On 2022-03-04 7:51 p.m., tsbru...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, January 4, 2021 at 6:29:22 AM UTC-8, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> In article <8780cc7a-297a-4810...@googlegroups.com>,
>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Saturday, June 26, 2010 at 2:39:17 PM UTC-7, Agamemnon wrote:
>>>> <pbo...@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:7b9968e9-2205-42bd...@u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com...
>>>>> On 26 June, 20:50, "Agamemnon" <agamem...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>>>>> Good performances all round. In the end more of a Douglas Adams
>>>>>> Hitchhikers
>>>>>> plot than a Doctor Who plot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> New let's make sense of it, after the big reset button has been pressed
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> the umpteenth time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What exactly did or did not happen?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Presumably the Doctor uses the time ring to go back to when the TARDIS
>>>>>> was
>>>>>> going to blow up, after he rescued River Song, and then pulls the plug
>>>>>> out
>>>>>> so it doesn't actually blow up, and then lands lands in on Amy's wedding.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But this Amy has parents and Rory is still alive, so it clearly isn't the
>>>>>> universe that he was in before, but a different one. The previous
>>>>>> universe
>>>>>> never existed and the Doctor is trapped outside of it, just like he said,
>>>>>> ie. in the "new" or current universe and the Doctor, Amy, Rory and River
>>>>>> Song have psychic connections with themselves in the other universe
>>>>>> caused
>>>>>> by the "silence" which are the source of their memories.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So does that mean the plastic Daleks never existed since clearly if Amy
>>>>>> has
>>>>>> not travelled with the Doctor in this universe, on the night before her
>>>>>> wedding then the Doctor would not have been there when plastic Daleks
>>>>>> were
>>>>>> created in 1942 (or whenever year it was), otherwise if she has travelled
>>>>>> with the Doctor and wakes up after Doctor has taken her back home then
>>>>>> Rory
>>>>>> would have been killed by the Silurian, unless the Rory that Amy has just
>>>>>> married is Auton Rory.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So for a series which never actually happened.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 10/10
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can't wait for the Christmas special and the next series, which hopefully
>>>>>> will happen.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, Aggy, but that's pretty much all wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Pandorica manifests a magical new ability to restore the universe
>>>> It's not restoring any universe. It's creating a second Big Bang. It's a
>>>> completely new universe they are supposed to be being (re-)created in.
>>>
>>> Why didn't the Doctor see to it that the new universe didn't contain any
>>> Daleks, Cybermen, Sontarans....?
>> On reboot?
>> --
>
> Yes, a golden opportunity to eliminate genocidal races.
>
and here's a re: from june

The Doctor wrote on 5/3/22 2:04 pm:
> In article <Xc-dnYzh37z8TL__nZ2dnUU7-dkAAAAA@giganews.com>, %
> <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2022-03-04 7:51 p.m., tsbru...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Monday, January 4, 2021 at 6:29:22 AM UTC-8, netk...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>> In article <8780cc7a-297a-4810...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:

<Snip>

>>>>> Why didn't the Doctor see to it that the new universe didn't
>>>>> contain any Daleks, Cybermen, Sontarans....?
>>>> On reboot? --
>>>
>>> Yes, a golden opportunity to eliminate genocidal races.
>>>
>> and here's a re: from june
>
> Good point % !!

If it IS a 'good point', clown, why had YOU, clown, already replied to
Tim without complaint, clown??

Oh!! Right! The all important Precious Post Count!!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 6/3/22 1:19 am:
> In article <svvfci$8p1$2@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 5/3/22 2:04 pm:
>>> In article <Xc-dnYzh37z8TL__nZ2dnUU7-dkAAAAA@giganews.com>, %
>>> <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2022-03-04 7:51 p.m., tsbru...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, January 4, 2021 at 6:29:22 AM UTC-8, netk...@gmail.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> In article <8780cc7a-297a-4810...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>>>>>> Why didn't the Doctor see to it that the new universe didn't
>>>>>>> contain any Daleks, Cybermen, Sontarans....?
>>>>>> On reboot? --
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, a golden opportunity to eliminate genocidal races.
>>>>>
>>>> and here's a re: from june
>>>
>>> Good point % !!
>>
>> If it IS a 'good point', clown, why had YOU, clown, already replied to
>> Tim without complaint, clown??
>>
>> Oh!! Right! The all important Precious Post Count!!

> Wrongo! Dannyboy!

How am I 'Wrongo', clown??

> % is pointing out the obvious.

WHAT?? So 'obvious' that YOU, clown, don't even notice them being
'obvious' until '%' points out their 'obvious'ness, clown!!

But, still, responding to '%' give YOU, clown, another chance to
increase your Precious Post Count, doesn't it, clown??
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 6/3/22 11:59 pm:
> In article <t021rd$628$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 6/3/22 1:19 am:
>>> In article <svvfci$8p1$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 5/3/22 2:04 pm:
>>>>> In article <Xc-dnYzh37z8TL__nZ2dnUU7-dkAAAAA@giganews.com>,
>>>>> % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2022-03-04 7:51 p.m., tsbru...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> On Monday, January 4, 2021 at 6:29:22 AM UTC-8,
>>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <8780cc7a-297a-4810...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <Snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why didn't the Doctor see to it that the new universe
>>>>>>>>> didn't contain any Daleks, Cybermen, Sontarans....?
>>>>>>>> On reboot? --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, a golden opportunity to eliminate genocidal races.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> and here's a re: from june
>>>>>
>>>>> Good point % !!
>>>>
>>>> If it IS a 'good point', clown, why had YOU, clown, already
>>>> replied to Tim without complaint, clown??
>>>>
>>>> Oh!! Right! The all important Precious Post Count!!
>>
>>
>>> Wrongo! Dannyboy!
>>
>> How am I 'Wrongo', clown??
>>
>>> % is pointing out the obvious.
>>
>> WHAT?? So 'obvious' that YOU, clown, don't even notice them being
>> 'obvious' until '%' points out their 'obvious'ness, clown!!
>>
>> But, still, responding to '%' give YOU, clown, another chance to
>> increase your Precious Post Count, doesn't it, clown??

> % is point out Tim's abusive posting habits, Dannyboy!

Yeah!! And that's achieved real results, hasn't it, clown?? Just like
YOUR pointing out Tim's SPAMMING has really helped the situation, too,
clown!!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 8/3/22 2:16 am:
> In article <t04hfi$r9t$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 6/3/22 11:59 pm:
>>> In article <t021rd$628$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 6/3/22 1:19 am:
>>>>> In article <svvfci$8p1$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 5/3/22 2:04 pm:
>>>>>>> In article <Xc-dnYzh37z8TL__nZ2dnUU7-dkAAAAA@giganews.com>,
>>>>>>> % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-04 7:51 p.m., tsbru...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Monday, January 4, 2021 at 6:29:22 AM UTC-8,
>>>>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <8780cc7a-297a-4810...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Why didn't the Doctor see to it that the new universe
>>>>>>>>>>> didn't contain any Daleks, Cybermen, Sontarans....?
>>>>>>>>>> On reboot? --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, a golden opportunity to eliminate genocidal races.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and here's a re: from june
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Good point % !!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If it IS a 'good point', clown, why had YOU, clown, already
>>>>>> replied to Tim without complaint, clown??
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh!! Right! The all important Precious Post Count!!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Wrongo! Dannyboy!
>>>>
>>>> How am I 'Wrongo', clown??
>>>>
>>>>> % is pointing out the obvious.
>>>>
>>>> WHAT?? So 'obvious' that YOU, clown, don't even notice them being
>>>> 'obvious' until '%' points out their 'obvious'ness, clown!!
>>>>
>>>> But, still, responding to '%' give YOU, clown, another chance to
>>>> increase your Precious Post Count, doesn't it, clown??
>>
>>
>>> % is point out Tim's abusive posting habits, Dannyboy!
>>
>> Yeah!! And that's achieved real results, hasn't it, clown?? Just like
>> YOUR pointing out Tim's SPAMMING has really helped the situation, too,
>> clown!!

> Silence i compliance , Dannyboy.

Non-silence just increases the Precious Post Count, doesn't it, clown??

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel