> RichA
>
> They figured if it suffuses the cities in smog, they can "prove their point."

Saw a webm video clip of a satellite shot of Canada that shows the wildfires,
which we're told happened due to lightening strikes, starting long _after_ the
cloud cover had cleared, the implication being that the fires were purposely
started by Leftist arsonists to promote the climate change agenda.

Did the trees get the jab?

On 6/8/2023 2:33 PM, Ed Stasiak wrote:
>> RichA
>>
>> They figured if it suffuses the cities in smog, they can "prove their point."
>
> Saw a webm video clip of a satellite shot of Canada that shows the wildfires,
> which we're told happened due to lightening strikes, starting long _after_ the
> cloud cover had cleared, the implication being that the fires were purposely
> started by Leftist arsonists to promote the climate change agenda.
>
I'd say that implication smells like a conspiracy theory. Lightning
strikes do cause many fires but they may not be noticeable until after
the clouds move on a few hours later. I did hear one fire may have been
caused by a controlled burn that got out of control.

On Thursday, June 8, 2023 at 5:18:59 PM UTC-5, suzeeq wrote:
> On 6/8/2023 2:33 PM, Ed Stasiak wrote:
> >> RichA
> >>
> >> They figured if it suffuses the cities in smog, they can "prove their point."
> >
> > Saw a webm video clip of a satellite shot of Canada that shows the wildfires,
> > which we're told happened due to lightening strikes, starting long _after_ the
> > cloud cover had cleared, the implication being that the fires were purposely
> > started by Leftist arsonists to promote the climate change agenda.
> >
> I'd say that implication smells like a conspiracy theory. Lightning
> strikes do cause many fires but they may not be noticeable until after
> the clouds move on a few hours later. I did hear one fire may have been
> caused by a controlled burn that got out of control.

I can see Hugh Rowland types from Ice Road Truckers setting the fires and trucking $$water to extinguish them.