Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Lavish spending can be disastrous. Don't buy any lavishes for a while.


arts / rec.arts.sf.tv / Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb

SubjectAuthor
* Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDbThe Doctor
+* Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDbanim8rfsk
|+* Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDbJohn Hall
||+* Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDbsolar penguin
|||+* Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDbThe Doctor
||||`* Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDbDaniel65
|||| `* Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDbThe Doctor
||||  `* Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDbDaniel65
||||   `* Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDbThe Doctor
||||    `* Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDbDaniel65
||||     `* Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDbThe Doctor
||||      `* Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDbBlueshirt
||||       `- Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDbThe Doctor
|||`- Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDbThe Doctor
||`- Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDbThe Doctor
|`- Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDbThe Doctor
+* Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDbBlueshirt
|`- Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDbThe Doctor
`* Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDbUbiquitous
 +- Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDbBlueshirt
 `- Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDbThe Doctor

1
Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb

<sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=1708&group=rec.arts.sf.tv#1708

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv rec.arts.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!.POSTED.doctor.nl2k.ab.ca!not-for-mail
From: doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv
Subject: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:12:12 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: NetKnow News
Message-ID: <sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Injection-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:12:12 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: gallifrey.nk.ca; posting-host="doctor.nl2k.ab.ca:204.209.81.1";
logging-data="79962"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@gallifrey.nk.ca"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
 by: The Doctor - Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:12 UTC

From https://www.cbr.com/doctor-who-worst-episodes-imdb/

Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb

Doctor Who is a beloved sci-fi series, but some episodes fall short.
By Gabriela Delgado

Doctor Who has managed to do what many shows haven't. It's kept itself fresh
every time a Doctor regenerates and passes the baton to the next one. With over
a hundred and eighty episodes and specials, the BBC show has managed to bring
the audience some of the best sci-fi stories in TV history, reaffirming
Doctor Who's legacy within the genre.

But not everything is a success, as fans of the show will know, and Doctor Who isn't infallible. The last two seasons, in particular, seem to have rubbed even the most dedicated of Whovians in the absolute worst way. Nine out of the ten worst-rated episodes belong to the new era led by head writer Chris Chibnall, who not only introduced the first female Doctor but also reinvented many aspects of the show, only to see poor reception from viewers.


10 "Sleep No More" Tries To Be Experimental (5.8)

In "Sleep No More," the Twelfth Doctor and Clara Oswald find themselves in the mysteriously silent Le Verrier space station. With the help of a military rescue team led by Nagata, the Doctor and his companion try to discover what happened with the station's personnel.

The episode utilizes a found footage style to tell the story, with one of the characters interrupting certain sections to explain what the audience is about to see or has just experienced. This gimmick, though interesting on paper, seems to do nothing but over-complicate the plot as it goes along. Furthermore, many fans found the main enemy of "Sleep No More" to be ridiculous and childish, which immediately hurt the episode as a whole.

9 "Can You Hear Me?" Doesn't Bring Anything New To The Series (5.6)

When a strange force seems to be stalking the Thirteenth Doctor and her companions by infiltrating their nightmares, the quartet must find the source of their strange visions and stop it before it's too late.

"Can You Hear Me?" starts with an interesting, if unoriginal, premise that quickly derails into a predictable plot. The episode has two godly beings who feed off fear as the main villains, a concept that has already been explored in past episodes with much better results. Many also criticized the episode's handling of mental health, calling "Can You Hear Me?" preachy and condemning the Doctor's social awkwardness as a bland attempt to appear "woke."

8 "Resolution" Is A Poor Reintroduction To The Daleks (5.6)
Doctor Who Resolution

In "Resolution," two archeologists discover an alien creature that poses a threat to the Thirteenth Doctor and her group of companions. Things take a turn for the worse when it's revealed to be the insides of a Dalek.

Despite reintroducing the Daleks after their long absence, the 2019 New Year's special failed once again to captivate Whovians due to its poor writing. "Resolution" rushed through an important plot point including one of the Doctor's companions, Ryan, and his dad, ruining what appeared to be a longer arc in the previous season. Fans also criticized the new Daleks for not being scary enough, and the dialogue for being rough and lacking humor.

7 The Writing In "The Witchfinders" Makes It Unwatchable (5.6)
Doctor Who The Witchfinders

Upon arriving in 17th century Lancashire, the Thirteenth Doctor and her three companions end up in the middle of an exhaustive witch hunt. When they attempt to help, the Doctor finds herself up against King James I, who accuses her of being a witch herself.

"The Witchfinders" received praise from critics and scorn from fans, mirroring the general response to the eleventh season of the show as a whole. Jodie Whittaker's acting and the quality of the writing are two of the episode's weakest points, which unfortunately make "The Witchfinders" unwatchable for many. British actor Alan Cumming's cameo as King James I also had a mixed reception, with some applauding his take on the historical figure.

6 "The Battle Of Ranskoor Av Kolos" Isn't Doctor Who's Best Season Finale (5.1)
Doctor Who The Battle Of Raskoor Av Kolos

After receiving several distress calls, the Thirteenth Doctor, Ryan, Graham, and Yasmin arrive at the planet Ranskoor Av Kolos where an alien is planning his revenge against Earth.

As a season finale, "The Battle Of Ranskoor Av Kolos" did not meet expectations. Though the stakes appear high, with a powerful alien threatening Earth, the episode continues to suffer from the entire season's rough writing. Many have pointed out that it feels like just another filler episode as "The Battle Of Ranskoor Av Kolos" doesn't include any of the classic Doctor Who villains nor does it deliver any particular character development for the Doctor.

5 "The Timeless Children" Leaves A Negative Impact On 60 Years Of Whovian Lore (5.0)
Doctor Who The Timeless Children

As the Master, now commanding an army of Cybermen, continues on his quest to take over the universe, the Thirteenth Doctor faces the shocking revelations of her origin.

"The Timeless Children" reinvented Doctor Who with little success. The episode attempts to put the Doctor as a significant figure within Gallifrey's history, tainting what made the character so lovable and trapping them under the controversial "chosen one" trope. Having an origin story demystifies the Doctor and negatively impacts the simple premise of a Time Lord, their TARDIS, and a whole universe to explore. As a clever IMDb user proposes, "The Timeless Children" took sixty minutes to kill sixty years of history.

4 "Praxeus" Is A PSA Rather Than An Episode (5.0)
Doctor Who Praxeus

In "Praxeus," the Thirteenth Doctor and her companions investigate a strange bacteria that seems to be infecting the population of various countries on Earth, causing scales to sprout all over the inhabitants' bodies before they explode.

Unlike many great standalones that have benefitted from being unrelated to the season's main arc, "Praxeus" is merely another lacking filler episode. Once again, the writing is most responsible for its poor rating, with many fans complaining of its patronizing, educational tone and dull characters. Rather than a Doctor Who episode, "Praxeus" seems like a PSA about the dangers of plastic pollution.

3 The Tsuranga Conundrum Has One Of The Least Interesting Enemies In The Show (4.9)
Doctor Who The Tsuranga Conundrum

Wounded, the Thirteenth Doctor and the rest of team TARDIS end up in the Tsuranga hospital ship only to find out that a dangerous creature has somehow snuck in and is roaming the ship, unsupervised.

"The Tsuranga Conundrum" demonstrates how the quality of the show's dialogue has really changed since Steven Moffat's days. There's a lack of engagement, serving only to provide the audience with large chunks of exposition and not capturing the audience's attention like it had before. The episode also has one of the least threatening enemies in Pting, a tiny alien creature that was obviously created to be cute rather than scary.

2 "Arachnids In The UK" Is A Parody Of Itself (4.9)
Doctor Who Arachnids In The UK

In "Arachnids In The UK," team TARDIS has just returned to Sheffield when they notice something strange affecting the spiders of the city. Now faced with gigantic arachnids, the Doctor and her companions must find what caused this massive issue.

While the episode is evidently meant to parody B-movies, it ends up becoming one rather than poking fun at them. The CGI is passable—certainly better than earlier episodes of modern Who—but the political commentary is a little too on the nose to be funny or clever. The biggest issue with the episode, however, is the Doctor's questionable decisions when dealing with the spiders themselves. The Doctor asked the other characters not to shoot the arachinids, only to let them suffocate and suffer instead.

1 The Preachy Message In "Orphan 55" Was Unappreciated (4.0)
Doctor Who Orphan 55

Hoping to finally get a vacation, the Thirteenth Doctor and her companions travel to a resort on Orphan 55, a strange planet with a terrifying secret and even more horrifying past.

"Orphan 55" is the worst-rated episode in the entire show, being panned by both critics and fans alike. While not written by season eleven and twelfth showrunner Chris Chibnall, "Orphan 55" is often used to represent what hasn't been working in the new era: preachy writing with lacking dialogue and characters.

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
iNova Scotia on 17 Aug 2021 vote Liberal! Beware https://mindspring.com

Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb

<1654033961.648396756.655098.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=1710&group=rec.arts.sf.tv#1710

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx36.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xT80TJbLMS5Z+sFweCVOOVlaCRs=
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv
Message-ID: <1654033961.648396756.655098.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
Subject: Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: anim8r...@cox.net (anim8rfsk)
References: <sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Lines: 187
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 08:03:23 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 10195
 by: anim8rfsk - Mon, 19 Jul 2021 15:03 UTC

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> From https://www.cbr.com/doctor-who-worst-episodes-imdb/
>
>
> Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
>
> Doctor Who is a beloved sci-fi series, but some episodes fall short.
> By Gabriela Delgado
>
> Doctor Who has managed to do what many shows haven't. It's kept itself fresh
> every time a Doctor regenerates and passes the baton to the next one. With over
> a hundred and eighty episodes and specials, the BBC show has managed to bring
> the audience some of the best sci-fi stories in TV history, reaffirming
> Doctor Who's legacy within the genre.
>
> But not everything is a success, as fans of the show will know, and
> Doctor Who isn't infallible. The last two seasons, in particular, seem to
> have rubbed even the most dedicated of Whovians in the absolute worst
> way. Nine out of the ten worst-rated episodes belong to the new era led
> by head writer Chris Chibnall, who not only introduced the first female
> Doctor but also reinvented many aspects of the show, only to see poor
> reception from viewers.
>
>
> 10 "Sleep No More" Tries To Be Experimental (5.8)
>
> In "Sleep No More," the Twelfth Doctor and Clara Oswald find themselves
> in the mysteriously silent Le Verrier space station. With the help of a
> military rescue team led by Nagata, the Doctor and his companion try to
> discover what happened with the station's personnel.
>
> The episode utilizes a found footage style to tell the story, with one of
> the characters interrupting certain sections to explain what the audience
> is about to see or has just experienced. This gimmick, though interesting
> on paper, seems to do nothing but over-complicate the plot as it goes
> along. Furthermore, many fans found the main enemy of "Sleep No More" to
> be ridiculous and childish, which immediately hurt the episode as a whole.
>
>
> 9 "Can You Hear Me?" Doesn't Bring Anything New To The Series (5.6)
>
> When a strange force seems to be stalking the Thirteenth Doctor and her
> companions by infiltrating their nightmares, the quartet must find the
> source of their strange visions and stop it before it's too late.
>
> "Can You Hear Me?" starts with an interesting, if unoriginal, premise
> that quickly derails into a predictable plot. The episode has two godly
> beings who feed off fear as the main villains, a concept that has already
> been explored in past episodes with much better results. Many also
> criticized the episode's handling of mental health, calling "Can You Hear
> Me?" preachy and condemning the Doctor's social awkwardness as a bland
> attempt to appear "woke."
>
> 8 "Resolution" Is A Poor Reintroduction To The Daleks (5.6)
> Doctor Who Resolution
>
> In "Resolution," two archeologists discover an alien creature that poses
> a threat to the Thirteenth Doctor and her group of companions. Things
> take a turn for the worse when it's revealed to be the insides of a Dalek.
>
> Despite reintroducing the Daleks after their long absence, the 2019 New
> Year's special failed once again to captivate Whovians due to its poor
> writing. "Resolution" rushed through an important plot point including
> one of the Doctor's companions, Ryan, and his dad, ruining what appeared
> to be a longer arc in the previous season. Fans also criticized the new
> Daleks for not being scary enough, and the dialogue for being rough and lacking humor.
>
>
> 7 The Writing In "The Witchfinders" Makes It Unwatchable (5.6)
> Doctor Who The Witchfinders
>
> Upon arriving in 17th century Lancashire, the Thirteenth Doctor and her
> three companions end up in the middle of an exhaustive witch hunt. When
> they attempt to help, the Doctor finds herself up against King James I,
> who accuses her of being a witch herself.
>
> "The Witchfinders" received praise from critics and scorn from fans,
> mirroring the general response to the eleventh season of the show as a
> whole. Jodie Whittaker's acting and the quality of the writing are two of
> the episode's weakest points, which unfortunately make "The Witchfinders"
> unwatchable for many. British actor Alan Cumming's cameo as King James I
> also had a mixed reception, with some applauding his take on the historical figure.
>
>
> 6 "The Battle Of Ranskoor Av Kolos" Isn't Doctor Who's Best Season Finale (5.1)
> Doctor Who The Battle Of Raskoor Av Kolos
>
> After receiving several distress calls, the Thirteenth Doctor, Ryan,
> Graham, and Yasmin arrive at the planet Ranskoor Av Kolos where an alien
> is planning his revenge against Earth.
>
> As a season finale, "The Battle Of Ranskoor Av Kolos" did not meet
> expectations. Though the stakes appear high, with a powerful alien
> threatening Earth, the episode continues to suffer from the entire
> season's rough writing. Many have pointed out that it feels like just
> another filler episode as "The Battle Of Ranskoor Av Kolos" doesn't
> include any of the classic Doctor Who villains nor does it deliver any
> particular character development for the Doctor.
>
>
> 5 "The Timeless Children" Leaves A Negative Impact On 60 Years Of Whovian Lore (5.0)
> Doctor Who The Timeless Children
>
> As the Master, now commanding an army of Cybermen, continues on his quest
> to take over the universe, the Thirteenth Doctor faces the shocking
> revelations of her origin.
>
> "The Timeless Children" reinvented Doctor Who with little success. The
> episode attempts to put the Doctor as a significant figure within
> Gallifrey's history, tainting what made the character so lovable and
> trapping them under the controversial "chosen one" trope. Having an
> origin story demystifies the Doctor and negatively impacts the simple
> premise of a Time Lord, their TARDIS, and a whole universe to explore. As
> a clever IMDb user proposes, "The Timeless Children" took sixty minutes
> to kill sixty years of history.
>
> 4 "Praxeus" Is A PSA Rather Than An Episode (5.0)
> Doctor Who Praxeus
>
> In "Praxeus," the Thirteenth Doctor and her companions investigate a
> strange bacteria that seems to be infecting the population of various
> countries on Earth, causing scales to sprout all over the inhabitants'
> bodies before they explode.
>
> Unlike many great standalones that have benefitted from being unrelated
> to the season's main arc, "Praxeus" is merely another lacking filler
> episode. Once again, the writing is most responsible for its poor rating,
> with many fans complaining of its patronizing, educational tone and dull
> characters. Rather than a Doctor Who episode, "Praxeus" seems like a PSA
> about the dangers of plastic pollution.
>
> 3 The Tsuranga Conundrum Has One Of The Least Interesting Enemies In The Show (4.9)
> Doctor Who The Tsuranga Conundrum
>
> Wounded, the Thirteenth Doctor and the rest of team TARDIS end up in the
> Tsuranga hospital ship only to find out that a dangerous creature has
> somehow snuck in and is roaming the ship, unsupervised.
>
>
> "The Tsuranga Conundrum" demonstrates how the quality of the show's
> dialogue has really changed since Steven Moffat's days. There's a lack of
> engagement, serving only to provide the audience with large chunks of
> exposition and not capturing the audience's attention like it had before.
> The episode also has one of the least threatening enemies in Pting, a
> tiny alien creature that was obviously created to be cute rather than scary.
>
> 2 "Arachnids In The UK" Is A Parody Of Itself (4.9)
> Doctor Who Arachnids In The UK
>
> In "Arachnids In The UK," team TARDIS has just returned to Sheffield when
> they notice something strange affecting the spiders of the city. Now
> faced with gigantic arachnids, the Doctor and her companions must find
> what caused this massive issue.
>

This terrible episode is where I quit watching the series.
I’m surprised at anything with Clara in it even made this list.

> While the episode is evidently meant to parody B-movies, it ends up
> becoming one rather than poking fun at them. The CGI is
> passable—certainly better than earlier episodes of modern Who—but the
> political commentary is a little too on the nose to be funny or clever.
> The biggest issue with the episode, however, is the Doctor's questionable
> decisions when dealing with the spiders themselves. The Doctor asked the
> other characters not to shoot the arachinids, only to let them suffocate
> and suffer instead.
>
> 1 The Preachy Message In "Orphan 55" Was Unappreciated (4.0)
> Doctor Who Orphan 55
>
> Hoping to finally get a vacation, the Thirteenth Doctor and her
> companions travel to a resort on Orphan 55, a strange planet with a
> terrifying secret and even more horrifying past.
>
> "Orphan 55" is the worst-rated episode in the entire show, being panned
> by both critics and fans alike. While not written by season eleven and
> twelfth showrunner Chris Chibnall, "Orphan 55" is often used to represent
> what hasn't been working in the new era: preachy writing with lacking
> dialogue and characters.
>
>


Click here to read the complete article
Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb

<upYvdmC1Ea9gFw1w@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=1711&group=rec.arts.sf.tv#1711

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.szaf.org!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: john_nos...@jhall.co.uk (John Hall)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:58:45 +0100
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <upYvdmC1Ea9gFw1w@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>
References: <sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>
<1654033961.648396756.655098.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
Reply-To: John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii;format=flowed
X-Trace: individual.net rOaKg8e++uW3z7+s4sG/ywYarIn9OvbcEyndBaJnYHnRaJJM7J
X-Orig-Path: jhall.co.uk!john_nospam
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hTzT/HTppc56uSLzXbjK+oUqZdw=
User-Agent: Turnpike/6.07-M (<b6TUhnJ3FYsA2V863i5PH+e5EO>)
 by: John Hall - Mon, 19 Jul 2021 15:58 UTC

>The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> From https://www.cbr.com/doctor-who-worst-episodes-imdb/
>>
>>
>> Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
>>
>> Doctor Who is a beloved sci-fi series, but some episodes fall short.
>> By Gabriela Delgado
<snip>

I'd like to think that she's Roger Delgado's daughter or granddaughter,
but I suppose that is highly unlikely.

[The least relevant newsgroup trimmed.]
--
John Hall "Hard work often pays off after time, but laziness always
pays off now." Anon

Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb

<sd4f7c$acb$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=1712&group=rec.arts.sf.tv#1712

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: solar.pe...@gmail.con (solar penguin)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 18:10:52 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <sd4f7c$acb$1@dont-email.me>
References: <sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>
<1654033961.648396756.655098.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
<upYvdmC1Ea9gFw1w@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 18:10:52 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f031ec1f405d697c0d9285637a4e6973";
logging-data="10635"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Etvjcz7VLdiz1x9oKLUQc7C3u38XoZKI="
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:WHfxL492E1uCBDSLBXldjypcHDM=
sha1:Mpe7uUcM1Xl9GHDd4VFKXVldVSA=
 by: solar penguin - Mon, 19 Jul 2021 18:10 UTC

The Idiot insisted:

> Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb

Any list of DW’s worst that doesn’t include Kill The Moon
or The Twin Dilemma or Paradise Towers is just plain wrong!

Anyway, for a more positive look at recent DW, try:
https://metro.co.uk/2021/07/16/doctor-who-fans-celebrate-four-years-of-jodie-whittaker-in-role-14942100/

--
solar penguin

Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb

<sd4njt$35a$2@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=1713&group=rec.arts.sf.tv#1713

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bluesh...@indigo.news (Blueshirt)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 21:34:05 +0100
Organization: Eternal Thunder
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <sd4njt$35a$2@dont-email.me>
References: <sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 20:34:05 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="7eb457d498ba722a43e18a4d606e2474";
logging-data="3242"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/CgwoV66H0uDxfA6ls6d4a"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.12.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:aJrIqoqeoenvzeTSI49cPZtTp8E=
In-Reply-To: <sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Content-Language: en-GB
 by: Blueshirt - Mon, 19 Jul 2021 20:34 UTC

On 19/07/2021 13:12, The Doctor wrote:
> From https://www.cbr.com/doctor-who-worst-episodes-imdb/
>
>
> Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
>
> Doctor Who is a beloved sci-fi series, but some episodes fall short.
> By Gabriela Delgado

Had she watched some Doctor Who from the Colin Baker and Sylvester McCoy
years she'd have found more than ten episodes!

Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb

<sd4q2t$1pfs$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=1714&group=rec.arts.sf.tv#1714

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!.POSTED.doctor.nl2k.ab.ca!not-for-mail
From: doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 21:16:13 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: NetKnow News
Message-ID: <sd4q2t$1pfs$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>
References: <sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <1654033961.648396756.655098.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 21:16:13 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: gallifrey.nk.ca; posting-host="doctor.nl2k.ab.ca:204.209.81.1";
logging-data="58876"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@gallifrey.nk.ca"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
 by: The Doctor - Mon, 19 Jul 2021 21:16 UTC

In article <1654033961.648396756.655098.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>,
anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> From https://www.cbr.com/doctor-who-worst-episodes-imdb/
>>
>>
>> Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
>>
>> Doctor Who is a beloved sci-fi series, but some episodes fall short.
>> By Gabriela Delgado
>>
>> Doctor Who has managed to do what many shows haven't. It's kept itself fresh
>> every time a Doctor regenerates and passes the baton to the next one.
>With over
>> a hundred and eighty episodes and specials, the BBC show has managed to bring
>> the audience some of the best sci-fi stories in TV history, reaffirming
>> Doctor Who's legacy within the genre.
>>
>> But not everything is a success, as fans of the show will know, and
>> Doctor Who isn't infallible. The last two seasons, in particular, seem to
>> have rubbed even the most dedicated of Whovians in the absolute worst
>> way. Nine out of the ten worst-rated episodes belong to the new era led
>> by head writer Chris Chibnall, who not only introduced the first female
>> Doctor but also reinvented many aspects of the show, only to see poor
>> reception from viewers.
>>
>>
>> 10 "Sleep No More" Tries To Be Experimental (5.8)
>>
>> In "Sleep No More," the Twelfth Doctor and Clara Oswald find themselves
>> in the mysteriously silent Le Verrier space station. With the help of a
>> military rescue team led by Nagata, the Doctor and his companion try to
>> discover what happened with the station's personnel.
>>
>> The episode utilizes a found footage style to tell the story, with one of
>> the characters interrupting certain sections to explain what the audience
>> is about to see or has just experienced. This gimmick, though interesting
>> on paper, seems to do nothing but over-complicate the plot as it goes
>> along. Furthermore, many fans found the main enemy of "Sleep No More" to
>> be ridiculous and childish, which immediately hurt the episode as a whole.
>>
>>
>> 9 "Can You Hear Me?" Doesn't Bring Anything New To The Series (5.6)
>>
>> When a strange force seems to be stalking the Thirteenth Doctor and her
>> companions by infiltrating their nightmares, the quartet must find the
>> source of their strange visions and stop it before it's too late.
>>
>> "Can You Hear Me?" starts with an interesting, if unoriginal, premise
>> that quickly derails into a predictable plot. The episode has two godly
>> beings who feed off fear as the main villains, a concept that has already
>> been explored in past episodes with much better results. Many also
>> criticized the episode's handling of mental health, calling "Can You Hear
>> Me?" preachy and condemning the Doctor's social awkwardness as a bland
>> attempt to appear "woke."
>>
>> 8 "Resolution" Is A Poor Reintroduction To The Daleks (5.6)
>> Doctor Who Resolution
>>
>> In "Resolution," two archeologists discover an alien creature that poses
>> a threat to the Thirteenth Doctor and her group of companions. Things
>> take a turn for the worse when it's revealed to be the insides of a Dalek.
>>
>> Despite reintroducing the Daleks after their long absence, the 2019 New
>> Year's special failed once again to captivate Whovians due to its poor
>> writing. "Resolution" rushed through an important plot point including
>> one of the Doctor's companions, Ryan, and his dad, ruining what appeared
>> to be a longer arc in the previous season. Fans also criticized the new
>> Daleks for not being scary enough, and the dialogue for being rough
>and lacking humor.
>>
>>
>> 7 The Writing In "The Witchfinders" Makes It Unwatchable (5.6)
>> Doctor Who The Witchfinders
>>
>> Upon arriving in 17th century Lancashire, the Thirteenth Doctor and her
>> three companions end up in the middle of an exhaustive witch hunt. When
>> they attempt to help, the Doctor finds herself up against King James I,
>> who accuses her of being a witch herself.
>>
>> "The Witchfinders" received praise from critics and scorn from fans,
>> mirroring the general response to the eleventh season of the show as a
>> whole. Jodie Whittaker's acting and the quality of the writing are two of
>> the episode's weakest points, which unfortunately make "The Witchfinders"
>> unwatchable for many. British actor Alan Cumming's cameo as King James I
>> also had a mixed reception, with some applauding his take on the
>historical figure.
>>
>>
>> 6 "The Battle Of Ranskoor Av Kolos" Isn't Doctor Who's Best Season
>Finale (5.1)
>> Doctor Who The Battle Of Raskoor Av Kolos
>>
>> After receiving several distress calls, the Thirteenth Doctor, Ryan,
>> Graham, and Yasmin arrive at the planet Ranskoor Av Kolos where an alien
>> is planning his revenge against Earth.
>>
>> As a season finale, "The Battle Of Ranskoor Av Kolos" did not meet
>> expectations. Though the stakes appear high, with a powerful alien
>> threatening Earth, the episode continues to suffer from the entire
>> season's rough writing. Many have pointed out that it feels like just
>> another filler episode as "The Battle Of Ranskoor Av Kolos" doesn't
>> include any of the classic Doctor Who villains nor does it deliver any
>> particular character development for the Doctor.
>>
>>
>> 5 "The Timeless Children" Leaves A Negative Impact On 60 Years Of
>Whovian Lore (5.0)
>> Doctor Who The Timeless Children
>>
>> As the Master, now commanding an army of Cybermen, continues on his quest
>> to take over the universe, the Thirteenth Doctor faces the shocking
>> revelations of her origin.
>>
>> "The Timeless Children" reinvented Doctor Who with little success. The
>> episode attempts to put the Doctor as a significant figure within
>> Gallifrey's history, tainting what made the character so lovable and
>> trapping them under the controversial "chosen one" trope. Having an
>> origin story demystifies the Doctor and negatively impacts the simple
>> premise of a Time Lord, their TARDIS, and a whole universe to explore. As
>> a clever IMDb user proposes, "The Timeless Children" took sixty minutes
>> to kill sixty years of history.
>>
>> 4 "Praxeus" Is A PSA Rather Than An Episode (5.0)
>> Doctor Who Praxeus
>>
>> In "Praxeus," the Thirteenth Doctor and her companions investigate a
>> strange bacteria that seems to be infecting the population of various
>> countries on Earth, causing scales to sprout all over the inhabitants'
>> bodies before they explode.
>>
>> Unlike many great standalones that have benefitted from being unrelated
>> to the season's main arc, "Praxeus" is merely another lacking filler
>> episode. Once again, the writing is most responsible for its poor rating,
>> with many fans complaining of its patronizing, educational tone and dull
>> characters. Rather than a Doctor Who episode, "Praxeus" seems like a PSA
>> about the dangers of plastic pollution.
>>
>> 3 The Tsuranga Conundrum Has One Of The Least Interesting Enemies In
>The Show (4.9)
>> Doctor Who The Tsuranga Conundrum
>>
>> Wounded, the Thirteenth Doctor and the rest of team TARDIS end up in the
>> Tsuranga hospital ship only to find out that a dangerous creature has
>> somehow snuck in and is roaming the ship, unsupervised.
>>
>>
>> "The Tsuranga Conundrum" demonstrates how the quality of the show's
>> dialogue has really changed since Steven Moffat's days. There's a lack of
>> engagement, serving only to provide the audience with large chunks of
>> exposition and not capturing the audience's attention like it had before.
>> The episode also has one of the least threatening enemies in Pting, a
>> tiny alien creature that was obviously created to be cute rather than scary.
>>
>> 2 "Arachnids In The UK" Is A Parody Of Itself (4.9)
>> Doctor Who Arachnids In The UK
>>
>> In "Arachnids In The UK," team TARDIS has just returned to Sheffield when
>> they notice something strange affecting the spiders of the city. Now
>> faced with gigantic arachnids, the Doctor and her companions must find
>> what caused this massive issue.
>>
>
>This terrible episode is where I quit watching the series.
>I’m surprised at anything with Clara in it even made this list.
>


Click here to read the complete article
Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb

<sd4q3r$1pfs$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=1715&group=rec.arts.sf.tv#1715

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!.POSTED.doctor.nl2k.ab.ca!not-for-mail
From: doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 21:16:43 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: NetKnow News
Message-ID: <sd4q3r$1pfs$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>
References: <sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <1654033961.648396756.655098.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> <upYvdmC1Ea9gFw1w@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>
Injection-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 21:16:43 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: gallifrey.nk.ca; posting-host="doctor.nl2k.ab.ca:204.209.81.1";
logging-data="58876"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@gallifrey.nk.ca"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
 by: The Doctor - Mon, 19 Jul 2021 21:16 UTC

In article <upYvdmC1Ea9gFw1w@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>>The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> From https://www.cbr.com/doctor-who-worst-episodes-imdb/
>>>
>>>
>>> Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
>>>
>>> Doctor Who is a beloved sci-fi series, but some episodes fall short.
>>> By Gabriela Delgado
><snip>
>
>I'd like to think that she's Roger Delgado's daughter or granddaughter,
>but I suppose that is highly unlikely.
>

IYIO.

>[The least relevant newsgroup trimmed.]
>--
>John Hall "Hard work often pays off after time, but laziness always
> pays off now." Anon

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
Nova Scotia on 17 Aug 2021 vote Liberal! Beware https://mindspring.com

Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb

<sd4q4g$1pfs$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=1716&group=rec.arts.sf.tv#1716

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!.POSTED.doctor.nl2k.ab.ca!not-for-mail
From: doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 21:17:04 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: NetKnow News
Message-ID: <sd4q4g$1pfs$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>
References: <sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <1654033961.648396756.655098.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> <upYvdmC1Ea9gFw1w@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk> <sd4f7c$acb$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 21:17:04 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: gallifrey.nk.ca; posting-host="doctor.nl2k.ab.ca:204.209.81.1";
logging-data="58876"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@gallifrey.nk.ca"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
 by: The Doctor - Mon, 19 Jul 2021 21:17 UTC

In article <sd4f7c$acb$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.con> wrote:
>The Idiot insisted:
>
>> Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
>
>Any list of DW’s worst that doesn’t include Kill The Moon
>or The Twin Dilemma or Paradise Towers is just plain wrong!
>
>Anyway, for a more positive look at recent DW, try:
>https://metro.co.uk/2021/07/16/doctor-who-fans-celebrate-four-years-of-jodie-whittaker-in-role-14942100/
>

Metro stinks!

>--
>solar penguin

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
Nova Scotia on 17 Aug 2021 vote Liberal! Beware https://mindspring.com

Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb

<sd4r2j$1pfs$33@gallifrey.nk.ca>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=1717&group=rec.arts.sf.tv#1717

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!.POSTED.doctor.nl2k.ab.ca!not-for-mail
From: doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 21:33:07 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: NetKnow News
Message-ID: <sd4r2j$1pfs$33@gallifrey.nk.ca>
References: <sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <sd4njt$35a$2@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 21:33:07 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: gallifrey.nk.ca; posting-host="doctor.nl2k.ab.ca:204.209.81.1";
logging-data="58876"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@gallifrey.nk.ca"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
 by: The Doctor - Mon, 19 Jul 2021 21:33 UTC

In article <sd4njt$35a$2@dont-email.me>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>On 19/07/2021 13:12, The Doctor wrote:
>> From https://www.cbr.com/doctor-who-worst-episodes-imdb/
>>
>>
>> Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
>>
>> Doctor Who is a beloved sci-fi series, but some episodes fall short.
>> By Gabriela Delgado
>
>Had she watched some Doctor Who from the Colin Baker and Sylvester McCoy
>years she'd have found more than ten episodes!

WEll that is over sleep no more.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
Nova Scotia on 17 Aug 2021 vote Liberal! Beware https://mindspring.com

Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb

<sd526m$149e$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=1718&group=rec.arts.sf.tv#1718

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!.POSTED.doctor.nl2k.ab.ca!not-for-mail
From: doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 23:34:46 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: NetKnow News
Message-ID: <sd526m$149e$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>
References: <sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <1654033961.648396756.655098.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> <upYvdmC1Ea9gFw1w@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk> <sd4f7c$acb$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 23:34:46 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: gallifrey.nk.ca; posting-host="doctor.nl2k.ab.ca:204.209.81.1";
logging-data="37166"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@gallifrey.nk.ca"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
 by: The Doctor - Mon, 19 Jul 2021 23:34 UTC

In article <sd4f7c$acb$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.con> wrote:
>The Idiot insisted:
>
>> Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
>
>Any list of DW’s worst that doesn’t include Kill The Moon
>or The Twin Dilemma or Paradise Towers is just plain wrong!
>
>Anyway, for a more positive look at recent DW, try:
>https://metro.co.uk/2021/07/16/doctor-who-fans-celebrate-four-years-of-jodie-whittaker-in-role-14942100/
>
>--
>solar penguin

I would replace Sleep No More with Timelash or Demons of the Punjab!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
Nova Scotia on 17 Aug 2021 vote Liberal! Beware https://mindspring.com

Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb

<sd90l8$5v2$3@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=1720&group=rec.arts.sf.tv#1720

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv rec.arts.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: web...@polaris.net (Ubiquitous)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 04:32:25 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 161
Message-ID: <sd90l8$5v2$3@dont-email.me>
References: <sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Injection-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 08:32:25 -0000
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8d0d46d881e23d912fdf39d24b0d4912";
logging-data="6114"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18sjFqLP6SzQk+i8qX5b3GIsc/1gbRtYNMJ/rZHsdNkWA=="
Summary: https://www.cbr.com/doctor-who-worst-episodes-imdb/
Keywords: https://www.cbr.com/doctor-who-worst-episodes-imdb/
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+fBNI9qki0CC6qCIWeNHZdTy+WA=
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.12N (x86 32bit)
 by: Ubiquitous - Wed, 21 Jul 2021 08:32 UTC

In article <sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:

>Doctor Who has managed to do what many shows haven't. It's kept itself fresh
>every time a Doctor regenerates and passes the baton to the next one. With
>over a hundred and eighty episodes and specials, the BBC show has managed to
>bring the audience some of the best sci-fi stories in TV history, reaffirming
>Doctor Who's legacy within the genre.
>
>But not everything is a success, as fans of the show will know, and Doctor
>Who isn't infallible. The last two seasons, in particular, seem to have
>rubbed even the most dedicated of Whovians in the absolute worst way. Nine
>out of the ten worst-rated episodes belong to the new era led by head writer
>Chris Chibnall, who not only introduced the first female Doctor but also
>reinvented many aspects of the show, only to see poor reception from viewers.
>
>10 "Sleep No More" Tries To Be Experimental (5.8)
>Doctor Who Sleep No More
>In "Sleep No More," the Twelfth Doctor and Clara Oswald find themselves in
>the mysteriously silent Le Verrier space station. With the help of a military
>rescue team led by Nagata, the Doctor and his companion try to discover what
>happened with the station's personnel.
>
>The episode utilizes a found footage style to tell the story, with one of the
>characters interrupting certain sections to explain what the audience is
>about to see or has just experienced. This gimmick, though interesting on
>paper, seems to do nothing but over-complicate the plot as it goes along.
>Furthermore, many fans found the main enemy of "Sleep No More" to be
>ridiculous and childish, which immediately hurt the episode as a whole.
>
>9 "Can You Hear Me?" Doesn't Bring Anything New To The Series (5.6)
>Doctor Who Can You Hear Me
>When a strange force seems to be stalking the Thirteenth Doctor and her
>companions by infiltrating their nightmares, the quartet must find the source
>of their strange visions and stop it before it's too late.
>
>"Can You Hear Me?" starts with an interesting, if unoriginal, premise that
>quickly derails into a predictable plot. The episode has two godly beings who
>feed off fear as the main villains, a concept that has already been explored
>in past episodes with much better results. Many also criticized the episode's
>handling of mental health, calling "Can You Hear Me?" preachy and condemning
>the Doctor's social awkwardness as a bland attempt to appear "woke."
>
>8 "Resolution" Is A Poor Reintroduction To The Daleks (5.6)
>Doctor Who Resolution
>In "Resolution," two archeologists discover an alien creature that poses a
>threat to the Thirteenth Doctor and her group of companions. Things take a
>turn for the worse when it's revealed to be the insides of a Dalek.
>
>Despite reintroducing the Daleks after their long absence, the 2019 New
>Year's special failed once again to captivate Whovians due to its poor
>writing. "Resolution" rushed through an important plot point including one
>of the Doctor's companions, Ryan, and his dad, ruining what appeared to be
>a longer arc in the previous season. Fans also criticized the new Daleks for
>not being scary enough, and the dialogue for being rough and lacking humor.
>
>7 The Writing In "The Witchfinders" Makes It Unwatchable (5.6)
>Doctor Who The Witchfinders
>Upon arriving in 17th century Lancashire, the Thirteenth Doctor and her three
>companions end up in the middle of an exhaustive witch hunt. When they
>attempt to help, the Doctor finds herself up against King James I, who
>accuses her of being a witch herself.
>
>"The Witchfinders" received praise from critics and scorn from fans,
>mirroring the general response to the eleventh season of the show as a whole.
>Jodie Whittaker's acting and the quality of the writing are two of the
>episode's weakest points, which unfortunately make "The Witchfinders"
>unwatchable for many. British actor Alan Cumming's cameo as King James I
>also had a mixed reception, with some applauding his take on the historical
>figure.
>
>6 "The Battle Of Ranskoor Av Kolos" Isn't Doctor Who's Best Season Finale
>(5.1)
>Doctor Who The Battle Of Raskoor Av Kolos
>After receiving several distress calls, the Thirteenth Doctor, Ryan, Graham,
>and Yasmin arrive at the planet Ranskoor Av Kolos where an alien is planning
>his revenge against Earth.
>
>As a season finale, "The Battle Of Ranskoor Av Kolos" did not meet
>expectations. Though the stakes appear high, with a powerful alien
>threatening Earth, the episode continues to suffer from the entire season's
>rough writing. Many have pointed out that it feels like just another filler
>episode as "The Battle Of Ranskoor Av Kolos" doesn't include any of the
>classic Doctor Who villains nor does it deliver any particular character
>development for the Doctor.
>
>5 "The Timeless Children" Leaves A Negative Impact On 60 Years Of Whovian
>Lore (5.0)
>Doctor Who The Timeless Children
>As the Master, now commanding an army of Cybermen, continues on his quest to
>take over the universe, the Thirteenth Doctor faces the shocking revelations
>of her origin.
>
>"The Timeless Children" reinvented Doctor Who with little success. The
>episode attempts to put the Doctor as a significant figure within Gallifrey's
>history, tainting what made the character so lovable and trapping them under
>the controversial "chosen one" trope. Having an origin story demystifies the
>Doctor and negatively impacts the simple premise of a Time Lord, their
>TARDIS, and a whole universe to explore. As a clever IMDb user proposes,
>"The Timeless Children" took sixty minutes to kill sixty years of history.
>
>4 "Praxeus" Is A PSA Rather Than An Episode (5.0)
>Doctor Who Praxeus
>In "Praxeus," the Thirteenth Doctor and her companions investigate a strange
>bacteria that seems to be infecting the population of various countries on
>Earth, causing scales to sprout all over the inhabitants' bodies before they
>explode.
>
>Unlike many great standalones that have benefitted from being unrelated to
>the season's main arc, "Praxeus" is merely another lacking filler episode.
>Once again, the writing is most responsible for its poor rating, with many
>fans complaining of its patronizing, educational tone and dull characters.
>Rather than a Doctor Who episode, "Praxeus" seems like a PSA about the
>dangers of plastic pollution.
>
>3 The Tsuranga Conundrum Has One Of The Least Interesting Enemies In The Show
>(4.9)
>Doctor Who The Tsuranga Conundrum
>Wounded, the Thirteenth Doctor and the rest of team TARDIS end up in the
>Tsuranga hospital ship only to find out that a dangerous creature has somehow
>snuck in and is roaming the ship, unsupervised.
>
>"The Tsuranga Conundrum" demonstrates how the quality of the show's dialogue
>has really changed since Steven Moffat's days. There's a lack of engagement,
>serving only to provide the audience with large chunks of exposition and not
>capturing the audience's attention like it had before. The episode also has
>one of the least threatening enemies in Pting, a tiny alien creature that was
>obviously created to be cute rather than scary.
>
>2 "Arachnids In The UK" Is A Parody Of Itself (4.9)
>Doctor Who Arachnids In The UK
>In "Arachnids In The UK," team TARDIS has just returned to Sheffield when
>they notice something strange affecting the spiders of the city. Now faced
>with gigantic arachnids, the Doctor and her companions must find what caused
>this massive issue.
>
>While the episode is evidently meant to parody B-movies, it ends up becoming
>one rather than poking fun at them. The CGI is passable-certainly better than
>earlier episodes of modern Who-but the political commentary is a little too
>on the nose to be funny or clever. The biggest issue with the episode,
>however, is the Doctor's questionable decisions when dealing with the spiders
>themselves. The Doctor asked the other characters not to shoot the
>arachinids, only to let them suffocate and suffer instead.
>
>1 The Preachy Message In "Orphan 55" Was Unappreciated (4.0)
>Doctor Who Orphan 55
>Hoping to finally get a vacation, the Thirteenth Doctor and her companions
>travel to a resort on Orphan 55, a strange planet with a terrifying secret
>and even more horrifying past.
>
>"Orphan 55" is the worst-rated episode in the entire show, being panned by
>both critics and fans alike. While not written by season eleven and twelfth
>showrunner Chris Chibnall, "Orphan 55" is often used to represent what hasn't
>been working in the new era: preachy writing with lacking dialogue and
>characters.


Click here to read the complete article
Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb

<sd924c$up2$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=1721&group=rec.arts.sf.tv#1721

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bluesh...@indigo.news (Blueshirt)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 12:58:04 +0100
Organization: Eternal Thunder
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <sd924c$up2$1@dont-email.me>
References: <sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <sd90l8$5v2$3@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:58:04 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="bf63f6bec8ca8f0c44ab38207624ea01";
logging-data="31522"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX197TJ/Hkos+IRkIfYXe3Znt"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.12.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:JOe7nZdpS8ta0sDJnM9Ssvr45Pg=
In-Reply-To: <sd90l8$5v2$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-GB
X-Mozilla-News-Host: news://news.eternal-september.org
 by: Blueshirt - Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:58 UTC

On 21/07/2021 09:32, Ubiquitous wrote:
> In article <sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>
>> Doctor Who has managed to do what many shows haven't. It's kept itself fresh
>> every time a Doctor regenerates and passes the baton to the next one. With
>> over a hundred and eighty episodes and specials, the BBC show has managed to
>> bring the audience some of the best sci-fi stories in TV history, reaffirming
>> Doctor Who's legacy within the genre.
>>
>> But not everything is a success, as fans of the show will know, and Doctor
>> Who isn't infallible. The last two seasons, in particular, seem to have
>> rubbed even the most dedicated of Whovians in the absolute worst way. Nine
>> out of the ten worst-rated episodes belong to the new era led by head writer
>> Chris Chibnall, who not only introduced the first female Doctor but also
>> reinvented many aspects of the show, only to see poor reception from viewers.
>
> [Snip]
>
> I found it interesting that nearly all of these involve the fake (female)
> Doctor.

A clickbait article with an agenda? How original! It's just a pity the
author didn't look back as far as the Sylvester McCoy era

A male Doctor wouldn't have made much difference to those episodes, as
an actor just reads a script. So male/female in the lead role is
irrelevant if the story itself lacks substance and/or coherence.

Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb

<sd9afb$10kf$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=1722&group=rec.arts.sf.tv#1722

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv rec.arts.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!.POSTED.doctor.nl2k.ab.ca!not-for-mail
From: doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 14:20:27 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: NetKnow News
Message-ID: <sd9afb$10kf$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>
References: <sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <sd90l8$5v2$3@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 14:20:27 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: gallifrey.nk.ca; posting-host="doctor.nl2k.ab.ca:204.209.81.1";
logging-data="33423"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@gallifrey.nk.ca"
Keywords: https://www.cbr.com/doctor-who-worst-episodes-imdb/
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
 by: The Doctor - Wed, 21 Jul 2021 14:20 UTC

In article <sd90l8$5v2$3@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>In article <sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>
>>Doctor Who has managed to do what many shows haven't. It's kept itself fresh
>>every time a Doctor regenerates and passes the baton to the next one. With
>>over a hundred and eighty episodes and specials, the BBC show has managed to
>>bring the audience some of the best sci-fi stories in TV history, reaffirming
>>Doctor Who's legacy within the genre.
>>
>>But not everything is a success, as fans of the show will know, and Doctor
>>Who isn't infallible. The last two seasons, in particular, seem to have
>>rubbed even the most dedicated of Whovians in the absolute worst way. Nine
>>out of the ten worst-rated episodes belong to the new era led by head writer
>>Chris Chibnall, who not only introduced the first female Doctor but also
>>reinvented many aspects of the show, only to see poor reception from viewers.
>>
>>10 "Sleep No More" Tries To Be Experimental (5.8)
>>Doctor Who Sleep No More
>>In "Sleep No More," the Twelfth Doctor and Clara Oswald find themselves in
>>the mysteriously silent Le Verrier space station. With the help of a military
>>rescue team led by Nagata, the Doctor and his companion try to discover what
>>happened with the station's personnel.
>>
>>The episode utilizes a found footage style to tell the story, with one of the
>>characters interrupting certain sections to explain what the audience is
>>about to see or has just experienced. This gimmick, though interesting on
>>paper, seems to do nothing but over-complicate the plot as it goes along.
>>Furthermore, many fans found the main enemy of "Sleep No More" to be
>>ridiculous and childish, which immediately hurt the episode as a whole.
>>
>>9 "Can You Hear Me?" Doesn't Bring Anything New To The Series (5.6)
>>Doctor Who Can You Hear Me
>>When a strange force seems to be stalking the Thirteenth Doctor and her
>>companions by infiltrating their nightmares, the quartet must find the source
>>of their strange visions and stop it before it's too late.
>>
>>"Can You Hear Me?" starts with an interesting, if unoriginal, premise that
>>quickly derails into a predictable plot. The episode has two godly beings who
>>feed off fear as the main villains, a concept that has already been explored
>>in past episodes with much better results. Many also criticized the episode's
>>handling of mental health, calling "Can You Hear Me?" preachy and condemning
>>the Doctor's social awkwardness as a bland attempt to appear "woke."
>>
>>8 "Resolution" Is A Poor Reintroduction To The Daleks (5.6)
>>Doctor Who Resolution
>>In "Resolution," two archeologists discover an alien creature that poses a
>>threat to the Thirteenth Doctor and her group of companions. Things take a
>>turn for the worse when it's revealed to be the insides of a Dalek.
>>
>>Despite reintroducing the Daleks after their long absence, the 2019 New
>>Year's special failed once again to captivate Whovians due to its poor
>>writing. "Resolution" rushed through an important plot point including one
>>of the Doctor's companions, Ryan, and his dad, ruining what appeared to be
>>a longer arc in the previous season. Fans also criticized the new Daleks for
>>not being scary enough, and the dialogue for being rough and lacking humor.
>>
>>7 The Writing In "The Witchfinders" Makes It Unwatchable (5.6)
>>Doctor Who The Witchfinders
>>Upon arriving in 17th century Lancashire, the Thirteenth Doctor and her three
>>companions end up in the middle of an exhaustive witch hunt. When they
>>attempt to help, the Doctor finds herself up against King James I, who
>>accuses her of being a witch herself.
>>
>>"The Witchfinders" received praise from critics and scorn from fans,
>>mirroring the general response to the eleventh season of the show as a whole.
>>Jodie Whittaker's acting and the quality of the writing are two of the
>>episode's weakest points, which unfortunately make "The Witchfinders"
>>unwatchable for many. British actor Alan Cumming's cameo as King James I
>>also had a mixed reception, with some applauding his take on the historical
>>figure.
>>
>>6 "The Battle Of Ranskoor Av Kolos" Isn't Doctor Who's Best Season Finale
>>(5.1)
>>Doctor Who The Battle Of Raskoor Av Kolos
>>After receiving several distress calls, the Thirteenth Doctor, Ryan, Graham,
>>and Yasmin arrive at the planet Ranskoor Av Kolos where an alien is planning
>>his revenge against Earth.
>>
>>As a season finale, "The Battle Of Ranskoor Av Kolos" did not meet
>>expectations. Though the stakes appear high, with a powerful alien
>>threatening Earth, the episode continues to suffer from the entire season's
>>rough writing. Many have pointed out that it feels like just another filler
>>episode as "The Battle Of Ranskoor Av Kolos" doesn't include any of the
>>classic Doctor Who villains nor does it deliver any particular character
>>development for the Doctor.
>>
>>5 "The Timeless Children" Leaves A Negative Impact On 60 Years Of Whovian
>>Lore (5.0)
>>Doctor Who The Timeless Children
>>As the Master, now commanding an army of Cybermen, continues on his quest to
>>take over the universe, the Thirteenth Doctor faces the shocking revelations
>>of her origin.
>>
>>"The Timeless Children" reinvented Doctor Who with little success. The
>>episode attempts to put the Doctor as a significant figure within Gallifrey's
>>history, tainting what made the character so lovable and trapping them under
>>the controversial "chosen one" trope. Having an origin story demystifies the
>>Doctor and negatively impacts the simple premise of a Time Lord, their
>>TARDIS, and a whole universe to explore. As a clever IMDb user proposes,
>>"The Timeless Children" took sixty minutes to kill sixty years of history.
>>
>>4 "Praxeus" Is A PSA Rather Than An Episode (5.0)
>>Doctor Who Praxeus
>>In "Praxeus," the Thirteenth Doctor and her companions investigate a strange
>>bacteria that seems to be infecting the population of various countries on
>>Earth, causing scales to sprout all over the inhabitants' bodies before they
>>explode.
>>
>>Unlike many great standalones that have benefitted from being unrelated to
>>the season's main arc, "Praxeus" is merely another lacking filler episode.
>>Once again, the writing is most responsible for its poor rating, with many
>>fans complaining of its patronizing, educational tone and dull characters.
>>Rather than a Doctor Who episode, "Praxeus" seems like a PSA about the
>>dangers of plastic pollution.
>>
>>3 The Tsuranga Conundrum Has One Of The Least Interesting Enemies In The Show
>>(4.9)
>>Doctor Who The Tsuranga Conundrum
>>Wounded, the Thirteenth Doctor and the rest of team TARDIS end up in the
>>Tsuranga hospital ship only to find out that a dangerous creature has somehow
>>snuck in and is roaming the ship, unsupervised.
>>
>>"The Tsuranga Conundrum" demonstrates how the quality of the show's dialogue
>>has really changed since Steven Moffat's days. There's a lack of engagement,
>>serving only to provide the audience with large chunks of exposition and not
>>capturing the audience's attention like it had before. The episode also has
>>one of the least threatening enemies in Pting, a tiny alien creature that was
>>obviously created to be cute rather than scary.
>>
>>2 "Arachnids In The UK" Is A Parody Of Itself (4.9)
>>Doctor Who Arachnids In The UK
>>In "Arachnids In The UK," team TARDIS has just returned to Sheffield when
>>they notice something strange affecting the spiders of the city. Now faced
>>with gigantic arachnids, the Doctor and her companions must find what caused
>>this massive issue.
>>
>>While the episode is evidently meant to parody B-movies, it ends up becoming
>>one rather than poking fun at them. The CGI is passable-certainly better than
>>earlier episodes of modern Who-but the political commentary is a little too
>>on the nose to be funny or clever. The biggest issue with the episode,
>>however, is the Doctor's questionable decisions when dealing with the spiders
>>themselves. The Doctor asked the other characters not to shoot the
>>arachinids, only to let them suffocate and suffer instead.
>>
>>1 The Preachy Message In "Orphan 55" Was Unappreciated (4.0)
>>Doctor Who Orphan 55
>>Hoping to finally get a vacation, the Thirteenth Doctor and her companions
>>travel to a resort on Orphan 55, a strange planet with a terrifying secret
>>and even more horrifying past.
>>
>>"Orphan 55" is the worst-rated episode in the entire show, being panned by
>>both critics and fans alike. While not written by season eleven and twelfth
>>showrunner Chris Chibnall, "Orphan 55" is often used to represent what hasn't
>>been working in the new era: preachy writing with lacking dialogue and
>>characters.
>
>I found it interesting that nearly all of these involve the fake (female)
>Doctor.
>


Click here to read the complete article
Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb

<sftkfc$qhe$4@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=1868&group=rec.arts.sf.tv#1868

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@eternal-september.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2021 23:46:23 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <sftkfc$qhe$4@dont-email.me>
References: <sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>
<1654033961.648396756.655098.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
<upYvdmC1Ea9gFw1w@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk> <sd4f7c$acb$1@dont-email.me>
<sd4q4g$1pfs$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2021 13:46:21 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="3a533937eeb1c0960392a1f2363f555f";
logging-data="27182"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19wg1dF2JmCCQBbHETUXtiaCS6zWoBWdus="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.8.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3jOif9ZZ796BbZclrnjJHe/LN1Y=
In-Reply-To: <sd4q4g$1pfs$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>
 by: Daniel65 - Sun, 22 Aug 2021 13:46 UTC

The Doctor wrote on 20/7/21 7:17 am:
> In article <sd4f7c$acb$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.con> wrote:
>> The Idiot insisted:
>>
>>> Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
>>
>> Any list of DW’s worst that doesn’t include Kill The Moon
>> or The Twin Dilemma or Paradise Towers is just plain wrong!
>>
>> Anyway, for a more positive look at recent DW, try:
>> https://metro.co.uk/2021/07/16/doctor-who-fans-celebrate-four-years-of-jodie-whittaker-in-role-14942100/

Why, idiot?? Because the article disagrees with your opinion, I'm guessing!!
--
Daniel

Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb

<sfufvq$rlg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=1871&group=rec.arts.sf.tv#1871

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!.POSTED.doctor.nl2k.ab.ca!not-for-mail
From: doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2021 21:35:54 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: NetKnow News
Message-ID: <sfufvq$rlg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>
References: <sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <sd4f7c$acb$1@dont-email.me> <sd4q4g$1pfs$3@gallifrey.nk.ca> <sftkfc$qhe$4@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2021 21:35:54 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: gallifrey.nk.ca; posting-host="doctor.nl2k.ab.ca:204.209.81.1";
logging-data="28336"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@gallifrey.nk.ca"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
 by: The Doctor - Sun, 22 Aug 2021 21:35 UTC

In article <sftkfc$qhe$4@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote on 20/7/21 7:17 am:
>> In article <sd4f7c$acb$1@dont-email.me>,
>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.con> wrote:
>>> The Idiot insisted:
>>>
>>>> Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
>>>
>>> Any list of DW’s worst that doesn’t include Kill The Moon
>>> or The Twin Dilemma or Paradise Towers is just plain wrong!
>>>
>>> Anyway, for a more positive look at recent DW, try:
>>>
>https://metro.co.uk/2021/07/16/doctor-who-fans-celebrate-four-years-of-jodie-whittaker-in-role-14942100/
>
>Why, idiot?? Because the article disagrees with your opinion, I'm guessing!!

Metro is a suck up!

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
Canada on 20 Sept 2021 vote ! Beware https://mindspring.com

Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb

<sg01jh$76e$2@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=1873&group=rec.arts.sf.tv#1873

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@eternal-september.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 21:42:45 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <sg01jh$76e$2@dont-email.me>
References: <sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <sd4f7c$acb$1@dont-email.me>
<sd4q4g$1pfs$3@gallifrey.nk.ca> <sftkfc$qhe$4@dont-email.me>
<sfufvq$rlg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:42:41 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="810192cc97a3bcc175bd525138c110cc";
logging-data="7374"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19SMTe9LL+J3LzagJyAOyDS5JYiBwWFrZk="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.8.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:cmoN7LjOmnHnvenivNZEoqB+PEk=
In-Reply-To: <sfufvq$rlg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>
 by: Daniel65 - Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:42 UTC

The Doctor wrote on 23/8/21 7:35 am:
> In article <sftkfc$qhe$4@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 20/7/21 7:17 am:
>>> In article <sd4f7c$acb$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.con> wrote:
>>>> The Idiot insisted:
>>>>
>>>>> Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
>>>>
>>>> Any list of DW’s worst that doesn’t include Kill The Moon
>>>> or The Twin Dilemma or Paradise Towers is just plain wrong!
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, for a more positive look at recent DW, try:
>>>>
>> https://metro.co.uk/2021/07/16/doctor-who-fans-celebrate-four-years-of-jodie-whittaker-in-role-14942100/
>>
>> Why, idiot?? Because the article disagrees with your opinion, I'm guessing!!
>
> Metro is a suck up!

A 'suck up' to who, idiot?? Not YOU, I'm guessing!!
--
Daniel

Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb

<sg087o$fsg$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=1874&group=rec.arts.sf.tv#1874

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!.POSTED.doctor.nl2k.ab.ca!not-for-mail
From: doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 13:35:52 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: NetKnow News
Message-ID: <sg087o$fsg$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>
References: <sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <sftkfc$qhe$4@dont-email.me> <sfufvq$rlg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <sg01jh$76e$2@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 13:35:52 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: gallifrey.nk.ca; posting-host="doctor.nl2k.ab.ca:204.209.81.1";
logging-data="16272"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@gallifrey.nk.ca"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
 by: The Doctor - Mon, 23 Aug 2021 13:35 UTC

In article <sg01jh$76e$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote on 23/8/21 7:35 am:
>> In article <sftkfc$qhe$4@dont-email.me>,
>> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote on 20/7/21 7:17 am:
>>>> In article <sd4f7c$acb$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.con> wrote:
>>>>> The Idiot insisted:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
>>>>>
>>>>> Any list of DW’s worst that
>doesn’t include Kill The Moon
>>>>> or The Twin Dilemma or Paradise Towers is just plain wrong!
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, for a more positive look at recent DW, try:
>>>>>
>>>
>https://metro.co.uk/2021/07/16/doctor-who-fans-celebrate-four-years-of-jodie-whittaker-in-role-14942100/
>>>
>>> Why, idiot?? Because the article disagrees with your opinion, I'm guessing!!
>>
>> Metro is a suck up!
>
>A 'suck up' to who, idiot?? Not YOU, I'm guessing!!

A suck up to the woke agenda!

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
Canada on 20 Sept 2021 vote ! Beware https://mindspring.com

Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb

<sg2j3f$3ig$2@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=1875&group=rec.arts.sf.tv#1875

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danie...@eternal-september.org (Daniel65)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 20:53:40 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <sg2j3f$3ig$2@dont-email.me>
References: <sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <sftkfc$qhe$4@dont-email.me>
<sfufvq$rlg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <sg01jh$76e$2@dont-email.me>
<sg087o$fsg$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 10:53:36 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="6b075dfe7fe1ec8f344d7b1c8f33a5ec";
logging-data="3664"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/25DXNAguOIiVn2Esuw5u1myLgWYZOzIs="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.8.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:w839EyZR9+CF0oYp2/N8kdxWlLA=
In-Reply-To: <sg087o$fsg$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>
 by: Daniel65 - Tue, 24 Aug 2021 10:53 UTC

The Doctor wrote on 23/8/21 11:35 pm:
> In article <sg01jh$76e$2@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 23/8/21 7:35 am:
>>> In article <sftkfc$qhe$4@dont-email.me>,
>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 20/7/21 7:17 am:
>>>>> In article <sd4f7c$acb$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.con> wrote:
>>>>>> The Idiot insisted:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any list of DW’s worst that
>> doesn’t include Kill The Moon
>>>>>> or The Twin Dilemma or Paradise Towers is just plain wrong!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyway, for a more positive look at recent DW, try:
>>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://metro.co.uk/2021/07/16/doctor-who-fans-celebrate-four-years-of-jodie-whittaker-in-role-14942100/
>>>>
>>>> Why, idiot?? Because the article disagrees with your opinion, I'm guessing!!
>>>
>>> Metro is a suck up!
>>
>> A 'suck up' to who, idiot?? Not YOU, I'm guessing!!
>
> A suck up to the woke agenda!

As against "A suck up to the idiot agenda!"!!
--
Daniel

Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb

<sg2s6t$381$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=1879&group=rec.arts.sf.tv#1879

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!.POSTED.doctor.nl2k.ab.ca!not-for-mail
From: doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 13:29:01 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: NetKnow News
Message-ID: <sg2s6t$381$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>
References: <sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <sg01jh$76e$2@dont-email.me> <sg087o$fsg$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <sg2j3f$3ig$2@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 13:29:01 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: gallifrey.nk.ca; posting-host="doctor.nl2k.ab.ca:204.209.81.1";
logging-data="3329"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@gallifrey.nk.ca"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
 by: The Doctor - Tue, 24 Aug 2021 13:29 UTC

In article <sg2j3f$3ig$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote on 23/8/21 11:35 pm:
>> In article <sg01jh$76e$2@dont-email.me>,
>> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote on 23/8/21 7:35 am:
>>>> In article <sftkfc$qhe$4@dont-email.me>,
>>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 20/7/21 7:17 am:
>>>>>> In article <sd4f7c$acb$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.con> wrote:
>>>>>>> The Idiot insisted:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any list of DW’s worst that
>>> doesn’t include Kill The Moon
>>>>>>> or The Twin Dilemma or Paradise Towers is just plain wrong!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyway, for a more positive look at recent DW, try:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>https://metro.co.uk/2021/07/16/doctor-who-fans-celebrate-four-years-of-jodie-whittaker-in-role-14942100/
>>>>>
>>>>> Why, idiot?? Because the article disagrees with your opinion, I'm
>guessing!!
>>>>
>>>> Metro is a suck up!
>>>
>>> A 'suck up' to who, idiot?? Not YOU, I'm guessing!!
>>
>> A suck up to the woke agenda!
>
>As against "A suck up to the idiot agenda!"!!
>--
>Daniel

Idiots are pro-woke. I am anti-woke!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
Canada on 20 Sept 2021 vote ! Beware https://mindspring.com

Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb

<sg3m2o$3lr$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=1883&group=rec.arts.sf.tv#1883

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bluesh...@indigo.news (Blueshirt)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 21:50:32 +0100
Organization: Eternal Thunder
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <sg3m2o$3lr$1@dont-email.me>
References: <sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <sg01jh$76e$2@dont-email.me>
<sg087o$fsg$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <sg2j3f$3ig$2@dont-email.me>
<sg2s6t$381$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 20:50:32 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="78dbbea80d3fea73af24e2d979abcf55";
logging-data="3771"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19y4zH7F/qvadx+sWekNZic"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.13.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:07E7JxOQeMPU18MTJbm4sN+9+r4=
In-Reply-To: <sg2s6t$381$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Content-Language: en-GB
X-Mozilla-News-Host: news://news.eternal-september.org
 by: Blueshirt - Tue, 24 Aug 2021 20:50 UTC

On 24/08/2021 14:29, The Doctor wrote:
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 23/8/21 11:35 pm:
>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 23/8/21 7:35 am:
>>>>>
>>>>> Metro is a suck up!
>>>>
>>>> A 'suck up' to who, idiot?? Not YOU, I'm guessing!!
>>>
>>> A suck up to the woke agenda!
>>
>> As against "A suck up to the idiot agenda!"!!
>
> Idiots are pro-woke. I am anti-woke!

A non sequitur if ever there was!

Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb

<sg3p5a$218u$23@gallifrey.nk.ca>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=1884&group=rec.arts.sf.tv#1884

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!.POSTED.doctor.nl2k.ab.ca!not-for-mail
From: doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Doctor Who: 10 Worst Episodes, According To IMDb
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 21:43:06 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: NetKnow News
Message-ID: <sg3p5a$218u$23@gallifrey.nk.ca>
References: <sd3q6s$2e2q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <sg2j3f$3ig$2@dont-email.me> <sg2s6t$381$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <sg3m2o$3lr$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 21:43:06 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: gallifrey.nk.ca; posting-host="doctor.nl2k.ab.ca:204.209.81.1";
logging-data="66846"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@gallifrey.nk.ca"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
 by: The Doctor - Tue, 24 Aug 2021 21:43 UTC

In article <sg3m2o$3lr$1@dont-email.me>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>On 24/08/2021 14:29, The Doctor wrote:
>> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote on 23/8/21 11:35 pm:
>>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 23/8/21 7:35 am:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Metro is a suck up!
>>>>>
>>>>> A 'suck up' to who, idiot?? Not YOU, I'm guessing!!
>>>>
>>>> A suck up to the woke agenda!
>>>
>>> As against "A suck up to the idiot agenda!"!!
>>
>> Idiots are pro-woke. I am anti-woke!
>
>A non sequitur if ever there was!

The good olde days are back!

>
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
Canada on 20 Sept 2021 vote ! Beware https://mindspring.com

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.7
clearnet tor