There is no evidence of DNA nor fingerprints on the baggie of cocaine
found in the White House lobby.

https://apnews.com/article/cocaine-white-house-biden-drugs-west-wing-e6bf17a4bfe7d450aa66005ad6feeec6

Surely they can run DNA analysis on drug itself to identify the
drug-growing region in South America, narrowing it down to a field if
not a specific plant, then trace it through the drug distribution
network? Couple of clicks on Penelope's keyboard?

In article <u8pltt$3o02k$1@dont-email.me>, Adam H. Kerman
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

> There is no evidence of DNA nor fingerprints on the baggie of cocaine
> found in the White House lobby.

That seems odd, unless the bag was planted there on purpose.

On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 19:10:47 -0400, A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:

>In article <u8pltt$3o02k$1@dont-email.me>, Adam H. Kerman
><ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>
>> There is no evidence of DNA nor fingerprints on the baggie of cocaine
>> found in the White House lobby.
>
>
>That seems odd, unless the bag was planted there on purpose.

Now the Magaites are up in arms because they just found out that
marijuana had been found in the past year in the White House. Given
the number of people that pass through there every day I would have
been shocked if it hadn't been found in every White House
administration. Which is a far cry from saying the President was
smoking it.

On 7/13/2023 4:10 PM, A Friend wrote:
> In article <u8pltt$3o02k$1@dont-email.me>, Adam H. Kerman
> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>
>> There is no evidence of DNA nor fingerprints on the baggie of cocaine
>> found in the White House lobby.
>
>
> That seems odd, unless the bag was planted there on purpose.
>
That's possible.

On 7/13/23 6:10 PM, A Friend wrote:
> In article <u8pltt$3o02k$1@dont-email.me>, Adam H. Kerman
> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>
>> There is no evidence of DNA nor fingerprints on the baggie of cocaine
>> found in the White House lobby.
>
>
> That seems odd, unless the bag was planted there on purpose.

Have you heard of Republicans?

On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 20:13:49 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

>There is no evidence of DNA nor fingerprints on the baggie of cocaine
>found in the White House lobby.
>
>https://apnews.com/article/cocaine-white-house-biden-drugs-west-wing-e6bf17a4bfe7d450aa66005ad6feeec6
>
>Surely they can run DNA analysis on drug itself to identify the
>drug-growing region in South America, narrowing it down to a field if
>not a specific plant, then trace it through the drug distribution
>network? Couple of clicks on Penelope's keyboard?

They know exactly who, what, where, when, how and why. They simply
chose to lie about it. There is NO way they don't know given the
amount of surveilance at the White House.

On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 21:18:05 -0700, suzeeq <suzee@imbris.com> wrote:

>On 7/13/2023 4:10 PM, A Friend wrote:
>> In article <u8pltt$3o02k$1@dont-email.me>, Adam H. Kerman
>> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>
>>> There is no evidence of DNA nor fingerprints on the baggie of cocaine
>>> found in the White House lobby.
>>
>>
>> That seems odd, unless the bag was planted there on purpose.
>>
>That's possible.

<eyeroll>

On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 7:16:32 AM UTC-4, NoBody wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 20:13:49 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
> <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>
> >There is no evidence of DNA nor fingerprints on the baggie of cocaine
> >found in the White House lobby.
> >
> >https://apnews.com/article/cocaine-white-house-biden-drugs-west-wing-e6bf17a4bfe7d450aa66005ad6feeec6
> >
> >Surely they can run DNA analysis on drug itself to identify the
> >drug-growing region in South America, narrowing it down to a field if
> >not a specific plant, then trace it through the drug distribution
> >network? Couple of clicks on Penelope's keyboard?
> They know exactly who, what, where, when, how and why. They simply
> chose to lie about it. There is NO way they don't know given the
> amount of surveilance at the White House.

They know exactly who brought in the cocaine and they know exactly who
leaked the Supreme Court's abortion ruling. But the American voters will never know.

Irish Mike

In article <Zv6sM.241134$edH5.35054@fx11.iad>, trotsky
<gmsingh@email.com> wrote:

> On 7/13/23 6:10 PM, A Friend wrote:
> > In article <u8pltt$3o02k$1@dont-email.me>, Adam H. Kerman
> > <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> >
> >> There is no evidence of DNA nor fingerprints on the baggie of cocaine
> >> found in the White House lobby.
> >
> >
> > That seems odd, unless the bag was planted there on purpose.
>
>
> Have you heard of Republicans?

I presume the bag was planted in an effort to make Biden look bad, so,
yes.

In article <140720230746329069%nope@noway.com>,
A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:

> In article <Zv6sM.241134$edH5.35054@fx11.iad>, trotsky
> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>
> > On 7/13/23 6:10 PM, A Friend wrote:
> > > In article <u8pltt$3o02k$1@dont-email.me>, Adam H. Kerman
> > > <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> There is no evidence of DNA nor fingerprints on the baggie of cocaine
> > >> found in the White House lobby.
> > >
> > > That seems odd, unless the bag was planted there on purpose.
> >
> > Have you heard of Republicans?
>
> I presume the bag was planted in an effort to make Biden look bad, so,
> yes.

Yes, because Democrats never behave badly, so it must be a setup. It
never takes long for this little bit of idiocy to slither its way to the
front.

Whenever leftists are caught behaving badly, there's always some brain
stem that claims that the culprits are really stealth conservatives just
trying to make the poor little socialists look bad. It basically goes
like this:

Conservatives caught behaving badly = proof conservatives behaved badly

Progs caught behaving badly = proof they were set up by conservatives

The theory being, I suppose, that no leftist would ever do anything
wrong or illegal because their hearts are with angels or some such
nonsense. So if a prog is caught doing wrong, it must be because he/she
isn't a real prog after all.

It's the "no true Scotsman" logical fallacy writ large.

irishranger317@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 7:16:32 AM UTC-4, NoBody wrote:
>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

>>> There is no evidence of DNA nor fingerprints on the baggie of cocaine
>>> found in the White House lobby.
>>>
>>> Surely they can run DNA analysis on drug itself to identify the
>>> drug-growing region in South America, narrowing it down to a field if
>>> not a specific plant, then trace it through the drug distribution
>>> network? Couple of clicks on Penelope's keyboard?
>>
>>They know exactly who, what, where, when, how and why. They simply
>>chose to lie about it. There is NO way they don't know given the
>>amount of surveilance at the White House.
>
>They know exactly who brought in the cocaine and they know exactly who
>leaked the Supreme Court's abortion ruling. But the American voters will
>never know.

They also know who planted those pipe bombs at RNC and DNC HQ on Jan 6, 2020.

[Kerman's incorrect formatting fixed.]

--
Let's go Brandon!

In article <140720230746329069%nope@noway.com>, nope@noway.com wrote:
> trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>> On 7/13/23 6:10 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>> Adam H. Kerman> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

>>>> There is no evidence of DNA nor fingerprints on the baggie of
>>>> cocaine found in the White House lobby.
>>>
>>> That seems odd, unless the bag was planted there on purpose.
>>
>> Have you heard of Republicans?
>
> I presume the bag was planted in an effort to make Biden look bad,
> so, yes.

TROLL-O-METER
5* 6* *7
4* *8
3* *9
2* *10
1* | *stuporous
0* -*- *catatonic
* |\ *comatose
* \ *clinical death
* \ *biological death
* _\/ *demonic apparition
* * *damned for all eternity

atropos@mac.com wrote:
> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:

>> I presume the bag was planted in an effort to make Biden look bad, so,
>> yes.

Umm, Senile Sleepy Joe is doing that just fine on his own.

>Yes, because Democrats never behave badly, so it must be a setup. It
>never takes long for this little bit of idiocy to slither its way to the
>front.
>
>Whenever leftists are caught behaving badly, there's always some brain
>stem that claims that the culprits are really stealth conservatives just
>trying to make the poor little socialists look bad. It basically goes
>like this:
>
>Conservatives caught behaving badly = proof conservatives behaved badly
>
>Progs caught behaving badly = proof they were set up by conservatives
>
>The theory being, I suppose, that no leftist would ever do anything
>wrong or illegal because their hearts are with angels or some such
>nonsense. So if a prog is caught doing wrong, it must be because he/she
>isn't a real prog after all.
>
>It's the "no true Scotsman" logical fallacy writ large.

It truely is amazing to see the lengths leftists will go to blame someone
else for their bad bahvior, eh?

If one were to propose a logical conspiracy theory, it would be that a
Democrat planted it as leverage to convince Resident Joke Biden to drop out
of running or to either convince Cackling Kamala Harris to resign or prevent
her from running for president.

--
Let's go Brandon!

nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com wrote:

>Now the Magaites

Epithet noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make (and
get the epithet right).

--
Let's go Brandon

On 7/14/2023 9:51 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <140720230746329069%nope@noway.com>,
> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <Zv6sM.241134$edH5.35054@fx11.iad>, trotsky
>> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/13/23 6:10 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>>> In article <u8pltt$3o02k$1@dont-email.me>, Adam H. Kerman
>>>> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> There is no evidence of DNA nor fingerprints on the baggie of cocaine
>>>>> found in the White House lobby.
>>>>
>>>> That seems odd, unless the bag was planted there on purpose.
>>>
>>> Have you heard of Republicans?
>>
>> I presume the bag was planted in an effort to make Biden look bad, so,
>> yes.
>
> Yes, because Democrats never behave badly, so it must be a setup. It
> never takes long for this little bit of idiocy to slither its way to the
> front.
>
> Whenever leftists are caught behaving badly, there's always some brain
> stem that claims that the culprits are really stealth conservatives just
> trying to make the poor little socialists look bad. It basically goes
> like this:
>
> Conservatives caught behaving badly = proof conservatives behaved badly
>
> Progs caught behaving badly = proof they were set up by conservatives
>
> The theory being, I suppose, that no leftist would ever do anything
> wrong or illegal because their hearts are with angels or some such
> nonsense. So if a prog is caught doing wrong, it must be because he/she
> isn't a real prog after all.
>
> It's the "no true Scotsman" logical fallacy writ large.
>
Since no one was actually caught, either on tape or forensically, it
coulda been either right or left. Or an independent.

On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 3:08:47 AM UTC-4, trotsky wrote:
> On 7/13/23 6:10 PM, A Friend wrote:
> > In article <u8pltt$3o02k$1...@dont-email.me>, Adam H. Kerman
> > <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
> >
> >> There is no evidence of DNA nor fingerprints on the baggie of cocaine
> >> found in the White House lobby.
> >
> > That seems odd, unless the bag was planted there on purpose.
>
> Have you heard of Republicans?

I wonder why these republicans would accuse Hunter with no evidence. I've heard republicans accusing Hunter of the cocaine. No evidence though. No fingerprints. No DNA linking Hunter to the cocaine.
Never evidence though. Never fingerprints.
I wonder why these republicans would accuse people with no evidence. Never witnesses. Never evidence. Never fingerprints. Never times or places of supposed crimes, though. Never anything from these republicans except ****.

On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 12:52:32 PM UTC-4, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <140720230746329069%no...@noway.com>,
> A Friend <no...@noway.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <Zv6sM.241134$edH5....@fx11.iad>, trotsky
> > <gms...@email.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 7/13/23 6:10 PM, A Friend wrote:
> > > > In article <u8pltt$3o02k$1...@dont-email.me>, Adam H. Kerman
> > > > <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> There is no evidence of DNA nor fingerprints on the baggie of cocaine
> > > >> found in the White House lobby.
> > > >
> > > > That seems odd, unless the bag was planted there on purpose.
> > >
> > > Have you heard of Republicans?
> >
> > I presume the bag was planted in an effort to make Biden look bad, so,
> > yes.
> Yes, because Democrats never behave badly, so it must be a setup.

You mean the guilty speak up?

In article <atropos-0055EA.09514714072023@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
<atropos@mac.com> wrote:

> In article <140720230746329069%nope@noway.com>,
> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <Zv6sM.241134$edH5.35054@fx11.iad>, trotsky
> > <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 7/13/23 6:10 PM, A Friend wrote:
> > > > In article <u8pltt$3o02k$1@dont-email.me>, Adam H. Kerman
> > > > <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> There is no evidence of DNA nor fingerprints on the baggie of cocaine
> > > >> found in the White House lobby.
> > > >
> > > > That seems odd, unless the bag was planted there on purpose.
> > >
> > > Have you heard of Republicans?
> >
> > I presume the bag was planted in an effort to make Biden look bad, so,
> > yes.
>
> Yes, because Democrats never behave badly, so it must be a setup. It
> never takes long for this little bit of idiocy to slither its way to the
> front.

Your own brand of idiocy is that someone left a baggie of cocaine in
the White House briefing room "by accident." Who would do something
like that?

The lack of fingerprints, etc., strongly suggests chicanery. No, it's
not proven. No one said it was.

> Whenever leftists are caught behaving badly, there's always some brain
> stem that claims that the culprits are really stealth conservatives just
> trying to make the poor little socialists look bad. It basically goes
> like this:
>
> Conservatives caught behaving badly = proof conservatives behaved badly
>
> Progs caught behaving badly = proof they were set up by conservatives
>
> The theory being, I suppose, that no leftist would ever do anything
> wrong or illegal because their hearts are with angels or some such
> nonsense. So if a prog is caught doing wrong, it must be because he/she
> isn't a real prog after all.
>
> It's the "no true Scotsman" logical fallacy writ large.

Spare me the horseshit. We have no idea what happened here; we're all
speculating.

In article <U8pltu$3o02k$1@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
<weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

> In article <140720230746329069%nope@noway.com>, nope@noway.com wrote:
> > trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
> >> On 7/13/23 6:10 PM, A Friend wrote:
> >>> Adam H. Kerman> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> There is no evidence of DNA nor fingerprints on the baggie of
> >>>> cocaine found in the White House lobby.
> >>>
> >>> That seems odd, unless the bag was planted there on purpose.
> >>
> >> Have you heard of Republicans?
> >
> > I presume the bag was planted in an effort to make Biden look bad,
> > so, yes.
>
>
> TROLL-O-METER

The oddest part of all this is that you still think the meter thing is
clever.

A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> In article <atropos-0055EA.09514714072023@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <140720230746329069%nope@noway.com>,
>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <Zv6sM.241134$edH5.35054@fx11.iad>, trotsky
>>> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 7/13/23 6:10 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>>>> In article <u8pltt$3o02k$1@dont-email.me>, Adam H. Kerman
>>>>> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> There is no evidence of DNA nor fingerprints on the baggie of cocaine
>>>>>> found in the White House lobby.
>>>>>
>>>>> That seems odd, unless the bag was planted there on purpose.
>>>>
>>>> Have you heard of Republicans?
>>>
>>> I presume the bag was planted in an effort to make Biden look bad, so,
>>> yes.
>>
>> Yes, because Democrats never behave badly, so it must be a setup. It
>> never takes long for this little bit of idiocy to slither its way to the
>> front.
>
> Your own brand of idiocy is that someone left a baggie of cocaine in
> the White House briefing room "by accident." Who would do something
> like that?

Maybe because they're a drug addict and drug addicts aren't known for their
reliability and common sense?

> The lack of fingerprints, etc., strongly suggests chicanery. No, it's
> not proven. No one said it was.
>
>
>> Whenever leftists are caught behaving badly, there's always some brain
>> stem that claims that the culprits are really stealth conservatives just
>> trying to make the poor little socialists look bad. It basically goes
>> like this:
>>
>> Conservatives caught behaving badly = proof conservatives behaved badly
>>
>> Progs caught behaving badly = proof they were set up by conservatives
>>
>> The theory being, I suppose, that no leftist would ever do anything
>> wrong or illegal because their hearts are with angels or some such
>> nonsense. So if a prog is caught doing wrong, it must be because he/she
>> isn't a real prog after all.
>>
>> It's the "no true Scotsman" logical fallacy writ large.
>
>
> Spare me the horseshit. We have no idea what happened here; we're all
> speculating.

On 7/14/2023 2:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>> In article <atropos-0055EA.09514714072023@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <140720230746329069%nope@noway.com>,
>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <Zv6sM.241134$edH5.35054@fx11.iad>, trotsky
>>>> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 7/13/23 6:10 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>>>>> In article <u8pltt$3o02k$1@dont-email.me>, Adam H. Kerman
>>>>>> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is no evidence of DNA nor fingerprints on the baggie of cocaine
>>>>>>> found in the White House lobby.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That seems odd, unless the bag was planted there on purpose.
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you heard of Republicans?
>>>>
>>>> I presume the bag was planted in an effort to make Biden look bad, so,
>>>> yes.
>>>
>>> Yes, because Democrats never behave badly, so it must be a setup. It
>>> never takes long for this little bit of idiocy to slither its way to the
>>> front.
>>
>> Your own brand of idiocy is that someone left a baggie of cocaine in
>> the White House briefing room "by accident." Who would do something
>> like that?
>
> Maybe because they're a drug addict and drug addicts aren't known for their
> reliability and common sense?
>
Drug use does not equal drug addiction.

suzeeq <suzee@imbris.com> wrote:
>On 7/14/2023 2:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>>trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>On 7/13/23 6:10 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>>>>>>Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

>>>>>>>>There is no evidence of DNA nor fingerprints on the baggie of cocaine
>>>>>>>>found in the White House lobby.

>>>>>>>That seems odd, unless the bag was planted there on purpose.

>>>>>>Have you heard of Republicans?

>>>>>I presume the bag was planted in an effort to make Biden look bad, so,
>>>>>yes.

>>>>Yes, because Democrats never behave badly, so it must be a setup. It
>>>>never takes long for this little bit of idiocy to slither its way to the
>>>>front.

>>>Your own brand of idiocy is that someone left a baggie of cocaine in
>>>the White House briefing room "by accident." Who would do something
>>>like that?

>>Maybe because they're a drug addict and drug addicts aren't known for their
>>reliability and common sense?

>Drug use does not equal drug addiction.

With cocaine? I don't think so.

On 7/14/2023 3:51 PM, A Friend wrote:
> In article <U8pltu$3o02k$1@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
> <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>
>> In article <140720230746329069%nope@noway.com>, nope@noway.com wrote:
>>> trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>> On 7/13/23 6:10 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>>>> Adam H. Kerman> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>> There is no evidence of DNA nor fingerprints on the baggie of
>>>>>> cocaine found in the White House lobby.
>>>>>
>>>>> That seems odd, unless the bag was planted there on purpose.
>>>>
>>>> Have you heard of Republicans?
>>>
>>> I presume the bag was planted in an effort to make Biden look bad,
>>> so, yes.
>>
>>
>> TROLL-O-METER
>
>
> The oddest part of all this is that you still think the meter thing is
> clever.

Isn't it? What else could explain the silence that always greets it?

On 7/14/2023 3:32 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> suzeeq <suzee@imbris.com> wrote:
>> On 7/14/2023 2:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>>> trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 7/13/23 6:10 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>>>>>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence of DNA nor fingerprints on the baggie of cocaine
>>>>>>>>> found in the White House lobby.
>
>>>>>>>> That seems odd, unless the bag was planted there on purpose.
>
>>>>>>> Have you heard of Republicans?
>
>>>>>> I presume the bag was planted in an effort to make Biden look bad, so,
>>>>>> yes.
>
>>>>> Yes, because Democrats never behave badly, so it must be a setup. It
>>>>> never takes long for this little bit of idiocy to slither its way to the
>>>>> front.
>
>>>> Your own brand of idiocy is that someone left a baggie of cocaine in
>>>> the White House briefing room "by accident." Who would do something
>>>> like that?
>
>>> Maybe because they're a drug addict and drug addicts aren't known for their
>>> reliability and common sense?
>
>> Drug use does not equal drug addiction.
>
> With cocaine? I don't think so.
>
I've used coke back in the 80s and certainly didn't become addicted to
it. Several friends too.

On Jul 14, 2023 at 3:06:08 PM PDT, "suzeeq" <suzee@imbris.com> wrote:

> On 7/14/2023 2:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>> In article <atropos-0055EA.09514714072023@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
>>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <140720230746329069%nope@noway.com>,
>>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <Zv6sM.241134$edH5.35054@fx11.iad>, trotsky
>>>>> <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/13/23 6:10 PM, A Friend wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <u8pltt$3o02k$1@dont-email.me>, Adam H. Kerman
>>>>>>> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is no evidence of DNA nor fingerprints on the baggie of cocaine
>>>>>>>> found in the White House lobby.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That seems odd, unless the bag was planted there on purpose.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have you heard of Republicans?
>>>>>
>>>>> I presume the bag was planted in an effort to make Biden look bad, so,
>>>>> yes.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, because Democrats never behave badly, so it must be a setup. It
>>>> never takes long for this little bit of idiocy to slither its way to the
>>>> front.
>>>
>>> Your own brand of idiocy is that someone left a baggie of cocaine in
>>> the White House briefing room "by accident." Who would do something
>>> like that?
>>
>> Maybe because they're a drug addict and drug addicts aren't known for their
>> reliability and common sense?
>>
> Drug use does not equal drug addiction.

Hence my use of the word "maybe".