On 8/16/23 7:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>On Aug 16, 2023 at 5:52:58 AM PDT, "Matt Walsh" <daily@mailer.dailywire.com>
>wrote:
>
>> Yesterday was the ninth anniversary of the lynching of a police officer named
>>
>> Darren Wilson. On the morning of August 9th, 2014, Wilson tried to detain 18
>> -year-old Michael Brown, who had just robbed a convenience store and attacked
>>
>> the clerk.
>>
>> That's when, according to the Obama DOJ, "Wilson and other witnesses stated
>> that Brown... reached into [Wilson's] SUV through the open driver's window
>> and
>> punched and grabbed Wilson". Investigators made that determination by
>> observing "bruising on Wilson's jaw and scratches on his neck, the presence
>> of Brown's DNA on Wilson's collar, shirt, and pants, and Wilson's DNA on
>> Brown’s palm". Brown then tried to grab Wilson's gun; Wilson shot him; Brown
>> ran away, then turned around and charged at Wilson; and Wilson fatally shot
>> Brown in self-defense.
>>
>> The Obama DOJ did everything it could to find a way to charge Darren Wilson,
>> yet those were their conclusions. Wilson did nothing wrong, much to the
>> dismay of those who wished to sacrifice him on the altar of racial justice.
>> Despite media reports, not a single witness ever claimed Brown said "don't
>> shoot". And all the witnesses who claimed that Brown’s hands were in the air
>> were either contradicted by the evidence, or later recanted their testimony.
>> Those are the factual details.
>
>All that "hands up, don't shoot" nonsense was completely fabricated. Yet the
>media couldn't wait to report it and plenty of people, including those right
>here on RAT, bought it hook, line, and sinker, and will still defend it and
>pretend it was true to this day.
>
>> If you're so inclined you can read the full DOJ report online.
>
>But you won't hear about it on CNN or MSNBC, other than perhaps to lie about
>its findings. Remember this bullshit from CNN?
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ha1ljAbOPnY&t=25s
>
>> What you can't find online, however, is what happened to Darren Wilson. His
>> name is never mentioned in the media. It's as if he never existed. The
>> handful of reports on Wilson in recent years suggest he's living a life of
>> anonymity in the middle of nowhere, and that he'll never be able to work as a
>>
>> police officer again. His life was destroyed. Nobody who defamed him as a
>> racist killer ever apologized. Nobody who took part in the destruction of an
>> innocent man's life was ever held accountable.
>>
>> In a country that cared about police officers, or the truth, that would be a
>> national scandal. But we don’'t live in a country like that, so instead,
>> yesterday the only name you heard was Michael Brown. They canonized him all
>> over again.
>
>We're developing quite the pantheon of latter-day saints in this country,
>aren't we?
>
>First, Saint Brown of Hands-Up Don't-Shoot, followed a few years later by
>Saint Floyd of Fentanyl.
>
>> Here's how one local news report talked about the case:
>>
>> https://youtu.be/WxukhWjA1iM
>>
>> A "ceremony to honor Michael Brown, the teenager shot and killed by a police
>> officer after a confrontation". That’s how a "news station" in 2023 is
>> talking about a thug who attacked a store clerk, then tried to kill a police
>> officer. They don't mention any of those facts we just reviewed because
>> they're inconvenient. Instead, the "news station" informs you that Brown's
>> body lay in the street for several hours after the shooting, as if that's
>> somehow incriminating or even relevant. Of course they leave out the fact
>> that the mob made processing the crime scene so difficult that Ferguson had
>> to call in the SWAT team to control the situation. They don’t mention all the
>>
>> lies that the supposed "witnesses" told the media, like the false claim that
>> Michael Brown had been shot in the back.
>>
>> It wasn't just one news station that decided to lie yesterday. They all did
>> it. Here’s how the local Fox station described what happened:
>>
>> https://youtu.be/5-dTsi3S3g4
>>
>> Again, without mentioning any details of what Michael Brown actually did,
>> we're told that his case has something to do with "police brutality and
>> injustice faced by African-Americans". That intro was followed by a
>> sympathetic clip with Michael Brown's family. Apparently Darren Wilson's
>> family wasn't available. Maybe they're in hiding. We really don't know.
>>
>> What we can say for sure is that there weren't any memorial events honoring
>> Darren Wilson yesterday in St. Louis. Instead the city put on a series of
>> events celebrating the legacy of the thug who robbed stores and attacked a
>> police officer:
>>
>> https://youtu.be/v00nMb2ucN4
>
>Well, he was a future scholar, after all. I mean, aren't they all?
>
>> Michael Brown "Was shot and killed followed by a confrontation," the reporter
>>
>> tells us. Wow, there's that word again. It was a "confrontation". It doesn't
>> imply any kind of fault by one side or the other. It doesn't tell you
>> anything. It leaves you completely in the dark, which is the exact opposite
>> of what the news media is supposed to do.
>
>But they're professional journalists! Just ask them, they'll tell you so.
>
>> We know that the Obama administration benefited from lying about Michael
>> Brown all the way back in 2014, just as they benefited from lying about
>> Trayvon Martin and all the other race hoaxes. That’s why the Obama DOJ
>> investigated Ferguson's police department (and many other police
>> departments), and claimed they must be racist because they pull over more
>> black people than white people. It didn't matter to the DOJ that Ferguson is
>> an overwhelmingly black town; they just ran with that reasoning, because they
>>
>> knew the city didn't have the money or the PR resources to fight them. In
>> fact, when the city publicly announced that it disagreed with the Obama DOJ's
>>
>> ridiculous reasoning, the DOJ called the city racist again, just for daring
>> to challenge their narrative. "You're racist, and if you deny that you're
>> racist, then that's just more evidence you're racist." That's basically what
>> the DOJ said. Again, the document is online if you want to read it.
>>
>> But that still doesn’t answer the question of, "why now?" Why is the media
>> still lying now about this shooting, even nine years later, when everyone
>> knows they're lying?
>>
>> It could be that they're still taking orders from the Democratic Party,
>> which, somehow, has not given up on the lie. Squad bench warmer Cori Bush
>> (D-MO) tweeted yesterday, "Today is the 9th anniversary of Mike Brown's
>> killing. He would be alive today if the institutions of racism and white
>> supremacy were eradicated. He should be alive today. We will never forget. We
>>
>> will continue to fight for justice and accountability." Ben Crump and various
>>
>> Left-wing groups said more or less the same thing.
>>
>> But it's not just a couple of race-hustling lawyers and politicians from
>> Missouri who are lying about Michael Brown. The Biden administration, at the
>> highest levels, is also portraying Michael Brown as a hero. This was the
>> State Department's new "equity representative", speaking yesterday as Tony
>> Blinken looked on:
>>
>> The state department's new 'equity representative' just eulogized
>> violent thug Michael brown, with Tony blinker looking on. Impossible
>> to overemphasize how their entire movement is built on lies and
>> repeating lies despite all evidence. It's not just Cori Bush and Ben
>> Crump pic.twitter.com/aL4fTVDFlO
>>
>> — Gregg Re (@gregg_re) August 9, 2023
>
>Why is the domestic shooting of a criminal by local police even an issue for
>the State Department to address? What does it have to do with anything over
>which the Department of State is involved, which is American foreign policy?
>
>> Well, that's interesting. The State Department, which uses coordinated
>> disinformation campaigns to inspire color revolutions overseas-- with the
>> express goal of overthrowing foreign governments-- is now deliberately lying
>> about a police shooting in Ferguson, Missouri from nine years ago. They're
>> telling you an "unarmed black teenager" was just murdered by a cop for no
>> reason, nine years after that narrative was completely and totally debunked.
>
>Yet they constantly warn us