On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 11:55:10 AM UTC-8, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:37:51 PM UTC-8, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
> > In article <e29872b6-7cef-413e...@googlegroups.com>,
> > tsbru...@gmail.com <tsbru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >293 On Tuesday, December 31, 2019 at 12:23:13 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
> > >> The Doctor wrote on 31/12/2019 6:21 PM:
> > >> > In article <que757$l6l$1...@dont-email.me>,
> > >> > Daniel60 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
> > >> >> The Doctor wrote on 31/12/2019 10:49 AM:
> > >> >>> In article <ba1e5496-8b43-4ed4...@googlegroups.com>,
> > >> >>> Timothy Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >>>> On Saturday, April 29, 2017 at 5:12:41 AM UTC-7, The Doctor wrote:
> > >> >>>>> In article <emirvh...@mid.individual.net>, The Last Doctor
> > >> >>>>> <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>> On 29/04/2017 00:59, Tim Bruening wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>> On Friday, April 28, 2017 at 4:06:57 PM UTC-7, The Doctor
> > >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>> In article
> > >> >>>>>>>> <67f0ac02-72af-4157...@googlegroups.com>,
> > >> >>>>>>>> Tim Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>> On Friday, April 28, 2017 at 7:57:08 AM UTC-7, The Last
> > >> >>>>>>>>> Doctor wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Tim Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, April 28, 2017 at 2:45:24 AM UTC-7, The
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Last Doctor wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you need an in-story reason for continuity
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> errors, try this (there's some evidence for it,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> particularly in NuWho series 1):
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Time is potentially in constant flux. Even when
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> changed, echoes of what never was but could have
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> been, and was once, remain.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> I have long suspected that time might be in constant
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> flux. This fact could lead to more interesting
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> episodes, in which the Doctor discovers that Earth's
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> history has been altered in an unwelcome direction,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> so must undo the change!
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Such as The Pyramids of Mars or The Wedding of River
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Song?
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> Yes. Why don't we have "Undo a bad time line change"
> > >> >>>>>>>>> episodes more often? (Why only two such episodes in 54
> > >> >>>>>>>>> years?).
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> Writers brain cramp.
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> Some more: Day of the Daleks: The Doctor must undo a Dalek
> > >> >>>>>>> dominated timeline.
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> Father's Day: Rose saves her father from a car, and alien
> > >> >>>>>>> time monkey bats go on the rampage. Rose's father corrects
> > >> >>>>>>> the problem by stepping in front of that car that Rose had
> > >> >>>>>>> saved him from.
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> The Pandorica Opens/The Big Bang: The Doctor has to reboot
> > >> >>>>>>> the universe.
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> Turn Left: A time beetle makes Donna turn right, so she
> > >> >>>>>>> doesn't meet the Doctor, so the Doctor dies. The world
> > >> >>>>>>> proceeds to go to pot. UNIT sends Donna back in time to send
> > >> >>>>>>> her earlier self left. Donna has to step in front of a truck
> > >> >>>>>>> to accomplish her mission.
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> So you've answered your own question Tim: it happens a lot,
> > >> >>>>>> much more often than you'd imagine offhand - at least five
> > >> >>>>>> times so far in new Who as well as from time to time in the
> > >> >>>>>> good old days!
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>> REcall what happened to the Day of the Daleks script.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Did it get stolen or burned?
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> You don't then.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >> It would seem that No, Tim does not "REcall what happened to the Day of
> > >> >> the Daleks script", idiot, so why don't YOU do us a favour, idiot, and
> > >> >> tell us what happened to the Day of the Daleks script.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I'm guessing they used the script during filming of the episode ... but
> > >> >> I could be wrong!!
> > >> >
> > >> > This is the one with the paradox.
> > >> >
> > >> So that's what happened to them, idiot!! They didn't get "stolen or
> > >> burned", as Tim asked, nor did they get used "during filming of the
> > >> episode", as I guessed!!
> > >
> > >Scripts erased by paradox?
> > Such is Chibnall/Whittaker!
>
> How did they erase The Day of the Daleks?

it probably caused a lot of erdu