On Sunday, March 30, 2008 at 3:20:30 AM UTC-4, Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
> OB wrote:
> > On Mar 29, 4:59 pm, Will Dockery <will.dock...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>Equivocation. If you repost an entire poem, anywhere, you need
> >>>permission.
> >>
> >>Except Michael Cook, Who can not only repost, but take the poem,
> >>record it, put the recording on his website without even crediting the
> >>write of the poem, right?
> >>
> >>That's the message you've been broadcasting with your noncomments on
> >>''Karma Bombs''.
> >
> >
> > Dockery, I don't owe you a comment on anything, and apart from you, no
> > one gives a shit what I think about Michael Cook, or "Karma Bombs", or
> > mysterious allegations of racism, or anything else unrelated to the
> > poems that are posted here - which is how it should be. If it weren't
> > for your constant spamming the group with personal smears and whining
> > about imaginary offences, this might actually begin to look like a
> > poetry forum. What would it take for you to just shut the fuck up and
> > either post poetry, or not, and critiques of actual poems (!> > "personalities"), or not?
> >
> There was an old poetry forum
> Where people would write 'em and score 'em,
> And settle their plights
> Without smearing or fights
> Until Dockery started to snore 'em.
> >
> >>>I'm referring to your posting links to people's photos accompanied by
> >>>snide remarks about their appearance. AFAIK, that's a trademark
> >>>Dockery method of "critique".
> >>
> >>Wrong again. If you're refering to Mushmouth's photo, and my
> >>speculation on the origin of his whistle-lisping gargle, /he/ was the
> >>one who began that with his ''review'' of one of my videos and /his/
> >>snide remarks about /my/ appearance.
> >
> If the /New York Times/ reported a train wreck, would that qualify as
> "snide," too?
> If Bert Parks reported that he'd rather look at Miss America's ass
> than at your face, would that qualify as "snide," too?
> If the /New England Journal of Medicine/ reported that shit stank,
> would that qualify as "snide," too?
> >
> > To my certain knowledge you've done the same thing with at least two
> > other posters -- that's when you're not publicly dismissing female
> > posters as "fat-n-ugly", etc. -- , apart from Evans. Like I said --
> > it's a Dockery trademark.
> >
> Oh, don't be silly.
> Dockery's trademark is a turd with a liplock on it.
> (You've seen his other "drawings." It only /looks like/ he's
> sucking cock.)

LOL -- and all too true!

This thread is a veritable treasure trove of Donkey-quotes for future sig.files.