On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 4:55:15 PM UTC-4, W.Dockery wrote:
> Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> >
> >> Dockery:
> >>
> >> "It really wasn't a gift or donation in the end, but rather a sort of loan."
> >>
> >> Fascinating!
>
> > My entire post, for context;
>
> > Michael Pendragon wrote:
>
> >> On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 10:47:43 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 10:37:59 PM UTC-4, Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> >>> > On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 10:21:38 PM UTC-4, Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> >>
> >>> > > Friends will be friends:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > 1. Fifty donated to Zod and his homeless plight.
> >>> Later paid back in full to Jim Senetto and the charity of his choice.
>
> >> Why do you stubbornly insist in misusing the words "paid back,"
> Like I said, because that's what it boiled down to in the end.

Since you don't understand what the words "paid back" mean, I don't doubt you.

> When Jim Senetto supposedly donated money to Zod then whined about it for years.

If you understand that the money had been donated to help the General, why did you treat yourself and your brother to steak dinners on it?

> So in order to try to stop Senetto's whining, I "paid back" the money Senetto had supposedly donated to Zod.

No. In order to settle things with Jim, you sent the money to a charity of Jim's choosing.

> Again, it really wasn't a gift or donation in the end, but rather a sort of loan.

It was money sent to help a man faced with homelessness. It was misappropriated by the individual it had been entrusted to, and an arrangement was made by which the matter was deemed to have been settled by both of the parties involved.
> And so it goes.

Michael Pendragon wrote:

> On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 2:51:32 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
>
>> (Lies from Michael Pendragon snipped)
>>
>> Again, the damned lie is that you keep trying to put blame on me for how Zod spent the money.
>> If Senetto or anyone else sends someone money, that's it, they don't have the right to demand how the money is spent.
>> Jim Senetto, control freak that he is, whined about the money for years so I returned his money so he'd supposedly quiet down about it.
>> Zod was free to spend the money as he pleased, and it was a positive thing that he spent the money on food.
>>
>> I returned the money, paid to the charity of his choice, and now the matter is settled.
>> In other words, why do you lie and misrepresent so much, Michael Pendragon?

> This bray

I didn't expect you to agree, Pendragon.

HTH and HAND.

On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 5:40:01 PM UTC-4, Michael Pendragon wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 2:51:32 AM UTC-4, W-Dockery wrote:
>
> > (Lies from Michael Pendragon snipped)
> >
> > Again, the damned lie is that you keep trying to put blame on me for how Zod spent the money.
> > If Senetto or anyone else sends someone money, that's it, they don't have the right to demand how the money is spent.
> > Jim Senetto, control freak that he is, whined about the money for years so I returned his money so he'd supposedly quiet down about it.
> > Zod was free to spend the money as he pleased, and it was a positive thing that he spent the money on food.
> >
> > I returned the money, paid to the charity of his choice, and now the matter is settled.
> > In other words, why do you lie and misrepresent so much, Michael Pendragon?
> This bray

I didn't expect you to admit it.

🙂