Hello...

More philosophy about Adam Smith and about Liberalism..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am a philosopher and i will talk more about my philosophy:

I invite you to read the following about Emmanuel Macron's initial
political positions:

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Ffr.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FPositions_politiques_d%2527Emmanuel_Macron

So as you notice that Emmanuel Macron is a social-liberal like the
american Democrats in USA, so notice that they believe in economic
Liberalism of the philosopher and economist Adam Smith that said that
said about economy the following:

"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"

So Adam Smith justifies the pursuit of self-interest and egoism in
economy, but i think i am a sophisticated philosopher and i don't
agree with Adam Smith, since my new way of doing in economy is called
Coopetition not Liberalism, my new way of doing is called Coopetition
since it seeks like a balance between cooperation (or collaboration) and
competition, so i am taking the first four letters of cooperation and i
am taking the six last letters of competition and both
of them compose the name of my new way of doing in economy that is
called Coopetition, since i also think that Liberalism is too much
violence since it is based on competition and egoism, so i think that my
Coopetition is the right balance that avoids this too much violence of
Liberalism, also i think that my Coopetition is more efficient for
creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of progress, and
here is also how i am explaining it:

More of my philosophy about egoism and competition and collaboration and
cooperation..

I invite you to look at the following video:

Why is Communism So Appealing?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_0UAsaqaOc

I am not a communist, my political philosophy is different,
and i think my philosophy is better, and i am explaining it in
my below thoughts, i think that the philosophy of the philosopher and
economist Adam Smith was lacking on efficiency, since he said that
"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"
and i think it is not true, simply because creativity and innovation
come not only from competition and its egoism, but they also come from
ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries(so they
need globalization), but egoism of competition is too much extremism
that hurts because it has also the tendency to make ideas not
circulating and combining efficiently across nations and industries, so
my philosophy says that we have to seek like a balance between
competition and collaboration or cooperation, and this needs also
collaboration and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and
sharing PhD papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my
new philosophy and model, read it carefully in my following thoughts:

More philosophy about the Scottish and economist and philosopher called
Adam Smith..

I invite you to look at the following video about Adam Smith:

ADAM SMITH - La main invisible

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIvtWvDkkVk

You can read about Adam Smith here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Smith

I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and i say that
the philosopher and economist Adam Smith was not right by saying the
following(you
can listen to it in the above video):

"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"

I think that Adam Smith is not right by saying so, since my new
philosophy and model says that you have to seek like a balance between
collaboration or cooperation and competition(and egoism comes
from competition), my philosophy says that innovation and creativity
not only come from competition but it also come from ideas circulating
and combining across nations and industries(so they need globalization),
so in my philosophy creativity and innovation needs also collaboration
and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and sharing PhD
papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my new
philosophy and model:

My today talk is about white supremacism and neo-nazism and the
far-right and nationalism.

So the first philosophical question is how to talk about
those above ideologies?

I think that it is also like a Mensa IQ test, so since i think i am
smart, i have to use my smartness to solve the Mensa IQ test, so when
you are smart, so how can you solve the problem(that is like a Mensa IQ
test) of those above ideologies ? i think that i have first to detect
the important pattern with my fluid intelligence, and i have to see
clearly the pattern(like for example getting into the details from the
abstraction of the pattern), and the important pattern is the following:

Notice that it is like an optimization problem of artificial
intelligence that looks like PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), it is
what we call Swarm intelligence, and in PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization)
there is what we call local optimization that we call exploitation, and
there is what we call global optimization that we call exploration(read
about PSO in my thoughts below so that to understand), so if PSO is not
balanced correctly with exploitation and exploration it can not converge
to the global optimum, we say that PSO has to guarantee the optimal
convergence, so if it is not correctly balanced with both exploitation
and exploration it can get stuck in a local maximum and not to converge
to global optimum, so then notice that with logical analogy, exploration
and exploitation of PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) is in philosophy
like seeking the right balance between individualism and collectivism
that guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, or it is like
seeking the right balance between collaboration and competition that
guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, so then since the above
ideologies are nationalism and nationalism is too much local
optimization and lack of global optimization , it is too much
competition and lack of collaboration or cooperation, so it is by
logical analogy like too much exploitation and lack of exploration in
PSO, so this is not good and here is how to notice it , read the following:

Read the following article about economic nationalism:

Rise of Economic Nationalism and Its Implications

https://www.lewisu.edu/experts/wordpress/index.php/rise-of-economic-nationalism-and-its-implications/

Notice that it says the following:

"Countries benefit with cooperation between countries to mutual benefit,
becoming too nationalistic at the expense of its partners is
counterproductive. It is an approach that creates conflict. Being more
nationalistic tends to be a zero sum game in an increasingly
interdependent world economy, where countries depend on other countries
for their economic and political and national security well being. When
companies cooperate, they can become more competitive. When they are
more competitive, they hire more workers, pay higher salaries, and
otherwise contribute to economic growth. Economic nationalism is a bad
policy."

So a you are noticing that nationalism is not the right way to do.

This is why i also said the following:

More political philosophy about globalization and nationalism..

I am a white arab and i think i am more smart, so today i will
talk about a very important subject about Globalization and nationalism,
so i will invite you to look at the following video of Marine Le Pen of
the far-right political party in France:

Marine Le Pen explains why nationalism is important

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNpI9wKnE8Q

As you notice that Marine Le Pen is saying in french that the
fight today is between nationalism and globalization, since
Marine Le Pen says that globalization is a treat to national
identity and is a treat to national sovereignty, but i think that Marine
Le Pen is not understanding correctly globalization, since i think that
nationalism is too much competition and communism and socialism is too
much collaboration , so i think the best way is to seek like a balance
between collaboration and competition and when we look
at globalization you will notice that we are collaborating with others
by for example sharing Open Source softwares or Free softwares or PhD
papers or knowledge on internet etc, and we are also competition by not
collaborating with others, and with this new kind of model we are
noticing that we are not just one identity like being french, but we are
becoming multiple identities because this kind of new model is making a
part of us that collaborate "universal", and this is why i think that
Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly this new kind of model of
like seeking a balance between competition and collaboration , and i
think that this new model is better because it is more efficient ,
because i think this partly collaboration of this new model is good and
more efficient for creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of
progress, i also think in capitalism the price of internet has gotten
cheap and the price of computers has gotten cheap, so we are able today
to access internet with a low price and benefit from "collaboration" and
also sharing in internet, for example look at me, i have invented many
scalable algorithms and i have decided to share some of them with the
others, and it is of course collaboration , so look for example at my
following inventions of scalable algorithms that i have shared with
others, here they are: