Does that mean that Doctor Who has to make Disney park appearances?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com

On 12/16/23 7:01 AM, The Doctor wrote:

> Does that mean that Doctor Who has to make Disney park appearances?

Yes. He must also publicly badmouth "Snow White" before revising and
retracting those statements at a later date.

Ian J. Ball <ijball@mac.invalid> wrote:
> On 12/16/23 7:01 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>
>> Does that mean that Doctor Who has to make Disney park appearances?
>
> Yes. He must also publicly badmouth "Snow White" before revising and
> retracting those statements at a later date.

And Catherine Tate will be in stocks at the park where the guests can throw
rotten fruit at her.

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

In article <ulknh8$2fudd$3@dont-email.me>,
Ian J. Ball <ijball@mac.invalid> wrote:
>On 12/16/23 7:01 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>
>> Does that mean that Doctor Who has to make Disney park appearances?
>
>Yes. He must also publicly badmouth "Snow White" before revising and
>retracting those statements at a later date.
>
>

:-)
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com

In article <1364551552.724466723.755283.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>,
anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>Ian J. Ball <ijball@mac.invalid> wrote:
>> On 12/16/23 7:01 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> Does that mean that Doctor Who has to make Disney park appearances?
>>
>> Yes. He must also publicly badmouth "Snow White" before revising and
>> retracting those statements at a later date.
>
>And Catherine Tate will be in stocks at the park where the guests can throw
>rotten fruit at her.
>
>

Hater!

>
>--
>The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <1364551552.724466723.755283.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>,
> anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>> Ian J. Ball <ijball@mac.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 12/16/23 7:01 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>
>>>> Does that mean that Doctor Who has to make Disney park appearances?
>>>
>>> Yes. He must also publicly badmouth "Snow White" before revising and
>>> retracting those statements at a later date.
>>
>> And Catherine Tate will be in stocks at the park where the guests can throw
>> rotten fruit at her.
>>
>>
>
> Hater!

Yes. Yes, I do.

>
>>
>> --
>> The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
>
>

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

On 2023-12-17 06:25:12 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> In article <1364551552.724466723.755283.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>,
>> anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>>> Ian J. Ball <ijball@mac.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On 12/16/23 7:01 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Does that mean that Doctor Who has to make Disney park appearances?
>>>>
>>>> Yes. He must also publicly badmouth "Snow White" before revising and
>>>> retracting those statements at a later date.
>>>
>>> And Catherine Tate will be in stocks at the park where the guests can
>>> throw rotten fruit at her.
>>
>> Hater!
>
> Yes. Yes, I do.

She is much much much better in Doctor Who than in anything else I've
ever had the misfortune of seeing her in (her so-called "comedy" is
just attrocious stupidity) ... including when she is apparently being
herself in real life shows like interviews. :-\

Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
> On 2023-12-17 06:25:12 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> In article <1364551552.724466723.755283.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>,
>>> anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>>>> Ian J. Ball <ijball@mac.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> On 12/16/23 7:01 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Does that mean that Doctor Who has to make Disney park appearances?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes. He must also publicly badmouth "Snow White" before revising and
>>>>> retracting those statements at a later date.
>>>>
>>>> And Catherine Tate will be in stocks at the park where the guests can
>>>> throw rotten fruit at her.
>>>
>>> Hater!
>>
>> Yes. Yes, I do.
>
> She is much much much better in Doctor Who than in anything else I've
> ever had the misfortune of seeing her in (her so-called "comedy" is
> just attrocious stupidity) ... including when she is apparently being
> herself in real life shows like interviews. :-\
>
>

That was the impression I got right from the Christmas bride, that she
wasn’t an actress, she was just some talkshow host only known in England,
making a stunt appearance.

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

anim8rfsk wrote:
> Your Name wrote:
>> anim8rfsk said:
>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>> anim8rfsk wrote:
>>>>> And Catherine Tate will be in stocks at the park where the guests can
>>>>> throw rotten fruit at her.
>>>>
>>>> Hater!
>>>
>>> Yes. Yes, I do.
>>
>> She is much much much better in Doctor Who than in anything else I've
>> ever had the misfortune of seeing her in (her so-called "comedy" is
>> just attrocious stupidity) ... including when she is apparently being
>> herself in real life shows like interviews. :-\
>
> That was the impression I got right from the Christmas bride, that she
> wasn’t an actress, she was just some talkshow host only known in England,
> making a stunt appearance.

Sadly no, she was a sketch show “comedian”. But yes, it was a stunt
appearance.

For the full “glory” of her talent hunt down “The Nan Movie”, doubtless
available on some junk streaming service (Roku, Freevee etc) as these days
every network needs all the content it can scrape together no matter how
poor.

--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

In article <ulm56e$2qkmd$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>On 2023-12-17 06:25:12 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> In article
><1364551552.724466723.755283.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>,
>>> anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>>>> Ian J. Ball <ijball@mac.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> On 12/16/23 7:01 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Does that mean that Doctor Who has to make Disney park appearances?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes. He must also publicly badmouth "Snow White" before revising and
>>>>> retracting those statements at a later date.
>>>>
>>>> And Catherine Tate will be in stocks at the park where the guests can
>>>> throw rotten fruit at her.
>>>
>>> Hater!
>>
>> Yes. Yes, I do.
>
>She is much much much better in Doctor Who than in anything else I've
>ever had the misfortune of seeing her in (her so-called "comedy" is
>just attrocious stupidity) ... including when she is apparently being
>herself in real life shows like interviews. :-\
>

Tate rocks you haters!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com

In article <216235791.724504078.876130.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>,
anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>> On 2023-12-17 06:25:12 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>> In article
><1364551552.724466723.755283.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>,
>>>> anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>> Ian J. Ball <ijball@mac.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/16/23 7:01 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does that mean that Doctor Who has to make Disney park appearances?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes. He must also publicly badmouth "Snow White" before revising and
>>>>>> retracting those statements at a later date.
>>>>>
>>>>> And Catherine Tate will be in stocks at the park where the guests can
>>>>> throw rotten fruit at her.
>>>>
>>>> Hater!
>>>
>>> Yes. Yes, I do.
>>
>> She is much much much better in Doctor Who than in anything else I've
>> ever had the misfortune of seeing her in (her so-called "comedy" is
>> just attrocious stupidity) ... including when she is apparently being
>> herself in real life shows like interviews. :-\
>>
>>
>
>That was the impression I got right from the Christmas bride, that she
>wasn’t an actress, she was just some talkshow host only known in England,
>making a stunt appearance.
>

IYIO!

>--
>The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com

In article <ulmokk$2u1ql$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>anim8rfsk wrote:
>> Your Name wrote:
>>> anim8rfsk said:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> anim8rfsk wrote:
>>>>>> And Catherine Tate will be in stocks at the park where the guests can
>>>>>> throw rotten fruit at her.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hater!
>>>>
>>>> Yes. Yes, I do.
>>>
>>> She is much much much better in Doctor Who than in anything else I've
>>> ever had the misfortune of seeing her in (her so-called "comedy" is
>>> just attrocious stupidity) ... including when she is apparently being
>>> herself in real life shows like interviews. :-\
>>
>> That was the impression I got right from the Christmas bride, that she
>> wasn’t an actress, she was just some talkshow host only known in England,
>> making a stunt appearance.
>
>Sadly no, she was a sketch show “comedian”. But yes, it was a stunt
>appearance.
>
>For the full “glory” of her talent hunt down “The Nan Movie”, doubtless
>available on some junk streaming service (Roku, Freevee etc) as these days
>every network needs all the content it can scrape together no matter how
>poor.
>

Do you like the Cathereine Tate show?

>--
>“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com

The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
> anim8rfsk wrote:
>> Your Name wrote:
>>> anim8rfsk said:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> anim8rfsk wrote:
>>>>>> And Catherine Tate will be in stocks at the park where the guests can
>>>>>> throw rotten fruit at her.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hater!
>>>>
>>>> Yes. Yes, I do.
>>>
>>> She is much much much better in Doctor Who than in anything else I've
>>> ever had the misfortune of seeing her in (her so-called "comedy" is
>>> just attrocious stupidity) ... including when she is apparently being
>>> herself in real life shows like interviews. :-\
>>
>> That was the impression I got right from the Christmas bride, that she
>> wasn’t an actress, she was just some talkshow host only known in England,
>> making a stunt appearance.
>
> Sadly no, she was a sketch show “comedian”. But yes, it was a stunt
> appearance.
>
> For the full “glory” of her talent hunt down “The Nan Movie”, doubtless
> available on some junk streaming service (Roku, Freevee etc) as these days
> every network needs all the content it can scrape together no matter how
> poor.
>

I was watching some of the good episodes last night with Martha Jones and
suddenly I’m in an episode with both Tate and Crapaldi and it’s like
watching a Saturday Night Live sketch.

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

On 2023-12-17 11:11:51 +0000, anim8rfsk said:

> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>> On 2023-12-17 06:25:12 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>> In article <1364551552.724466723.755283.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>,
>>>> anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>> Ian J. Ball <ijball@mac.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/16/23 7:01 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does that mean that Doctor Who has to make Disney park appearances?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes. He must also publicly badmouth "Snow White" before revising and
>>>>>> retracting those statements at a later date.
>>>>>
>>>>> And Catherine Tate will be in stocks at the park where the guests can
>>>>> throw rotten fruit at her.
>>>>
>>>> Hater!
>>>
>>> Yes. Yes, I do.
>>
>> She is much much much better in Doctor Who than in anything else I've
>> ever had the misfortune of seeing her in (her so-called "comedy" is
>> just attrocious stupidity) ... including when she is apparently being
>> herself in real life shows like interviews. :-\
>
> That was the impression I got right from the Christmas bride, that she
> wasn’t an actress, she was just some talkshow host only known in England,
> making a stunt appearance.

She isn't a talkshow host. I meant seeing her being interviewed on
talkshows (hosted by other people), TV quiz show panels, etc. For
example, on 'The Graham Norton Show' <https://youtu.be/LQco8BM1DuQ>

She is supposedly a comedian, but nothing she has done has been even
remotely funny ... just purile, silly, and highly annoying.

In article <732608613.724523169.973695.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>,
anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> anim8rfsk wrote:
>>> Your Name wrote:
>>>> anim8rfsk said:
>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>> anim8rfsk wrote:
>>>>>>> And Catherine Tate will be in stocks at the park where the guests can
>>>>>>> throw rotten fruit at her.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hater!
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes. Yes, I do.
>>>>
>>>> She is much much much better in Doctor Who than in anything else I've
>>>> ever had the misfortune of seeing her in (her so-called "comedy" is
>>>> just attrocious stupidity) ... including when she is apparently being
>>>> herself in real life shows like interviews. :-\
>>>
>>> That was the impression I got right from the Christmas bride, that she
>>> wasn’t an actress, she was just some talkshow host only known in England,
>>> making a stunt appearance.
>>
>> Sadly no, she was a sketch show “comedian”. But yes, it was a stunt
>> appearance.
>>
>> For the full “glory” of her talent hunt down “The Nan Movie”,
>doubtless
>> available on some junk streaming service (Roku, Freevee etc) as these days
>> every network needs all the content it can scrape together no matter how
>> poor.
>>
>
>I was watching some of the good episodes last night with Martha Jones and
>suddenly I’m in an episode with both Tate and Crapaldi and it’s like
>watching a Saturday Night Live sketch.
>

As you like it!

>--
>The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com