM UTC-4, BTR1701 wrote:

>> New reparations proposal before the California Assembly Task Force: $200
>> million to every black person
>
>Sounds fair to me and it should be paid by every white person
>in California who voted for a Democrat.

Obviously, the DNC should pay for the reparations because they're at fault.
Dems were the party that supported slavery, Jim Crow laws, etc.

--
Let's go Brandon!

On 5/9/23 9:08 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>> In article <tL-dnSYjYp2CwcX5nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>,
>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>> New reparations proposal before the California Assembly Task Force: $200
>>> million to every black person
>>>
>>> https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1655067739348770817/pu/vid/
>>> 640x360/ph_yJlFOxOFuihmp.mp4?tag=12
>>
>> Don't miss out, move there and claim you're one of those rare
>> white-skinned Blacks.
>
> Why not? I mean, if you can have a penis, a beard, and an Adam's apple and
> the government and society has to ignore reality and treat you as a woman
> just because you say you're one, why can't I "identify" as black regardless
> of whether I actually am or not?
>
>> They may get suspicious when they find out you're a registered
>> Republican though.
>
> There's plenty of actual black Republicans out there. I wouldn't be
> surprised, however, if California made that a disqualifying factor to
> receive the money.

Agreed, because you're a drooling idiot brainwashed by Oath Keepers.

On 5/10/23 12:22 AM, Irish Mike wrote:
> On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 10:19:25 PM UTC-4, BTR1701 wrote:
>> New reparations proposal before the California Assembly Task Force: $200
>> million to every black person
>
> Sounds fair to me and it should be paid by every white person
> in California who voted for a Democrat.

Well shitposted cunt face. Try to post with less abject stupidity.