Rep. Santos faces new charges he stole donor IDs, made unauthorized
charges to their credit cards
By JAKE OFFENHARTZ
AP
October 11, 2023
https://apnews.com/article/george-santos-credit-card-fraud-f723e69a777b02a2e6b87595f45c21ce

Top party officials in the Republican Party of New York may not have
done the best job vetting this guy.

The bill of indictment has been updated, 23 counts replacing 13 counts.

In new counts, he is indicted for unauthorized charges of more than
$44,000 to contributors' credit cards. The monies went into the campaign
fund but in one case, $12,000 went into his personal bank account.

We knew about the falsified personal loan of $500,000 to the campaign he
reported to Federal Elections Commissions to fool the Republican Party
that he had access to real money.

I guess I don't see how he's disqualified to be a member of Congress.
With $3 trillion in debt, Congress regularly appropriates spending of
moneys that don't yet belong to the federal government. But that's not
embezzlement for reasons that aren't clear to me.

In <ug6lkm$1urnj$1@dont-email.me> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> writes:

>Rep. Santos faces new charges he stole donor IDs, made unauthorized
>charges to their credit cards
>By JAKE OFFENHARTZ
>AP
>October 11, 2023
>https://apnews.com/article/george-santos-credit-card-fraud-f723e69a777b02a2e6b87595f45c21ce
====
what pisses me off here (well, make that one of things that pisses me off)
is that if you or I falsely and illegally charged someone's credit
card, we'd have some detectives knocking on our door the next day,
and a pretty good chance of an ADA having a pretty serious chat
with us (or our attorney) 24 hours later.

Why the fuck was he treated so lightly?

(To be clear, the Federal indictment is a well done piece
of damming paperwork, but he should have been at Central
Booking a year ago).

--
_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
dannyb@panix.com
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]

On 10/11/23 5:50 PM, danny burstein wrote:
> In <ug6lkm$1urnj$1@dont-email.me> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> writes:
>
>> Rep. Santos faces new charges he stole donor IDs, made unauthorized
>> charges to their credit cards
>> By JAKE OFFENHARTZ
>> AP
>> October 11, 2023
>> https://apnews.com/article/george-santos-credit-card-fraud-f723e69a777b02a2e6b87595f45c21ce
> ====
> what pisses me off here (well, make that one of things that pisses me off)
> is that if you or I falsely and illegally charged someone's credit
> card, we'd have some detectives knocking on our door the next day,
> and a pretty good chance of an ADA having a pretty serious chat
> with us (or our attorney) 24 hours later.
>
> Why the fuck was he treated so lightly?
>
> (To be clear, the Federal indictment is a well done piece
> of damming paperwork, but he should have been at Central
> Booking a year ago).

It's New York, and he's part of an extremely thin majority in the House.
They couldn't afford to take him out of his seat, because they'd almost
surely lose it.

He got away with it because he had help. Nothing happens in a vacuum,
and nothing happens to people with money (for a while).

Look at Rapey McForehead... why is Matt Gaetz allowed to prance around?
Hell, he took down a Speaker of the House, almost single-handedly.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

In article <ug6lkm$1urnj$1@dont-email.me>, ahk@chinet.com wrote:

>Rep. Santos faces new charges he stole donor IDs, made unauthorized
>charges to their credit cards

If that proves to be true, then he needs to be expelled from Congress.

OTOH, the Biden DoJ is making these claims...

--
Let's go Brandon!

In article <ug7iev$28j19$1@dont-email.me>, fredp1571@gmail.com wrote:
> On 10/11/23 5:50 PM, danny burstein wrote:
>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> writes:

>>> Rep. Santos faces new charges he stole donor IDs, made unauthorized
>>> charges to their credit cards
>>
>> what pisses me off here (well, make that one of things that pisses me off)
>> is that if you or I falsely and illegally charged someone's credit
>> card, we'd have some detectives knocking on our door the next day,
>> and a pretty good chance of an ADA having a pretty serious chat
>> with us (or our attorney) 24 hours later.
>>
>> Why the fuck was he treated so lightly?
>>
>> (To be clear, the Federal indictment is a well done piece
>> of damming paperwork, but he should have been at Central
>> Booking a year ago).
>
>It's New York, and he's part of an extremely thin majority in the House.
>They couldn't afford to take him out of his seat, because they'd almost
>surely lose it.
>
>He got away with it because he had help. Nothing happens in a vacuum,
>and nothing happens to people with money (for a while).
>
>Look at Rapey McForehead... why is Matt Gaetz allowed to prance around?

Big Lie noted.
Homophobia noted.

Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.

--
Let's go Brandon!

On 10/12/23 3:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
>In article <ug6lkm$1urnj$1@dont-email.me>, ahk@chinet.com wrote:
>
>>Rep. Santos faces new charges he stole donor IDs, made unauthorized
>>charges to their credit cards
>
>If that proves to be true, then he needs to be expelled from Congress.
>
>OTOH, the Biden DoJ is making these claims...

Pure s*** as expected.
>
>--
>Let's go Brandon!
>

--
GOP sucks

On 10/12/23 2:25 PM, trotsky wrote:
> On 10/12/23 3:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
>> In article <ug6lkm$1urnj$1@dont-email.me>, ahk@chinet.com wrote:
>>
>>> Rep. Santos faces new charges he stole donor IDs, made unauthorized
>>> charges to their credit cards
>>
>> If that proves to be true, then he needs to be expelled from Congress.
>>
>> OTOH, the Biden DoJ is making these claims...
>
>
> Pure s*** as expected.
>>
>> --
>> Let's go Brandon!

Oh My God! Someone is defending George Santos.

Did I say George Santos? I meant Anthony Zabrovsky.
Did I say Anthony Zabrovsky? I meant Anthony Devolder.
Did I say Anthony Devolder? I meant Kitara Ravache!

I'm not sure how Biden MADE him do this, but he DID!
He also made George Jew-ish.

Pubiquitous (if that is his real name) is really reaching here...
Hi Mikey!

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On Oct 12, 2023 at 1:30:42 AM PDT, "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

> In article <ug6lkm$1urnj$1@dont-email.me>, ahk@chinet.com wrote:
>
>> Rep. Santos faces new charges he stole donor IDs, made unauthorized
>> charges to their credit cards
>
> If that proves to be true, then he needs to be expelled from Congress.

Santos should indeed be expelled if he committed actual crimes. But the Dems
have been calling for his expulsion long before criminal accusations were
known or leveled based merely on him lying about himself.

Yet they have no problem with a president who has been lying about himself--
and continues to do so even after the lies have been debunked-- for the last
30+ years.

On 10/12/23 4:04 PM, FPP wrote:
> On 10/12/23 2:25 PM, trotsky wrote:
>> On 10/12/23 3:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
>>> In article <ug6lkm$1urnj$1@dont-email.me>, ahk@chinet.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> Rep. Santos faces new charges he stole donor IDs, made unauthorized
>>>> charges to their credit cards
>>>
>>> If that proves to be true, then he needs to be expelled from Congress.
>>>
>>> OTOH, the Biden DoJ is making these claims...
>>
>>
>> Pure s*** as expected.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Let's go Brandon!
>
>
> Oh My God!  Someone is defending George Santos.
>
> Did I say George Santos?  I meant Anthony Zabrovsky.
> Did I say Anthony Zabrovsky?  I meant Anthony Devolder.
> Did I say Anthony Devolder?  I meant Kitara Ravache!
>
> I'm not sure how Biden MADE him do this, but he DID!
> He also made George Jew-ish.
>
> Pubiquitous (if that is his real name) is really reaching here...
> Hi Mikey!

He has weasels living rent free in his head.

On 10/12/23 4:14 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Oct 12, 2023 at 1:30:42 AM PDT, "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>
>> In article <ug6lkm$1urnj$1@dont-email.me>, ahk@chinet.com wrote:
>>
>>> Rep. Santos faces new charges he stole donor IDs, made unauthorized
>>> charges to their credit cards
>>
>> If that proves to be true, then he needs to be expelled from Congress.
>
> Santos should indeed be expelled if he committed actual crimes. But the Dems
> have been calling for his expulsion long before criminal accusations were
> known or leveled based merely on him lying about himself.

What has the GQP called for, more troon personas?

> Yet they have no problem with a president who has been lying about himself--
> and continues to do so even after the lies have been debunked-- for the last
> 30+ years.

Hey, here's a thought, instead of making an inaccurate analogy, why
don't you get a pair of balls from somewhere and speak to the subject of
the post?

On 10/12/23 5:14 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Oct 12, 2023 at 1:30:42 AM PDT, "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>
>> In article <ug6lkm$1urnj$1@dont-email.me>, ahk@chinet.com wrote:
>>
>>> Rep. Santos faces new charges he stole donor IDs, made unauthorized
>>> charges to their credit cards
>>
>> If that proves to be true, then he needs to be expelled from Congress.
>
> Santos should indeed be expelled if he committed actual crimes. But the Dems
> have been calling for his expulsion long before criminal accusations were
> known or leveled based merely on him lying about himself.
>
> Yet they have no problem with a president who has been lying about himself--
> and continues to do so even after the lies have been debunked-- for the last
> 30+ years.
>
>

Irony is dead. George Santos confessed to stealing checks in Brazil in
a deal to drop charges.

That still *is* a crime, right, lawyer? But you're forgiving him
because he committed that crime in Brazil, so it doesn't count as a crime?

The leader of your party has been convicted or scamming with his charity.
He's had to pay for his Trump University scam.
His main business is a fraud, and has a summary judgement saying so.
He's been convicted of defamation and been branded a rapist by a judge.

He's still far and away the front-runner for your party. You know... the
one you pretend not to be a part of - but never seem to denounce them
every time they're caught with their pants down.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0