THE MT VOID
08/05/22 -- Vol. 41, No. 6, Whole Number 2235

Co-Editor: Mark Leeper, mleeper@optonline.net
Co-Editor: Evelyn Leeper, eleeper@optonline.net
Sending Address: evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com
All material is the opinion of the author and is copyrighted by the
author unless otherwise noted.
All comments sent or posted will be assumed authorized for
inclusion unless otherwise noted.

To subscribe or unsubscribe, send mail to eleeper@optonline.net
The latest issue is at <http://www.leepers.us/mtvoid/latest.htm>.
An index with links to the issues of the MT VOID since 1986 is at
<http://leepers.us/mtvoid/back_issues.htm>.

Topics:
Six Lost Worlds: The Dramatic Adaptations of Sir Arthur
Conan Doyle's Novel (Part 3) (film comments
by Mark R. Leeper)
OPERATION MINCEMEAT (letter of comment by Joseph T. Major)
Racist, Sexist Robots (letter of comment by Gary McGath)
This Week's Reading (NEEDLE) (book comments
by Evelyn C. Leeper)

===================================================================

TOPIC: Six Lost Worlds: The Dramatic Adaptations of Sir Arthur
Conan Doyle's Novel (Part 3) (film comments by Mark R. Leeper)

[continued from last week]

THE LOST WORLD (1992)

The 1992 version of THE LOST WORLD, a Canadian production directed
by Timothy Bond (who previously directed episodes for the
television series "Star Trek: The Next Generation" and "War of the
Worlds") and written and co-produced by Harry Alan Towers. The
film is shot in Zimbabwe and apparently was made together or in
tandem with a sequel, RETURN TO THE LOST WORLD. To accommodate
this location the plateau is moved from South America to Africa.
The transplant gives the story a sort of H. Rider Haggard feel that
would be okay, but it is not Doyle.

Towers's script starts reasonably faithful to the Doyle but quickly
shows its loyalties are more to sending (condescending) politically
correct messages than to the text by Doyle. Male chauvinists
everywhere are given a come-uppance by a strong female on the
expedition. Because the script is already being written on a
juvenile level, a boy is added to the expedition to give children
someone to identify with.

As in the book, Malone (Edward McCormack) passes himself off to
Challenger (John Rhys-Davies) as a scientist, but he does not have
the knowledge to maintain the ruse. Malone is, incidentally, made
a Canadian to give the Canadian audience a one of their own to care
about. Challenger attacks Malone, the police intervene, and Malone
endears himself to Challenger by choosing not to press charges.
The forming of the expedition is pretty much like in the manner of
the novel though they end up with woman reporter Jenny Nielson
(Tamara Gorksu) and a twelve-ish boy Jim (Darren Peter Mercer).
The character of Roxton has been eliminated and there is no
equivalent. As in the book but few film versions it is decided
that it is Summerlee (David Warner) who will lead the expedition
and Challenger will remain behind. Not to worry, Rhys-Davies is
too big a star to not be included in the expedition.

More invented characters come along. On the way the expedition is
joined by a female Noble Savage in a revealing two-piece outfit.
She is Malu (Nathania Stanford) and can be counted on to have
politically correct thinking as everybody raised in the bush would
have. Also along is the nasty Gomez (Geza Kovacs). One more piece
that harks from the book--in the end the expedition brings back to
London a pterodactyl, though the story of the pterodactyl is
somewhat different from Doyle's tale.

The reporter Jenny Nielson appears inspired by the real person
Nellie Bly. She is a slightly aggressive feminist. On the other
hand John Rhys-Davies makes a passable Challenger in stature and
temperament. He is, after his earliest scenes and though he feuds
with Summerlee, less strident and more boyishly likable than in the
Doyle.

The choice to do the film in a didactic and juvenile fashion that
makes it a very bad disappointment after a start that is at least
decent. The dinosaurs were rubbery and cute with rough edges
rounded off and so was the writing. The script looks for every
politically correct lesson that can be wrung from the plot. Doyle,
of course, had no women on the expedition. The first two film
versions each had one woman along. This version has two attractive
women and a plucky youngster. Things are going downhill.

I will not say much about the sequel, RETURN TO THE LOST WORLD. It
is not an adaptation of the Doyle, but only inspired by it. The
story involves European entrepreneurs who want to exploit the
petroleum in the no longer lost world and the team returns to the
plateau to protect it. It is not the most original or engaging
story and did not really need this particular prehistoric land to
tell its story. The sequel certainly underscored that Maple White
Land was a noble and wondrous world that needed to be preserved.
The 1998 version had a very different attitude toward Maple White's
mysterious land.

THE LOST WORLD (1998)
a.k.a. SIR ARTHUR CONAN DOYLE'S THE LOST WORLD

Six years after the Canadian production of THE LOST WORLD, the
story was again adapted in the United States with some unusual
variations. Even the title was modified. Following the films BRAM
STOKER'S DRACULA and MARY SHELLEY'S FRANKENSTEIN, it became popular
to include the original author's name in the title of films based
on classics. It somehow promised that the content fidelity to the
original work. BRAM STOKER'S DRACULA added a love interest for
Dracula that Bram Stoker would not have recognized, and MARY
SHELLEY'S FRANKENSTEIN had Victor bringing his bride back from the
dead in precisely the way that the character in the book did not.
Still, it was popular for a while to put the author's name in the
title. Hence in two years we have two different films titled SIR
ARTHUR CONAN DOYLE'S THE LOST WORLD. This is the first. To make
things even more confusing the two versions each has the same actor
playing Summerlee. It must take a lot of explanation on his resume
that these really are different films. This film proves its
loyalty (or lack thereof) to the original text by starting in
Mongolia, of all places.

The 1998 film opens with Maple White finding a pterodactyl egg and
paying for it with his life. He lives long enough to pass his
notebook and other interesting evidence to his traveling companion
and partner G. E. Challenger (Patrick Bergin, who does not look
anything like Doyle's Challenger). When Challenger returns to
London with his claims that dinosaurs exist, showing notebooks as
his evidence, as usual in adaptations he is met with skepticism and
is offered the means for an expedition. Amanda White (Jayne
Heitmeyer) recognizes her father's notebooks and insists on being
part of the expedition. Mr. Summerlee is ambivalent about being
asked to go on the expedition, but after a moment agrees. Unique
in this version, Summerlee is actually a fairly decent and
interesting character and one the audience cares for. Michael
Sinelnikoff makes a very acceptable if not highly memorable
Summerlee. He does such a good job that in the unrelated
production the following year he repeated the role, though that
part was not as well written. He is, I believe, the only actor to
repeat a role in two unconnected productions of THE LOST WORLD. He
also plays the role in the "Lost World" television series, of which
I will say more later. John Roxton (David Nerman) is demoted from
being the book's English lord to being an obnoxious American hunter
who later proves to be of villainous intent. Arthur (!) Malone the
reporter also joins the expedition played by an unmemorable Julian
Casey. Bergin's Challenger gets along neither with Summerlee nor
Roxton, though the audience likes Roxton considerably less.

Using several conveyances of the period, which seems to be the
1930s or so, the crew makes its way to Mongolia and the plateau out
of time. The final step involves a helium balloon to ascend the
plateau as a sort of getaway after the team has just rescued Ms.
White. In the best traditions of KING KONG she had been kidnapped
by natives and stretched out on a rack. Having just been rescued
and ascending to a land of vicious dinosaurs, Amanda White
literally found herself between a rack and a hard place. And a
hard place, the plateau is. The travelers find their land of
dinosaurs--particularly vicious dinosaurs--and two warring tribes.
One of the tribes are Neanderthals one more modern. In the end of
an uncomfortable stay only Challenger and White make it out alive,
though Malone is left behind on plateau like an Edgar Rice
Burroughs hero.

We initially see a "brontosaurus" with some features that are wrong
for the animal. Perhaps some effect artist tried to get creative.
However, it turns out that the inaccuracy is a feature, not a bug.
With hundreds of millions of years of evolution. it appears
dinosaurs have diverged from those in the fossil record. Other
adaptations have implied that once you got to know this plateau it
was a groovy place to be. Perhaps one of the best touches of this
version is that definitely is NOT the case in this adaptation.
This is probably the goriest adaptation, and the plateau is a
painful and dangerous place to be. Perhaps inspired by JURASSIC
PARK this film has the meanest and most nasty dinosaurs of any
version. The dinosaur effects seem to be in large part digital,
though perhaps some mechanical effects were used also.

On 8/7/22 9:14 AM, eleeper@optonline.net wrote:
> Six years after the Canadian production of THE LOST WORLD, the
> story was again adapted in the United States with some unusual
> variations. Even the title was modified. Following the films BRAM
> STOKER'S DRACULA and MARY SHELLEY'S FRANKENSTEIN, it became popular
> to include the original author's name in the title of films based
> on classics. It somehow promised that the content fidelity to the
> original work. BRAM STOKER'S DRACULA added a love interest for
> Dracula that Bram Stoker would not have recognized, and MARY
> SHELLEY'S FRANKENSTEIN had Victor bringing his bride back from the
> dead in precisely the way that the character in the book did not.
> Still, it was popular for a while to put the author's name in the
> title. Hence in two years we have two different films titled SIR
> ARTHUR CONAN DOYLE'S THE LOST WORLD.

Some people were so annoyed with the changes Peter Jackson made to Lord
of the Rings that they said it should be called "J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord
of the Rings."

--
Gary McGath http://www.mcgath.com