Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

6 May, 2024: The networking issue during the past two days has been identified and appears to be fixed. Will keep monitoring.


arts / rec.music.classical.recordings / Re: Shostakovich Symphonies

SubjectAuthor
o Re: Shostakovich Symphoniesgggg gggg

1
Re: Shostakovich Symphonies

<2603e02d-3ff0-4c8c-951c-cc92982e5c36n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=36320&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#36320

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1136:: with SMTP id p22mr816034qkk.685.1643960438375;
Thu, 03 Feb 2022 23:40:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a81:310:: with SMTP id 16mr1750041ywd.35.1643960438222;
Thu, 03 Feb 2022 23:40:38 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 23:40:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <45is35lm27rci9a9rm48t8l96u0jpsrfjg@4ax.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=32.132.12.210; posting-account=VREO7AoAAABGo_TnRXAj3kKbki4Qex7X
NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.132.12.210
References: <45is35lm27rci9a9rm48t8l96u0jpsrfjg@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2603e02d-3ff0-4c8c-951c-cc92982e5c36n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Shostakovich Symphonies
From: ggggg9...@gmail.com (gggg gggg)
Injection-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 07:40:38 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 28
 by: gggg gggg - Fri, 4 Feb 2022 07:40 UTC

On Sunday, June 21, 2009 at 4:53:03 AM UTC-10, Juan I. Cahis wrote:
> Dear friends:
> I am trying to install a sub-set of Shostakovich Symphonies in my
> iPod, and I want to share with you the criteria for selecting them,
> because, in my opinion, there are some that they are very good and
> some that they are very ugly.
> In my opinion:
> 1) The best ones: No. 4, No, 15, No.6 and No. 10, No. 5, No. 1,
> in that order.
> 2) The ugliest ones: No. 2, No. 3, No. 7, No. 12 (although its
> principal tune is very good, it is a pity that DSCH didn't use it in a
> better work).
> 3) The good ones but I have doubts about them: No. 8 and No. 9
> (are they so good?), No. 13 (apart of the two first movements which
> are outstanding, is the rest so good? Is maybe "Stenka Razin" much
> better?), No. 14 (does it work as a "Symphony"?)
> 4) The normally accepted as "ugly", but that I have some doubts
> about its classification: No. 11 (is it so bad as the critics say?)
> Your comments about the four classification items above will be
> greatly welcome!!!!!!!!!
>
> Thanks
> Juan I. Cahis
> Santiago de Chile (South America)
> Note: Please forgive me for my bad English, I am trying to improve it!

(Recent Y. upload):

Repertoire: The BEST and Worst Shostakovich Symphony No. 10

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor