The new ”$600 rule”
Under the new rules set forth by the IRS, if you got paid more than $600 for the transaction of goods and services through third-party payment platforms, you will receive a 1099-K for reporting the income.

....

Amazing

https://primal.net/thread/note12ejrj2g23ayve48kpv9p9c3mdeef4kwj8ylf8gvejz4hhsvm99zqgmudm4

---------

keep a song in your heart !

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zvk_uLnv4uo

In article <2ab4def3-3ca7-4145-a3da-02e02eca5514n@googlegroups.com>,
chromebook test <chromiumtest56@gmail.com> wrote:

> The new "$600 rule"

> Under the new rules set forth by the IRS, if you got paid more than $600 for
> the transaction of goods and services through third-party payment platforms,
> you will receive a 1099-K for reporting the income.

"But those 20,000 new IRS agents we're hiring are just to go after
billionaires who aren't paying their fair share. Honest. Trust us!"

On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:13:11 PM UTC-4, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <2ab4def3-3ca7-4145...@googlegroups.com>,
> chromebook test <chromiu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The new "$600 rule"
>
> > Under the new rules set forth by the IRS, if you got paid more than $600 for
> > the transaction of goods and services through third-party payment platforms,
> > you will receive a 1099-K for reporting the income.

> "But those 20,000 new IRS agents we're hiring are just to go after
> billionaires who aren't paying their fair share. Honest. Trust us!"

They will have their hands full with bitcoin, nostr, and 'for sale' classifieds on nostr
https://primal.net/thread/note12ejrj2g23ayve48kpv9p9c3mdeef4kwj8ylf8gvejz4hhsvm99zqgmudm4

tags: im guessin' ... but it sounds like the silk road x a million ...

On 7/13/23 5:12 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <2ab4def3-3ca7-4145-a3da-02e02eca5514n@googlegroups.com>,
> chromebook test <chromiumtest56@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The new "$600 rule"
>
>> Under the new rules set forth by the IRS, if you got paid more than $600 for
>> the transaction of goods and services through third-party payment platforms,
>> you will receive a 1099-K for reporting the income.
>
> "But those 20,000 new IRS agents we're hiring are just to go after
> billionaires who aren't paying their fair share. Honest. Trust us!"
>

And how, exactly does this correlate?

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 22:21:29 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 7/13/23 5:12 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <2ab4def3-3ca7-4145-a3da-02e02eca5514n@googlegroups.com>,
>> chromebook test <chromiumtest56@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The new "$600 rule"
>>
>>> Under the new rules set forth by the IRS, if you got paid more than $600 for
>>> the transaction of goods and services through third-party payment platforms,
>>> you will receive a 1099-K for reporting the income.
>>
>> "But those 20,000 new IRS agents we're hiring are just to go after
>> billionaires who aren't paying their fair share. Honest. Trust us!"
>>
>
>
>And how, exactly does this correlate?

You seriously can't add one and one to make two?

On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:13:11 PM UTC-4, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <2ab4def3-3ca7-4145...@googlegroups.com>,
> chromebook test <chromiu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The new "$600 rule"
>
> > Under the new rules set forth by the IRS, if you got paid more than $600 for
> > the transaction of goods and services through third-party payment platforms,
> > you will receive a 1099-K for reporting the income.
> "But those 20,000 new IRS agents we're hiring are just to go after
> billionaires who aren't paying their fair share. Honest. Trust us!"

Biden wanted to hire 87,000 new additional IRS Agents - to just go after the
735 billionaires in America. That would, of course, be in addition to the
thousands of IRS Agents currently on the payroll.

Irish Mike

On Sat, 15 Jul 2023 07:43:19 -0700 (PDT), Irish Mike
<irishranger317@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:13:11?PM UTC-4, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <2ab4def3-3ca7-4145...@googlegroups.com>,
>> chromebook test <chromiu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > The new "$600 rule"
>>
>> > Under the new rules set forth by the IRS, if you got paid more than $600 for
>> > the transaction of goods and services through third-party payment platforms,
>> > you will receive a 1099-K for reporting the income.
>> "But those 20,000 new IRS agents we're hiring are just to go after
>> billionaires who aren't paying their fair share. Honest. Trust us!"
>
>Biden wanted to hire 87,000 new additional IRS Agents - to just go after the
>735 billionaires in America. That would, of course, be in addition to the
> thousands of IRS Agents currently on the payroll.

While that is part of the plan many of those new people are to replace
existing people who leave or are retiring.

On 7/15/2023 8:05 AM, shawn wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jul 2023 07:43:19 -0700 (PDT), Irish Mike
> <irishranger317@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:13:11?PM UTC-4, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <2ab4def3-3ca7-4145...@googlegroups.com>,
>>> chromebook test <chromiu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The new "$600 rule"
>>>
>>>> Under the new rules set forth by the IRS, if you got paid more than $600 for
>>>> the transaction of goods and services through third-party payment platforms,
>>>> you will receive a 1099-K for reporting the income.
>>> "But those 20,000 new IRS agents we're hiring are just to go after
>>> billionaires who aren't paying their fair share. Honest. Trust us!"
>>
>> Biden wanted to hire 87,000 new additional IRS Agents - to just go after the
>> 735 billionaires in America. That would, of course, be in addition to the
>> thousands of IRS Agents currently on the payroll.
>
> While that is part of the plan many of those new people are to replace
> existing people who leave or are retiring.

Plus just how many people do you think the billionaires have working on
hiding their money?

--
I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
dirty old man.

On 7/15/23 9:43 AM, Irish Mike wrote:
> On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:13:11 PM UTC-4, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <2ab4def3-3ca7-4145...@googlegroups.com>,
>> chromebook test <chromiu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The new "$600 rule"
>>
>>> Under the new rules set forth by the IRS, if you got paid more than $600 for
>>> the transaction of goods and services through third-party payment platforms,
>>> you will receive a 1099-K for reporting the income.
>> "But those 20,000 new IRS agents we're hiring are just to go after
>> billionaires who aren't paying their fair share. Honest. Trust us!"
>
> Biden wanted to hire 87,000 new additional IRS Agents - to just go after the
> 735 billionaires in America. That would, of course, be in addition to the
> thousands of IRS Agents currently on the payroll.
>
> Irish Mike

So now the back and forth between regular/constipated guy and sockpuppet
is being done with "Irish Mike" and "Ed Stasiak" is in semi-retirement?

On 7/15/23 10:43 AM, Irish Mike wrote:
> On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:13:11 PM UTC-4, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <2ab4def3-3ca7-4145...@googlegroups.com>,
>> chromebook test <chromiu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The new "$600 rule"
>>
>>> Under the new rules set forth by the IRS, if you got paid more than $600 for
>>> the transaction of goods and services through third-party payment platforms,
>>> you will receive a 1099-K for reporting the income.

>> "But those 20,000 new IRS agents we're hiring are just to go after
>> billionaires who aren't paying their fair share. Honest. Trust us!"
>
> Biden wanted to hire 87,000 new additional IRS Agents - to just go after the
> 735 billionaires in America. That would, of course, be in addition to the
> thousands of IRS Agents currently on the payroll.
>
> Irish Mike
>

Congrats! You actually managed to tell the truth. The extra agents are
to get the wealthy to pay their fair share.

Why else would Republicans be falling all over themselves to stop them?

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 05:39:30 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 7/15/23 10:43 AM, Irish Mike wrote:
>> On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:13:11?PM UTC-4, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <2ab4def3-3ca7-4145...@googlegroups.com>,
>>> chromebook test <chromiu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The new "$600 rule"
>>>
>>>> Under the new rules set forth by the IRS, if you got paid more than $600 for
>>>> the transaction of goods and services through third-party payment platforms,
>>>> you will receive a 1099-K for reporting the income.
>
>>> "But those 20,000 new IRS agents we're hiring are just to go after
>>> billionaires who aren't paying their fair share. Honest. Trust us!"
>>
>> Biden wanted to hire 87,000 new additional IRS Agents - to just go after the
>> 735 billionaires in America. That would, of course, be in addition to the
>> thousands of IRS Agents currently on the payroll.
>>
>> Irish Mike
>>
>
>Congrats! You actually managed to tell the truth. The extra agents are
>to get the wealthy to pay their fair share.
>
>Why else would Republicans be falling all over themselves to stop them?

And yet the new laws seem to be going for the little guy. How do you
reconcile that?

On Jul 16, 2023 at 8:13:42 AM PDT, "NoBody" <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 05:39:30 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 7/15/23 10:43 AM, Irish Mike wrote:
>>> On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:13:11?PM UTC-4, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> In article <2ab4def3-3ca7-4145...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>> chromebook test <chromiu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The new "$600 rule"
>>>>
>>>>> Under the new rules set forth by the IRS, if you got paid more than $600 for
>>>>> the transaction of goods and services through third-party payment platforms,
>>>>> you will receive a 1099-K for reporting the income.
>>
>>>> "But those 20,000 new IRS agents we're hiring are just to go after
>>>> billionaires who aren't paying their fair share. Honest. Trust us!"
>>>
>>> Biden wanted to hire 87,000 new additional IRS Agents - to just go after
>>> the
>>> 735 billionaires in America. That would, of course, be in addition to the
>>> thousands of IRS Agents currently on the payroll.
>>>
>>> Irish Mike
>>>
>>
>> Congrats! You actually managed to tell the truth. The extra agents are
>> to get the wealthy to pay their fair share.
>>
>> Why else would Republicans be falling all over themselves to stop them?
>
> And yet the new laws seem to be going for the little guy. How do you
> reconcile that?

Don't you know that in Progressive Land, 'fair share' is explicitly
constructed to be a never-achievable standard? Whoever is accused of not
paying their fair share today will never be paying their fair share, no matter
how much they actually *do* pay. "Fair share" with leftists is an
ever-changing concept.

I've come to realize that the *real* definition of "fair share" is always
"more than you're paying now", no matter how much that is, no matter how many
tax increases we've already been through. Like a unicorn, we never actually
get to the magical land of "fair share" where enough is finally enough.

Why do leftists always claim no one's paying their fair share?

According to the Congressional Budget Office, the top 40% of
households by before-tax income actually paid 106.2% of the
nation's net income taxes in 2018.

At the same time, households in the bottom 40% took in an
average of $18,950 in what the CBO called "government
transfers" in 2018.

Taxpayers in the top 40% of households were able to pay more than
100% of net federal income taxes in 2018 because Americans
in the bottom 40% actually paid negative income taxes, according
to the CBO study entitled, "The Distribution of Household Income
and Federal Taxes, 2010."

Top 40%: 106.2%

Bottom 40%: -9.1%

Seems like the well-off are paying their fair share to me.

Here in California, the wealthy pay 90% of the income taxes. Out of a
population of 40 million people, only 144,000 people pay 90% of the taxes.
You'd be hard-pressed to rationally explain how that's not their "fair
share".

Also, when leftists like Biden and Effa Pee Pee complain about people "not
paying their fair share", they're not just talking about the likes of Jeff
Bezos and Mark Zuuckerberg. They're talking about anyone making $150,000 or
more. That was Obama's yardstick during his campaign for the people "not
paying their fair share" who needed to be soaked with more taxes.

Someone making $200,000 is hardly 'idly rich' under any sane definition of the
term, especially in places like Los Angeles and New York, where that level of
income barely keeps them in the middle class.

According to the state of California, I'm "not paying my fair share" either. I
pay over 50% of my income to some level of government (and I'm certainly not
flying around in my personal jet or week-ending on the Vineyard), and yet I
constantly have one leftist group after another here in California telling me
that I'm not "paying my fair share". And then when they get their way, and
taxes go up, it doesn't take but maybe a year before they're back with their
hands out again, wanting to raise taxes again, and telling me I'm still "not
paying my fair share".

It's amazing how every time they pass a tax that is touted as "ensuring the
wealthy pay their fair share", they're back again within a year or so with a
new tax, also touted as "ensuring the wealthy pay their fair share".

But wait, I thought after the previous tax went through, that meant the
wealthy *were* paying their fair share. Now suddenly they're not paying their
fair share anymore just in time for this new tax to come along?

And if this one passes, a few years down the road the same gang will be back
claiming the wealthy aren't paying their fair share again and wouldn't you
know it, they have an exciting new tax to solve that problem...

And then there's this little gem. Old Joe "Pay Your Fair Share" Biden has been
caught not paying his taxes.

Taking their income as corporate profits allowed
the Bidens to avoid paying a combined 3.8% payroll
tax on the more than $13.5 million in income they
received from 2017 through 2019.

This chart lays out the details:

https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Screen-Shot-2020-09-
29-at-9.41.56-PM-1024x489.png

To most ordinary Americans the Bidens circumvented
a staggering amount of taxes: $513,540 in total over
the three years.

So Biden can spare me the lectures about not paying my fair share until he
starts paying his.

On Sat, 15 Jul 2023 08:48:44 -0700, Dimensional Traveler
<dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:

>Plus just how many people do you think the billionaires have working on
>hiding their money?

Probably more people earning way more dollars than I paid the CA who
did mine this year!

On 7/16/23 12:28 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Jul 16, 2023 at 8:13:42 AM PDT, "NoBody" <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 05:39:30 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/15/23 10:43 AM, Irish Mike wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:13:11?PM UTC-4, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <2ab4def3-3ca7-4145...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> chromebook test <chromiu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The new "$600 rule"
>>>>>
>>>>>> Under the new rules set forth by the IRS, if you got paid more than $600 for
>>>>>> the transaction of goods and services through third-party payment platforms,
>>>>>> you will receive a 1099-K for reporting the income.
>>>
>>>>> "But those 20,000 new IRS agents we're hiring are just to go after
>>>>> billionaires who aren't paying their fair share. Honest. Trust us!"
>>>>
>>>> Biden wanted to hire 87,000 new additional IRS Agents - to just go after
>>>> the
>>>> 735 billionaires in America. That would, of course, be in addition to the
>>>> thousands of IRS Agents currently on the payroll.
>>>>
>>>> Irish Mike
>>>>
>>>
>>> Congrats! You actually managed to tell the truth. The extra agents are
>>> to get the wealthy to pay their fair share.
>>>
>>> Why else would Republicans be falling all over themselves to stop them?
>>
>> And yet the new laws seem to be going for the little guy. How do you
>> reconcile that?
>
> Don't you know that in Progressive Land, 'fair share' is explicitly
> constructed to be a never-achievable standard? Whoever is accused of not
> paying their fair share today will never be paying their fair share, no matter
> how much they actually *do* pay. "Fair share" with leftists is an
> ever-changing concept.
>
> I've come to realize that the *real* definition of "fair share" is always
> "more than you're paying now", no matter how much that is, no matter how many
> tax increases we've already been through. Like a unicorn, we never actually
> get to the magical land of "fair share" where enough is finally enough.
>
> Why do leftists always claim no one's paying their fair share?
>
> According to the Congressional Budget Office, the top 40% of
> households by before-tax income actually paid 106.2% of the
> nation's net income taxes in 2018.
>
> At the same time, households in the bottom 40% took in an
> average of $18,950 in what the CBO called "government
> transfers" in 2018.
>
> Taxpayers in the top 40% of households were able to pay more than
> 100% of net federal income taxes in 2018 because Americans
> in the bottom 40% actually paid negative income taxes, according
> to the CBO study entitled, "The Distribution of Household Income
> and Federal Taxes, 2010."
>
> Top 40%: 106.2%
>
> Bottom 40%: -9.1%
>
> Seems like the well-off are paying their fair share to me.
>
> Here in California, the wealthy pay 90% of the income taxes. Out of a
> population of 40 million people, only 144,000 people pay 90% of the taxes.
> You'd be hard-pressed to rationally explain how that's not their "fair
> share".
>
> Also, when leftists like Biden and Effa Pee Pee complain about people "not
> paying their fair share", they're not just talking about the likes of Jeff
> Bezos and Mark Zuuckerberg. They're talking about anyone making $150,000 or
> more. That was Obama's yardstick during his campaign for the people "not
> paying their fair share" who needed to be soaked with more taxes.
>
> Someone making $200,000 is hardly 'idly rich' under any sane definition of the
> term, especially in places like Los Angeles and New York, where that level of
> income barely keeps them in the middle class.
>
> According to the state of California, I'm "not paying my fair share" either. I
> pay over 50% of my income to some level of government (and I'm certainly not
> flying around in my personal jet or week-ending on the Vineyard), and yet I
> constantly have one leftist group after another here in California telling me
> that I'm not "paying my fair share". And then when they get their way, and
> taxes go up, it doesn't take but maybe a year before they're back with their
> hands out again, wanting to raise taxes again, and telling me I'm still "not
> paying my fair share".
>
> It's amazing how every time they pass a tax that is touted as "ensuring the
> wealthy pay their fair share", they're back again within a year or so with a
> new tax, also touted as "ensuring the wealthy pay their fair share".
>
> But wait, I thought after the previous tax went through, that meant the
> wealthy *were* paying their fair share. Now suddenly they're not paying their
> fair share anymore just in time for this new tax to come along?
>
> And if this one passes, a few years down the road the same gang will be back
> claiming the wealthy aren't paying their fair share again and wouldn't you
> know it, they have an exciting new tax to solve that problem...
>
> And then there's this little gem. Old Joe "Pay Your Fair Share" Biden has been
> caught not paying his taxes.
>
> Taking their income as corporate profits allowed
> the Bidens to avoid paying a combined 3.8% payroll
> tax on the more than $13.5 million in income they
> received from 2017 through 2019.
>
> This chart lays out the details:
>
> https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Screen-Shot-2020-09-
> 29-at-9.41.56-PM-1024x489.png
>
> To most ordinary Americans the Bidens circumvented
> a staggering amount of taxes: $513,540 in total over
> the three years.
>
> So Biden can spare me the lectures about not paying my fair share until he
> starts paying his.

You're a fucking liar. And Ubi's sock is too stupid to state any proof
of his idiotic observation - so it's as worthless as he is.

Any moron can use Google. Well, almost any morons - present company of
morons excluded.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On 7/16/23 12:28 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> Seems like the well-off are paying their fair share to me.

Seems like you're fucking stupid.

> The Forbes 400 Pay Lower Tax Rates Than Many Ordinary Americans.
> The Forbes 400 paid an average income tax rate of 8.2 percent from 2010 to 2018

https://www.americanprogress.org/article/forbes-400-pay-lower-tax-rates-many-ordinary-americans/

Seems like you're historically ignorant too.
Tax rates through the years from 1932 to 2022:

> 1932–1933 63%
>
> 1934–1935 63%
>
> 1936–1940 81%
>
> 1942–1943 94%
>
> 1945–1963 77%
>
> 1965–1981 70%
>
> 1982–1986 50%
>
> 1987 38.5%
>
> 1988–90 33%
>
> 1991–1992 31%
>
> 1993–2000 39.6%
>
> 2001 39.1%
>
> 2002 38.6%
>
> 2003–2012 35%
>
> 2013–2017 39.6%
>
> 2018-2022 37%

https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/expert-insights/whole-ball-of-tax-historical-income-tax-rates

Stupid, stupid man.
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On 7/17/2023 5:47 AM, FPP wrote:
> On 7/16/23 12:28 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> Seems like the well-off are paying their fair share to me.
>
> Seems like you're fucking stupid.
>
>> The Forbes 400 Pay Lower Tax Rates Than Many Ordinary Americans.
>> The Forbes 400 paid an average income tax rate of 8.2 percent from
>> 2010 to 2018
>
>
> https://www.americanprogress.org/article/forbes-400-pay-lower-tax-rates-many-ordinary-americans/
>
> Seems like you're historically ignorant too.
> Tax rates through the years from 1932 to 2022:
>
>> 1932–1933        63%
>>
>> 1934–1935        63%
>>
>> 1936–1940        81%
>>
>> 1942–1943        94%
>>
>> 1945–1963        77%
>>
>> 1965–1981        70%
>>
>> 1982–1986        50%
>>
>> 1987            38.5%
>>
>> 1988–90        33%
>>
>> 1991–1992        31%
>>
>> 1993–2000        39.6%
>>
>> 2001            39.1%
>>
>> 2002            38.6%
>>
>> 2003–2012        35%
>>
>> 2013–2017        39.6%
>>
>> 2018-2022        37%
>
> https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/expert-insights/whole-ball-of-tax-historical-income-tax-rates
>
> Stupid, stupid man.

You don't know that. Gender is fluid...

On 7/17/23 4:27 AM, FPP wrote:
> On 7/16/23 12:28 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> On Jul 16, 2023 at 8:13:42 AM PDT, "NoBody" <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 05:39:30 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 7/15/23 10:43 AM, Irish Mike wrote:
>>>>>   On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:13:11?PM UTC-4, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>   In article <2ab4def3-3ca7-4145...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>   chromebook test <chromiu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   The new "$600 rule"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   Under the new rules set forth by the IRS, if you got paid more
>>>>>>> than $600 for
>>>>>>>   the transaction of goods and services through third-party
>>>>>>> payment platforms,
>>>>>>>   you will receive a 1099-K for reporting the income.
>>>>
>>>>>>   "But those 20,000 new IRS agents we're hiring are just to go after
>>>>>>   billionaires who aren't paying their fair share. Honest. Trust us!"
>>>>>   Biden wanted  to hire 87,000 new additional IRS Agents - to just
>>>>> go after
>>>>> the
>>>>>   735 billionaires in America.  That would, of course, be in
>>>>> addition to the
>>>>>     thousands of IRS Agents currently on the payroll.
>>>>>   Irish Mike
>>>>
>>>> Congrats!  You actually managed to tell the truth.  The extra agents
>>>> are
>>>> to get the wealthy to pay their fair share.
>>>>
>>>> Why else would Republicans be falling all over themselves to stop them?
>>>
>>> And yet the new laws seem to be going for the little guy.  How do you
>>> reconcile that?
>>
>> Don't you know that in Progressive Land, 'fair share' is explicitly
>> constructed to be a never-achievable standard? Whoever is accused of not
>> paying their fair share today will never be paying their fair share,
>> no matter
>> how much they actually *do* pay. "Fair share" with leftists is an
>> ever-changing concept.
>>
>> I've come to realize that the *real* definition of "fair share" is always
>> "more than you're paying now", no matter how much that is, no matter
>> how many
>> tax increases we've already been through. Like a unicorn, we never
>> actually
>> get to the magical land of "fair share" where enough is finally enough.
>>
>> Why do leftists always claim no one's paying their fair share?
>>
>>      According to the Congressional Budget Office, the top 40% of
>>      households by before-tax income actually paid 106.2% of the
>>      nation's net income taxes in 2018.
>>
>>      At the same time, households in the bottom 40% took in an
>>      average of $18,950 in what the CBO called "government
>>      transfers" in 2018.
>>
>>      Taxpayers in the top 40% of households were able to pay more than
>>      100% of net federal income taxes in 2018 because Americans
>>      in the bottom 40% actually paid negative income taxes, according
>>      to the CBO study entitled, "The Distribution of Household Income
>>      and Federal Taxes, 2010."
>>
>> Top 40%: 106.2%
>>
>> Bottom 40%: -9.1%
>>
>> Seems like the well-off are paying their fair share to me.
>>
>> Here in California, the wealthy pay 90% of the income taxes. Out of a
>> population of 40 million people, only 144,000 people pay 90% of the
>> taxes.
>> You'd be hard-pressed to rationally explain how that's not their "fair
>> share".
>>
>> Also, when leftists like Biden and Effa Pee Pee complain about people
>> "not
>> paying their fair share", they're not just talking about the likes of
>> Jeff
>> Bezos and Mark Zuuckerberg. They're talking about anyone making
>> $150,000 or
>> more. That was Obama's yardstick during his campaign for the people "not
>> paying their fair share" who needed to be soaked with more taxes.
>>
>> Someone making $200,000 is hardly 'idly rich' under any sane
>> definition of the
>> term, especially in places like Los Angeles and New York, where that
>> level of
>> income barely keeps them in the middle class.
>>
>> According to the state of California, I'm "not paying my fair share"
>> either. I
>> pay over 50% of my income to some level of government (and I'm
>> certainly not
>> flying around in my personal jet or week-ending on the Vineyard), and
>> yet I
>> constantly have one leftist group after another here in California
>> telling me
>> that I'm not "paying my fair share". And then when they get their way,
>> and
>> taxes go up, it doesn't take but maybe a year before they're back with
>> their
>> hands out again, wanting to raise taxes again, and telling me I'm
>> still "not
>> paying my fair share".
>>
>> It's amazing how every time they pass a tax that is touted as
>> "ensuring the
>> wealthy pay their fair share", they're back again within a year or so
>> with a
>> new tax, also touted as "ensuring the wealthy pay their fair share".
>>
>> But wait, I thought after the previous tax went through, that meant the
>> wealthy *were* paying their fair share. Now suddenly they're not
>> paying their
>> fair share anymore just in time for this new tax to come along?
>>
>> And if this one passes, a few years down the road the same gang will
>> be back
>> claiming the wealthy aren't paying their fair share again and wouldn't
>> you
>> know it, they have an exciting new tax to solve that problem...
>>
>> And then there's this little gem. Old Joe "Pay Your Fair Share" Biden
>> has been
>> caught not paying his taxes.
>>
>>      Taking their income as corporate profits allowed
>>      the Bidens to avoid paying a combined 3.8% payroll
>>      tax on the more than $13.5 million in income they
>>      received from 2017 through 2019.
>>
>>      This chart lays out the details:
>>
>> https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Screen-Shot-2020-09-
>> 29-at-9.41.56-PM-1024x489.png
>>
>>      To most ordinary Americans the Bidens circumvented
>>      a staggering amount of taxes: $513,540 in total over
>>      the three years.
>>
>> So Biden can spare me the lectures about not paying my fair share
>> until he
>> starts paying his.
>
>
> You're a fucking liar.  And Ubi's sock is too stupid to state any proof
> of his idiotic observation -  so it's as worthless as he is.
>
> Any moron can use Google.  Well, almost any morons - present company of
> morons excluded.

You're not being fair to OKT, he's driven off a cliff, literally, and
has been decimated many times.

On 7/17/23 11:39 AM, moviePig wrote:
> On 7/17/2023 5:47 AM, FPP wrote:
>> On 7/16/23 12:28 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> Seems like the well-off are paying their fair share to me.
>>
>> Seems like you're fucking stupid.
>>
>>> The Forbes 400 Pay Lower Tax Rates Than Many Ordinary Americans.
>>> The Forbes 400 paid an average income tax rate of 8.2 percent from
>>> 2010 to 2018
>>
>>
>> https://www.americanprogress.org/article/forbes-400-pay-lower-tax-rates-many-ordinary-americans/
>>
>>
>> Seems like you're historically ignorant too.
>> Tax rates through the years from 1932 to 2022:
>>
>>> 1932–1933        63%
>>>
>>> 1934–1935        63%
>>>
>>> 1936–1940        81%
>>>
>>> 1942–1943        94%
>>>
>>> 1945–1963        77%
>>>
>>> 1965–1981        70%
>>>
>>> 1982–1986        50%
>>>
>>> 1987            38.5%
>>>
>>> 1988–90        33%
>>>
>>> 1991–1992        31%
>>>
>>> 1993–2000        39.6%
>>>
>>> 2001            39.1%
>>>
>>> 2002            38.6%
>>>
>>> 2003–2012        35%
>>>
>>> 2013–2017        39.6%
>>>
>>> 2018-2022        37%
>>
>> https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/expert-insights/whole-ball-of-tax-historical-income-tax-rates
>>
>>
>> Stupid, stupid man.
>
> You don't know that.  Gender is fluid...

Should have I just said "penis enthusiast"? That seemed a little harsh.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0