On 3/28/24 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Because BLM ain't racist like you.
>>>
>>> BLM isn't racist?
>>> HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
>>
>> "Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
>
> But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
>
>

Some I'm sure are. But BLM isn't a people.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On 3/28/24 6:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>> On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Because BLM ain't racist like you.
>>>>>
>>>>> BLM isn't racist?
>>>>> HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
>>>>
>>>> "Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
>>>
>>> But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
>>
>> Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior race. I
>> don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief necessary
>> to the organization's stated aim.
>
> Well, at least we agree that all the claims of "white supremacy that we
> constantly hear about from progs are bullshit.
>

Republicans aren't hiding it any more. They actually SAY it. Ask Tommy
Tubbashit.

> Scott followed up to say that the definition of a white nationalist is someone believing "the white race is superior to all other races" and asked, "Do you believe that white nationalists are racist?"
>
> "Yes, if that's what a racist is, yes," he (Tubberville) said.

Wrong again, whyte boy.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

In article <uu6ij9$b577$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 3/28/24 6:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
> >> On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Because BLM ain't racist like you.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> BLM isn't racist?
> >>>>> HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
> >>>>
> >>>> "Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
> >>>
> >>> But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
> >>
> >> Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior race. I
> >> don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief necessary
> >> to the organization's stated aim.
> >
> > Well, at least we agree that all the claims of "white supremacy" that we
> > constantly hear about from progs are bullshit.

> > Scott followed up to say that the definition of a white nationalist is
> > someone believing "the white race is superior to all other races"

(1) Mind your attributions, Shit-Shoes. I didn't say what your quote
levels claim I did.

(2) That's not the definition of a white nationalist.

A nationalist is someone who believes in the policy or doctrine of
asserting or giving primacy to the interests of one's own nation viewed
as separate from the interests of other nations or the international
community.

A white nationalist is someone who believes all that and is white.
> and asked, "Do you believe that white nationalists are racist?"

The answer would be-- like most groups of people-- some are and most
aren't.

Just as black nationalists, taken as a whole, would count a few racists
among their group while most are just people advocating that the
interests of their own country should be the priority.

In article <uu6ibp$b577$4@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 3/28/24 2:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <uu3un9$3kj1o$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/28/24 12:18 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >
> >>> BLM protesters flooded Western Kentucky University today and surrounded
> >>> the building where Kyle Rittenhouse was making an appearance.
> >>>
> >>> The biggest question I have is: why is BLM mad at Kyle Rittenhouse?
> >>>
> >>> The dude shot three white guys and has never said anything that can be
> >>> construed as racist toward blacks.
> >>>
> >>> Is it because he came to Wisconsin to defend businesses from looters?
> >>> Is it now racist to stand in the way of a black mob when they want to
> >>> take shit that doesn't belong to them?
> >>>
> >> Because BLM ain't racist.
> >
> > Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
> >
> > And who says dour leftists have no sense of humor?
>
> Usually you. Guess you're wrong again.

Yes, you got me. You told a pretty good joke there. Props where props
are due.

On 3/29/2024 2:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <uu6ij9$b577$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/28/24 6:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>> On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Because BLM ain't racist like you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BLM isn't racist?
>>>>>>> HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
>>>>>
>>>>> But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
>>>>
>>>> Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior race. I
>>>> don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief necessary
>>>> to the organization's stated aim.
>>>
>>> Well, at least we agree that all the claims of "white supremacy" that we
>>> constantly hear about from progs are bullshit.
>
>>> Scott followed up to say that the definition of a white nationalist is
>>> someone believing "the white race is superior to all other races"
>
> (1) Mind your attributions, Shit-Shoes. I didn't say what your quote
> levels claim I did.
>
> (2) That's not the definition of a white nationalist.
>
> A nationalist is someone who believes in the policy or doctrine of
> asserting or giving primacy to the interests of one's own nation viewed
> as separate from the interests of other nations or the international
> community.
>
> A white nationalist is someone who believes all that and is white.
>
>> and asked, "Do you believe that white nationalists are racist?"
>
> The answer would be-- like most groups of people-- some are and most
> aren't.
>
> Just as black nationalists, taken as a whole, would count a few racists
> among their group while most are just people advocating that the
> interests of their own country should be the priority.

What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"?

On 3/29/2024 2:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <uu6ij9$b577$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/28/24 6:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>> On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Because BLM ain't racist like you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BLM isn't racist?
>>>>>>> HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
>>>>>
>>>>> But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
>>>>
>>>> Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior race. I
>>>> don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief necessary
>>>> to the organization's stated aim.
>>>
>>> Well, at least we agree that all the claims of "white supremacy" that we
>>> constantly hear about from progs are bullshit.
>
>>> Scott followed up to say that the definition of a white nationalist is
>>> someone believing "the white race is superior to all other races"
>
> (1) Mind your attributions, Shit-Shoes. I didn't say what your quote
> levels claim I did.
>
> (2) That's not the definition of a white nationalist.
>
> A nationalist is someone who believes in the policy or doctrine of
> asserting or giving primacy to the interests of one's own nation viewed
> as separate from the interests of other nations or the international
> community.
>
> A white nationalist is someone who believes all that and is white.
>
>> and asked, "Do you believe that white nationalists are racist?"
>
> The answer would be-- like most groups of people-- some are and most
> aren't.
>
> Just as black nationalists, taken as a whole, would count a few racists
> among their group while most are just people advocating that the
> interests of their own country should be the priority.

What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"?

On 3/29/2024 2:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <uu6ij9$b577$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/28/24 6:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>> On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Because BLM ain't racist like you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BLM isn't racist?
>>>>>>> HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
>>>>>
>>>>> But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
>>>>
>>>> Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior race. I
>>>> don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief necessary
>>>> to the organization's stated aim.
>>>
>>> Well, at least we agree that all the claims of "white supremacy" that we
>>> constantly hear about from progs are bullshit.
>
>>> Scott followed up to say that the definition of a white nationalist is
>>> someone believing "the white race is superior to all other races"
>
> (1) Mind your attributions, Shit-Shoes. I didn't say what your quote
> levels claim I did.
>
> (2) That's not the definition of a white nationalist.
>
> A nationalist is someone who believes in the policy or doctrine of
> asserting or giving primacy to the interests of one's own nation viewed
> as separate from the interests of other nations or the international
> community.
>
> A white nationalist is someone who believes all that and is white.
>
>> and asked, "Do you believe that white nationalists are racist?"
>
> The answer would be-- like most groups of people-- some are and most
> aren't.
>
> Just as black nationalists, taken as a whole, would count a few racists
> among their group while most are just people advocating that the
> interests of their own country should be the priority.

What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"?

On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:47:48 -0400, moviePig <never@nothere.com>
wrote:

>On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Because BLM ain't racist like you.
>>
>> BLM isn't racist?
>> HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
>
>"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
>
Never said it was. Nor did I say BLM urged their people to loot and
pillage stores and other buildings - but equally there is no doubt
that many of the "mostly peaceful protesters" did exactly that. And
cited real or imagined grievances as justification for their looting.

If you look at the speeches of BLM leaders they're fairly hardcore
towards anybody who isn't black - and the claim that ONLY whites can
be racist is pure bollocks - no matter your color, if you're treating
people differently by reason of ethnicity, yeah that's racist. All of
us to one extent or another but 90+% of people keep it well checked
and actually DO try to do better.

Which is why I have no time for the 'grievance' types who would rename
everything and demolish statues and other meorials. I am particularly
appalled by what's going on in London since October 7th particularly
with war memorials and statues. (Though I personally tend to feel a
lot of the "Confederate herore" memorials should have come down
decades ago) Because the bottom line is having laws is fine but what's
in peoples' hearts is more important and peoples' attitudes do change
over time once they realize the effects of attitudes on actions.

On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:44:13 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

>On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Because BLM ain't racist like you.
>>>
>>> BLM isn't racist?
>>> HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
>>
>> "Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
>
>But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
>
Which was the whole point I was trying to make - and apparently my
attempt to be sensitive wasn't respected.

On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 07:34:27 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:

>>Because BLM ain't racist like you.
>
>That's the funniest thing I'll read all day (but not because of why
>you think it is).

Basically the problem is BLM argues that if a group (and in their
world, which group you belong to matters more than what's in your own
heart) that because blacks have a history of not being on top that
they can't be racist which is complete bollocks.

Naturally they also believe anybody who doesn't share their views
(including their entire agenda) is racist which is also bollocks.

In article
<17c1554881e6f860$47316$3081049$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:

> On 3/29/2024 2:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <uu6ij9$b577$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/28/24 6:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>> On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Because BLM ain't racist like you.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> BLM isn't racist?
> >>>>>>> HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> "Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
> >>>>
> >>>> Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior race. I
> >>>> don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief necessary
> >>>> to the organization's stated aim.
> >>>
> >>> Well, at least we agree that all the claims of "white supremacy" that we
> >>> constantly hear about from progs are bullshit.
> >
> >>> Scott followed up to say that the definition of a white nationalist is
> >>> someone believing "the white race is superior to all other races"
> >
> > (1) Mind your attributions, Shit-Shoes. I didn't say what your quote
> > levels claim I did.
> >
> > (2) That's not the definition of a white nationalist.
> >
> > A nationalist is someone who believes in the policy or doctrine of
> > asserting or giving primacy to the interests of one's own nation viewed
> > as separate from the interests of other nations or the international
> > community.
> >
> > A white nationalist is someone who believes all that and is white.
> >
> >> and asked, "Do you believe that white nationalists are racist?"
> >
> > The answer would be-- like most groups of people-- some are and most
> > aren't.
> >
> > Just as black nationalists, taken as a whole, would count a few racists
> > among their group while most are just people advocating that the
> > interests of their own country should be the priority.
>
> What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"?

The same thing we call someone who praises "the browning of America": a
racist.

In article
<17c15538b804c570$26844$2601257$cad58068@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:

> On 3/29/2024 2:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <uu6ij9$b577$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/28/24 6:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>> On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Because BLM ain't racist like you.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> BLM isn't racist?
> >>>>>>> HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> "Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
> >>>>
> >>>> Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior race. I
> >>>> don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief necessary
> >>>> to the organization's stated aim.
> >>>
> >>> Well, at least we agree that all the claims of "white supremacy" that we
> >>> constantly hear about from progs are bullshit.
> >
> >>> Scott followed up to say that the definition of a white nationalist is
> >>> someone believing "the white race is superior to all other races"
> >
> > (1) Mind your attributions, Shit-Shoes. I didn't say what your quote
> > levels claim I did.
> >
> > (2) That's not the definition of a white nationalist.
> >
> > A nationalist is someone who believes in the policy or doctrine of
> > asserting or giving primacy to the interests of one's own nation viewed
> > as separate from the interests of other nations or the international
> > community.
> >
> > A white nationalist is someone who believes all that and is white.
> >
> >> and asked, "Do you believe that white nationalists are racist?"
> >
> > The answer would be-- like most groups of people-- some are and most
> > aren't.
> >
> > Just as black nationalists, taken as a whole, would count a few racists
> > among their group while most are just people advocating that the
> > interests of their own country should be the priority.
>
> What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"?

Are we expected to answer every question you post in triplicate?

On 3/29/24 3:10 PM, moviePig wrote:
> On 3/29/2024 2:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <uu6ij9$b577$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/28/24 6:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Because BLM ain't racist like you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BLM isn't racist?
>>>>>>>> HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior race. I
>>>>> don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief
>>>>> necessary
>>>>> to the organization's stated aim.
>>>>
>>>> Well, at least we agree that all the claims of "white supremacy"
>>>> that we
>>>> constantly hear about from progs are bullshit.
>>
>>>> Scott followed up to say that the definition of a white nationalist is
>>>> someone believing "the white race is superior to all other races"
>>
>> (1) Mind your attributions, Shit-Shoes. I didn't say what your quote
>> levels claim I did.
>>
>> (2) That's not the definition of a white nationalist.
>>
>> A nationalist is someone who believes in the policy or doctrine of
>> asserting or giving primacy to the interests of one's own nation viewed
>> as separate from the interests of other nations or the international
>> community.
>>
>> A white nationalist is someone who believes all that and is white.
>>> and asked, "Do you believe that white nationalists are racist?"
>>
>> The answer would be-- like most groups of people-- some are and most
>> aren't.
>>
>> Just as black nationalists, taken as a whole, would count a few racists
>> among their group while most are just people advocating that the
>> interests of their own country should be the priority.
>
> What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"?

Oath Keeper Twat. Duh.

On 3/29/24 3:34 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article
> <17c15538b804c570$26844$2601257$cad58068@news.newsdemon.com>,
> moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/29/2024 2:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <uu6ij9$b577$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/28/24 6:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Because BLM ain't racist like you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BLM isn't racist?
>>>>>>>>> HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior race. I
>>>>>> don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief necessary
>>>>>> to the organization's stated aim.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, at least we agree that all the claims of "white supremacy" that we
>>>>> constantly hear about from progs are bullshit.
>>>
>>>>> Scott followed up to say that the definition of a white nationalist is
>>>>> someone believing "the white race is superior to all other races"
>>>
>>> (1) Mind your attributions, Shit-Shoes. I didn't say what your quote
>>> levels claim I did.
>>>
>>> (2) That's not the definition of a white nationalist.
>>>
>>> A nationalist is someone who believes in the policy or doctrine of
>>> asserting or giving primacy to the interests of one's own nation viewed
>>> as separate from the interests of other nations or the international
>>> community.
>>>
>>> A white nationalist is someone who believes all that and is white.
>>>
>>>> and asked, "Do you believe that white nationalists are racist?"
>>>
>>> The answer would be-- like most groups of people-- some are and most
>>> aren't.
>>>
>>> Just as black nationalists, taken as a whole, would count a few racists
>>> among their group while most are just people advocating that the
>>> interests of their own country should be the priority.
>>
>> What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"?
>
> Are we expected to answer every question you post in triplicate?

Why not, it's only one question. You fucking idiot.

On 3/29/2024 4:13 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:44:13 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Because BLM ain't racist like you.
>>>>
>>>> BLM isn't racist?
>>>> HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
>>>
>>> "Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
>>
>> But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
>>
> Which was the whole point I was trying to make - and apparently my
> attempt to be sensitive wasn't respected.

How was "HaHaHa...etc." sensitive? And where was it disrespected?

On 3/29/2024 4:12 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:47:48 -0400, moviePig <never@nothere.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Because BLM ain't racist like you.
>>>
>>> BLM isn't racist?
>>> HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
>>
>> "Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
>>
> Never said it was. Nor did I say BLM urged their people to loot and
> pillage stores and other buildings - but equally there is no doubt
> that many of the "mostly peaceful protesters" did exactly that. And
> cited real or imagined grievances as justification for their looting.
>
> If you look at the speeches of BLM leaders they're fairly hardcore
> towards anybody who isn't black - and the claim that ONLY whites can
> be racist is pure bollocks - no matter your color, if you're treating
> people differently by reason of ethnicity, yeah that's racist. All of
> us to one extent or another but 90+% of people keep it well checked
> and actually DO try to do better.
>
> Which is why I have no time for the 'grievance' types who would rename
> everything and demolish statues and other meorials. I am particularly
> appalled by what's going on in London since October 7th particularly
> with war memorials and statues. (Though I personally tend to feel a
> lot of the "Confederate herore" memorials should have come down
> decades ago) Because the bottom line is having laws is fine but what's
> in peoples' hearts is more important and peoples' attitudes do change
> over time once they realize the effects of attitudes on actions.

Then that'd make, e.g., busing and affirmative action "racist". I don't
know of any measures that can effectively address racism that aren't.

In article
<17c15b50736ea91f$14175$2820980$c4d58e68@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:

> On 3/29/2024 4:12 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:47:48 -0400, moviePig <never@nothere.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Because BLM ain't racist like you.
> >>>
> >>> BLM isn't racist?
> >>> HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
> >>
> >> "Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
> >>
> > Never said it was. Nor did I say BLM urged their people to loot and
> > pillage stores and other buildings - but equally there is no doubt
> > that many of the "mostly peaceful protesters" did exactly that. And
> > cited real or imagined grievances as justification for their looting.
> >
> > If you look at the speeches of BLM leaders they're fairly hardcore
> > towards anybody who isn't black - and the claim that ONLY whites can
> > be racist is pure bollocks - no matter your color, if you're treating
> > people differently by reason of ethnicity, yeah that's racist. All of
> > us to one extent or another but 90+% of people keep it well checked
> > and actually DO try to do better.
> >
> > Which is why I have no time for the 'grievance' types who would rename
> > everything and demolish statues and other meorials. I am particularly
> > appalled by what's going on in London since October 7th particularly
> > with war memorials and statues. (Though I personally tend to feel a
> > lot of the "Confederate herore" memorials should have come down
> > decades ago) Because the bottom line is having laws is fine but what's
> > in peoples' hearts is more important and peoples' attitudes do change
> > over time once they realize the effects of attitudes on actions.
>
> Then that'd make, e.g., busing and affirmative action "racist".

Now you're getting it!

On 3/29/2024 8:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article
> <17c15b50736ea91f$14175$2820980$c4d58e68@news.newsdemon.com>,
> moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/29/2024 4:12 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:47:48 -0400, moviePig <never@nothere.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Because BLM ain't racist like you.
>>>>>
>>>>> BLM isn't racist?
>>>>> HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
>>>>
>>>> "Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
>>>>
>>> Never said it was. Nor did I say BLM urged their people to loot and
>>> pillage stores and other buildings - but equally there is no doubt
>>> that many of the "mostly peaceful protesters" did exactly that. And
>>> cited real or imagined grievances as justification for their looting.
>>>
>>> If you look at the speeches of BLM leaders they're fairly hardcore
>>> towards anybody who isn't black - and the claim that ONLY whites can
>>> be racist is pure bollocks - no matter your color, if you're treating
>>> people differently by reason of ethnicity, yeah that's racist. All of
>>> us to one extent or another but 90+% of people keep it well checked
>>> and actually DO try to do better.
>>>
>>> Which is why I have no time for the 'grievance' types who would rename
>>> everything and demolish statues and other meorials. I am particularly
>>> appalled by what's going on in London since October 7th particularly
>>> with war memorials and statues. (Though I personally tend to feel a
>>> lot of the "Confederate herore" memorials should have come down
>>> decades ago) Because the bottom line is having laws is fine but what's
>>> in peoples' hearts is more important and peoples' attitudes do change
>>> over time once they realize the effects of attitudes on actions.
>>
>> Then that'd make, e.g., busing and affirmative action "racist".
>
> Now you're getting it!

I hope not. I should think we've all been vaccinated...

On 3/29/2024 8:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article
> <17c15b50736ea91f$14175$2820980$c4d58e68@news.newsdemon.com>,
> moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/29/2024 4:12 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:47:48 -0400, moviePig <never@nothere.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Because BLM ain't racist like you.
>>>>>
>>>>> BLM isn't racist?
>>>>> HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
>>>>
>>>> "Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
>>>>
>>> Never said it was. Nor did I say BLM urged their people to loot and
>>> pillage stores and other buildings - but equally there is no doubt
>>> that many of the "mostly peaceful protesters" did exactly that. And
>>> cited real or imagined grievances as justification for their looting.
>>>
>>> If you look at the speeches of BLM leaders they're fairly hardcore
>>> towards anybody who isn't black - and the claim that ONLY whites can
>>> be racist is pure bollocks - no matter your color, if you're treating
>>> people differently by reason of ethnicity, yeah that's racist. All of
>>> us to one extent or another but 90+% of people keep it well checked
>>> and actually DO try to do better.
>>>
>>> Which is why I have no time for the 'grievance' types who would rename
>>> everything and demolish statues and other meorials. I am particularly
>>> appalled by what's going on in London since October 7th particularly
>>> with war memorials and statues. (Though I personally tend to feel a
>>> lot of the "Confederate herore" memorials should have come down
>>> decades ago) Because the bottom line is having laws is fine but what's
>>> in peoples' hearts is more important and peoples' attitudes do change
>>> over time once they realize the effects of attitudes on actions.
>>
>> Then that'd make, e.g., busing and affirmative action "racist".
>
> Now you're getting it!

I hope not. I should think we've all been vaccinated...

On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 06:51:03 -0500, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:

>On 3/29/24 6:34 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/28/24 12:18 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> BLM protesters flooded Western Kentucky University today and surrounded the
>>>> building where Kyle Rittenhouse was making an appearance.
>>>>
>>>> The biggest question I have is: why is BLM mad at Kyle Rittenhouse?
>>>>
>>>> The dude shot three white guys and has never said anything that can be
>>>> construed as racist toward blacks.
>>>>
>>>> Is it because he came to Wisconsin to defend businesses from looters? Is it
>>>> now racist to stand in the way of a black mob when they want to take shit that
>>>> doesn't belong to them?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Because BLM ain't racist like you.
>>
>> That's the funniest thing I'll read all day (but not because of why
>> you think it is).
>
>
>Since when is 6:34 am "all day?" Was it the stupidity talking again?

Reading challeged? "I'll read all day" which means in anticipation of
over the course of the entire day.

Of course you won't correct your error because you're simply not
capable of it.

On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 06:58:20 -0500, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:

>On 3/28/24 1:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <uu3un9$3kj1o$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/28/24 12:18 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>
>>>> BLM protesters flooded Western Kentucky University today and surrounded
>>>> the building where Kyle Rittenhouse was making an appearance.
>>>>
>>>> The biggest question I have is: why is BLM mad at Kyle Rittenhouse?
>>>>
>>>> The dude shot three white guys and has never said anything that can be
>>>> construed as racist toward blacks.
>>>>
>>>> Is it because he came to Wisconsin to defend businesses from looters?
>>>> Is it now racist to stand in the way of a black mob when they want to
>>>> take shit that doesn't belong to them?
>>>>
>>> Because BLM ain't racist.
>>
>> Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
>>
>> And who says dour leftists have no sense of humor?
>
>
>Wait, so you're claim is because you're a white supremacist to say
>"black lives matter" is racist? Do you have ANY IDEA how stupid this
>makes you look?

"you're claim"? Do you have ANY IDEA how stupid this makes you look?

On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 13:33:36 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

>In article
><17c1554881e6f860$47316$3081049$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>,
> moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/29/2024 2:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> > In article <uu6ij9$b577$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 3/28/24 6:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> >>> moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>> >>>> On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> >>>>> On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com>
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Because BLM ain't racist like you.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> BLM isn't racist?
>> >>>>>>> HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> "Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior race. I
>> >>>> don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief necessary
>> >>>> to the organization's stated aim.
>> >>>
>> >>> Well, at least we agree that all the claims of "white supremacy" that we
>> >>> constantly hear about from progs are bullshit.
>> >
>> >>> Scott followed up to say that the definition of a white nationalist is
>> >>> someone believing "the white race is superior to all other races"
>> >
>> > (1) Mind your attributions, Shit-Shoes. I didn't say what your quote
>> > levels claim I did.
>> >
>> > (2) That's not the definition of a white nationalist.
>> >
>> > A nationalist is someone who believes in the policy or doctrine of
>> > asserting or giving primacy to the interests of one's own nation viewed
>> > as separate from the interests of other nations or the international
>> > community.
>> >
>> > A white nationalist is someone who believes all that and is white.
>> >
>> >> and asked, "Do you believe that white nationalists are racist?"
>> >
>> > The answer would be-- like most groups of people-- some are and most
>> > aren't.
>> >
>> > Just as black nationalists, taken as a whole, would count a few racists
>> > among their group while most are just people advocating that the
>> > interests of their own country should be the priority.
>>
>> What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"?
>
>The same thing we call someone who praises "the browning of America": a
>racist.

Don't look for any honesty out him. It would be earth shattering if
he were.

On 3/30/2024 10:32 AM, NoBody wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 13:33:36 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> In article
>> <17c1554881e6f860$47316$3081049$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>,
>> moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/29/2024 2:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> In article <uu6ij9$b577$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/28/24 6:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Because BLM ain't racist like you.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> BLM isn't racist?
>>>>>>>>>> HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior race. I
>>>>>>> don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief necessary
>>>>>>> to the organization's stated aim.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, at least we agree that all the claims of "white supremacy" that we
>>>>>> constantly hear about from progs are bullshit.
>>>>
>>>>>> Scott followed up to say that the definition of a white nationalist is
>>>>>> someone believing "the white race is superior to all other races"
>>>>
>>>> (1) Mind your attributions, Shit-Shoes. I didn't say what your quote
>>>> levels claim I did.
>>>>
>>>> (2) That's not the definition of a white nationalist.
>>>>
>>>> A nationalist is someone who believes in the policy or doctrine of
>>>> asserting or giving primacy to the interests of one's own nation viewed
>>>> as separate from the interests of other nations or the international
>>>> community.
>>>>
>>>> A white nationalist is someone who believes all that and is white.
>>>>
>>>>> and asked, "Do you believe that white nationalists are racist?"
>>>>
>>>> The answer would be-- like most groups of people-- some are and most
>>>> aren't.
>>>>
>>>> Just as black nationalists, taken as a whole, would count a few racists
>>>> among their group while most are just people advocating that the
>>>> interests of their own country should be the priority.
>>>
>>> What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"?
>>
>> The same thing we call someone who praises "the browning of America": a
>> racist.
>
> Don't look for any honesty out him. It would be earth shattering if
> he were.

Do you (honestly) think BTR answered the question (honestly)?

On 3/29/24 2:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <uu6ij9$b577$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/28/24 6:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>> On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Because BLM ain't racist like you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BLM isn't racist?
>>>>>>> HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
>>>>>
>>>>> But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
>>>>
>>>> Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior race. I
>>>> don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief necessary
>>>> to the organization's stated aim.
>>>
>>> Well, at least we agree that all the claims of "white supremacy" that we
>>> constantly hear about from progs are bullshit.
>
>>> Scott followed up to say that the definition of a white nationalist is
>>> someone believing "the white race is superior to all other races"
>
> (1) Mind your attributions, Shit-Shoes. I didn't say what your quote
> levels claim I did.
>
> (2) That's not the definition of a white nationalist.
>
> A nationalist is someone who believes in the policy or doctrine of
> asserting or giving primacy to the interests of one's own nation viewed
> as separate from the interests of other nations or the international
> community.
>
> A white nationalist is someone who believes all that and is white.
>
>> and asked, "Do you believe that white nationalists are racist?"
>
> The answer would be-- like most groups of people-- some are and most
> aren't.
>
> Just as black nationalists, taken as a whole, would count a few racists
> among their group while most are just people advocating that the
> interests of their own country should be the priority.
>

Scott's your guy, not mine. So is Tubbashit, and even that inbred trash
knows it's racist..

> Tommy Tuberville now says ‘White nationalists are racists’ after refusing to denounce them
> Republican Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama finally condemned White nationalists, telling reporters on Capitol Hill on Tuesday that “White nationalists are racists,” after previously refusing to equate White nationalism with racism.

Now you've even lost Senator Tubbashit. You know, when the stupidest
man finally admits it, face it, you've lost.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On 3/29/24 4:10 PM, moviePig wrote:
> On 3/29/2024 2:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <uu6ij9$b577$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/28/24 6:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Because BLM ain't racist like you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BLM isn't racist?
>>>>>>>> HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior race. I
>>>>> don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief
>>>>> necessary
>>>>> to the organization's stated aim.
>>>>
>>>> Well, at least we agree that all the claims of "white supremacy"
>>>> that we
>>>> constantly hear about from progs are bullshit.
>>
>>>> Scott followed up to say that the definition of a white nationalist is
>>>> someone believing "the white race is superior to all other races"
>>
>> (1) Mind your attributions, Shit-Shoes. I didn't say what your quote
>> levels claim I did.
>>
>> (2) That's not the definition of a white nationalist.
>>
>> A nationalist is someone who believes in the policy or doctrine of
>> asserting or giving primacy to the interests of one's own nation viewed
>> as separate from the interests of other nations or the international
>> community.
>>
>> A white nationalist is someone who believes all that and is white.
>>> and asked, "Do you believe that white nationalists are racist?"
>>
>> The answer would be-- like most groups of people-- some are and most
>> aren't.
>>
>> Just as black nationalists, taken as a whole, would count a few racists
>> among their group while most are just people advocating that the
>> interests of their own country should be the priority.
>
> What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"?
>
>

I calls 'em "Thannies".

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0