The Doctor wrote on 9/1/22 11:38 pm:
> In article <CuSdnTBu8Ju660f8nZ2dnUU78SHNnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>, The
> True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>> On 09/01/2022 05:27, Idlehands wrote:
>>> On 2022-01-08 9:15 p.m., The True Doctor wrote:
>>>> On 09/01/2022 01:05, Idlehands wrote:
>>>>> On 2022-01-08 5:00 p.m., The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>>> On 08/01/2022 23:40, Idlehands wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2022-01-08 1:34 p.m., The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 08/01/2022 19:33, John Hall wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In message
>>>>>>>>> <Yoydne6KKdKhl0T8nZ2dnUU78R3NnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>,
>>>>>>>>> The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> writes
>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>> On top of that no one would trust a woman to
>>>>>>>>>> protect them, but they would always trust a man,
>>>>>>>>>> just as long as he's not a moron. No one would
>>>>>>>>>> take orders from a woman unless she proved herself
>>>>>>>>>> to everyone she meets every time, even to other
>>>>>>>>>> women. A man, meaning her male companion, or
>>>>>>>>>> someone else, would have to be seen making all of
>>>>>>>>>> the decisions and she would have to be seen as his
>>>>>>>>>> assistant, even if most of the thinking was hers.
>>>>>>>>>> This is not the character of the Doctor or Doctor
>>>>>>>>>> Who, but it is the ONLY way to write a female
>>>>>>>>>> character in the position of the Doctor.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What a load of patronising, sexist drivel! (And
>>>>>>>>> please don't call me a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is nothing sexist or patronizing in anything I
>>>>>>>> have written.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Anyone who understands creative writing and psychology
>>>>>>>> knows that what I have said is absolutely true. People
>>>>>>>> do not see strength in the form of a woman, they only
>>>>>>>> see weakness, someone who cannot take on or hold back
>>>>>>>> a man or a wild animal, because of their lack of
>>>>>>>> height, lack of mass, and lack of their resultant
>>>>>>>> physical strength. People will only trust someone to
>>>>>>>> defend them who they see as being strong. A woman is
>>>>>>>> not strong by nature, and the only way to credibly
>>>>>>>> write a female character who doesn't run and hide from
>>>>>>>> danger is for her to be manipulative and use proxies to
>>>>>>>> do her dirty work for her, and even then she still has
>>>>>>>> to work in the shadows. A woman cannot expect anyone
>>>>>>>> she is introduced to to act as her subordinate,
>>>>>>>> especially a man, unless there is money involved or she
>>>>>>>> is backed up by hired thugs to intimidate them, which
>>>>>>>> again is not the character of the Doctor.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think this is one of the stupidest thing I have seen
>>>>>>> you write and that is saying one hell of a lot
>>>>>>> considering your prodigious output.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why do I suspect you carry a Gold Incel card.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why do I suspect that you are sorely afraid of the truth?
>>>>>
>>>>> If you consider your bilge the "truth", you are sorely
>>>>> mistaken, your rampant hatred of women shines through all
>>>>> this bullshit you write and seems to indicated much deeper
>>>>> problems that should be treated by a professional, perhaps a
>>>>> team of professionals.
>>>>
>>>> You are the one who hates women and anyone who does not share
>>>> your deranged uninformed opinion and political views. You are
>>>> nothing more than bully, and bullying has always been the
>>>> primary tactic of the far left as exemplified by Marx,
>>>> Mussolini, and Hitler.
>>>
>>> Perhaps you could post one link to where I declare women can
>>> only run away from a challenge?
>>
>> Declaring that a woman must run away from danger to survive does
>> not make someone hate women.
>>
>> In contrast wanting a woman to run into danger against superior
>> forces which she is ill-equipped to survive, like you are
>> supporting, demonstrates that you yourself hate women by wanting
>> harm to come to them.
>>
>>> A post where I declare women are born to serve men? Just one
>>> post where I say anything derogatory about women in general?Â
>>> Perhaps one post where I hate women?
>>
>> You want women to act, behave, and be written and portrayed as
>> men. Why would anyone be supporting something like that unless
>> they thought women were inferior to men themselves? Someone who
>> wants a woman to be depicted and behave like a man clearly hates
>> women.
>>>
>>> Calling me the bully merely reflects your classic gas lighting
>>> tactics of the abuser, attempting to turn your actions onto me.
>>>
>>> You're a sick man who desperately needs serious help.
>>
>> You are the one who is sick and needs serious help.
>>
>> You are the resident bully of this group as is demonstrated by your
>> constant bulling and persecution of Yads who has done nothing to
>> you whatsoever. SJW know they can't win their arguments by reasoned
>> and informed debate so they bully everyone who dares to make known
>> a different opinion.
>
> Idlehands is indecent.
>
> Idlehands is full of lies.

So point out his lies, clown, rather than just tacking a couple of lines
to Aggy's behemoth post, pick out Idlehands lies, lie after lie after
lie, clown!! (If there are any there!!)

Oh! And by the way .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou say to
thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine eye,
when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye? *Thou
hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then shalt
thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye* .
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 28/2/22 12:18 am:
> In article <svf6ab$dvo$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 9/1/22 11:38 pm:
>>> In article <CuSdnTBu8Ju660f8nZ2dnUU78SHNnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>, The
>>> True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

<Snip>

>>>> You are the resident bully of this group as is demonstrated by your
>>>> constant bulling and persecution of Yads who has done nothing to
>>>> you whatsoever. SJW know they can't win their arguments by reasoned
>>>> and informed debate so they bully everyone who dares to make known
>>>> a different opinion.
>>>
>>> Idlehands is indecent.
>>>
>>> Idlehands is full of lies.
>>
>> So point out his lies, clown, rather than just tacking a couple of lines
>> to Aggy's behemoth post, pick out Idlehands lies, lie after lie after
>> lie, clown!! (If there are any there!!)

> Idlehands denies the existence of Satan, even though
> Christ saw him fall light lightening!

Where is YOUR PROOF, clown?? Statements are not PROOF!!
--
Daniel

Binky bleated:

> In article <svi8a4$9ae$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 28/2/22 12:18 am:
>>> In article <svf6ab$dvo$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 9/1/22 11:38 pm:
>>>>>
>>>>> Idlehands is full of lies.
>>>>
>>>> So point out his lies, clown, rather than just tacking
>>>> a couple of lines to Aggy's behemoth post, pick
>>>> out Idlehands lies, lie after lie after lie, clown!! (If
>>>> there are any there!!)
>>
>>
>>> Idlehands denies the existence of Satan, even though
>>> Christ saw him fall light lightening!
>>
>> Where is YOUR PROOF, clown?? Statements are not PROOF!!
>
> Abot Satan or Idlelies?
>

Gibberish!

--
solar penguin

Binky bleated:

> In article <svilm3$ku7$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <svi8a4$9ae$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 28/2/22 12:18 am:
>>>>> In article <svf6ab$dvo$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 9/1/22 11:38 pm:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Idlehands is full of lies.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So point out his lies, clown, rather than just tacking
>>>>>> a couple of lines to Aggy's behemoth post, pick
>>>>>> out Idlehands lies, lie after lie after lie, clown!! (If
>>>>>> there are any there!!)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Idlehands denies the existence of Satan, even though
>>>>> Christ saw him fall light lightening!
>>>>
>>>> Where is YOUR PROOF, clown?? Statements are not PROOF!!
>>>
>>> About Satan or Idlelies?
>>>

Liar! That’s not what you posted! And it’s still gibberish !

>>
>> Gibberish!
>>
>
> Yes?

Yes, gibberish!

--
solar penguin