....and got him to be "woke" about "troons."

https://ktla.com/news/nationworld/carlos-santana-gives-anti-trans-speech-during-new-jersey-concert/

Carlos Santana gives anti-trans speech during New Jersey concert

But then maybe his record label told him he'd totally fuck up his album
sales:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2023/08/24/carlos-santana-anti-trans-comments-apology/70672438007/

Carlos Santana apologizes for 'insensitive' anti-trans remarks during
recent show

They must be totally hating on the guy at Oath Keeper HQ for apologizing
like a pussy. Oat

On 2023-08-25 9:01 AM, FPP wrote:
> On 8/25/23 6:45 AM, trotsky wrote:
>> ...and got him to be "woke" about "troons."
>>
>> https://ktla.com/news/nationworld/carlos-santana-gives-anti-trans-speech-during-new-jersey-concert/
>>
>> Carlos Santana gives anti-trans speech during New Jersey concert
>>
>>
>> But then maybe his record label told him he'd totally fuck up his
>> album sales:
>>
>> https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2023/08/24/carlos-santana-anti-trans-comments-apology/70672438007/
>>
>> Carlos Santana apologizes for 'insensitive' anti-trans remarks during
>> recent show
>>
>>
>> They must be totally hating on the guy at Oath Keeper HQ for
>> apologizing like a pussy.  Oat
>
>
> While I understand everybody has an opinion, and even assholes get to be
> assholes under the 1st Amendment... what I DON'T understand is why
> they're not smart enough to shut their fucking bigoted traps?
>
> For fuck's sake, if your business depends on serving the public, shut
> your pie-hole if you want to keep sellin' them songs.  I don't give a
> shit about your personal bigoted opinions... I come for the music.
>
I'll bet you said exactly the same when the Dixie Chicks were spouting
there opinions too, right? Oh wait, they were on the side of the angels
so they get a pass. In fact they got major kudos for "speaking truth to
power", right?

> Coincidentally, I was listening to Santana two days ago, while I was
> looking to see if the typeface used on the cover of ABRAXAS might be a
> font.  (Sadly it isn't... it's a hand drawn logo, which is a damned shame.)
>
> But I did get to listen to a few albums while I was looking for a
> similar font.  Now even that won't be the same.  Carlos is still one of
> the greatest guitarists of the last 50 years, but I think I was happier
> not knowing he was such a turd.
>

--
Rhino

On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 9:01:27 AM UTC-4, FPP wrote:
> On 8/25/23 6:45 AM, trotsky wrote:
> > ...and got him to be "woke" about "troons."
> >
> > https://ktla.com/news/nationworld/carlos-santana-gives-anti-trans-speech-during-new-jersey-concert/
> >
> >
> > Carlos Santana gives anti-trans speech during New Jersey concert
> >
> >
> > But then maybe his record label told him he'd totally fuck up his album
> > sales:
> >
> > https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2023/08/24/carlos-santana-anti-trans-comments-apology/70672438007/
> >
> >
> > Carlos Santana apologizes for 'insensitive' anti-trans remarks during
> > recent show
> >
> >
> > They must be totally hating on the guy at Oath Keeper HQ for apologizing
> > like a pussy. Oat

> For fuck's sake, if your business depends on serving the public, shut
> your pie-hole if you want to keep sellin' them songs. I don't give a
> shit about your personal bigoted opinions... I come for the music.

> Coincidentally, I was listening to Santana two days ago, while I was
> looking to see if the typeface used on the cover of ABRAXAS might be a
> font.

I didn't ask for Santana Abraxas! Look, something is very wrong! I don't want Santana Abraxas! I didn't ask for Santana Abraxis! I didn't listen to Santana Abraxis! I didn't do anything!

In article <ucadaa$3ra9q$1@dont-email.me>, Rhino
<no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

> On 2023-08-25 9:01 AM, FPP wrote:
> > On 8/25/23 6:45 AM, trotsky wrote:
> >> ...and got him to be "woke" about "troons."
> >>
> >>
> >> https://ktla.com/news/nationworld/carlos-santana-gives-anti-trans-speech-du
> >> ring-new-jersey-concert/
> >>
> >> Carlos Santana gives anti-trans speech during New Jersey concert
> >>
> >>
> >> But then maybe his record label told him he'd totally fuck up his
> >> album sales:
> >>
> >>
> >> https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2023/08/24/carlos-
> >> santana-anti-trans-comments-apology/70672438007/
> >>
> >> Carlos Santana apologizes for 'insensitive' anti-trans remarks during
> >> recent show
> >>
> >>
> >> They must be totally hating on the guy at Oath Keeper HQ for
> >> apologizing like a pussy.  Oat
> >
> >
> > While I understand everybody has an opinion, and even assholes get to be
> > assholes under the 1st Amendment... what I DON'T understand is why
> > they're not smart enough to shut their fucking bigoted traps?
> >
> > For fuck's sake, if your business depends on serving the public, shut
> > your pie-hole if you want to keep sellin' them songs.  I don't give a
> > shit about your personal bigoted opinions... I come for the music.
> >
> I'll bet you said exactly the same when the Dixie Chicks were spouting
> there opinions too, right? Oh wait, they were on the side of the angels
> so they get a pass. In fact they got major kudos for "speaking truth to
> power", right?

You've accused him here of saying something he in fact did not say, and
then you attack him for having said it. Typical.

I could ask if that's the best you've got, but I already know the
answer. I think we all do. Right?

In article <250820231248253393%nope@noway.com>,
A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:

> In article <ucadaa$3ra9q$1@dont-email.me>, Rhino
> <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
>
> > On 2023-08-25 9:01 AM, FPP wrote:
> > > On 8/25/23 6:45 AM, trotsky wrote:
> > >> ...and got him to be "woke" about "troons."
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> https://ktla.com/news/nationworld/carlos-santana-gives-anti-trans-speech-
> > >> during-new-jersey-concert/
> > >>
> > >> Carlos Santana gives anti-trans speech during New Jersey concert
> > >>
> > >> But then maybe his record label told him he'd totally fuck up his
> > >> album sales:
> > >>
> > >> https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2023/08/24/carlo
> > >> s-santana-anti-trans-comments-apology/70672438007/
> > >>
> > >> Carlos Santana apologizes for 'insensitive' anti-trans remarks during
> > >> recent show
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> They must be totally hating on the guy at Oath Keeper HQ for
> > >> apologizing like a pussy.� Oat
> > >
> > > While I understand everybody has an opinion, and even assholes get to be
> > > assholes under the 1st Amendment... what I DON'T understand is why
> > > they're not smart enough to shut their fucking bigoted traps?
> > >
> > > For fuck's sake, if your business depends on serving the public, shut
> > > your pie-hole if you want to keep sellin' them songs.� I don't give a
> > > shit about your personal bigoted opinions... I come for the music.
> > >
> > I'll bet you said exactly the same when the Dixie Chicks were spouting
> > there opinions too, right? Oh wait, they were on the side of the angels
> > so they get a pass. In fact they got major kudos for "speaking truth to
> > power", right?
>
> You've accused him here of saying something he in fact did not say, and
> then you attack him for having said it.

Dude, look in the mirror. You've done that to me several times over the
last several months.

In article <atropos-C4E72F.10415425082023@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
<atropos@mac.com> wrote:

> In article <250820231248253393%nope@noway.com>,
> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <ucadaa$3ra9q$1@dont-email.me>, Rhino
> > <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 2023-08-25 9:01 AM, FPP wrote:
> > > > On 8/25/23 6:45 AM, trotsky wrote:
> > > >> ...and got him to be "woke" about "troons."
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> https://ktla.com/news/nationworld/carlos-santana-gives-anti-trans-speec
> > > >> h-
> > > >> during-new-jersey-concert/
> > > >>
> > > >> Carlos Santana gives anti-trans speech during New Jersey concert
> > > >>
> > > >> But then maybe his record label told him he'd totally fuck up his
> > > >> album sales:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2023/08/24/car
> > > >> lo
> > > >> s-santana-anti-trans-comments-apology/70672438007/
> > > >>
> > > >> Carlos Santana apologizes for 'insensitive' anti-trans remarks during
> > > >> recent show
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> They must be totally hating on the guy at Oath Keeper HQ for
> > > >> apologizing like a pussy.Ý Oat
> > > >
> > > > While I understand everybody has an opinion, and even assholes get to
> > > > be
> > > > assholes under the 1st Amendment... what I DON'T understand is why
> > > > they're not smart enough to shut their fucking bigoted traps?
> > > >
> > > > For fuck's sake, if your business depends on serving the public, shut
> > > > your pie-hole if you want to keep sellin' them songs.Ý I don't give a
> > > > shit about your personal bigoted opinions... I come for the music.
> > > >
> > > I'll bet you said exactly the same when the Dixie Chicks were spouting
> > > there opinions too, right? Oh wait, they were on the side of the angels
> > > so they get a pass. In fact they got major kudos for "speaking truth to
> > > power", right?
> >
> > You've accused him here of saying something he in fact did not say, and
> > then you attack him for having said it.
>
> Dude, look in the mirror. You've done that to me several times over the
> last several months.

I'm sure you have cites for that. BTW never mind the mirror. You
don't get to falsely accuse others of having done what you've just done
here. Dude.

In article <250820231401118440%nope@noway.com>,
A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:

> In article <atropos-C4E72F.10415425082023@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <250820231248253393%nope@noway.com>,
> > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <ucadaa$3ra9q$1@dont-email.me>, Rhino
> > > <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 2023-08-25 9:01 AM, FPP wrote:
> > > > > On 8/25/23 6:45 AM, trotsky wrote:
> > > > >> ...and got him to be "woke" about "troons."

> > > > >> https://ktla.com/news/nationworld/carlos-santana-gives-anti-trans-spe
> > > > >> ech-during-new-jersey-concert/
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Carlos Santana gives anti-trans speech during New Jersey concert
> > > > >>
> > > > >> But then maybe his record label told him he'd totally fuck up his
> > > > >> album sales:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2023/08/24/c
> > > > >> arlos-santana-anti-trans-comments-apology/70672438007/
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Carlos Santana apologizes for 'insensitive' anti-trans remarks
> > > > >> duringrecent show
> > > > >>
> > > > >> They must be totally hating on the guy at Oath Keeper HQ for
> > > > >> apologizing like a pussy.� Oat
> > > > >
> > > > > While I understand everybody has an opinion, and even assholes get to
> > > > > be assholes under the 1st Amendment... what I DON'T understand is why
> > > > > they're not smart enough to shut their fucking bigoted traps?
> > > > >
> > > > > For fuck's sake, if your business depends on serving the public, shut
> > > > > your pie-hole if you want to keep sellin' them songs.� I don't give a
> > > > > shit about your personal bigoted opinions... I come for the music.
> > > > >
> > > > I'll bet you said exactly the same when the Dixie Chicks were spouting
> > > > there opinions too, right? Oh wait, they were on the side of the angels
> > > > so they get a pass. In fact they got major kudos for "speaking truth to
> > > > power", right?
> > >
> > > You've accused him here of saying something he in fact did not say, and
> > > then you attack him for having said it.
> >
> > Dude, look in the mirror. You've done that to me several times over the
> > last several months.
>
> I'm sure you have cites for that.

Before I bother looking them up, will they even count?

SeeOn 8/25/23 8:01 AM, FPP wrote:
>On 8/25/23 6:45 AM, trotsky wrote:
>> ...and got him to be "woke" about "troons."
>>
>> https://ktla.com/news/nationworld/carlos-santana-gives-anti-trans-speech-during-new-jersey-concert/
>>
>>
>> Carlos Santana gives anti-trans speech during New Jersey concert
>>
>>
>> But then maybe his record label told him he'd totally fuck up his album
>> sales:
>>
>> https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2023/08/24/carlos-santana-anti-trans-comments-apology/70672438007/
>>
>>
>> Carlos Santana apologizes for 'insensitive' anti-trans remarks during
>> recent show
>>
>>
>> They must be totally hating on the guy at Oath Keeper HQ for apologizing
>> like a pussy.  Oat
>
>
>While I understand everybody has an opinion, and even assholes get to be
>assholes under the 1st Amendment... what I DON'T understand is why
>they're not smart enough to shut their fucking bigoted traps?
>
>For fuck's sake, if your business depends on serving the public, shut
>your pie-hole if you want to keep sellin' them songs. I don't give a
>shit about your personal bigoted opinions... I come for the music.
>
>Coincidentally, I was listening to Santana two days ago, while I was
>looking to see if the typeface used on the cover of ABRAXAS might be a
>font. (Sadly it isn't... it's a hand drawn logo, which is a damned shame.)
>
>But I did get to listen to a few albums while I was looking for a
>similar font. Now even that won't be the same. Carlos is still one of
>the greatest guitarists of the last 50 years, but I think I was happier
>not knowing he was such a turd.

Three guys come to mind: Eric Clapton, Van Morrison and now Carlos Santana.
All three are pop music legends and the only thing I can figure is that if
they have enough screaming fans over the past 50 years that they think
they're some sort of demigods they're going to say stuff like this and
think that it has some sort of relevance. It doesn't that there's just
letting their egos talk for 'em.
--
This space for rent.

SeeOn 8/25/23 11:48 AM, A Friend wrote:
>In article <ucadaa$3ra9q$1@dont-email.me>, Rhino
><no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2023-08-25 9:01 AM, FPP wrote:
>> > On 8/25/23 6:45 AM, trotsky wrote:
>> >> ...and got him to be "woke" about "troons."
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> https://ktla.com/news/nationworld/carlos-santana-gives-anti-trans-speech-du
>> >> ring-new-jersey-concert/
>> >>
>> >> Carlos Santana gives anti-trans speech during New Jersey concert
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> But then maybe his record label told him he'd totally fuck up his
>> >> album sales:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2023/08/24/carlos-
>> >> santana-anti-trans-comments-apology/70672438007/
>> >>
>> >> Carlos Santana apologizes for 'insensitive' anti-trans remarks during
>> >> recent show
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> They must be totally hating on the guy at Oath Keeper HQ for
>> >> apologizing like a pussy.  Oat
>> >
>> >
>> > While I understand everybody has an opinion, and even assholes get to be
>> > assholes under the 1st Amendment... what I DON'T understand is why
>> > they're not smart enough to shut their fucking bigoted traps?
>> >
>> > For fuck's sake, if your business depends on serving the public, shut
>> > your pie-hole if you want to keep sellin' them songs.  I don't give a
>> > shit about your personal bigoted opinions... I come for the music.
>> >
>> I'll bet you said exactly the same when the Dixie Chicks were spouting
>> there opinions too, right? Oh wait, they were on the side of the angels
>> so they get a pass. In fact they got major kudos for "speaking truth to
>> power", right?
>
>
>You've accused him here of saying something he in fact did not say, and
>then you attack him for having said it. Typical.
>
>I could ask if that's the best you've got, but I already know the
>answer. I think we all do. Right?

Canadians have a pretty poor showing on this group.
--
This space for rent.

On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 4:53:04 PM UTC-4, Trotsky wrote:
> SeeOn 8/25/23 8:01 AM, FPP wrote:
> >On 8/25/23 6:45 AM, trotsky wrote:
> >> ...and got him to be "woke" about "troons."
> >>
> >> https://ktla.com/news/nationworld/carlos-santana-gives-anti-trans-speech-during-new-jersey-concert/
> >>
> >>
> >> Carlos Santana gives anti-trans speech during New Jersey concert
> >>
> >>
> >> But then maybe his record label told him he'd totally fuck up his album
> >> sales:
> >>
> >> https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2023/08/24/carlos-santana-anti-trans-comments-apology/70672438007/
> >>
> >>
> >> Carlos Santana apologizes for 'insensitive' anti-trans remarks during
> >> recent show
> >>
> >>
> >> They must be totally hating on the guy at Oath Keeper HQ for apologizing
> >> like a pussy. Oat
> >
> >
> >While I understand everybody has an opinion, and even assholes get to be
> >assholes under the 1st Amendment... what I DON'T understand is why
> >they're not smart enough to shut their fucking bigoted traps?
> >
> >For fuck's sake, if your business depends on serving the public, shut
> >your pie-hole if you want to keep sellin' them songs. I don't give a
> >shit about your personal bigoted opinions... I come for the music.
> >
> >Coincidentally, I was listening to Santana two days ago, while I was
> >looking to see if the typeface used on the cover of ABRAXAS might be a
> >font. (Sadly it isn't... it's a hand drawn logo, which is a damned shame..)
> >
> >But I did get to listen to a few albums while I was looking for a
> >similar font. Now even that won't be the same. Carlos is still one of
> >the greatest guitarists of the last 50 years, but I think I was happier
> >not knowing he was such a turd.

> Three guys come to mind: Eric Clapton, Van Morrison and now Carlos Santana.
> All three are pop music legends and the only thing I can figure is that if
> they have enough screaming fans over the past 50 years that they think
> they're some sort of demigods

Gawdammit trotsky, Clapton IS a god ! LOL

On 8/25/23 10:19 AM, Rhino wrote:
> On 2023-08-25 9:01 AM, FPP wrote:
>> On 8/25/23 6:45 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>> ...and got him to be "woke" about "troons."
>>>
>>> https://ktla.com/news/nationworld/carlos-santana-gives-anti-trans-speech-during-new-jersey-concert/
>>>
>>>
>>> Carlos Santana gives anti-trans speech during New Jersey concert
>>>
>>>
>>> But then maybe his record label told him he'd totally fuck up his
>>> album sales:
>>>
>>> https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2023/08/24/carlos-santana-anti-trans-comments-apology/70672438007/
>>>
>>>
>>> Carlos Santana apologizes for 'insensitive' anti-trans remarks during
>>> recent show
>>>
>>>
>>> They must be totally hating on the guy at Oath Keeper HQ for
>>> apologizing like a pussy.  Oat
>>
>>
>> While I understand everybody has an opinion, and even assholes get to
>> be assholes under the 1st Amendment... what I DON'T understand is why
>> they're not smart enough to shut their fucking bigoted traps?
>>
>> For fuck's sake, if your business depends on serving the public, shut
>> your pie-hole if you want to keep sellin' them songs.  I don't give a
>> shit about your personal bigoted opinions... I come for the music.
>>
> I'll bet you said exactly the same when the Dixie Chicks were spouting
> there opinions too, right? Oh wait, they were on the side of the angels
> so they get a pass. In fact they got major kudos for "speaking truth to
> power", right?

Let's see... the Dixie Chicks were speaking about how they, themselves,
felt. Carlos was speaking for God... which one, he didn't say.

Yeah, exactly the same thing.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On 8/25/23 2:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <250820231401118440%nope@noway.com>,
> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <atropos-C4E72F.10415425082023@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <250820231248253393%nope@noway.com>,
>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <ucadaa$3ra9q$1@dont-email.me>, Rhino
>>>> <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2023-08-25 9:01 AM, FPP wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/25/23 6:45 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>>>>>> ...and got him to be "woke" about "troons."
>
>>>>>>> https://ktla.com/news/nationworld/carlos-santana-gives-anti-trans-spe
>>>>>>> ech-during-new-jersey-concert/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Carlos Santana gives anti-trans speech during New Jersey concert
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But then maybe his record label told him he'd totally fuck up his
>>>>>>> album sales:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2023/08/24/c
>>>>>>> arlos-santana-anti-trans-comments-apology/70672438007/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Carlos Santana apologizes for 'insensitive' anti-trans remarks
>>>>>>> duringrecent show
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They must be totally hating on the guy at Oath Keeper HQ for
>>>>>>> apologizing like a pussy.İ Oat
>>>>>>
>>>>>> While I understand everybody has an opinion, and even assholes get to
>>>>>> be assholes under the 1st Amendment... what I DON'T understand is why
>>>>>> they're not smart enough to shut their fucking bigoted traps?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For fuck's sake, if your business depends on serving the public, shut
>>>>>> your pie-hole if you want to keep sellin' them songs.İ I don't give a
>>>>>> shit about your personal bigoted opinions... I come for the music.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I'll bet you said exactly the same when the Dixie Chicks were spouting
>>>>> there opinions too, right? Oh wait, they were on the side of the angels
>>>>> so they get a pass. In fact they got major kudos for "speaking truth to
>>>>> power", right?
>>>>
>>>> You've accused him here of saying something he in fact did not say, and
>>>> then you attack him for having said it.
>>>
>>> Dude, look in the mirror. You've done that to me several times over the
>>> last several months.
>>
>> I'm sure you have cites for that.
>
> Before I bother looking them up, will they even count?
>

Is that your new excuse for not providing citations for what you say
now? Well, at least that's new.

And when did you learn what a mirror is?

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On 8/25/23 12:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <250820231248253393%nope@noway.com>,
> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <ucadaa$3ra9q$1@dont-email.me>, Rhino
>> <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2023-08-25 9:01 AM, FPP wrote:
>>>> On 8/25/23 6:45 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>>>> ...and got him to be "woke" about "troons."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://ktla.com/news/nationworld/carlos-santana-gives-anti-trans-speech-
>>>>> during-new-jersey-concert/
>>>>>
>>>>> Carlos Santana gives anti-trans speech during New Jersey concert
>>>>>
>>>>> But then maybe his record label told him he'd totally fuck up his
>>>>> album sales:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2023/08/24/carlo
>>>>> s-santana-anti-trans-comments-apology/70672438007/
>>>>>
>>>>> Carlos Santana apologizes for 'insensitive' anti-trans remarks during
>>>>> recent show
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> They must be totally hating on the guy at Oath Keeper HQ for
>>>>> apologizing like a pussy.  Oat
>>>>
>>>> While I understand everybody has an opinion, and even assholes get to be
>>>> assholes under the 1st Amendment... what I DON'T understand is why
>>>> they're not smart enough to shut their fucking bigoted traps?
>>>>
>>>> For fuck's sake, if your business depends on serving the public, shut
>>>> your pie-hole if you want to keep sellin' them songs.  I don't give a
>>>> shit about your personal bigoted opinions... I come for the music.
>>>>
>>> I'll bet you said exactly the same when the Dixie Chicks were spouting
>>> there opinions too, right? Oh wait, they were on the side of the angels
>>> so they get a pass. In fact they got major kudos for "speaking truth to
>>> power", right?
>>
>> You've accused him here of saying something he in fact did not say, and
>> then you attack him for having said it.
>
> Dude, look in the mirror. You've done that to me several times over the
> last several months.

That sounds very mean. Did it make you cry?

no_offline_contact@example.com wrote:
> On 2023-08-25 9:01 AM, FPP wrote:
>> On 8/25/23 6:45 AM, trotsky wrote:

>>> ...and got him to be "woke" about "troons."
>>>
>>> https://ktla.com/news/nationworld/carlos-santana-gives-anti-trans-speech-during-new-jersey-concert/
>>>
>>> Carlos Santana gives anti-trans speech during New Jersey concert
>>>
>>> But then maybe his record label told him he'd totally fuck up his
>>> album sales:
>>>
>>> https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2023/08/24/carlos-santana-anti-trans-comments-apology/70672438007/
>>>
>>> Carlos Santana apologizes for 'insensitive' anti-trans remarks during
>>> recent show
>>>
>>> They must be totally hating on the guy at Oath Keeper HQ for
>>> apologizing like a pussy.  Oat
>>
>> While I understand everybody has an opinion, and even assholes get to be
>> assholes under the 1st Amendment... what I DON'T understand is why
>> they're not smart enough to shut their fucking bigoted traps?
>>
>> For fuck's sake, if your business depends on serving the public, shut
>> your pie-hole if you want to keep sellin' them songs.  I don't give a
>> shit about your personal bigoted opinions... I come for the music.
>>
>I'll bet you said exactly the same when the Dixie Chicks were spouting
>there opinions too, right? Oh wait, they were on the side of the angels
>so they get a pass. In fact they got major kudos for "speaking truth to
>power", right?

As I've said many many times, "trotsky" and his sockpuppets determine their
opinion on things by whether they like the person or not.

--
"Sometimes, bad things happen to bad people"
-- "FPP"

In article <250820231248253393%nope@noway.com>, nope@noway.com wrote:
> Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
>> On 2023-08-25 9:01 AM, "trotsky" wrote:

>>> While I understand everybody has an opinion, and even assholes get to be
>>> assholes under the 1st Amendment... what I DON'T understand is why
>>> they're not smart enough to shut their fucking bigoted traps?
>>>
>>> For fuck's sake, if your business depends on serving the public, shut
>>> your pie-hole if you want to keep sellin' them songs.� I don't give a
>>> shit about your personal bigoted opinions... I come for the music.
>>
>> I'll bet you said exactly the same when the Dixie Chicks were spouting
>> there opinions too, right? Oh wait, they were on the side of the angels
>> so they get a pass. In fact they got major kudos for "speaking truth to
>> power", right?
>
>You've accused him here of saying something he in fact did not say, and
>then you attack him for having said it. Typical.

Nice strawman and projection, dude.

Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.

--
Let's go Brandon!

atropos@mac.com wrote:
> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>> Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

>>> I'll bet you said exactly the same when the Dixie Chicks were spouting
>>> there opinions too, right? Oh wait, they were on the side of the angels
>>> so they get a pass. In fact they got major kudos for "speaking truth to
>>> power", right?
>>
>> You've accused him here of saying something he in fact did not say, and
>> then you attack him for having said it.
>
>Dude, look in the mirror. You've done that to me several times over the
>last several months.

#MeToo

--
Let's go Brandon!

Someone's sockpuppet wrote:
>On 8/25/23 10:19 AM, Rhino wrote:
>> On 2023-08-25 9:01 AM, "trotsk"y wrote:

>>> While I understand everybody has an opinion, and even assholes get to
>>> be assholes under the 1st Amendment... what I DON'T understand is why
>>> they're not smart enough to shut their fucking bigoted traps?
>>>
>>> For fuck's sake, if your business depends on serving the public, shut
>>> your pie-hole if you want to keep sellin' them songs.� I don't give a
>>> shit about your personal bigoted opinions... I come for the music.
>>
>> I'll bet you said exactly the same when the Dixie Chicks were spouting
>> there opinions too, right? Oh wait, they were on the side of the angels
>> so they get a pass. In fact they got major kudos for "speaking truth to
>> power", right?
>
>
>Let's see... the Dixie Chicks were speaking about how they, themselves,
>felt. Carlos was speaking for God... which one, he didn't say.
>
>Yeah, exactly the same thing.

Nonresponse noted. get back to us when you have a real argument to make.

--
THE LEFT WING INTERNET ARGUING CHECKLIST

1.Skim until Offended
2.Disqualify that Opinion
3.Attack, Attack, Attack
4.Disregard Inconvenient facts
5.Make Shit Up
6.Resort to Moral Equivalency
7.Concern Trolling
8.When all else fails, Racism!

On 8/28/23 3:38 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
>Someone's sockpuppet wrote:
>>On 8/25/23 10:19 AM, Rhino wrote:
>>> On 2023-08-25 9:01 AM, "trotsk"y wrote:
>
>>>> While I understand everybody has an opinion, and even assholes get to
>>>> be assholes under the 1st Amendment... what I DON'T understand is why
>>>> they're not smart enough to shut their fucking bigoted traps?
>>>>
>>>> For fuck's sake, if your business depends on serving the public, shut
>>>> your pie-hole if you want to keep sellin' them songs.� I don't give a
>>>> shit about your personal bigoted opinions... I come for the music.
>>>
>>> I'll bet you said exactly the same when the Dixie Chicks were spouting
>>> there opinions too, right? Oh wait, they were on the side of the angels
>>> so they get a pass. In fact they got major kudos for "speaking truth to
>>> power", right?
>>
>>
>>Let's see... the Dixie Chicks were speaking about how they, themselves,
>>felt. Carlos was speaking for God... which one, he didn't say.
>>
>>Yeah, exactly the same thing.
>
>Nonresponse noted. get back to us when you have a real argument to make.
>
>--
>THE LEFT WING INTERNET ARGUING CHECKLIST

Filthy disgusting pubic hair like troll alert.

>
>1.Skim until Offended
>2.Disqualify that Opinion
>3.Attack, Attack, Attack
>4.Disregard Inconvenient facts
>5.Make Shit Up
>6.Resort to Moral Equivalency
>7.Concern Trolling
>8.When all else fails, Racism!
>

--
GQP sucks.

In article <uci28f$1m4mo$7@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
<weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

> In article <250820231248253393%nope@noway.com>, nope@noway.com wrote:
> > Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
> >> On 2023-08-25 9:01 AM, "trotsky" wrote:
>
> >>> While I understand everybody has an opinion, and even assholes get to be
> >>> assholes under the 1st Amendment... what I DON'T understand is why
> >>> they're not smart enough to shut their fucking bigoted traps?
> >>>
> >>> For fuck's sake, if your business depends on serving the public, shut
> >>> your pie-hole if you want to keep sellin' them songs.Ý I don't give a
> >>> shit about your personal bigoted opinions... I come for the music.
> >>
> >> I'll bet you said exactly the same when the Dixie Chicks were spouting
> >> there opinions too, right? Oh wait, they were on the side of the angels
> >> so they get a pass. In fact they got major kudos for "speaking truth to
> >> power", right?
> >
> >You've accused him here of saying something he in fact did not say, and
> >then you attack him for having said it. Typical.
>
> Nice strawman and projection, dude.
>
> Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.

To repeat: He didn't say that. You attacked him for it anyway. Then
you cried "strawman!" and your usual "get back to us when" bullshit,
with another failed attempt to divert replies out of the ng.

You're babbling nonsense and you should stop now. Dude.

In article <uci2be$1m4mo$8@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
<weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

> atropos@mac.com wrote:
> > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> >> Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
>
> >>> I'll bet you said exactly the same when the Dixie Chicks were spouting
> >>> there opinions too, right? Oh wait, they were on the side of the angels
> >>> so they get a pass. In fact they got major kudos for "speaking truth to
> >>> power", right?
> >>
> >> You've accused him here of saying something he in fact did not say, and
> >> then you attack him for having said it.
> >
> >Dude, look in the mirror. You've done that to me several times over the
> >last several months.
>
> #MeToo

Still no cites from either of you. Of course, that's because I didn't
do it.

> trotsky
>
> https://ktla.com/news/nationworld/carlos-santana-gives-anti-trans-speech-during-new-jersey-concert/
> Carlos Santana gives anti-trans speech during New Jersey concert

"In the clip, which can be seen across several outlets, including Consequence, the “Smooth” musician can be heard saying:
“When God made you and me, before we came out of the womb, you know who you are and what you are. Later on, when
you grow out of it, you see things, and you start believing that you could be something that sounds good, but you know it
ain’t right. Because a woman is a woman and a man is a man. That’s it. Whatever you wanna do in the closet, that’s your
business. I’m OK with that.”

During the same concert, Santana also stopped to express support for comedian Dave Chappelle, who has made several
inflammatory comments about the trans community in recent years. In the clip, Santana is heard saying as a follow-up to
his previous statement,”I am like this with my brother Dave Chappelle,” as reported by Rolling Stone."

The Dems need that "Latinx" vote but Hispanics tend to be socially conservative
and don't go for chopping their kid's dick off and shooting them up with female
hormones, to get upvotes on Reddit.

In article <280820231825298905%nope@noway.com>,
A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:

> In article <uci2be$1m4mo$8@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
> <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>
> > atropos@mac.com wrote:
> > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> > >> Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
> >
> > >>> I'll bet you said exactly the same when the Dixie Chicks were spouting
> > >>> there opinions too, right? Oh wait, they were on the side of the angels
> > >>> so they get a pass. In fact they got major kudos for "speaking truth to
> > >>> power", right?
> > >>
> > >> You've accused him here of saying something he in fact did not say, and
> > >> then you attack him for having said it.
> > >
> > >Dude, look in the mirror. You've done that to me several times over the
> > >last several months.
> >
> > #MeToo
>
>
> Still no cites from either of you. Of course, that's because I didn't
> do it.

No, as I said earlier, I'm waiting for a guarantee from you that when
cites are provided, you won't just say they don't count as you're wont
to do.

On 8/28/23 7:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <280820231825298905%nope@noway.com>,
> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <uci2be$1m4mo$8@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
>> <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>
>>> atropos@mac.com wrote:
>>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>> Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> I'll bet you said exactly the same when the Dixie Chicks were spouting
>>>>>> there opinions too, right? Oh wait, they were on the side of the angels
>>>>>> so they get a pass. In fact they got major kudos for "speaking truth to
>>>>>> power", right?
>>>>>
>>>>> You've accused him here of saying something he in fact did not say, and
>>>>> then you attack him for having said it.
>>>>
>>>> Dude, look in the mirror. You've done that to me several times over the
>>>> last several months.
>>>
>>> #MeToo
>>
>>
>> Still no cites from either of you. Of course, that's because I didn't
>> do it.
>
> No, as I said earlier, I'm waiting for a guarantee from you that when
> cites are provided, you won't just say they don't count as you're wont
> to do.
>

So, still won't back up your own words. Non-response noted.
I give you my citations all day... and that's when you go silent and run
away with your tail tucked between your legs.

Wouldn't you like to see us run like YOU do? All you need do to enjoy
it (like we do) is post your citation. It isn't hard... and the sight
of your opponent fleeing in terror is well worth it.

Don't you WANT to see us back down? Don't you?
"What is best in life?"

"To crush Thanny, see him driven before you, and to hear the lamentation
of his women."

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On 8/28/23 6:41 PM, Ed Stasiak wrote:

> The Dems need that "Latinx" vote but Hispanics tend to be socially conservative
> and don't go for chopping their kid's dick off and shooting them up with female
> hormones, to get upvotes on Reddit.
>

Right. Conservatives just prefer shooting them up at their schools instead.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

In article <atropos-0B1798.16062828082023@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
<atropos@mac.com> wrote:

> In article <280820231825298905%nope@noway.com>,
> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <uci2be$1m4mo$8@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
> > <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
> >
> > > atropos@mac.com wrote:
> > > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> > > >> Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >>> I'll bet you said exactly the same when the Dixie Chicks were
> > > >>> spouting
> > > >>> there opinions too, right? Oh wait, they were on the side of the
> > > >>> angels
> > > >>> so they get a pass. In fact they got major kudos for "speaking truth
> > > >>> to
> > > >>> power", right?
> > > >>
> > > >> You've accused him here of saying something he in fact did not say, and
> > > >> then you attack him for having said it.
> > > >
> > > >Dude, look in the mirror. You've done that to me several times over the
> > > >last several months.
> > >
> > > #MeToo
> >
> >
> > Still no cites from either of you. Of course, that's because I didn't
> > do it.
>
> No, as I said earlier, I'm waiting for a guarantee from you that when
> cites are provided, you won't just say they don't count as you're wont
> to do.

Hilarious. Please, keep 'em comin'. Just make sure the cites are
relevant, as you have a bit of a problem with that.