Hornplayer9599 wrote:

> On 2/29/2024 04:58, Daniel65 wrote:
>
> >
> > So Jesus WAS a descendant of DAVID, "Yellow Beard Yadallee"!!
> > Doesn't YOUR Church teach YOU ANYTHING , "Yellow Beard
> > Yadallee"??
>
> I'm sure the Church taught him that...

Judging by the stuff Dave posts here I'm not sure the church
actually taught him anything... as he flounders when asked a
question about any of it! All we get is cut and paste bible quote
replies or a response that has no relevance to the question asked.

Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

> The Doctor wrote:
>
>>
>> We refer to King Charles III being a descendant of JEsus Christ.
>
> WTF? I must have skipped over some of this discussion. How did we
> get to King Charles being a descendant of Jewsus?!
>

ObWho: maybe that’s covered by Henry Lincoln’s conspiracy theories?
It’s the sort of thing he was into.

--
solar penguin

In article <xn0oinjjsg7rkzb004@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote:
>
>> In article <aY_DN.10926957$ee1.7311270@fx16.ams4>,
>> Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
>> > On 2/29/2024 04:58, Daniel65 wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> So Jesus WAS a descendant of DAVID, "Yellow Beard Yadallee"!!
>> >> Doesn't YOUR Church teach YOU ANYTHING , "Yellow Beard
>> >> Yadallee"??
>> >
>> > I'm sure the Church taught him that...well the rest of his
>> > Sunday School class anyway. He probably missed that session in
>> > order to be here running up his self-indulgent post count.
>>
>> We refer to King Charles III being a descendant of JEsus Christ.
>
>WTF? I must have skipped over some of this discussion. How did we
>get to King Charles being a descendant of Jewsus?!

Cut-and-lie in action!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <urqhb9$o37c$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> We refer to King Charles III being a descendant of JEsus Christ.
>>
>> WTF? I must have skipped over some of this discussion. How did we
>> get to King Charles being a descendant of Jewsus?!
>>
>
>ObWho: maybe that’s covered by Henry Lincoln’s conspiracy theories?
>It’s the sort of thing he was into.
>

:-)

>--
>solar penguin

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

On 2024-02-29 7:37 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
>
>> In article <aY_DN.10926957$ee1.7311270@fx16.ams4>,
>> Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
>>> On 2/29/2024 04:58, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> So Jesus WAS a descendant of DAVID, "Yellow Beard Yadallee"!!
>>>> Doesn't YOUR Church teach YOU ANYTHING , "Yellow Beard
>>>> Yadallee"??
>>>
>>> I'm sure the Church taught him that...well the rest of his
>>> Sunday School class anyway. He probably missed that session in
>>> order to be here running up his self-indulgent post count.
>>
>> We refer to King Charles III being a descendant of JEsus Christ.
>
> WTF? I must have skipped over some of this discussion. How did we
> get to King Charles being a descendant of Jewsus?!

First of all who is "We"? Would that be the asswipe and his tapeworm?

The divine right of kings was well known way back in the day, I don't
believe any of them claimed to be the direct descendant of Jesus, the
Church would have burned them at the stake.

Oh and how could Jesus have descendants if he never had a women?

--
Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.

George Bernard Shaw

Hornplayer9599 wrote on 29/2/24 11:41 pm:
> On 2/29/2024 04:58, Daniel65 wrote:
>
>> So Jesus *WAS* a descendant of DAVID, "Yellow Beard Yadallee"!!
>> Doesn't YOUR Church teach YOU *ANYTHING* , "Yellow Beard Yadallee"??
>
> I'm sure the Church taught him that...well the rest of his Sunday School
> class anyway. He probably missed that session in order to be here
> running up his self-indulgent post count.
>
;-)
--
Daniel

Blueshirt wrote on 1/3/24 1:31 am:
> Daniel65 wrote:
>>
>> Sorry! Where in all that did Jesus rebuke the prostitutes,
>
> My guess is that he rebuked the prostitutes for charging too much!

Ah!! But that WAS what he did to the Traders in The Temple.

> He probably thought being god would have got him some sort of a
> discount...
>
Ah Hummmm!! Surely you mean The Son of God .... even if part of the
God-Triumvirate.
--
Daniel

Daniel65 wrote:

> Blueshirt wrote on 1/3/24 1:31 am:
> > Daniel65 wrote:
> > >
> > > Sorry! Where in all that did Jesus rebuke the prostitutes,
> >
> > My guess is that he rebuked the prostitutes for charging too
> > much!
>
> Ah!! But that WAS what he did to the Traders in The Temple.

Yes, I read about that in the Book of John...

Two Shekels for a blow-job? You cannot be serious?!!!

> > He probably thought being god would have got him some sort of a
> > discount...
> >
> Ah Hummmm!! Surely you mean The Son of God .... even if part of
> the God-Triumvirate.

Men would say anything to a woman to get a shag...

Some claim to be airline pilots, others god!

Idlehands wrote:

> On 2024-02-29 7:37 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
> > The Doctor wrote:
> > >
> > > We refer to King Charles III being a descendant of JEsus
> > > Christ.
> >
> > WTF? I must have skipped over some of this discussion. How did we
> > get to King Charles being a descendant of Jewsus?!
>
> First of all who is "We"? Would that be the asswipe and his
> tapeworm?

Dave has split personalities. So we've got Dave, Yads and The
Doctor. One person but three, hence his "we". Father Brennan says to
think of it like the leaves on a shamrock!

> The divine right of kings was well known way back in the day, I
> don't believe any of them claimed to be the direct descendant of
> Jesus, the Church would have burned them at the stake.
>
> Oh and how could Jesus have descendants if he never had a women?

I can believe Jewsus had descendants. He was a man after all. I
reckon he rode women all over Judea and Galilee when he was young,
like any of us would have done.... before he became an apprentice
messiah of course.

In article <urs974$163qu$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>Hornplayer9599 wrote on 29/2/24 11:41 pm:
>> On 2/29/2024 04:58, Daniel65 wrote:
>>
>>> So Jesus *WAS* a descendant of DAVID, "Yellow Beard Yadallee"!!
>>> Doesn't YOUR Church teach YOU *ANYTHING* , "Yellow Beard Yadallee"??
>>
>> I'm sure the Church taught him that...well the rest of his Sunday School
>> class anyway. He probably missed that session in order to be here
>> running up his self-indulgent post count.
>>
>;-)

8-P

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <urs9nd$167qk$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>Blueshirt wrote on 1/3/24 1:31 am:
>> Daniel65 wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry! Where in all that did Jesus rebuke the prostitutes,
>>
>> My guess is that he rebuked the prostitutes for charging too much!
>
>Ah!! But that WAS what he did to the Traders in The Temple.

Both!

>
>> He probably thought being god would have got him some sort of a
>> discount...
>>
>Ah Hummmm!! Surely you mean The Son of God .... even if part of the
>God-Triumvirate.

Correct!

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <xn0oit5bkhmheg5000@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>Daniel65 wrote:
>
>> Blueshirt wrote on 1/3/24 1:31 am:
>> > Daniel65 wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Sorry! Where in all that did Jesus rebuke the prostitutes,
>> >
>> > My guess is that he rebuked the prostitutes for charging too
>> > much!
>>
>> Ah!! But that WAS what he did to the Traders in The Temple.
>
>Yes, I read about that in the Book of John...
>
>Two Shekels for a blow-job? You cannot be serious?!!!
>
>> > He probably thought being god would have got him some sort of a
>> > discount...
>> >
>> Ah Hummmm!! Surely you mean The Son of God .... even if part of
>> the God-Triumvirate.
>
>Men would say anything to a woman to get a shag...
>
>Some claim to be airline pilots, others god!
>

You really are sick!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <xn0oit5l9hmvdy1001@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>Idlehands wrote:
>
>> On 2024-02-29 7:37 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
>> > The Doctor wrote:
>> > >
>> > > We refer to King Charles III being a descendant of JEsus
>> > > Christ.
>> >
>> > WTF? I must have skipped over some of this discussion. How did we
>> > get to King Charles being a descendant of Jewsus?!
>>
>> First of all who is "We"? Would that be the a%e and his
>> tapeworm?
>

Lying Idlehands Like again!

>Dave has split personalities. So we've got Dave, Yads and The
>Doctor. One person but three, hence his "we". Father Brennan says to
>think of it like the leaves on a shamrock!
>
>> The divine right of kings was well known way back in the day, I
>> don't believe any of them claimed to be the direct descendant of
>> Jesus, the Church would have burned them at the stake.
>>
>> Oh and how could Jesus have descendants if he never had a women?
>

Hey Lying Idlehadns you really a nasty lying piece of work!

>I can believe Jewsus had descendants. He was a man after all. I
>reckon he rode women all over Judea and Galilee when he was young,
>like any of us would have done.... before he became an apprentice
>messiah of course.

There is a lie!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

Yar!!!!!! Hello Sirs!!!!

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <xn0oit5bkhmheg5000@reader.xsnews.nl>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > Daniel65 wrote:
> >> Blueshirt wrote on 1/3/24 1:31 am:
> >
> >> > He probably thought being god would have got him some sort of
> >> > a discount...
> >>
> >> Ah Hummmm!! Surely you mean The Son of God .... even if part of
> >> the God-Triumvirate.
> >
> > Men would say anything to a woman to get a shag...
> >
> > Some claim to be airline pilots, others god!
>
> You really are sick!

All of my observations were formed at the University of Life...
maybe you should attempt going outside and trying it sometime...

However, the real experts on "sick" would be your paedo pastors and
priests who preach the word of 'god' whilst they molest children.
Now, THAT'S sick!!!

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <xn0oit5l9hmvdy1001@reader.xsnews.nl>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > Idlehands wrote:
> >
> >> Oh and how could Jesus have descendants if he never had a women?
> >
> > I can believe Jewsus had descendants. He was a man after all. I
> > reckon he rode women all over Judea and Galilee when he was
> > young, like any of us would have done.... before he became an
> > apprentice messiah of course.
>
> There is a lie!

How can it be a lie when you - or anybody else - cannot prove that
Jewsus did not have relationships with women when he was a younger
man? The balance of probabilities is that he did. Why wouldn't he,
he was a man? So sexual relations could easily result in accidental
descendants...

It might not be something that you know much about but trust me, it
happens!

Blueshirt wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
>
>> In article <xn0oit5bkhmheg5000@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> Daniel65 wrote:
>>>> Blueshirt wrote on 1/3/24 1:31 am:
>>>
>>>>> He probably thought being god would have got him some sort of
>>>>> a discount...
>>>>
>>>> Ah Hummmm!! Surely you mean The Son of God .... even if part of
>>>> the God-Triumvirate.
>>>
>>> Men would say anything to a woman to get a shag...
>>>
>>> Some claim to be airline pilots, others god!
>>
>> You really are sick!
>
> All of my observations were formed at the University of Life...
> maybe you should attempt going outside and trying it sometime...
>
> However, the real experts on "sick" would be your paedo pastors and
> priests who preach the word of 'god' whilst they molest children.
> Now, THAT'S sick!!!
>
no , sick is having to mention these things happen

Blueshirt wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
>
>> In article <xn0oit5l9hmvdy1001@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> Idlehands wrote:
>>>
>>>> Oh and how could Jesus have descendants if he never had a women?
>>>
>>> I can believe Jewsus had descendants. He was a man after all. I
>>> reckon he rode women all over Judea and Galilee when he was
>>> young, like any of us would have done.... before he became an
>>> apprentice messiah of course.
>>
>> There is a lie!
>
> How can it be a lie when you - or anybody else - cannot prove that
> Jewsus did not have relationships with women when he was a younger
> man? The balance of probabilities is that he did. Why wouldn't he,
> he was a man? So sexual relations could easily result in accidental
> descendants...
>
> It might not be something that you know much about but trust me, it
> happens!
>
it was 2,000 years ago ,
i don't think it matters much now

Okay, so do we agree that we are proposing one of two things?

1. Jesus was a virgin

or

2. Jesus was gay

In article <xn0oiteeihyri3p002@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote:
>
>> In article <xn0oit5bkhmheg5000@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> > Daniel65 wrote:
>> >> Blueshirt wrote on 1/3/24 1:31 am:
>> >
>> >> > He probably thought being god would have got him some sort of
>> >> > a discount...
>> >>
>> >> Ah Hummmm!! Surely you mean The Son of God .... even if part of
>> >> the God-Triumvirate.
>> >
>> > Men would say anything to a woman to get a shag...
>> >
>> > Some claim to be airline pilots, others god!
>>
>> You really are sick!
>
>All of my observations were formed at the University of Life...
>maybe you should attempt going outside and trying it sometime...
>
>However, the real experts on "sick" would be your paedo pastors and
>priests who preach the word of 'god' whilst they molest children.
>Now, THAT'S sick!!!

Paedo are really sick!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <xn0oitek1hyzjcg003@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote:
>
>> In article <xn0oit5l9hmvdy1001@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> > Idlehands wrote:
>> >
>> >> Oh and how could Jesus have descendants if he never had a women?
>> >
>> > I can believe Jewsus had descendants. He was a man after all. I
>> > reckon he rode women all over Judea and Galilee when he was
>> > young, like any of us would have done.... before he became an
>> > apprentice messiah of course.
>>
>> There is a lie!
>
>How can it be a lie when you - or anybody else - cannot prove that
>Jewsus did not have relationships with women when he was a younger
>man? The balance of probabilities is that he did. Why wouldn't he,
>he was a man? So sexual relations could easily result in accidental
>descendants...
>
>It might not be something that you know much about but trust me, it
>happens!

So you say there is no documentation?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <QYGcnTddiZ6Aqn_4nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
>Blueshirt wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> In article <xn0oit5bkhmheg5000@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>> Blueshirt wrote on 1/3/24 1:31 am:
>>>>
>>>>>> He probably thought being god would have got him some sort of
>>>>>> a discount...
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah Hummmm!! Surely you mean The Son of God .... even if part of
>>>>> the God-Triumvirate.
>>>>
>>>> Men would say anything to a woman to get a shag...
>>>>
>>>> Some claim to be airline pilots, others god!
>>>
>>> You really are sick!
>>
>> All of my observations were formed at the University of Life...
>> maybe you should attempt going outside and trying it sometime...
>>
>> However, the real experts on "sick" would be your paedo pastors and
>> priests who preach the word of 'god' whilst they molest children.
>> Now, THAT'S sick!!!
>>
>no , sick is having to mention these things happen

Good point sir!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <QYGcnTZdiZ7sqn_4nZ2dnZfqnPUTyJ2d@giganews.com>,
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
>Blueshirt wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> In article <xn0oit5l9hmvdy1001@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> Idlehands wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Oh and how could Jesus have descendants if he never had a women?
>>>>
>>>> I can believe Jewsus had descendants. He was a man after all. I
>>>> reckon he rode women all over Judea and Galilee when he was
>>>> young, like any of us would have done.... before he became an
>>>> apprentice messiah of course.
>>>
>>> There is a lie!
>>
>> How can it be a lie when you - or anybody else - cannot prove that
>> Jewsus did not have relationships with women when he was a younger
>> man? The balance of probabilities is that he did. Why wouldn't he,
>> he was a man? So sexual relations could easily result in accidental
>> descendants...
>>
>> It might not be something that you know much about but trust me, it
>> happens!
>>
>it was 2,000 years ago ,
>i don't think it matters much now

BS is really crazy.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <9e525e9b0eba70890db0b6bbf3071494@www.novabbs.com>,
cheesetray <roach4994@gmail.com> wrote:
>Okay, so do we agree that we are proposing one of two things?
>
>1. Jesus was a virgin
>
>or
>
>2. Jesus was gay

1 !!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <xn0oiteeihyri3p002@reader.xsnews.nl>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > The Doctor wrote:
> >>
> >> You really are sick!
> >
> > All of my observations were formed at the University of Life...
> > maybe you should attempt going outside and trying it sometime...
> >
> > However, the real experts on "sick" would be your paedo pastors
> > and priests who preach the word of 'god' whilst they molest
> > children. Now, THAT'S sick!!!
>
> Paedo are really sick!

Yes Dave, they are. Very sick.