On 11/28/23 2:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2023 at 10:55:14 AM PST, "EGK" <memyself@null.net> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 18:41:47 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Nikki Haley wins backing from powerful Koch network as she aims to take on
>>> Trump
>>> By STEVE PEOPLES
>>> AP
>>> Updated 12:02 PM CST, November 28, 2023
>>>
>>> https://apnews.com/article/nikki-haley-koch-network-endorsement-desantis-trump-938d932aaf2b9b299c32b4d736aaade4
>>>
>>> I've wanted to like her ever since she showed guts after
>>> Charlottesville. But she's gone completely over to the dark side.
>>
>> Riggggght! The Dark side as opposed to all the Democrats taking money from
>> Soros.
>
> And Big Labor. The same Democrats who decry "big corporate donors" have no
> problem taking mountains of cash from corrupt labor unions.
>

Which side was it that gutted campaign finance reform again, asshole?
Because we HAD controls on dark money until the right wing shitbags on
the Supreme Court opened the floodgates.

Now your theme of the day is that Dems should sit back and refuse money
while the Republican hogs get fat and monopolize the trough?

YOU clowns made the rules. Now you asses bray about everybody playing
by them.

Typical.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 03:56:23 -0000 (UTC)
"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
> >>. . .
>
> >But you're not even allowed to mention Soros. If you do, the Left
> >shuts down all criticism by automatically labeling you an
> >anti-Semite because Soros is nominally Jewish.
>
> EGK has always perfectly free to discuss Soros. He just didn't want to
> start a separate thread to discuss it, so he wasn't seriously
> discussing Soros. All he was interested in doing was not discussing
> Nikki Haley or Koch in followup to my article disucssing them.
>
> He chose to fuck up what I wanted to discuss.
>
> It's news to me that the Left defends Jews these days.

Even the Jews don't defend Jews these days!

I just saw a video where Antony Blinken, who is himself Jewish, was
demanding that Netanyahu not attack UN facilities in Gaza as the IDF
prepares for its operations in southern Gaza. This is despite the fact
that there have been widespread allegations that the UNWRA, a UN
organization, has worked very hard to help brainwash Gazan children to
hate Jews from their earliest school days and has funneled lots of
money that was intended to build infrastructure like schools into make
the tunnels from which Hamas fires rockets at Israel and (presumably)
hides fighters and hostages. The Hamas rocket launchers are typically
AT those UNWRA schools in an obvious attempt to shield them from
IDF retaliation by placing them adjacent to school buildings. Blinken
must be well aware of all this yet he is evidently acting to restrain
Netanyahu in cleaning out this nest of vipers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWDFVCNNuxs

--
Rhino

atropos@mac.com wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2023 at 10:55:14 AM PST, "EGK" <memyself@null.net> wrote:
>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

>>> I've wanted to like her ever since she showed guts after
>>> Charlottesville. But she's gone completely over to the dark side.
>>
>> Riggggght! The Dark side as opposed to all the Democrats taking money
>> from Soros.
>
>And Big Labor. The same Democrats who decry "big corporate donors" have no
>problem taking mountains of cash from corrupt labor unions.

And Teacher Unions, and other assorted PACS and politics groups.

--
Let's go Brandon!

"trotsky" wrote:
> On 11/28/23 2:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> On Nov 28, 2023 at 10:55:14 AM PST, "EGK" <memyself@null.net> wrote:
>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

>>>> I've wanted to like her ever since she showed guts after
>>>> Charlottesville. But she's gone completely over to the dark side.
>>>
>>> Riggggght! The Dark side as opposed to all the Democrats taking money
>>> from Soros.
>>
>> And Big Labor. The same Democrats who decry "big corporate donors" have no
>> problem taking mountains of cash from corrupt labor unions.
>
>Which side was it that gutted campaign finance reform again, asshole?

The premise of your question is incorrect. Try again.

>Because we HAD controls on dark money until the right wing shitbags on
>the Supreme Court opened the floodgates.

TROLL-O-METER
5* 6* *7
4* *8
3* *9
2* *10
1* | *stuporous
0* -*- *catatonic
* |\ *comatose
* \ *clinical death
* \ *biological death
* _\/ *demonic apparition
* * *damned for all eternity

>Now your theme of the day is that Dems should sit back and refuse money
>while the Republican hogs get fat and monopolize the trough?

"But but but they doi it toooo!!!"

Tu coque noted.

>YOU clowns made the rules. Now you asses bray about everybody playing
>by them.

Projection noted.

Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.

--
Lety's go Brandon!

In article <uk64ie$g9tk$1@dont-email.me>, ahk@chinet.com wrote:
> EGK <memyself@null.net> wrote:
>> Tue, 28 Nov 2023 19:09:42 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>:
>>> EGK <memyself@null.net> wrote:
>>>> Tue, 28 Nov 2023 18:41:47 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>:

>>>>>I've wanted to like her ever since she showed guts after
>>>>>Charlottesville. But she's gone completely over to the dark side.
>>>>
>>>>Riggggght! The Dark side as opposed to all the Democrats taking money
>>>>from Soros.
>>>
>>>I am under no obligation to make a moral equivalency to make a comment
>>>on Nikki accepting these monies.
>>
>>No, but when you pretend to be on some moral high horse by labeling it as
>>"the dark side" don't be surprised when you get some push back.
>
>Your push back is fuck, given that I've never defending the policies you
>object to and they are irrelevant to Nikki Haley.

TROLL-O-METER
5* 6* *7
4* *8
3* *9
2* *10
1* | *stuporous
0* -*- *catatonic
* |\ *comatose
* \ *clinical death
* \ *biological death
* _\/ *demonic apparition
* * *damned for all eternity

[Kerman's incorrect formatting fixed.]

atropos@mac.com wrote:

>But you're not even allowed to mention Soros. If you do, the Left shuts
>down all criticism by automatically labeling you an anti-Semite because
>Soros is nominally Jewish.

Ironic, considering how rabidly antisemite leftists are.

--
Let's go Brandon!

In article <uk5i39$23hhf$1@solani.org>, suzee@imbris.com wrote:
> On 11/28/2023 10:41 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:

>> I've wanted to like her ever since she showed guts after
>> Charlottesville. But she's gone completely over to the dark side.
>
>She's still a republican.

TROLL-O-METER
5* 6* *7
4* *8
3* *9
2* *10
1* | *stuporous
0* -*- *catatonic
* |\ *comatose
* \ *clinical death
* \ *biological death
* _\/ *demonic apparition
* * *damned for all eternity

Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
>>. . .

>Even the Jews don't defend Jews these days!

>I just saw a video where Antony Blinken, who is himself Jewish, was
>demanding that Netanyahu not attack UN facilities in Gaza as the IDF
>prepares for its operations in southern Gaza. This is despite the fact
>that there have been widespread allegations that the UNWRA, a UN
>organization, has worked very hard to help brainwash Gazan children to
>hate Jews from their earliest school days and has funneled lots of
>money that was intended to build infrastructure like schools into make
>the tunnels from which Hamas fires rockets at Israel and (presumably)
>hides fighters and hostages. The Hamas rocket launchers are typically
>AT those UNWRA schools in an obvious attempt to shield them from
>IDF retaliation by placing them adjacent to school buildings. Blinken
>must be well aware of all this yet he is evidently acting to restrain
>Netanyahu in cleaning out this nest of vipers.

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWDFVCNNuxs

I watched this twice and I missed Blinken saying this.

UNWRA has been a scandal for decades. Still, you can't bomb United
Nations workers no matter how complicit they are with terrorism.

Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

>. . .

>I've wanted to like her ever since she showed guts after
>Charlottesville. But she's gone completely over to the dark side.

Considering how many people on Usenet live to correct me, no one called
me on this. It wasn't Charlottesville. It was Charleston, the mass
killing by Dylann Roof at Emanuel A.M.E. Church. He murdered 8
congregants during bible study plus the senior pastor and injured a 10th
person. June 17, 2015

She had the Confederate flag long flying on the grounds of the state
capitol taken down. Interestingly, she'd campaigned on allowing it to
remain flying when running for governor several years earlier.

At a campaign event in New Hampshire, at a meet the presidential
candidate event and take one home with you event, a voter was trying to
get her to link preservation of slavery as a key cause of the Civil War.
After more than a century and a half, she wasn't prepared to say.

It'll be the War of Northern Aggression Upon the Peaceful
Southerns forever and always in South Carolina.

Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>
>> . . .
>
>> I've wanted to like her ever since she showed guts after
>> Charlottesville. But she's gone completely over to the dark side.
>
> Considering how many people on Usenet live to correct me,

Do not

no one called
> me on this. It wasn't Charlottesville. It was Charleston, the mass
> killing by Dylann Roof at Emanuel A.M.E. Church. He murdered 8
> congregants during bible study plus the senior pastor and injured a 10th
> person. June 17, 2015
>
> She had the Confederate flag long flying on the grounds of the state
> capitol taken down. Interestingly, she'd campaigned on allowing it to
> remain flying when running for governor several years earlier.
>
> At a campaign event in New Hampshire, at a meet the presidential
> candidate event and take one home with you event, a voter was trying to
> get her to link preservation of slavery as a key cause of the Civil War.
> After more than a century and a half, she wasn't prepared to say.
>
> It'll be the War of Northern Aggression Upon the Peaceful
> Southerns forever and always in South Carolina.
>

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote:
> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

>> Considering how many people on Usenet live to correct me,
>
> Do not

Oh, don't be mean to Kerman!

--
Let's go Brandon!

Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
> anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote:
>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>
>>> Considering how many people on Usenet live to correct me,
>>
>> Do not
>
> Oh, don't be mean to Kerman!

How would he know?

>
> --
> Let's go Brandon!
>
>

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.