Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

The sun never sets on those who ride into it. -- RKO


arts / rec.arts.tv / Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

SubjectAuthor
* MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"Ubiquitous
+* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"BTR1701
|+* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"super70s
||+* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"Adam H. Kerman
|||`* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"super70s
||| `- Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"Adam H. Kerman
||`- Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"BTR1701
|+* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"shawn
||`* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"anim8rfsk
|| `* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"shawn
||  +- Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"anim8rfsk
||  `* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"Adam H. Kerman
||   +* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"suzeeq
||   |+* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"shawn
||   ||`* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"The Horny Goat
||   || +* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"A Friend
||   || |+* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"Adam H. Kerman
||   || ||+- Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"anim8rfsk
||   || ||`* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"A Friend
||   || || `* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"Adam H. Kerman
||   || ||  `* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"anim8rfsk
||   || ||   +* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"A Friend
||   || ||   |+* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"Adam H. Kerman
||   || ||   ||`* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"A Friend
||   || ||   || `* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"Adam H. Kerman
||   || ||   ||  `- Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"moviePig
||   || ||   |+- Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"anim8rfsk
||   || ||   |`- Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"trotsky
||   || ||   `* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"The Horny Goat
||   || ||    `* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"anim8rfsk
||   || ||     `* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"BTR1701
||   || ||      +* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"FPP
||   || ||      |`- Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"Ubiquitous
||   || ||      +- Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"anim8rfsk
||   || ||      `- Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"Ubiquitous
||   || |`- Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"trotsky
||   || `* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"Ubiquitous
||   ||  +- Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"A Friend
||   ||  `* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"anim8rfsk
||   ||   `- Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"Ubiquitous
||   |`* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"Adam H. Kerman
||   | +- Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"anim8rfsk
||   | `* Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"suzeeq
||   |  `- Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"trotsky
||   `- Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"anim8rfsk
|+- Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"anim8rfsk
|`- Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"FPP
`- Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"anim8rfsk

Pages:12
MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

<U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=188070&group=rec.arts.tv#188070

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv msnbc.breakingnews alt.news-media
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 22:30:18 +0000
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,msnbc.breakingnews,alt.news-media
Subject: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"
From: web...@polaris.net (Ubiquitous)
Keywords: https://www.dailywire.com/news/msnbc-guest-says-target-boycotts-are-literally-terrorism
Summary: https://www.dailywire.com/news/msnbc-guest-says-target-boycotts-are-literally-terrorism
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.12N (x86 32bit)
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 18:28:31 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>
Lines: 46
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-u3A3VG6qUvoJPdoTz6Ib3UJYtSBjMdNwabLiGTuu2UAB+nAI1o6ml0H9Ix6QWcaZ4ZrpsGHKRMKlYpG!ioy5cdapRxuC6KYrGYtgIwF4P7Rs4eIlKdu8McW06ZIGfIwwISNaTso=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
 by: Ubiquitous - Tue, 30 May 2023 22:28 UTC

An MSNBC guest claimed that boycott threats against major retailers
like Target amounted to �literal� economic terrorism.

The guest argued, in a video clip that surfaced on Twitter on Tuesday,
that such boycotts were proof that a small number of people could
control what a store like Target did or did not sell simply by refusing
to shop there until the appropriate changes were made.

WATCH:

If you�re boycotting Target you�re a literal terrorist, says
talking head on MSNBC. pic.twitter.com/TrlCCw0CAb

� Catch Up (@CatchUpFeed) May 30, 2023

�When Target caves in to this, then it says that the moment you
threaten the employees of even a very large corporation, you get to
control its policies,� he said. �This is economic terrorism, literally
terrorism, creating fear among the workers and forcing the corporations
to sell the things you want and not sell the things you don�t.�

Critics quickly responded to the video, saying in a number of tweets
that consumers deciding what to buy � and where they would and would
not spend their money � was not terrorism at all. Rather, they argued
that it was simply capitalism at work.

Target has faced considerable backlash over prominent LGBTQ Pride
displays � which include transgender-friendly swimwear and Pride-themed
products for babies and toddlers.

When photos and videos showing the Pride products marketed to children
went viral, executives reportedly scrambled to avoid what they referred
to as a �Bud Light situation� � namely the dramatic loss in market
capitalization that hit Anheuser-Busch after Bud Light partnered with
controversial trans-identifying influencer Dylan Mulvaney. Following an
�emergency call� to mitigate disaster, in some areas of the country,
stores have opted to move the displays to more out-of-the-way areas.

Despite that, calls for a boycott of the retail giant have continued to
grow � and by Friday, the Minnesota-based company had seen a 14% drop
in stock price. The overall loss in market capitalization was
calculated to be about $10 billion over the last ten days.

--
Let's go Brandon!

Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

<atropos-0F40DD.16381530052023@news.giganews.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=188081&group=rec.arts.tv#188081

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv msnbc.breakingnews alt.news-media
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!69.80.99.26.MISMATCH!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 23:35:17 +0000
From: atro...@mac.com (BTR1701)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,msnbc.breakingnews,alt.news-media
Subject: Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"
References: <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 16:38:15 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-0F40DD.16381530052023@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 40
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-5mFVng4/WmMyC1rr9ttMT5egU29fNl+wd1S4BqcOy36BT0ig8Us2BvFqLM/o1otN5z1aGLrT4gOBYNj!k220SkQCMW7Bi49QGWyHXI8Q7YmkaqlHF9R0f23oJIISi4r5iwc6B/x+NW6C8vers8BOA4EhfLRw!8WA=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Received-Bytes: 2948
 by: BTR1701 - Tue, 30 May 2023 23:38 UTC

In article <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

> An MSNBC guest claimed that boycott threats against major retailers
> like Target amounted to "literal" economic terrorism.

But let me guess, it's "different" when leftists boycott businesses they
don't like, e.g., the Great Chick-fil-a Gay Boycott of 2012.

That's not economic terrorism, that's just social justice, amirite?

(Of course unlike Target and Bud Light, the gay boycott against
Chick-fil-a didn't work. During the boycott, the restaurant chain saw a
massive customer surge and enjoyed record-breaking profits. The
drive-thru line for my local Chik-fil-a (in Torrance, deep-blue CA, no
less) stretched out the parking lot and down the street for a quarter
mile.

That "boycott" was the best thing that ever happened to them.

> The guest argued, in a video clip that surfaced on Twitter on Tuesday,
> that such boycotts were proof that a small number of people could
> control what a store like Target did or did not sell simply by refusing
> to shop there until the appropriate changes were made.

So how is that different from leftist boycotts like the one I mentioned
above?

> "When Target caves in to this, then it says that the moment you
> threaten the employees of even a very large corporation, you get to
> control its policies," he said. "This is economic terrorism, literally
> terrorism, creating fear among the workers and forcing the corporations
> to sell the things you want and not sell the things you don't."

Again, where were you when the gays were threatening Chick-fil-a or the
troons were calling for a Netflix boycott when they wouldn't censor Dave
Chappelle?

This is just another example of something that "is only okay when we
(leftists) do it".

Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

<super70s-2AC3A6.19311030052023@reader.eternal-september.org>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=188096&group=rec.arts.tv#188096

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv msnbc.breakingnews alt.news-media
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: super...@super70s.invalid (super70s)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,msnbc.breakingnews,alt.news-media
Subject: Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 19:31:10 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <super70s-2AC3A6.19311030052023@reader.eternal-september.org>
References: <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me> <atropos-0F40DD.16381530052023@news.giganews.com>
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e3cc5939273fc4ecd73d3df7bd1ba0bc";
logging-data="2268046"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+P7edte429o813oy6BhVB/+smJHH0fokk="
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (PPC Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+MIDSVoOY1sUy/TCAPgY1nq66q4=
X-No-Archive: yes
 by: super70s - Wed, 31 May 2023 00:31 UTC

In article <atropos-0F40DD.16381530052023@news.giganews.com>,
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

> In article <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>,
> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>
> > An MSNBC guest claimed that boycott threats against major retailers
> > like Target amounted to "literal" economic terrorism.
>
> But let me guess, it's "different" when leftists boycott businesses they
> don't like, e.g., the Great Chick-fil-a Gay Boycott of 2012.
>
> That's not economic terrorism, that's just social justice, amirite?
>
> (Of course unlike Target and Bud Light, the gay boycott against
> Chick-fil-a didn't work. During the boycott, the restaurant chain saw a
> massive customer surge and enjoyed record-breaking profits. The
> drive-thru line for my local Chik-fil-a (in Torrance, deep-blue CA, no
> less) stretched out the parking lot and down the street for a quarter
> mile.
>
> That "boycott" was the best thing that ever happened to them.

Chick-fil-A now has a diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policy.

Let's see the right boycott them, or are you afraid you'd fall on your
face with this one?

People love those grilled club sandwiches, politics be damned.

Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

<u566cu$25atd$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=188097&group=rec.arts.tv#188097

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: ahk...@chinet.com (Adam H. Kerman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 01:03:26 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <u566cu$25atd$1@dont-email.me>
References: <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me> <atropos-0F40DD.16381530052023@news.giganews.com> <super70s-2AC3A6.19311030052023@reader.eternal-september.org>
Injection-Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 01:03:26 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d985e3f919000647a9874b6c1d0c7cb5";
logging-data="2272173"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+lBstKU7gHLlHpntGRVD3AXXloIKBqxtE="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CGCJ6cC4jrfx0PDvkS/50EnEDUI=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
 by: Adam H. Kerman - Wed, 31 May 2023 01:03 UTC

Fuck Ubi and his bullshit crossposting to newsgroups that don't exist
and that he doesn't read

super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>. . .
>>But let me guess, it's "different" when leftists boycott businesses they
>>don't like, e.g., the Great Chick-fil-a Gay Boycott of 2012.

>>That's not economic terrorism, that's just social justice, amirite?

>>(Of course unlike Target and Bud Light, the gay boycott against
>>Chick-fil-a didn't work. During the boycott, the restaurant chain saw a
>>massive customer surge and enjoyed record-breaking profits. The
>>drive-thru line for my local Chik-fil-a (in Torrance, deep-blue CA, no
>>less) stretched out the parking lot and down the street for a quarter
>>mile.

>>That "boycott" was the best thing that ever happened to them.

>Chick-fil-A now has a diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policy.

They always had nondiscrimination policies as required by federal and
state law. Sounds like they renamed the document.

>Let's see the right boycott them, or are you afraid you'd fall on your
>face with this one?

Are they promoting transgendered clerks into management for
representation reasons, or is it the very same company it was last year?

Are they still enforcing the Christian sabbath?

>People love those grilled club sandwiches, politics be damned.

Feh

No one complained about them for corporate-wide employee discrimination.
It's a franchise system anyway, so any problems would have been limited
to a franchisee's location.

One of the family members personally supported religiously-conservative
causes that had nothing whatsoever to do with how the business was run.
Therefore the boycott was very personal to the speech of a single
individual. Is that the America you want to live in, or do you favor a
diversity of opinions?

Tell us what corporate policies were changed. Be quite specific as to
how any employee was being mistreated in the past and would no longer be
mistreated under the current policy.

Again: The boycott was not due to illegal discrimination.

I know you've got nothing, so just shut up at this point.

Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

<k98d7ipb59qdlevceq1avtel1do4bop8i7@4ax.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=188098&group=rec.arts.tv#188098

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv msnbc.breakingnews alt.news-media
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!peer03.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx01.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nanoflo...@notforg.m.a.i.l.com (shawn)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,msnbc.breakingnews,alt.news-media
Subject: Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"
Message-ID: <k98d7ipb59qdlevceq1avtel1do4bop8i7@4ax.com>
References: <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me> <atropos-0F40DD.16381530052023@news.giganews.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 50
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 21:24:18 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 3215
 by: shawn - Wed, 31 May 2023 01:24 UTC

On Tue, 30 May 2023 16:38:15 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

>In article <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>,
> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>
>> An MSNBC guest claimed that boycott threats against major retailers
>> like Target amounted to "literal" economic terrorism.
>
>But let me guess, it's "different" when leftists boycott businesses they
>don't like, e.g., the Great Chick-fil-a Gay Boycott of 2012.

Don't worry. The right is now preparing to boycott Chick-Fil-A. All
due to the head of Diversity the company has had in the job since
2020, but I guess no one noticed. He's been in charge of the same
diversity policies that the company has had for years according to
former employees, but that doesn't matter because now they can claim
the company has gone woke and it's time to boycott them.

>That's not economic terrorism, that's just social justice, amirite?
>
>(Of course unlike Target and Bud Light, the gay boycott against
>Chick-fil-a didn't work. During the boycott, the restaurant chain saw a
>massive customer surge and enjoyed record-breaking profits. The
>drive-thru line for my local Chik-fil-a (in Torrance, deep-blue CA, no
>less) stretched out the parking lot and down the street for a quarter
>mile.
>
>That "boycott" was the best thing that ever happened to them.
>
>> The guest argued, in a video clip that surfaced on Twitter on Tuesday,
>> that such boycotts were proof that a small number of people could
>> control what a store like Target did or did not sell simply by refusing
>> to shop there until the appropriate changes were made.
>
>So how is that different from leftist boycotts like the one I mentioned
>above?
>
>> "When Target caves in to this, then it says that the moment you
>> threaten the employees of even a very large corporation, you get to
>> control its policies," he said. "This is economic terrorism, literally
>> terrorism, creating fear among the workers and forcing the corporations
>> to sell the things you want and not sell the things you don't."
>
>Again, where were you when the gays were threatening Chick-fil-a or the
>troons were calling for a Netflix boycott when they wouldn't censor Dave
>Chappelle?
>
>This is just another example of something that "is only okay when we
>(leftists) do it".

Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

<super70s-6D8699.21372130052023@reader.eternal-september.org>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=188103&group=rec.arts.tv#188103

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: super...@super70s.invalid (super70s)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 21:37:21 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 72
Message-ID: <super70s-6D8699.21372130052023@reader.eternal-september.org>
References: <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me> <atropos-0F40DD.16381530052023@news.giganews.com> <super70s-2AC3A6.19311030052023@reader.eternal-september.org> <u566cu$25atd$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e3cc5939273fc4ecd73d3df7bd1ba0bc";
logging-data="2411318"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18QRxG6LTvmvQ5DZ+3cXSN9AeguciJjXdY="
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (PPC Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:yLT2JYJW/FROpoMMQ2Nz0OmWT+I=
X-No-Archive: yes
 by: super70s - Wed, 31 May 2023 02:37 UTC

In article <u566cu$25atd$1@dont-email.me>,
"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

> Fuck Ubi and his bullshit crossposting to newsgroups that don't exist
> and that he doesn't read

I'm afraid you've become much more annoying than he ever was with your
constant "crossposting" reminders.

1. Nobody cares.
2. You haven't been elected newsgroup hall monitor.

> super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
> >BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
> >>>. . .
>
> >>But let me guess, it's "different" when leftists boycott businesses they
> >>don't like, e.g., the Great Chick-fil-a Gay Boycott of 2012.
>
> >>That's not economic terrorism, that's just social justice, amirite?
>
> >>(Of course unlike Target and Bud Light, the gay boycott against
> >>Chick-fil-a didn't work. During the boycott, the restaurant chain saw a
> >>massive customer surge and enjoyed record-breaking profits. The
> >>drive-thru line for my local Chik-fil-a (in Torrance, deep-blue CA, no
> >>less) stretched out the parking lot and down the street for a quarter
> >>mile.
>
> >>That "boycott" was the best thing that ever happened to them.
>
> >Chick-fil-A now has a diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policy.
>
> They always had nondiscrimination policies as required by federal and
> state law. Sounds like they renamed the document.
>
> >Let's see the right boycott them, or are you afraid you'd fall on your
> >face with this one?
>
> Are they promoting transgendered clerks into management for
> representation reasons, or is it the very same company it was last year?
>
> Are they still enforcing the Christian sabbath?
>
> >People love those grilled club sandwiches, politics be damned.
>
> Feh
>
> No one complained about them for corporate-wide employee discrimination.
> It's a franchise system anyway, so any problems would have been limited
> to a franchisee's location.
>
> One of the family members personally supported religiously-conservative
> causes that had nothing whatsoever to do with how the business was run.
> Therefore the boycott was very personal to the speech of a single
> individual. Is that the America you want to live in, or do you favor a
> diversity of opinions?
>
> Tell us what corporate policies were changed. Be quite specific as to
> how any employee was being mistreated in the past and would no longer be
> mistreated under the current policy.
>
> Again: The boycott was not due to illegal discrimination.

There he goes again, assigning positions to people out of the blue.

> I know you've got nothing, so just shut up at this point.

Ooh, looks like I've become the victim of a "Running Adam H. Kerman
Vendetta."

What will I do? What will I ever do?

Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

<AuCcnXYv9_dyVOv5nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=188111&group=rec.arts.tv#188111

 copy link   Newsgroups: alt.news-media msnbc.breakingnews rec.arts.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 04:15:43 +0000
From: atro...@mac.com (BTR1701)
Newsgroups: alt.news-media,msnbc.breakingnews,rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"
References: <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me> <atropos-0F40DD.16381530052023@news.giganews.com> <super70s-2AC3A6.19311030052023@reader.eternal-september.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Usenapp/0.92.2/l for MacOS
Message-ID: <AuCcnXYv9_dyVOv5nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 04:15:43 +0000
Lines: 33
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-J7WtBHKKUpKA+ITzl6orqPQH8MlxRLivAy7By0UtXNYGu9tROk/EnJVANSuggEXy9mAbQf9vgmADISk!8p+nBF0FFp+/Y7PDF9gf8iJoU3vSITLyuJ21a5wYZzba9uEd0lzzsZh/l8t5ApsQ2fzEtkmq4Huk
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Lines: 29
 by: BTR1701 - Wed, 31 May 2023 04:15 UTC

On May 30, 2023 at 5:31:10 PM PDT, "super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid>
wrote:

> In article <atropos-0F40DD.16381530052023@news.giganews.com>,
> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>,
>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>
>> > An MSNBC guest claimed that boycott threats against major retailers
>> > like Target amounted to "literal" economic terrorism.
>>
>> But let me guess, it's "different" when leftists boycott businesses they
>> don't like, e.g., the Great Chick-fil-a Gay Boycott of 2012.
>>
>> That's not economic terrorism, that's just social justice, amirite?
>>
>> (Of course unlike Target and Bud Light, the gay boycott against
>> Chick-fil-a didn't work. During the boycott, the restaurant chain saw a
>> massive customer surge and enjoyed record-breaking profits. The
>> drive-thru line for my local Chick-fil-a (in Torrance, deep-blue CA, no
>> less) stretched out the parking lot and down the street for a quarter
>> mile.
>>
>> That "boycott" was the best thing that ever happened to them.
>
> Chick-fil-A now has a diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policy.

They never discriminated. That was all just nonsense made up by gay activists
because they didn't like what the company founder said about traditional
religious values. But the restaurants themselves never discriminated against
gays and they didn't need a DIE policy telling them not to, either.

Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

<1277982017.707192961.942003.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=188113&group=rec.arts.tv#188113

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv msnbc.breakingnews alt.news-media
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!news.neodome.net!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!peer02.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx18.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Pq699FAtm7Oero3t4X7JP+fkFjo=
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,msnbc.breakingnews,alt.news-media
Message-ID: <1277982017.707192961.942003.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
Subject: Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: anim8r...@cox.net (anim8rfsk)
References: <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>
Lines: 28
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 21:15:55 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 1729
 by: anim8rfsk - Wed, 31 May 2023 04:15 UTC

Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
> An MSNBC guest claimed that boycott threats against major retailers
> like Target amounted to “literal” economic terrorism.
>
> The guest argued, in a video clip that surfaced on Twitter on Tuesday,
> that such boycotts were proof that a small number of people could
> control what a store like Target did or did not sell simply by refusing
> to shop there until the appropriate changes were made.
>
> WATCH:
>
> If you’re boycotting Target you’re a literal terrorist, says
> talking head on MSNBC. pic.twitter.com/TrlCCw0CAb
>

Well, he has a really stupid accent and looks like a doofus, but at least
he doesn’t know what terrorism or literal mean.

> --
> Let's go Brandon!
>
>

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

<2059806072.707193122.642853.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=188114&group=rec.arts.tv#188114

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv msnbc.breakingnews alt.news-media
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx18.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Srx2SUYQFeU6s9ntYmTzqwDJ1/U=
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,msnbc.breakingnews,alt.news-media
Message-ID: <2059806072.707193122.642853.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
Subject: Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: anim8r...@cox.net (anim8rfsk)
References: <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>
<atropos-0F40DD.16381530052023@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 52
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 21:15:56 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 2973
 by: anim8rfsk - Wed, 31 May 2023 04:15 UTC

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> In article <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>,
> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>
>> An MSNBC guest claimed that boycott threats against major retailers
>> like Target amounted to "literal" economic terrorism.
>
> But let me guess, it's "different" when leftists boycott businesses they
> don't like, e.g., the Great Chick-fil-a Gay Boycott of 2012.
>

Well, that was justified, and the people running Chick-fil-A should be
moldering in prison.

> That's not economic terrorism, that's just social justice, amirite?
>
> (Of course unlike Target and Bud Light, the gay boycott against
> Chick-fil-a didn't work. During the boycott, the restaurant chain saw a
> massive customer surge and enjoyed record-breaking profits. The
> drive-thru line for my local Chik-fil-a (in Torrance, deep-blue CA, no
> less) stretched out the parking lot and down the street for a quarter
> mile.
>
> That "boycott" was the best thing that ever happened to them.
>
>> The guest argued, in a video clip that surfaced on Twitter on Tuesday,
>> that such boycotts were proof that a small number of people could
>> control what a store like Target did or did not sell simply by refusing
>> to shop there until the appropriate changes were made.
>
> So how is that different from leftist boycotts like the one I mentioned
> above?
>
>> "When Target caves in to this, then it says that the moment you
>> threaten the employees of even a very large corporation, you get to
>> control its policies," he said. "This is economic terrorism, literally
>> terrorism, creating fear among the workers and forcing the corporations
>> to sell the things you want and not sell the things you don't."
>
> Again, where were you when the gays were threatening Chick-fil-a or the
> troons were calling for a Netflix boycott when they wouldn't censor Dave
> Chappelle?
>
> This is just another example of something that "is only okay when we
> (leftists) do it".
>

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

<1724262464.707193236.370753.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=188115&group=rec.arts.tv#188115

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv msnbc.breakingnews alt.news-media
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx18.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZT/PscNWssV3UKPwNdBUhHjBd8w=
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,msnbc.breakingnews,alt.news-media
Message-ID: <1724262464.707193236.370753.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
Subject: Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: anim8r...@cox.net (anim8rfsk)
References: <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>
<atropos-0F40DD.16381530052023@news.giganews.com>
<k98d7ipb59qdlevceq1avtel1do4bop8i7@4ax.com>
Lines: 61
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 21:15:56 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 3537
 by: anim8rfsk - Wed, 31 May 2023 04:15 UTC

shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 May 2023 16:38:15 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>,
>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>
>>> An MSNBC guest claimed that boycott threats against major retailers
>>> like Target amounted to "literal" economic terrorism.
>>
>> But let me guess, it's "different" when leftists boycott businesses they
>> don't like, e.g., the Great Chick-fil-a Gay Boycott of 2012.
>
> Don't worry. The right is now preparing to boycott Chick-Fil-A. All

Good. They’ve been conspiring to murder their customers for years.

> due to the head of Diversity the company has had in the job since
> 2020, but I guess no one noticed. He's been in charge of the same
> diversity policies that the company has had for years according to
> former employees, but that doesn't matter because now they can claim
> the company has gone woke and it's time to boycott them.
>
>
>> That's not economic terrorism, that's just social justice, amirite?
>>
>> (Of course unlike Target and Bud Light, the gay boycott against
>> Chick-fil-a didn't work. During the boycott, the restaurant chain saw a
>> massive customer surge and enjoyed record-breaking profits. The
>> drive-thru line for my local Chik-fil-a (in Torrance, deep-blue CA, no
>> less) stretched out the parking lot and down the street for a quarter
>> mile.
>>
>> That "boycott" was the best thing that ever happened to them.
>>
>>> The guest argued, in a video clip that surfaced on Twitter on Tuesday,
>>> that such boycotts were proof that a small number of people could
>>> control what a store like Target did or did not sell simply by refusing
>>> to shop there until the appropriate changes were made.
>>
>> So how is that different from leftist boycotts like the one I mentioned
>> above?
>>
>>> "When Target caves in to this, then it says that the moment you
>>> threaten the employees of even a very large corporation, you get to
>>> control its policies," he said. "This is economic terrorism, literally
>>> terrorism, creating fear among the workers and forcing the corporations
>>> to sell the things you want and not sell the things you don't."
>>
>> Again, where were you when the gays were threatening Chick-fil-a or the
>> troons were calling for a Netflix boycott when they wouldn't censor Dave
>> Chappelle?
>>
>> This is just another example of something that "is only okay when we
>> (leftists) do it".
>

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

<cnld7i1flin5fbhdklgjo60eg1tvevmg5m@4ax.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=188130&group=rec.arts.tv#188130

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!newsfeed.endofthelinebbs.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx16.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nanoflo...@notforg.m.a.i.l.com (shawn)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"
Message-ID: <cnld7i1flin5fbhdklgjo60eg1tvevmg5m@4ax.com>
References: <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me> <atropos-0F40DD.16381530052023@news.giganews.com> <k98d7ipb59qdlevceq1avtel1do4bop8i7@4ax.com> <1724262464.707193236.370753.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 23
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 01:12:21 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 1795
 by: shawn - Wed, 31 May 2023 05:12 UTC

On Tue, 30 May 2023 21:15:56 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
wrote:

>shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 30 May 2023 16:38:15 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>,
>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> An MSNBC guest claimed that boycott threats against major retailers
>>>> like Target amounted to "literal" economic terrorism.
>>>
>>> But let me guess, it's "different" when leftists boycott businesses they
>>> don't like, e.g., the Great Chick-fil-a Gay Boycott of 2012.
>>
>> Don't worry. The right is now preparing to boycott Chick-Fil-A. All
>
>Good. They’ve been conspiring to murder their customers for years.

Me too. I switched to using peanut oil a couple of years ago for all
my high temp cooking since it won't burn at any reasonable temps
unlike olive oil (my previous choice for high temp cooking.)

Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

<175629821.707208496.543922.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=188133&group=rec.arts.tv#188133

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx18.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:WaakMeixaGAha+QbV0i4gXZBc2o=
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Message-ID: <175629821.707208496.543922.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
Subject: Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: anim8r...@cox.net (anim8rfsk)
References: <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>
<atropos-0F40DD.16381530052023@news.giganews.com>
<k98d7ipb59qdlevceq1avtel1do4bop8i7@4ax.com>
<1724262464.707193236.370753.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
<cnld7i1flin5fbhdklgjo60eg1tvevmg5m@4ax.com>
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 00:12:44 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 2168
 by: anim8rfsk - Wed, 31 May 2023 07:12 UTC

shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 May 2023 21:15:56 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 30 May 2023 16:38:15 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>,
>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> An MSNBC guest claimed that boycott threats against major retailers
>>>>> like Target amounted to "literal" economic terrorism.
>>>>
>>>> But let me guess, it's "different" when leftists boycott businesses they
>>>> don't like, e.g., the Great Chick-fil-a Gay Boycott of 2012.
>>>
>>> Don't worry. The right is now preparing to boycott Chick-Fil-A. All
>>
>> Good. They’ve been conspiring to murder their customers for years.
>
> Me too. I switched to using peanut oil a couple of years ago for all
> my high temp cooking since it won't burn at any reasonable temps
> unlike olive oil (my previous choice for high temp cooking.)
>
>

But do you bribe officials so you won’t have to put up signs warning your
customers?

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

<u570ie$2bl60$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=188141&group=rec.arts.tv#188141

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv msnbc.breakingnews alt.news-media
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: fredp1...@gmail.com (FPP)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,msnbc.breakingnews,alt.news-media
Subject: Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 04:30:04 -0400
Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn.
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <u570ie$2bl60$1@dont-email.me>
References: <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>
<atropos-0F40DD.16381530052023@news.giganews.com>
Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 08:30:06 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="91ace52da6a9062bee488bcb9c8d3623";
logging-data="2479296"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/sCIP+0M0HTxoHcTilrQBl"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:vhlbpE+9g/K9g8cA+fIqtQ7j7h4=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <atropos-0F40DD.16381530052023@news.giganews.com>
 by: FPP - Wed, 31 May 2023 08:30 UTC

On 5/30/23 7:38 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>,
> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>
>> An MSNBC guest claimed that boycott threats against major retailers
>> like Target amounted to "literal" economic terrorism.
>
> But let me guess, it's "different" when leftists boycott businesses they
> don't like, e.g., the Great Chick-fil-a Gay Boycott of 2012.
>
> That's not economic terrorism, that's just social justice, amirite?
>
> (Of course unlike Target and Bud Light, the gay boycott against
> Chick-fil-a didn't work. During the boycott, the restaurant chain saw a
> massive customer surge and enjoyed record-breaking profits. The
> drive-thru line for my local Chik-fil-a (in Torrance, deep-blue CA, no
> less) stretched out the parking lot and down the street for a quarter
> mile.
>
> That "boycott" was the best thing that ever happened to them.
>
>> The guest argued, in a video clip that surfaced on Twitter on Tuesday,
>> that such boycotts were proof that a small number of people could
>> control what a store like Target did or did not sell simply by refusing
>> to shop there until the appropriate changes were made.
>
> So how is that different from leftist boycotts like the one I mentioned
> above?
>
>> "When Target caves in to this, then it says that the moment you
>> threaten the employees of even a very large corporation, you get to
>> control its policies," he said. "This is economic terrorism, literally
>> terrorism, creating fear among the workers and forcing the corporations
>> to sell the things you want and not sell the things you don't."
>
> Again, where were you when the gays were threatening Chick-fil-a or the
> troons were calling for a Netflix boycott when they wouldn't censor Dave
> Chappelle?
>
> This is just another example of something that "is only okay when we
> (leftists) do it".
>

Well, fuck it... I guess threatening people with fear and threats of
violence aren't terrorism to you.

> Terrorism: the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

Why doesn't this fit the definition, counselor? That isn't a boycott,
it's a crime.
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

<u57qo2$2elp2$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=188174&group=rec.arts.tv#188174

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: ahk...@chinet.com (Adam H. Kerman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 15:56:50 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 103
Message-ID: <u57qo2$2elp2$1@dont-email.me>
References: <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me> <super70s-2AC3A6.19311030052023@reader.eternal-september.org> <u566cu$25atd$1@dont-email.me> <super70s-6D8699.21372130052023@reader.eternal-september.org>
Injection-Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 15:56:50 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d985e3f919000647a9874b6c1d0c7cb5";
logging-data="2578210"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/RFuy8k3cmRdLTusG1lFlfTBpKT6reJFg="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:anu85/28h9QTLCzCfAy9qqN6GTw=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
 by: Adam H. Kerman - Wed, 31 May 2023 15:56 UTC

super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

>>Fuck Ubi and his bullshit crossposting to newsgroups that don't exist
>>and that he doesn't read

>I'm afraid you've become much more annoying than he ever was with your
>constant "crossposting" reminders.

>1. Nobody cares.

I care.

>2. You haven't been elected newsgroup hall monitor.

I'm not hall monitor. In followup, if the crosspost is changed or
redirected, it's polite to announce it. That's all I did. Ubi is the one
trying to encourage everyone else in the thread to crosspost, which is
truly assholish behavior. Ubi likes trolling by proxy. You can choose
for yourself not to let Ubi manipulate you.

If I were playing hall monitor, I'd have admonished you for your own
failure to cut the crosspost given that it included newsgroups you don't
read, but I didn't do that. I cut the crosspost in my own followup.

I'm not obligated to play stupid Ubi crossposting games. But you, the
author of what you post to Usenet, choose for yourself to play stupid
Ubi crossposting games.

>>super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>>>BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

>>>>>. . .

>>>>But let me guess, it's "different" when leftists boycott businesses they
>>>>don't like, e.g., the Great Chick-fil-a Gay Boycott of 2012.

>>>>That's not economic terrorism, that's just social justice, amirite?

>>>>(Of course unlike Target and Bud Light, the gay boycott against
>>>>Chick-fil-a didn't work. During the boycott, the restaurant chain saw a
>>>>massive customer surge and enjoyed record-breaking profits. The
>>>>drive-thru line for my local Chik-fil-a (in Torrance, deep-blue CA, no
>>>>less) stretched out the parking lot and down the street for a quarter
>>>>mile.

>>>>That "boycott" was the best thing that ever happened to them.

>>>Chick-fil-A now has a diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policy.

>>They always had nondiscrimination policies as required by federal and
>>state law. Sounds like they renamed the document.

>>>Let's see the right boycott them, or are you afraid you'd fall on your
>>>face with this one?

>>Are they promoting transgendered clerks into management for
>>representation reasons, or is it the very same company it was last year?

>>Are they still enforcing the Christian sabbath?

>>>People love those grilled club sandwiches, politics be damned.

>>Feh

>>No one complained about them for corporate-wide employee discrimination.
>>It's a franchise system anyway, so any problems would have been limited
>>to a franchisee's location.

>>One of the family members personally supported religiously-conservative
>>causes that had nothing whatsoever to do with how the business was run.
>>Therefore the boycott was very personal to the speech of a single
>>individual. Is that the America you want to live in, or do you favor a
>>diversity of opinions?

Ducking the main issue as alway. Do you want to live in an America in
which opinions are censored or one with a diversity of opinions?

As you refused to answer, then it can be infered that you supported the
censorship attempt through boycott.

Quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack

>>Tell us what corporate policies were changed. Be quite specific as to
>>how any employee was being mistreated in the past and would no longer be
>>mistreated under the current policy.

>>Again: The boycott was not due to illegal discrimination.

>There he goes again, assigning positions to people out of the blue.

You were being utterly ignorant, so I was reminding you WHY there had
been a boycott. You truly had no idea.

>>I know you've got nothing, so just shut up at this point.

>Ooh, looks like I've become the victim of a "Running Adam H. Kerman
>Vendetta."

>What will I do? What will I ever do?

I was hoping you'd go for shutting the fuck up to stop contributing
ignorance to Usenet, but you decided to go another way.

Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

<u57sbo$2elp2$5@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=188180&group=rec.arts.tv#188180

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: ahk...@chinet.com (Adam H. Kerman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 16:24:24 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <u57sbo$2elp2$5@dont-email.me>
References: <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me> <k98d7ipb59qdlevceq1avtel1do4bop8i7@4ax.com> <1724262464.707193236.370753.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> <cnld7i1flin5fbhdklgjo60eg1tvevmg5m@4ax.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 16:24:24 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d985e3f919000647a9874b6c1d0c7cb5";
logging-data="2578210"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+foqw/oh3fSEg77D8wH7hQLFao75yj0oY="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2xTd/iwgPLLjcsTm9WzfoMfD5uU=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
 by: Adam H. Kerman - Wed, 31 May 2023 16:24 UTC

shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 30 May 2023 21:15:56 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>wrote:
>
>>shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 30 May 2023 16:38:15 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>,
>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> An MSNBC guest claimed that boycott threats against major retailers
>>>>> like Target amounted to "literal" economic terrorism.
>>>>
>>>> But let me guess, it's "different" when leftists boycott businesses they
>>>> don't like, e.g., the Great Chick-fil-a Gay Boycott of 2012.
>>>
>>> Don't worry. The right is now preparing to boycott Chick-Fil-A. All
>>
>>Good. They’ve been conspiring to murder their customers for years.
>
>Me too. I switched to using peanut oil a couple of years ago for all
>my high temp cooking since it won't burn at any reasonable temps
>unlike olive oil (my previous choice for high temp cooking.)

Rapeseed oil has an even higher smoke point with a more neutral flavor.

Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

<u57tim$2f02j$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=188181&group=rec.arts.tv#188181

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: suz...@imbris.com (suzeeq)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 09:45:09 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <u57tim$2f02j$1@dont-email.me>
References: <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>
<k98d7ipb59qdlevceq1avtel1do4bop8i7@4ax.com>
<1724262464.707193236.370753.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
<cnld7i1flin5fbhdklgjo60eg1tvevmg5m@4ax.com> <u57sbo$2elp2$5@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 16:45:10 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3529dc475bd669ad7b419da114b6d827";
logging-data="2588755"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ChMS1MyUNPRuHtTQU6oi+"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.12.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:eENusu5W/CLXbJ2o37pnHPzDCcg=
In-Reply-To: <u57sbo$2elp2$5@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: suzeeq - Wed, 31 May 2023 16:45 UTC

On 5/31/2023 9:24 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 30 May 2023 21:15:56 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 30 May 2023 16:38:15 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> An MSNBC guest claimed that boycott threats against major retailers
>>>>>> like Target amounted to "literal" economic terrorism.
>>>>>
>>>>> But let me guess, it's "different" when leftists boycott businesses they
>>>>> don't like, e.g., the Great Chick-fil-a Gay Boycott of 2012.
>>>>
>>>> Don't worry. The right is now preparing to boycott Chick-Fil-A. All
>>>
>>> Good. They’ve been conspiring to murder their customers for years.
>>
>> Me too. I switched to using peanut oil a couple of years ago for all
>> my high temp cooking since it won't burn at any reasonable temps
>> unlike olive oil (my previous choice for high temp cooking.)
>
> Rapeseed oil has an even higher smoke point with a more neutral flavor.
>
Isn't that just another word for canola oil?

Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

<a01f7il8t5ksh357ohlt9g6c3c4mdlisdh@4ax.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=188184&group=rec.arts.tv#188184

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx15.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nanoflo...@notforg.m.a.i.l.com (shawn)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"
Message-ID: <a01f7il8t5ksh357ohlt9g6c3c4mdlisdh@4ax.com>
References: <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me> <k98d7ipb59qdlevceq1avtel1do4bop8i7@4ax.com> <1724262464.707193236.370753.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> <cnld7i1flin5fbhdklgjo60eg1tvevmg5m@4ax.com> <u57sbo$2elp2$5@dont-email.me> <u57tim$2f02j$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 42
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 13:39:08 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 2955
 by: shawn - Wed, 31 May 2023 17:39 UTC

On Wed, 31 May 2023 09:45:09 -0700, suzeeq <suzee@imbris.com> wrote:

>On 5/31/2023 9:24 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 30 May 2023 21:15:56 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 30 May 2023 16:38:15 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> An MSNBC guest claimed that boycott threats against major retailers
>>>>>>> like Target amounted to "literal" economic terrorism.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But let me guess, it's "different" when leftists boycott businesses they
>>>>>> don't like, e.g., the Great Chick-fil-a Gay Boycott of 2012.
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't worry. The right is now preparing to boycott Chick-Fil-A. All
>>>>
>>>> Good. They’ve been conspiring to murder their customers for years.
>>>
>>> Me too. I switched to using peanut oil a couple of years ago for all
>>> my high temp cooking since it won't burn at any reasonable temps
>>> unlike olive oil (my previous choice for high temp cooking.)
>>
>> Rapeseed oil has an even higher smoke point with a more neutral flavor.
>>
>Isn't that just another word for canola oil?

Yes, it is. Though according to this chart Canola oil can have a
higher or lower smoke point (400-475F) than peanut oil (450F).
So there seems to be more variability between the smoke point of
various productions of canola oil. Good thing is there really isn't
much of a price difference between the two so you can buy what you
like. I had thought there was more a difference in smoke points
between canola and peanut oil which is why I switched a while back
when I noticed they had peanut oil for sale at my local grocery store.

https://blog.mountainroseherbs.com/how-to-choose-the-best-culinary-oil-with-oil-smoke-point-chart

Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

<u58bbp$2gcr7$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=188199&group=rec.arts.tv#188199

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: ahk...@chinet.com (Adam H. Kerman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 20:40:26 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <u58bbp$2gcr7$1@dont-email.me>
References: <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me> <cnld7i1flin5fbhdklgjo60eg1tvevmg5m@4ax.com> <u57sbo$2elp2$5@dont-email.me> <u57tim$2f02j$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 20:40:26 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d985e3f919000647a9874b6c1d0c7cb5";
logging-data="2634599"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18VsVuMDzy6Vm0lDBbGTbCLQWVU8wJL9Fs="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8u+1giOEf0HEX+DVVh+tr+Cnao0=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
 by: Adam H. Kerman - Wed, 31 May 2023 20:40 UTC

suzeeq <suzee@imbris.com> wrote:
>On 5/31/2023 9:24 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

>>>>. . .

>>>Me too. I switched to using peanut oil a couple of years ago for all
>>>my high temp cooking since it won't burn at any reasonable temps
>>>unlike olive oil (my previous choice for high temp cooking.)

>>Rapeseed oil has an even higher smoke point with a more neutral flavor.

>Isn't that just another word for canola oil?

"Canola" is named for "Canada", developed at University of Manitoba. It
significantly reduces the level of erucic acid to make it human food
grade and not industrial grade. Other rapeseed oils are not fit for
human consumption.

So don't listen to me.

The vegetable oil chart at Wikipedia sez Canola's smoke point is 400 F,
so peanut oil beats it with a higher smoke point of 450 F.

I should have written "grapeseed", which has a smoke point of 421 F,
still below peanut oil, but with a more neutral flavor. I've got a
bottle of it next to the stove. It's all edible as far as I know.

Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

<968008877.707260864.240752.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=188206&group=rec.arts.tv#188206

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx38.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:q7+EAPs9jzm7+5XhoFILvzlM6BM=
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Message-ID: <968008877.707260864.240752.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
Subject: Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: anim8r...@cox.net (anim8rfsk)
References: <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>
<k98d7ipb59qdlevceq1avtel1do4bop8i7@4ax.com>
<1724262464.707193236.370753.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
<cnld7i1flin5fbhdklgjo60eg1tvevmg5m@4ax.com>
<u57sbo$2elp2$5@dont-email.me>
Lines: 41
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 15:25:06 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 2444
 by: anim8rfsk - Wed, 31 May 2023 22:25 UTC

Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 30 May 2023 21:15:56 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 30 May 2023 16:38:15 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> An MSNBC guest claimed that boycott threats against major retailers
>>>>>> like Target amounted to "literal" economic terrorism.
>>>>>
>>>>> But let me guess, it's "different" when leftists boycott businesses they
>>>>> don't like, e.g., the Great Chick-fil-a Gay Boycott of 2012.
>>>>
>>>> Don't worry. The right is now preparing to boycott Chick-Fil-A. All
>>>
>>> Good. They’ve been conspiring to murder their customers for years.
>>
>> Me too. I switched to using peanut oil a couple of years ago for all
>> my high temp cooking since it won't burn at any reasonable temps
>> unlike olive oil (my previous choice for high temp cooking.)
>
> Rapeseed oil has an even higher smoke point with a more neutral flavor.
>

Don’t make me defend the legacy of murder of history‘s greatest Monster!

Rapeseed oil has a smoke point of 400°F.

Peanut oil as a smoke point of 444°F.

Yes, four, four, four

Each one of those fours screaming “death“

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

<2136569714.707261048.594134.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=188207&group=rec.arts.tv#188207

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx38.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hPqYuuk8FRMEZZdeuzq6IiNX0jg=
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Message-ID: <2136569714.707261048.594134.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
Subject: Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: anim8r...@cox.net (anim8rfsk)
References: <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>
<cnld7i1flin5fbhdklgjo60eg1tvevmg5m@4ax.com>
<u57sbo$2elp2$5@dont-email.me>
<u57tim$2f02j$1@dont-email.me>
<u58bbp$2gcr7$1@dont-email.me>
Lines: 34
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 15:25:07 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 2231
 by: anim8rfsk - Wed, 31 May 2023 22:25 UTC

Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> suzeeq <suzee@imbris.com> wrote:
>> On 5/31/2023 9:24 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> . . .
>
>>>> Me too. I switched to using peanut oil a couple of years ago for all
>>>> my high temp cooking since it won't burn at any reasonable temps
>>>> unlike olive oil (my previous choice for high temp cooking.)
>
>>> Rapeseed oil has an even higher smoke point with a more neutral flavor.
>
>> Isn't that just another word for canola oil?
>
> "Canola" is named for "Canada", developed at University of Manitoba. It
> significantly reduces the level of erucic acid to make it human food
> grade and not industrial grade. Other rapeseed oils are not fit for
> human consumption.
>
> So don't listen to me.
>
> The vegetable oil chart at Wikipedia sez Canola's smoke point is 400 F,
> so peanut oil beats it with a higher smoke point of 450 F.
>
> I should have written "grapeseed", which has a smoke point of 421 F,
> still below peanut oil, but with a more neutral flavor. I've got a
> bottle of it next to the stove. It's all edible as far as I know.
>

I’ve got a bottle of macadamia nut oil over the stove. 572°F.

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

<u58p8s$oe6l$1@solani.org>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=188226&group=rec.arts.tv#188226

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: suz...@imbris.com (suzeeq)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 17:37:47 -0700
Message-ID: <u58p8s$oe6l$1@solani.org>
References: <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>
<cnld7i1flin5fbhdklgjo60eg1tvevmg5m@4ax.com> <u57sbo$2elp2$5@dont-email.me>
<u57tim$2f02j$1@dont-email.me> <u58bbp$2gcr7$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 00:37:48 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
logging-data="800981"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.12.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FlyoAY1g1A687aERlrrh/gn0zps=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <u58bbp$2gcr7$1@dont-email.me>
X-User-ID: eJwFwYEBACAEBMCViKfG8cX+I3QHC42bHgjHYE7VTqW8RfUn4VndXEZIs4ShYO4+OhcNwwcjNBFN
 by: suzeeq - Thu, 1 Jun 2023 00:37 UTC

On 5/31/2023 1:40 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> suzeeq <suzee@imbris.com> wrote:
>> On 5/31/2023 9:24 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> . . .
>
>>>> Me too. I switched to using peanut oil a couple of years ago for all
>>>> my high temp cooking since it won't burn at any reasonable temps
>>>> unlike olive oil (my previous choice for high temp cooking.)
>
>>> Rapeseed oil has an even higher smoke point with a more neutral flavor.
>
>> Isn't that just another word for canola oil?
>
> "Canola" is named for "Canada", developed at University of Manitoba. It
> significantly reduces the level of erucic acid to make it human food
> grade and not industrial grade. Other rapeseed oils are not fit for
> human consumption.
>
> So don't listen to me.
>
> The vegetable oil chart at Wikipedia sez Canola's smoke point is 400 F,
> so peanut oil beats it with a higher smoke point of 450 F.
>
> I should have written "grapeseed", which has a smoke point of 421 F,
> still below peanut oil, but with a more neutral flavor. I've got a
> bottle of it next to the stove. It's all edible as far as I know.
>
What a difference leaving off one letter makes...

Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

<TURdM.858023$PXw7.218866@fx45.iad>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=188232&group=rec.arts.tv#188232

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx45.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:102.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.2
Subject: Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"
Content-Language: en-US
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me>
<cnld7i1flin5fbhdklgjo60eg1tvevmg5m@4ax.com> <u57sbo$2elp2$5@dont-email.me>
<u57tim$2f02j$1@dont-email.me> <u58bbp$2gcr7$1@dont-email.me>
<u58p8s$oe6l$1@solani.org>
From: gmsi...@email.com (trotsky)
In-Reply-To: <u58p8s$oe6l$1@solani.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <TURdM.858023$PXw7.218866@fx45.iad>
X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2023 00:47:47 UTC
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 19:47:47 -0500
X-Received-Bytes: 2386
 by: trotsky - Thu, 1 Jun 2023 00:47 UTC

On 5/31/23 7:37 PM, suzeeq wrote:
> On 5/31/2023 1:40 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>> suzeeq <suzee@imbris.com> wrote:
>>> On 5/31/2023 9:24 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>> shawn  <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>> . . .
>>
>>>>> Me too. I switched to using peanut oil a couple of years ago for all
>>>>> my high temp cooking since it won't burn at any reasonable temps
>>>>> unlike olive oil (my previous choice for high temp cooking.)
>>
>>>> Rapeseed oil has an even higher smoke point with a more neutral flavor.
>>
>>> Isn't that just another word for canola oil?
>>
>> "Canola" is named for "Canada", developed at University of Manitoba. It
>> significantly reduces the level of erucic acid to make it human food
>> grade and not industrial grade. Other rapeseed oils are not fit for
>> human consumption.
>>
>> So don't listen to me.
>>
>> The vegetable oil chart at Wikipedia sez Canola's smoke point is 400 F,
>> so peanut oil beats it with a higher smoke point of 450 F.
>>
>> I should have written "grapeseed", which has a smoke point of 421 F,
>> still below peanut oil, but with a more neutral flavor. I've got a
>> bottle of it next to the stove. It's all edible as far as I know.
>>
> What a difference leaving off one letter makes...

To you maybe, not necessarily to the other fucking morons. It was nice
to see canola oil explained correctly though.

Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

<sg7j7ihst1ghgp8g3hjtteiheh7elkk5r6@4ax.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=188371&group=rec.arts.tv#188371

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!news.neodome.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx01.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: lcra...@home.ca (The Horny Goat)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"
Message-ID: <sg7j7ihst1ghgp8g3hjtteiheh7elkk5r6@4ax.com>
References: <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me> <k98d7ipb59qdlevceq1avtel1do4bop8i7@4ax.com> <1724262464.707193236.370753.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> <cnld7i1flin5fbhdklgjo60eg1tvevmg5m@4ax.com> <u57sbo$2elp2$5@dont-email.me> <u57tim$2f02j$1@dont-email.me> <a01f7il8t5ksh357ohlt9g6c3c4mdlisdh@4ax.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 21
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2023 00:47:13 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 2033
 by: The Horny Goat - Fri, 2 Jun 2023 07:47 UTC

On Wed, 31 May 2023 13:39:08 -0400, shawn
<nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

>>Isn't that just another word for canola oil?
>
>Yes, it is. Though according to this chart Canola oil can have a
>higher or lower smoke point (400-475F) than peanut oil (450F).
>So there seems to be more variability between the smoke point of
>various productions of canola oil. Good thing is there really isn't
>much of a price difference between the two so you can buy what you
>like. I had thought there was more a difference in smoke points
>between canola and peanut oil which is why I switched a while back
>when I noticed they had peanut oil for sale at my local grocery store.
>
>https://blog.mountainroseherbs.com/how-to-choose-the-best-culinary-oil-with-oil-smoke-point-chart

They had a big discussion in Alberta about this years ago and decided
that maybe 1 person in 10 might be offended by the arr-ay-pee-ee word
and if that meant 1 lost sale in 10 best to pick another word. No idea
why they chose canola but it was all about making sales even to
snowflakes.

Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

<020620230854359066%nope@noway.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=188393&group=rec.arts.tv#188393

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx12.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"
From: nop...@noway.com (A Friend)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Reply-To: A Friend
Message-ID: <020620230854359066%nope@noway.com>
References: <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me> <k98d7ipb59qdlevceq1avtel1do4bop8i7@4ax.com> <1724262464.707193236.370753.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> <cnld7i1flin5fbhdklgjo60eg1tvevmg5m@4ax.com> <u57sbo$2elp2$5@dont-email.me> <u57tim$2f02j$1@dont-email.me> <a01f7il8t5ksh357ohlt9g6c3c4mdlisdh@4ax.com> <sg7j7ihst1ghgp8g3hjtteiheh7elkk5r6@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.1 (Mac OS X)
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2023 12:54:37 UTC
Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2023 08:54:35 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 2417
 by: A Friend - Fri, 2 Jun 2023 12:54 UTC

In article <sg7j7ihst1ghgp8g3hjtteiheh7elkk5r6@4ax.com>, The Horny Goat
<lcraver@home.ca> wrote:

> On Wed, 31 May 2023 13:39:08 -0400, shawn
> <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>
> >>Isn't that just another word for canola oil?
> >
> >Yes, it is. Though according to this chart Canola oil can have a
> >higher or lower smoke point (400-475F) than peanut oil (450F).
> >So there seems to be more variability between the smoke point of
> >various productions of canola oil. Good thing is there really isn't
> >much of a price difference between the two so you can buy what you
> >like. I had thought there was more a difference in smoke points
> >between canola and peanut oil which is why I switched a while back
> >when I noticed they had peanut oil for sale at my local grocery store.
> >
>
> >>https://blog.mountainroseherbs.com/how-to-choose-the-best-culinary-oil-with-
> >oil-smoke-point-chart
>
> They had a big discussion in Alberta about this years ago and decided
> that maybe 1 person in 10 might be offended by the arr-ay-pee-ee word
> and if that meant 1 lost sale in 10 best to pick another word. No idea
> why they chose canola but it was all about making sales even to
> snowflakes.

You seem to be saying that, in order to prevent sales losses of perhaps
10%, the rapeseed-oil people changed the name of their product. How
this could strike anyone as unreasonable surpasses understanding.

Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"

<u5d2k5$37muu$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=188396&group=rec.arts.tv#188396

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: ahk...@chinet.com (Adam H. Kerman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: MSNBC Guest Says Target Boycotts Are "Literally Terrorism"
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 15:41:57 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <u5d2k5$37muu$1@dont-email.me>
References: <U54o68$1vbau$12@dont-email.me> <a01f7il8t5ksh357ohlt9g6c3c4mdlisdh@4ax.com> <sg7j7ihst1ghgp8g3hjtteiheh7elkk5r6@4ax.com> <020620230854359066%nope@noway.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 15:41:57 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e57f714ba3164e213854e30f58b64250";
logging-data="3398622"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19EJj4oSpIeyiNFi9nD2ywtB2i284Xk2rs="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:F6QPZ/AgNlalqyQMTqLfSOt2/lg=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
 by: Adam H. Kerman - Fri, 2 Jun 2023 15:41 UTC

A Friend wrote:
>The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
>>Wed, 31 May 2023 13:39:08 -0400, shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>:
>>>suzeeq wrote:

>>>>Isn't that just another word for canola oil?

>>>Yes, it is. Though according to this chart Canola oil can have a
>>>higher or lower smoke point (400-475F) than peanut oil (450F).
>>>So there seems to be more variability between the smoke point of
>>>various productions of canola oil. Good thing is there really isn't
>>>much of a price difference between the two so you can buy what you
>>>like. I had thought there was more a difference in smoke points
>>>between canola and peanut oil which is why I switched a while back
>>>when I noticed they had peanut oil for sale at my local grocery store.

>>>>https://blog.mountainroseherbs.com/how-to-choose-the-best-culinary-oil-with-oil-smoke-point-chart

>>They had a big discussion in Alberta about this years ago and decided
>>that maybe 1 person in 10 might be offended by the arr-ay-pee-ee word
>>and if that meant 1 lost sale in 10 best to pick another word. No idea
>>why they chose canola but it was all about making sales even to
>>snowflakes.

>You seem to be saying that, in order to prevent sales losses of perhaps
>10%, the rapeseed-oil people changed the name of their product. How
>this could strike anyone as unreasonable surpasses understanding.

What idiot would believe a refined oil induces rape?

You know, you can take a survey to get the conclusion that you want. It
was a brand-new consumer product. It was decided to market it under a
brand new name. They wrote a survey to justify selling it under a new
name and not selling the product as "rapeseed oil".

It's a centuries-old product, one of the very oldest refined vegetable
oils. The word means "turnip", a related plant.

What I pointed out earlier was the reason: Rapeseed oil wasn't human
consumable. Agricultural scientists figured out how to grow the
plant to lower the amount of poisonous erucic acid in its seeds. The
human-consumable oil is Canola oil. Industrial-grade rapeseed oil is not
Canola oil. There was no such thing as human-consumable rapeseed oil
before the '80s. All rapeseed oil was industrial grade. None of it was
sold in supermarkets.

Different purpose, different name

I just read an article that says in some countries, "rapeseed" and
"Canola" are used interchangeably, which is probably a BAD idea 'cuz
that doesn't tell you whether it's fit for human consumption.

https://foodal.com/knowledge/paleo/canola-rapeseed-oil-difference/

Pages:12
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.7
clearnet tor