novaBBS - rec.arts.sf.tv - Re: Jodie Whittaker teases a bare back regeneration

Re: Jodie Whittaker teases a bare back regeneration

<tj8i67$1vp35$3@dont-email.me>

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=2737&group=rec.arts.sf.tv#2737

copy link Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv rec.arts.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: web...@polaris.net (Ubiquitous)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Jodie Whittaker teases a bare back regeneration
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 04:30:43 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <tj8i67$1vp35$3@dont-email.me>
References: <tj3tsm$1b8jr$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 8:30:43 -0000
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4e70d10686009d891bade53ec481f4fa";
logging-data="2090085"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19yzUWjGcEwSloPfI0YVplqQeyvVvxoRm0="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:I8y5SsZ7l/PRsDWy93/sZMD7vvs=
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.12N (x86 32bit)

by: Ubiquitous - Tue, 25 Oct 2022 08:30 UTC

In article <tj3tsm$1b8jr$1@dont-email.me>, darkdoctor@geocities.com wrote:

> In a recent Digital Spy interview, Jodie Whittaker said that she will have
> a "stripped-back" regeneration in her final Doctor Who.
>
> I was hoping for a stripped-front regeneration, but there is probably not
> much to see there.

Obviously, it was wishful thinking on somebody's part because it clearly
means the fake Doctor's regeneration will be quick and simple.

--
Let's go Brandon!

Re: Jodie Whittaker teases a bare back regeneration

<tjb5ku$2evqg$5@dont-email.me>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=2738&group=rec.arts.sf.tv#2738

copy link Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv rec.arts.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: web...@polaris.net (Ubiquitous)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Jodie Whittaker teases a bare back regeneration
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 04:30:45 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <tjb5ku$2evqg$5@dont-email.me>
References: <tj3tsm$1b8jr$1@dont-email.me> <tj8i67$1vp35$3@dont-email.me> <tj8n9u$2ccc$69@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Injection-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 8:30:45 -0000
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="1f3c834a3a6db6f5221e641bf77e44d4";
logging-data="2588496"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Z3CGHW0CIUZ2FOOeLok/BQr/HsElKpj4="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ddXPT6UhMGeHXTitSmIPYAAFpnM=
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.12N (x86 32bit)

by: Ubiquitous - Wed, 26 Oct 2022 08:30 UTC

In article <tj8n9u$2ccc$69@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>> darkdoctor@geocities.com wrote:

>>> In a recent Digital Spy interview, Jodie Whittaker said that she will
>>> have a "stripped-back" regeneration in her final Doctor Who.
>>>
>>> I was hoping for a stripped-front regeneration, but there is probably not
>>> much to see there.
>>
>>Obviously, it was wishful thinking on somebody's part because it clearly
>>means the fake Doctor's regeneration will be quick and simple.
>
> And back to a REAL Doctor!

Hopefully, setting the groundwork for retconning her out of existance.

--
Let's go Brandon!

Re: Jodie Whittaker teases a bare back regeneration

<tjdqvl$2ocpp$9@dont-email.me>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=2741&group=rec.arts.sf.tv#2741

copy link Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv rec.arts.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: web...@polaris.net (Ubiquitous)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Jodie Whittaker teases a bare back regeneration
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 04:30:48 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <tjdqvl$2ocpp$9@dont-email.me>
References: <tj3tsm$1b8jr$1@dont-email.me> <tj8i67$1vp35$3@dont-email.me> <tj8n9u$2ccc$69@gallifrey.nk.ca> <tjb5ku$2evqg$5@dont-email.me> <tjbfoi$uhh$63@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 8:30:48 -0000
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="28bd6d49ddf2049f12332603af967211";
logging-data="2896697"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195iBJbe6HyJTrlGc6wN9rz9NPal2Rxy7I="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4CU8y670IqLdnbkQyLYrCBI/Vhk=
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.12N (x86 32bit)

by: Ubiquitous - Thu, 27 Oct 2022 08:30 UTC

In article <tjbfoi$uhh$63@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>> darkdoctor@geocities.com wrote:

>>>>> In a recent Digital Spy interview, Jodie Whittaker said that she will
>>>>> have a "stripped-back" regeneration in her final Doctor Who.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was hoping for a stripped-front regeneration, but there is probably
>>>>> not much to see there.
>>>>
>>>>Obviously, it was wishful thinking on somebody's part because it clearly
>>>>means the fake Doctor's regeneration will be quick and simple.
>>>
>>> And back to a REAL Doctor!
>>
>>Hopefully, setting the groundwork for retconning her out of existance.
>
> Exactly!

Yay!

--
Let's go Brandon!

The person who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything.

arts / rec.arts.sf.tv / Re: Jodie Whittaker teases a bare back regeneration

Subject	Author
Re: Jodie Whittaker teases a bare back regeneration	Ubiquitous
Re: Jodie Whittaker teases a bare back regeneration	Ubiquitous
Re: Jodie Whittaker teases a bare back regeneration	Ubiquitous