rander3128@gmail.com wrote:

> They put out the word six months ago, no challenger of note would be
> permitted to run against Biden in the Democratic primary. Remember
> about two years ago people saying even Harris might/could contest it?

"But-but-but-but DEMOCRACY!!!"

--
Let's go Brandon!

In article <upqlgq$9los$6@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

> rander3128@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > They put out the word six months ago, no challenger of note would be
> > permitted to run against Biden in the Democratic primary. Remember
> > about two years ago people saying even Harris might/could contest it?
>
> "But-but-but-but DEMOCRACY!!!"

Biden won a primary against other Democrats, which as the sitting
president and leader of the party it would be unheard of for him not to
win, and the Dem mouthpieces on CNN and Twitter are rolling around in
their own orgasmic fluids and acting like he just won the general
election in a landslide.

Buncha clowns.

On 2/5/2024 2:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <upqlgq$9los$6@dont-email.me>,
> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>
>> rander3128@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> They put out the word six months ago, no challenger of note would be
>>> permitted to run against Biden in the Democratic primary. Remember
>>> about two years ago people saying even Harris might/could contest it?
>>
>> "But-but-but-but DEMOCRACY!!!"
>
> Biden won a primary against other Democrats, which as the sitting
> president and leader of the party it would be unheard of for him not to
> win, and the Dem mouthpieces on CNN and Twitter are rolling around in
> their own orgasmic fluids and acting like he just won the general
> election in a landslide.
>
> Buncha clowns.

What part of this sequence constitutes a mention-worthy surprise? E.g.,
did CNN's coverage exceed what it gave Trump's Iowa "win""?

In article <upqlgq$9los$6@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
<weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

> rander3128@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > They put out the word six months ago, no challenger of note would be
> > permitted to run against Biden in the Democratic primary. Remember
> > about two years ago people saying even Harris might/could contest it?

Which "people" said that? Republicans? Harris was never going to
challenge Biden. The very idea is ridiculous.

> "But-but-but-but DEMOCRACY!!!"

Really? Where?

This thing would mean more if Biden were in political trouble. He's
not. People are generally content, leaving no clear pathway to
challenge Biden's incumbency. Voters have to be really pissed off to
even consider dumping an incumbent. I don't see any indication of
this. They're probably just bored, and I don't blame them.

On Mon, 05 Feb 2024 11:44:42 -0800, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

>Biden won a primary against other Democrats, which as the sitting
>president and leader of the party it would be unheard of for him not to
>win, and the Dem mouthpieces on CNN and Twitter are rolling around in
>their own orgasmic fluids and acting like he just won the general
>election in a landslide.
>

In 1968 LBJ chose not to run again as he had been given polls
suggesting that he would LOSE primaries to RFK and others which of
course would be unheard of for a sitting president seeking
re-election.

atropos@mac.com wrote:
> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>> rander3128@gmail.com wrote:

>>> They put out the word six months ago, no challenger of note would be
>>> permitted to run against Biden in the Democratic primary. Remember
>>> about two years ago people saying even Harris might/could contest it?
>>
>> "But-but-but-but DEMOCRACY!!!"
>
>Biden won a primary against other Democrats, which as the sitting
>president and leader of the party it would be unheard of for him not to
>win, and the Dem mouthpieces on CNN and Twitter are rolling around in
>their own orgasmic fluids and acting like he just won the general
>election in a landslide.
>
>Buncha clowns.

Senile Resident Joke Biden was the only person on the ballot.
Of course it was a "landslide".

--
Let's go Brandon!

In article <050220241550263537%nope@noway.com>, nope@noway.com wrote:

> This thing would mean more if Biden were in political trouble. He's not.

TROLL-O-METER
5* 6* *7
4* *8
3* *9
2* *10
1* | *stuporous
0* -*- *catatonic
* |\ *comatose
* \ *clinical death
* \ *biological death
* _\/ *demonic apparition
* * *damned for all eternity

In article <upta9i$scqv$7@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
<weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

> In article <050220241550263537%nope@noway.com>, nope@noway.com wrote:
>
> > This thing would mean more if Biden were in political trouble. He's not.
>
>
> TROLL-O-METER

Hey, Ubi, my best advice to you is to go troll yourself.

To repeat, Biden is not in trouble. He will get his party's nomination
without effort, and he will win the general because his present
opposition is thin. Smarter and better candidates know to wait for
2028. Sorry if you find all of this too complicated.

And stop redirecting followups without notice, you stupid punk.

On 2/5/24 3:04 PM, moviePig wrote:
> On 2/5/2024 2:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <upqlgq$9los$6@dont-email.me>,
>>   Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>
>>> rander3128@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> They put out the word six months ago, no challenger of note would be
>>>> permitted to run against Biden in the Democratic primary. Remember
>>>> about two years ago people saying even Harris might/could contest it?
>>>
>>> "But-but-but-but DEMOCRACY!!!"
>>
>> Biden won a primary against other Democrats, which as the sitting
>> president and leader of the party it would be unheard of for him not to
>> win, and the Dem mouthpieces on CNN and Twitter are rolling around in
>> their own orgasmic fluids and acting like he just won the general
>> election in a landslide.
>>
>> Buncha clowns.
>
> What part of this sequence constitutes a mention-worthy surprise?  E.g.,
> did CNN's coverage exceed what it gave Trump's Iowa "win""?
>
>

He won a primary that he wasn't even in. And by a landslide, which is
unusual for a write in candidate.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On 2/5/24 1:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <upqlgq$9los$6@dont-email.me>,
> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>
>> rander3128@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> They put out the word six months ago, no challenger of note would be
>>> permitted to run against Biden in the Democratic primary. Remember
>>> about two years ago people saying even Harris might/could contest it?
>>
>> "But-but-but-but DEMOCRACY!!!"
>
> Biden won a primary against other Democrats, which as the sitting
> president and leader of the party it would be unheard of for him not to
> win, and the Dem mouthpieces on CNN and Twitter are rolling around in
> their own orgasmic fluids and acting like he just won the general
> election in a landslide.
>
> Buncha clowns.

But you and your sidekick are unable to talk about Trump due to lack of
balls?