On Monday, December 1, 2003 at 1:56:55 PM UTC-5, j r sherman wrote:
> In article <vsn2pc4...@corp.supernews.com>, Ironywaves says...
> >
> >"j r sherman" <jr...@earthlink.net> wrote
> >
> >> > slandering me isn't going to improve
> >> >> it.
> >> >
> >> >Not slander J. R. S. Simply reacting to what *you* wrote... what, you
> >don't
> >> >back up the things you write? Do you or do you not defend and support a
> >> >group that promotes sexual abuse of children?
> >>
> >> i have never once defended NAMBLA, and you know this to be true, dockery.
> >
> >Your post obviously suggests that you do support and defend NAMBLA.
> really? how?
> >> you have crossposted this thread to alt.sexual.abuse.recovery in some
> >pathetic,
> >> and rather childish attempts to gain attention from yet another newsgroup.
> >
> >Sexual abuse of children, JRS, a part of this you seem to care little, or
> >nothing about, only the molesters seem to warrant your support and defense.
> interesting. where have i said that, dockery? ever? could you please post where
> i have stated that i defend the act of child molestation?
> if you can't, i wish you'd shut your slanderous mouth, because you're only
> making yourself look even more pathetic than you all ready are.
> >Why is this..? You so proudly defend these criminals' rights, why not let
> >the victims know how you feel?
> this isn't about the "victims", dockery. this isn't about the freedom of speech,
> this is about my calling your wretched writing shit. you cannot defend your own
> shitty writing, so now you use slander and lies to in some attempt to try and
> get me to stop telling you the truth about your writing.
> sorry, dockery, you write shit. it's that simple. all the lies in the world
> aren't going to stop the fact that you write shit.
> why must you bother people in other newsgroups because you can't handle the
> truth? you write shit. why does this upset you so?
> love and kisses,
> j r sherman
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> "A sad tale's best for winter: I have one
> Of sprites and goblins."
> ------------------------------------------------------------------

My writing has withstood the test of time
You are dead
I win

On Saturday, November 18, 2023 at 1:32:30 AM UTC-5, fake W-Dockery forged:
> On Monday, December 1, 2003 at 1:56:55 PM UTC-5, j r sherman wrote:
> > In article <vsn2pc4...@corp.supernews.com>, Ironywaves says...
> > >
> > >"j r sherman" <jr...@earthlink.net> wrote
> > >
> > >> > slandering me isn't going to improve
> > >> >> it.
> > >> >
> > >> >Not slander J. R. S. Simply reacting to what *you* wrote... what, you
> > >don't
> > >> >back up the things you write? Do you or do you not defend and support a
> > >> >group that promotes sexual abuse of children?
> > >>
> > >> i have never once defended NAMBLA, and you know this to be true, dockery.
> > >
> > >Your post obviously suggests that you do support and defend NAMBLA.
> > really? how?
> > >> you have crossposted this thread to alt.sexual.abuse.recovery in some
> > >pathetic,
> > >> and rather childish attempts to gain attention from yet another newsgroup.
> > >
> > >Sexual abuse of children, JRS, a part of this you seem to care little, or
> > >nothing about, only the molesters seem to warrant your support and defense.
> > interesting. where have i said that, dockery? ever? could you please post where
> > i have stated that i defend the act of child molestation?
> > if you can't, i wish you'd shut your slanderous mouth, because you're only
> > making yourself look even more pathetic than you all ready are.
> > >Why is this..? You so proudly defend these criminals' rights, why not let
> > >the victims know how you feel?
> > this isn't about the "victims", dockery. this isn't about the freedom of speech,
> > this is about my calling your wretched writing shit. you cannot defend your own
> > shitty writing, so now you use slander and lies to in some attempt to try and
> > get me to stop telling you the truth about your writing.
> > sorry, dockery, you write shit. it's that simple. all the lies in the world
> > aren't going to stop the fact that you write shit.
> > why must you bother people in other newsgroups because you can't handle the
> > truth? you write shit. why does this upset you so?
> > love and kisses,
> > j r sherman
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > "A sad tale's best for winter: I have one
> > Of sprites and goblins."
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> My writing has withstood the test of time
> You are dead
> xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx

Impostor troll, as far as I know J.R. Sherman is still alive.

HTH and HAND.

On Saturday, November 18, 2023 at 1:51:35 AM UTC-5, Will Dockery wrote:
> On Saturday, November 18, 2023 at 1:32:30 AM UTC-5, fake W-Dockery forged:
> > On Monday, December 1, 2003 at 1:56:55 PM UTC-5, j r sherman wrote:
> > > In article <vsn2pc4...@corp.supernews.com>, Ironywaves says...
> > > >
> > > >"j r sherman" <jr...@earthlink.net> wrote
> > > >
> > > >> > slandering me isn't going to improve
> > > >> >> it.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Not slander J. R. S. Simply reacting to what *you* wrote... what, you
> > > >don't
> > > >> >back up the things you write? Do you or do you not defend and support a
> > > >> >group that promotes sexual abuse of children?
> > > >>
> > > >> i have never once defended NAMBLA, and you know this to be true, dockery.
> > > >
> > > >Your post obviously suggests that you do support and defend NAMBLA.
> > > really? how?
> > > >> you have crossposted this thread to alt.sexual.abuse.recovery in some
> > > >pathetic,
> > > >> and rather childish attempts to gain attention from yet another newsgroup.
> > > >
> > > >Sexual abuse of children, JRS, a part of this you seem to care little, or
> > > >nothing about, only the molesters seem to warrant your support and defense.
> > > interesting. where have i said that, dockery? ever? could you please post where
> > > i have stated that i defend the act of child molestation?
> > > if you can't, i wish you'd shut your slanderous mouth, because you're only
> > > making yourself look even more pathetic than you all ready are.
> > > >Why is this..? You so proudly defend these criminals' rights, why not let
> > > >the victims know how you feel?
> > > this isn't about the "victims", dockery. this isn't about the freedom of speech,
> > > this is about my calling your wretched writing shit. you cannot defend your own
> > > shitty writing, so now you use slander and lies to in some attempt to try and
> > > get me to stop telling you the truth about your writing.
> > > sorry, dockery, you write shit. it's that simple. all the lies in the world
> > > aren't going to stop the fact that you write shit.
> > > why must you bother people in other newsgroups because you can't handle the
> > > truth? you write shit. why does this upset you so?
> > > love and kisses,
> > > j r sherman
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > "A sad tale's best for winter: I have one
> > > Of sprites and goblins."
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > My writing has withstood the test of time
> > You are dead
> > xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx
>
> Impostor troll, as far as I know J.R. Sherman is still alive.
>
> HTH and HAND.

These old threads invariably prove to be a goldmine of sig.file quotes.

Check out this gem:

"this isn't about the 'victims', dockery. this isn't about the freedom of speech,
this is about my calling your wretched writing shit. you cannot defend your own
shitty writing, so now you use slander and lies to in some attempt to try and
get me to stop telling you the truth about your writing.
sorry, dockery, you write shit. it's that simple. all the lies in the world
aren't going to stop the fact that you write shit.
why must you bother people in other newsgroups because you can't handle the
truth? you write shit. why does this upset you so?"
-- j.r. sherman