Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Live within your income, even if you have to borrow to do so. -- Josh Billings


arts / rec.music.classical.recordings / Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein

SubjectAuthor
* Steinway vs. BechsteinDan Koren
+* Re: Steinway vs. BechsteinAB
|`- Re: Steinway vs. BechsteinOwen
+* Re: Steinway vs. BechsteinNéstor Castiglione
|`* Re: Steinway vs. BechsteinDan Koren
| `* Re: Steinway vs. BechsteinJonathan Ben Schragadove
|  `* Re: Steinway vs. BechsteinGraham
|   +* Re: Steinway vs. BechsteinDan Koren
|   |`- Re: Steinway vs. BechsteinDan Koren
|   `* Re: Steinway vs. BechsteinMELMOTH
|    `* Re: Steinway vs. BechsteinDan Koren
|     `* Re: Steinway vs. BechsteinPaul Alsing
|      `* Re: Steinway vs. BechsteinDan Koren
|       `- Re: Steinway vs. BechsteinPaul Alsing
`- Re: Steinway vs. BechsteinDan Koren

1
Steinway vs. Bechstein

<39dc437e-0004-4614-82bd-3123b851b4c4n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=39437&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#39437

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:208c:b0:69f:f0f4:75d with SMTP id e12-20020a05620a208c00b0069ff0f4075dmr1142613qka.690.1651491322779;
Mon, 02 May 2022 04:35:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:b09c:0:b0:648:5eb6:86bb with SMTP id
f28-20020a25b09c000000b006485eb686bbmr10065562ybj.530.1651491322451; Mon, 02
May 2022 04:35:22 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 04:35:22 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=76.247.181.171; posting-account=zoRlLAkAAADnaynpk4ZzIoUiINS0rxoJ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.247.181.171
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <39dc437e-0004-4614-82bd-3123b851b4c4n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Steinway vs. Bechstein
From: dan.ko...@gmail.com (Dan Koren)
Injection-Date: Mon, 02 May 2022 11:35:22 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 0
 by: Dan Koren - Mon, 2 May 2022 11:35 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6ZTm4r4pNM

Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein

<f84d4758-934f-47fe-b86a-2cbb969aa5b4n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=39442&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#39442

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:454e:b0:69f:b9fd:f05d with SMTP id u14-20020a05620a454e00b0069fb9fdf05dmr9433684qkp.633.1651513528764;
Mon, 02 May 2022 10:45:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a81:ae54:0:b0:2f8:9161:b243 with SMTP id
g20-20020a81ae54000000b002f89161b243mr12133631ywk.139.1651513528602; Mon, 02
May 2022 10:45:28 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 10:45:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <39dc437e-0004-4614-82bd-3123b851b4c4n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.125.45.56; posting-account=pvE54goAAABbEv3LjHqSgtDxSfmsO3Q4
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.125.45.56
References: <39dc437e-0004-4614-82bd-3123b851b4c4n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f84d4758-934f-47fe-b86a-2cbb969aa5b4n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein
From: arribach...@gmail.com (AB)
Injection-Date: Mon, 02 May 2022 17:45:28 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 4
 by: AB - Mon, 2 May 2022 17:45 UTC

On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 7:35:25 AM UTC-4, dan....@gmail.com wrote:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6ZTm4r4pNM

again, mostly talk
AB

Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein

<DYednVNwa7KV4-3_nZ2dnUU7-W2dnZ2d@supernews.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=39447&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#39447

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 02 May 2022 19:57:43 -0500
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 20:57:43 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1
Subject: Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein
Content-Language: en-US
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
References: <39dc437e-0004-4614-82bd-3123b851b4c4n@googlegroups.com>
<f84d4758-934f-47fe-b86a-2cbb969aa5b4n@googlegroups.com>
From: inf...@clipboardinc.com (Owen)
In-Reply-To: <f84d4758-934f-47fe-b86a-2cbb969aa5b4n@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <DYednVNwa7KV4-3_nZ2dnUU7-W2dnZ2d@supernews.com>
Lines: 17
X-Trace: sv3-G6ZQIBTFSEfjgu2xfsLJDBS1GHpC+GlOJ88kVbp6rDoJfbuIO1BrfRmu2eQ1TDc9Dr5sIgWLjTjfS5u!C+/LN7L8E7bTL8wsePbMbgJ9vfn4m7Mvh6nf1Gh46xB6+Iv3NG51BopAquoLZ+Sz/dKbCx3OmbCS!N0NOqnYmypLdIg==
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1851
 by: Owen - Tue, 3 May 2022 00:57 UTC

On 5/2/22 1:45 PM, AB wrote:
> On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 7:35:25 AM UTC-4, dan....@gmail.com wrote:
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6ZTm4r4pNM
>
> again, mostly talk
> AB

Yes, and he should have played the same music on each piano.

I liked the Steinway very much, it had a way of caressing the notes.

The Bechstein had more energy, brighter, seemed more nimble, but the
sound seemed brittle to me, and after a while, I found it more tiresome
to listen to, almost annoying. Perhaps I've imprinted on the ubiquitous
Stoneways.

-Owen

Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein

<2ab1ab60-2891-4b32-8330-a95d4b110040n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=39468&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#39468

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:648:b0:2f3:642d:c12a with SMTP id a8-20020a05622a064800b002f3642dc12amr16456625qtb.464.1651609059150;
Tue, 03 May 2022 13:17:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:48c8:0:b0:648:be07:a758 with SMTP id
v191-20020a2548c8000000b00648be07a758mr15478780yba.346.1651609058950; Tue, 03
May 2022 13:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 13:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <39dc437e-0004-4614-82bd-3123b851b4c4n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:6c50:437f:fd8e:84db:da90:b7f9:ca3e;
posting-account=MkbEhwoAAABdfpWHuK8vpAdccwjEHNeP
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:6c50:437f:fd8e:84db:da90:b7f9:ca3e
References: <39dc437e-0004-4614-82bd-3123b851b4c4n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2ab1ab60-2891-4b32-8330-a95d4b110040n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein
From: castigli...@gmail.com (Néstor Castiglione)
Injection-Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 20:17:39 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 10
 by: Néstor Castiglione - Tue, 3 May 2022 20:17 UTC

On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 4:35:25 AM UTC-7, dan....@gmail.com wrote:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6ZTm4r4pNM

It's funny that the host says Steinways have a "darker tone" in the upper range. I've always felt they sounded shrill and chalk-white. I used to think Steinways were good for a lot of 20th-century repertoire that needed clear definition of rhythms and intricate polyphonic textures, but no longer believe this to be the case. Their sound to me, overall, is strident, even metallic. For me, the other three Bs (Blüthner, Baldwin, and Bösendorfer) are superior.

Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein

<b38128a9-cbb8-4c26-ba17-74eaa8b93d31n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=39470&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#39470

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:208c:b0:69f:f0f4:75d with SMTP id e12-20020a05620a208c00b0069ff0f4075dmr6686230qka.690.1651610020216;
Tue, 03 May 2022 13:33:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:cdca:0:b0:633:c810:6ca with SMTP id
d193-20020a25cdca000000b00633c81006camr15254577ybf.261.1651610019869; Tue, 03
May 2022 13:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 13:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2ab1ab60-2891-4b32-8330-a95d4b110040n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=76.247.181.171; posting-account=zoRlLAkAAADnaynpk4ZzIoUiINS0rxoJ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.247.181.171
References: <39dc437e-0004-4614-82bd-3123b851b4c4n@googlegroups.com> <2ab1ab60-2891-4b32-8330-a95d4b110040n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b38128a9-cbb8-4c26-ba17-74eaa8b93d31n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein
From: dan.ko...@gmail.com (Dan Koren)
Injection-Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 20:33:40 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 48
 by: Dan Koren - Tue, 3 May 2022 20:33 UTC

On Tuesday, May 3, 2022 at 1:17:41 PM UTC-7, Néstor Castiglione wrote:
> On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 4:35:25 AM UTC-7, dan....@gmail.com wrote:
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6ZTm4r4pNM
>
> It's funny that the host says Steinways have a "darker tone" in the upper range.
> I've always felt they sounded shrill and chalk-white. I used to think Steinways
> were good for a lot of 20th-century repertoire that needed clear definition of
> rhythms and intricate polyphonic textures, but no longer believe this to be
> the case. Their sound to me, overall, is strident, even metallic.

It is extremely difficult to generalize about Stoneways. There are so many of
them all over the world, manfuctured over more than a century, maintained
(or not) God knows how, etc... By and large, I agree with you however: they
tend towards a metallic sound. They also tend to sound differently from
top to bottom, producing different timbres in the bass, medium and treble
registers. In the right (wrong?) hands this can be used to create a three
hand imprssion -- e.g. by VH.

From a different angle, I do not like Stoneway actions since they started to
use Renner howitzers. They are heavy and non-linear, like the steering on
newer Audis ;-)

> For me, the other three Bs (Blüthner, Baldwin, and Bösendorfer) are
> superior.

Why only 3? Bechstein no longer matters? ;-)

I have always preferred the B sound to the S sound. Rounder, mellower,
richer, warmer. Unfortunately, the Bs are not viable choices for concert
pianists (except perhaps Bosies) because of limited availability and
shortage of technicians. Many Baldwins have gorgeous sound but
are let down by their actions. I've seen quite a few refitted with
Yamaha actions. Jazz pianists seem to like them.

Last but not least, Yamaha CFS/ CFX are also great instruments.

dk

Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein

<ed6bb6ea-2b2a-482b-bb3b-db4a6bd3910an@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=39473&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#39473

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:518d:b0:45a:933f:965d with SMTP id kl13-20020a056214518d00b0045a933f965dmr8393287qvb.94.1651622192527;
Tue, 03 May 2022 16:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a81:134a:0:b0:2f8:6751:bd66 with SMTP id
71-20020a81134a000000b002f86751bd66mr17381420ywt.340.1651622192273; Tue, 03
May 2022 16:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 16:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <b38128a9-cbb8-4c26-ba17-74eaa8b93d31n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2603:8001:b400:e995:dce1:3b7f:a4d2:c87;
posting-account=1kU88AoAAABiHm0FixoGeB6DAYPpoztB
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2603:8001:b400:e995:dce1:3b7f:a4d2:c87
References: <39dc437e-0004-4614-82bd-3123b851b4c4n@googlegroups.com>
<2ab1ab60-2891-4b32-8330-a95d4b110040n@googlegroups.com> <b38128a9-cbb8-4c26-ba17-74eaa8b93d31n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ed6bb6ea-2b2a-482b-bb3b-db4a6bd3910an@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein
From: ybschrag...@gmail.com (Jonathan Ben Schragadove)
Injection-Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 23:56:32 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 56
 by: Jonathan Ben Schraga - Tue, 3 May 2022 23:56 UTC

On Tuesday, May 3, 2022 at 1:33:42 PM UTC-7, dan....@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 3, 2022 at 1:17:41 PM UTC-7, Néstor Castiglione wrote:
> > On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 4:35:25 AM UTC-7, dan....@gmail.com wrote:
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6ZTm4r4pNM
> >
> > It's funny that the host says Steinways have a "darker tone" in the upper range.
> > I've always felt they sounded shrill and chalk-white. I used to think Steinways
> > were good for a lot of 20th-century repertoire that needed clear definition of
> > rhythms and intricate polyphonic textures, but no longer believe this to be
> > the case. Their sound to me, overall, is strident, even metallic.
> It is extremely difficult to generalize about Stoneways. There are so many of
> them all over the world, manfuctured over more than a century, maintained
> (or not) God knows how, etc... By and large, I agree with you however: they
> tend towards a metallic sound. They also tend to sound differently from
> top to bottom, producing different timbres in the bass, medium and treble
> registers. In the right (wrong?) hands this can be used to create a three
> hand imprssion -- e.g. by VH.
>
> From a different angle, I do not like Stoneway actions since they started to
> use Renner howitzers. They are heavy and non-linear, like the steering on
> newer Audis ;-)
> > For me, the other three Bs (Blüthner, Baldwin, and Bösendorfer) are
> > superior.
> Why only 3? Bechstein no longer matters? ;-)
>
> I have always preferred the B sound to the S sound. Rounder, mellower,
> richer, warmer. Unfortunately, the Bs are not viable choices for concert
> pianists (except perhaps Bosies) because of limited availability and
> shortage of technicians. Many Baldwins have gorgeous sound but
> are let down by their actions. I've seen quite a few refitted with
> Yamaha actions. Jazz pianists seem to like them.
>
> Last but not least, Yamaha CFS/ CFX are also great instruments.
>
> dk
A Bechstein (in the right hands) can produce a beautifully warm and gorgeous singing tone. One pianist who preferred Baldwins (Bolet) mentioned that the una corda ("soft) pedal on the Steinways altered the tone too much - Baldwin was more subtle. My understanding is that for jazz, pop, etc. Baldwin and Yamaha are preferred over Steinway because the latter's huge sound with complex overtones produces a "complicated" sound, and a "whiter" tone sounds (and records) "cleaner" for that kind of music.

Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein

<o6wcK.10126$Awz.519@fx03.iad>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=39482&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#39482

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx03.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.8.1
Subject: Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein
Content-Language: en-GB
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
References: <39dc437e-0004-4614-82bd-3123b851b4c4n@googlegroups.com>
<2ab1ab60-2891-4b32-8330-a95d4b110040n@googlegroups.com>
<b38128a9-cbb8-4c26-ba17-74eaa8b93d31n@googlegroups.com>
<ed6bb6ea-2b2a-482b-bb3b-db4a6bd3910an@googlegroups.com>
From: g.ste...@shaw.ca (Graham)
In-Reply-To: <ed6bb6ea-2b2a-482b-bb3b-db4a6bd3910an@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <o6wcK.10126$Awz.519@fx03.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@blocknews.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 14:30:44 UTC
Organization: blocknews - www.blocknews.net
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 08:30:42 -0600
X-Received-Bytes: 3683
 by: Graham - Wed, 4 May 2022 14:30 UTC

On 2022-05-03 5:56 p.m., Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 3, 2022 at 1:33:42 PM UTC-7, dan....@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Tuesday, May 3, 2022 at 1:17:41 PM UTC-7, Néstor Castiglione wrote:
>>> On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 4:35:25 AM UTC-7, dan....@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6ZTm4r4pNM
>>>
>>> It's funny that the host says Steinways have a "darker tone" in the upper range.
>>> I've always felt they sounded shrill and chalk-white. I used to think Steinways
>>> were good for a lot of 20th-century repertoire that needed clear definition of
>>> rhythms and intricate polyphonic textures, but no longer believe this to be
>>> the case. Their sound to me, overall, is strident, even metallic.
>> It is extremely difficult to generalize about Stoneways. There are so many of
>> them all over the world, manfuctured over more than a century, maintained
>> (or not) God knows how, etc... By and large, I agree with you however: they
>> tend towards a metallic sound. They also tend to sound differently from
>> top to bottom, producing different timbres in the bass, medium and treble
>> registers. In the right (wrong?) hands this can be used to create a three
>> hand imprssion -- e.g. by VH.
>>
>> From a different angle, I do not like Stoneway actions since they started to
>> use Renner howitzers. They are heavy and non-linear, like the steering on
>> newer Audis ;-)
>>> For me, the other three Bs (Blüthner, Baldwin, and Bösendorfer) are
>>> superior.
>> Why only 3? Bechstein no longer matters? ;-)
>>
>> I have always preferred the B sound to the S sound. Rounder, mellower,
>> richer, warmer. Unfortunately, the Bs are not viable choices for concert
>> pianists (except perhaps Bosies) because of limited availability and
>> shortage of technicians. Many Baldwins have gorgeous sound but
>> are let down by their actions. I've seen quite a few refitted with
>> Yamaha actions. Jazz pianists seem to like them.
>>
>> Last but not least, Yamaha CFS/ CFX are also great instruments.
>>
>> dk
> A Bechstein (in the right hands) can produce a beautifully warm and gorgeous singing tone. One pianist who preferred Baldwins (Bolet) mentioned that the una corda ("soft) pedal on the Steinways altered the tone too much - Baldwin was more subtle. My understanding is that for jazz, pop, etc. Baldwin and Yamaha are preferred over Steinway because the latter's huge sound with complex overtones produces a "complicated" sound, and a "whiter" tone sounds (and records) "cleaner" for that kind of music.

Moravec used a Baldwin for his NY recordings and it sounds awful.

Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein

<14f5458d-b841-4720-b852-937003417ba5n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=39483&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#39483

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5a89:0:b0:2f3:5ab1:3e4f with SMTP id c9-20020ac85a89000000b002f35ab13e4fmr19408849qtc.528.1651675708326;
Wed, 04 May 2022 07:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:ca48:0:b0:648:534b:8803 with SMTP id
a69-20020a25ca48000000b00648534b8803mr18070422ybg.453.1651675707982; Wed, 04
May 2022 07:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 07:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <o6wcK.10126$Awz.519@fx03.iad>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=76.247.181.171; posting-account=zoRlLAkAAADnaynpk4ZzIoUiINS0rxoJ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.247.181.171
References: <39dc437e-0004-4614-82bd-3123b851b4c4n@googlegroups.com>
<2ab1ab60-2891-4b32-8330-a95d4b110040n@googlegroups.com> <b38128a9-cbb8-4c26-ba17-74eaa8b93d31n@googlegroups.com>
<ed6bb6ea-2b2a-482b-bb3b-db4a6bd3910an@googlegroups.com> <o6wcK.10126$Awz.519@fx03.iad>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <14f5458d-b841-4720-b852-937003417ba5n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein
From: dan.ko...@gmail.com (Dan Koren)
Injection-Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 14:48:28 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 20
 by: Dan Koren - Wed, 4 May 2022 14:48 UTC

On Wednesday, May 4, 2022 at 7:30:49 AM UTC-7, Graham wrote:
> On 2022-05-03 5:56 p.m., Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
>
> > A Bechstein (in the right hands) can produce a beautifully warm and
> > gorgeous singing tone. One pianist who preferred Baldwins (Bolet)
> > mentioned that the una corda ("soft) pedal on the Steinways altered
> > the tone too much - Baldwin was more subtle. My understanding is
> > that for jazz, pop, etc. Baldwin and Yamaha are preferred over Steinway
> > because the latter's huge sound with complex overtones produces a
> > "complicated" sound, and a "whiter" tone sounds (and records) "cleaner"
> > for that kind of music.
>
> Moravec used a Baldwin for his NY recordings and it sounds awful.

This is a meaningless non-sequitur. Individual instruments can sound
as bad or as good as they are maintained, tuned, voiced and regulated.
The fact Baldwins have a certain kind of sound statistically as a family
does not preclude any single specimen from sounding otherwise.

dk

Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein

<149c72ad-aba9-4adc-94b6-e032780fb7e8n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=39484&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#39484

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:4ce:b0:2f3:a1d9:b60d with SMTP id q14-20020a05622a04ce00b002f3a1d9b60dmr15675441qtx.625.1651676986630;
Wed, 04 May 2022 08:09:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a81:ae54:0:b0:2f8:9161:b243 with SMTP id
g20-20020a81ae54000000b002f89161b243mr19714879ywk.139.1651676986286; Wed, 04
May 2022 08:09:46 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 08:09:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <14f5458d-b841-4720-b852-937003417ba5n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=76.247.181.171; posting-account=zoRlLAkAAADnaynpk4ZzIoUiINS0rxoJ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.247.181.171
References: <39dc437e-0004-4614-82bd-3123b851b4c4n@googlegroups.com>
<2ab1ab60-2891-4b32-8330-a95d4b110040n@googlegroups.com> <b38128a9-cbb8-4c26-ba17-74eaa8b93d31n@googlegroups.com>
<ed6bb6ea-2b2a-482b-bb3b-db4a6bd3910an@googlegroups.com> <o6wcK.10126$Awz.519@fx03.iad>
<14f5458d-b841-4720-b852-937003417ba5n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <149c72ad-aba9-4adc-94b6-e032780fb7e8n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein
From: dan.ko...@gmail.com (Dan Koren)
Injection-Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 15:09:46 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 32
 by: Dan Koren - Wed, 4 May 2022 15:09 UTC

On Wednesday, May 4, 2022 at 7:48:30 AM UTC-7, Dan Koren wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 4, 2022 at 7:30:49 AM UTC-7, Graham wrote:
> > On 2022-05-03 5:56 p.m., Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> >
> > > A Bechstein (in the right hands) can produce a beautifully warm and
> > > gorgeous singing tone. One pianist who preferred Baldwins (Bolet)
> > > mentioned that the una corda ("soft) pedal on the Steinways altered
> > > the tone too much - Baldwin was more subtle. My understanding is
> > > that for jazz, pop, etc. Baldwin and Yamaha are preferred over Steinway
> > > because the latter's huge sound with complex overtones produces a
> > > "complicated" sound, and a "whiter" tone sounds (and records) "cleaner"
> > > for that kind of music.
> >
> > Moravec used a Baldwin for his NY recordings and it sounds awful.
>
> This is a meaningless non-sequitur. Individual instruments can sound
> as bad or as good as they are maintained, tuned, voiced and regulated.
> The fact Baldwins have a certain kind of sound statistically as a family
> does not preclude any single specimen from sounding different.

Judging from personal experience, good Baldwins have a wonderful
sound: softer than Stoneways, warmer than Bechsteins, and clearer
than Bluthners. They are well suited for a wide range of repertoire
from Schubert all the way to jazz.

Actions have always been Baldwin's greatest weakness. After WWII
Baldwin started to use Renner actions, with every evil this implies.
Many Baldwin owners replaced their actions with Yamaha actions.

Baldwin owned Bechstein from 1963 to 1986.

dk

Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein

<6272b528$0$22249$426a74cc@news.free.fr>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=39486&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#39486

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!pasdenom.info!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!cleanfeed1-a.proxad.net!nnrp4-1.free.fr!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein
From: theom...@free.fr (MELMOTH)
References: <39dc437e-0004-4614-82bd-3123b851b4c4n@googlegroups.com> <2ab1ab60-2891-4b32-8330-a95d4b110040n@googlegroups.com> <b38128a9-cbb8-4c26-ba17-74eaa8b93d31n@googlegroups.com> <ed6bb6ea-2b2a-482b-bb3b-db4a6bd3910an@googlegroups.com> <o6wcK.10126$Awz.519@fx03.iad>
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Organization: MELMOTH
X-Newsreader: MesNews/1.08.06.00
Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 19:17:28 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: theomonk@free.fr
X-Plugin-copyright: 2003-AS
X-Plugin-EXIF: http://www.chasta.com/fr/plugin.htm et http://chasta971.free.fr
X-Plugin-info: plugin-XFace
X-Plugin-version: 0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <6272b528$0$22249$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 04 May 2022 19:17:28 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 109.218.73.191
X-Trace: 1651684648 news-3.free.fr 22249 109.218.73.191:1652
X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net
 by: MELMOTH - Wed, 4 May 2022 17:17 UTC

Graham vient de nous annoncer :
> Moravec used a Baldwin

And Jorge Bolet...

Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein

<b721d522-d74a-4f3a-a511-54d4a95d48ffn@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=39487&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#39487

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:cc08:0:b0:45a:8f81:d8a8 with SMTP id r8-20020a0ccc08000000b0045a8f81d8a8mr12030410qvk.88.1651693928740;
Wed, 04 May 2022 12:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:48c8:0:b0:648:be07:a758 with SMTP id
v191-20020a2548c8000000b00648be07a758mr19200367yba.346.1651693928364; Wed, 04
May 2022 12:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 12:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6272b528$0$22249$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=76.247.181.171; posting-account=zoRlLAkAAADnaynpk4ZzIoUiINS0rxoJ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.247.181.171
References: <39dc437e-0004-4614-82bd-3123b851b4c4n@googlegroups.com>
<2ab1ab60-2891-4b32-8330-a95d4b110040n@googlegroups.com> <b38128a9-cbb8-4c26-ba17-74eaa8b93d31n@googlegroups.com>
<ed6bb6ea-2b2a-482b-bb3b-db4a6bd3910an@googlegroups.com> <o6wcK.10126$Awz.519@fx03.iad>
<6272b528$0$22249$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b721d522-d74a-4f3a-a511-54d4a95d48ffn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein
From: dan.ko...@gmail.com (Dan Koren)
Injection-Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 19:52:08 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 14
 by: Dan Koren - Wed, 4 May 2022 19:52 UTC

On Wednesday, May 4, 2022 at 10:17:33 AM UTC-7, MELMOTH wrote:
> Graham vient de nous annoncer :
> > Moravec used a Baldwin
>
> And Jorge Bolet...

And many jazz pianists.
They are more important
than Moravec and Bolet
combined and raised to
the 100th power!

Jazz rules!

dk

Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein

<1b7322f1-c12d-4980-a505-b1093bf5ab65n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=39505&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#39505

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1792:b0:2f3:a9d4:d238 with SMTP id s18-20020a05622a179200b002f3a9d4d238mr13512729qtk.61.1651720652602;
Wed, 04 May 2022 20:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a81:134a:0:b0:2f8:6751:bd66 with SMTP id
71-20020a81134a000000b002f86751bd66mr22175671ywt.340.1651720652411; Wed, 04
May 2022 20:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 20:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <b721d522-d74a-4f3a-a511-54d4a95d48ffn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:1700:9c80:b020:7436:b46b:c107:9041;
posting-account=FyvUbwkAAAARAfp2CSw2Km63SBNL9trz
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:1700:9c80:b020:7436:b46b:c107:9041
References: <39dc437e-0004-4614-82bd-3123b851b4c4n@googlegroups.com>
<2ab1ab60-2891-4b32-8330-a95d4b110040n@googlegroups.com> <b38128a9-cbb8-4c26-ba17-74eaa8b93d31n@googlegroups.com>
<ed6bb6ea-2b2a-482b-bb3b-db4a6bd3910an@googlegroups.com> <o6wcK.10126$Awz.519@fx03.iad>
<6272b528$0$22249$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <b721d522-d74a-4f3a-a511-54d4a95d48ffn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <1b7322f1-c12d-4980-a505-b1093bf5ab65n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein
From: pnals...@gmail.com (Paul Alsing)
Injection-Date: Thu, 05 May 2022 03:17:32 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 10
 by: Paul Alsing - Thu, 5 May 2022 03:17 UTC

On Wednesday, May 4, 2022 at 12:52:11 PM UTC-7, dan....@gmail.com wrote:

> And many jazz pianists.
> They are more important
> than Moravec and Bolet
> combined and raised to
> the 100th power!

I doubt very seriously that you can comprehend *any* number raised to the 100th power... after all, this would exceed the number of atoms in the entire observable universe...

https://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/stories/which-greater-number-of-atoms-universe-or-number-of-chess-moves

Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein

<193d2816-afed-472f-9598-ee9b00f0f0can@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=39506&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#39506

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:16c2:b0:69f:ca37:f6b5 with SMTP id a2-20020a05620a16c200b0069fca37f6b5mr16830671qkn.48.1651721109611;
Wed, 04 May 2022 20:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a81:1003:0:b0:2e5:d446:6ccb with SMTP id
3-20020a811003000000b002e5d4466ccbmr22696059ywq.324.1651721109298; Wed, 04
May 2022 20:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 20:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1b7322f1-c12d-4980-a505-b1093bf5ab65n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=76.247.181.171; posting-account=zoRlLAkAAADnaynpk4ZzIoUiINS0rxoJ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.247.181.171
References: <39dc437e-0004-4614-82bd-3123b851b4c4n@googlegroups.com>
<2ab1ab60-2891-4b32-8330-a95d4b110040n@googlegroups.com> <b38128a9-cbb8-4c26-ba17-74eaa8b93d31n@googlegroups.com>
<ed6bb6ea-2b2a-482b-bb3b-db4a6bd3910an@googlegroups.com> <o6wcK.10126$Awz.519@fx03.iad>
<6272b528$0$22249$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <b721d522-d74a-4f3a-a511-54d4a95d48ffn@googlegroups.com>
<1b7322f1-c12d-4980-a505-b1093bf5ab65n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <193d2816-afed-472f-9598-ee9b00f0f0can@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein
From: dan.ko...@gmail.com (Dan Koren)
Injection-Date: Thu, 05 May 2022 03:25:09 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 19
 by: Dan Koren - Thu, 5 May 2022 03:25 UTC

On Wednesday, May 4, 2022 at 8:17:35 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 4, 2022 at 12:52:11 PM UTC-7, dan....@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > And many jazz pianists.
> > They are more important
> > than Moravec and Bolet
> > combined and raised to
> > the 100th power!
>
> I doubt very seriously that
> you can comprehend *any*
> number raised to the 100th
> power... after all, this would
> exceed the number of atoms
> in the entire observable universe...

I am a physicist. I think beyond
the limits of this universe .... ;-)

dk

Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein

<ee81ff2e-0702-4c44-9317-7ae39d9b13f4n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=39509&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#39509

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2552:b0:67b:32e2:2400 with SMTP id s18-20020a05620a255200b0067b32e22400mr17653340qko.768.1651728713516;
Wed, 04 May 2022 22:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:ca48:0:b0:648:534b:8803 with SMTP id
a69-20020a25ca48000000b00648534b8803mr20551808ybg.453.1651728713288; Wed, 04
May 2022 22:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 22:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <193d2816-afed-472f-9598-ee9b00f0f0can@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:1700:9c80:b020:5d52:5d47:c73a:ee29;
posting-account=FyvUbwkAAAARAfp2CSw2Km63SBNL9trz
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:1700:9c80:b020:5d52:5d47:c73a:ee29
References: <39dc437e-0004-4614-82bd-3123b851b4c4n@googlegroups.com>
<2ab1ab60-2891-4b32-8330-a95d4b110040n@googlegroups.com> <b38128a9-cbb8-4c26-ba17-74eaa8b93d31n@googlegroups.com>
<ed6bb6ea-2b2a-482b-bb3b-db4a6bd3910an@googlegroups.com> <o6wcK.10126$Awz.519@fx03.iad>
<6272b528$0$22249$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <b721d522-d74a-4f3a-a511-54d4a95d48ffn@googlegroups.com>
<1b7322f1-c12d-4980-a505-b1093bf5ab65n@googlegroups.com> <193d2816-afed-472f-9598-ee9b00f0f0can@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ee81ff2e-0702-4c44-9317-7ae39d9b13f4n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein
From: pnals...@gmail.com (Paul Alsing)
Injection-Date: Thu, 05 May 2022 05:31:53 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 29
 by: Paul Alsing - Thu, 5 May 2022 05:31 UTC

On Wednesday, May 4, 2022 at 8:25:11 PM UTC-7, dan....@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 4, 2022 at 8:17:35 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Wednesday, May 4, 2022 at 12:52:11 PM UTC-7, dan....@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > And many jazz pianists.
> > > They are more important
> > > than Moravec and Bolet
> > > combined and raised to
> > > the 100th power!
> >
> > I doubt very seriously that
> > you can comprehend *any*
> > number raised to the 100th
> > power... after all, this would
> > exceed the number of atoms
> > in the entire observable universe...
> I am a physicist. I think beyond
> the limits of this universe .... ;-)
>
> dk

I am an astronomer, and I am unable to comprehend the limits of the universe... it is just incomprehensable... and I doubt that I am alone in this regard...

“Not only is the Universe stranger than we think, it is stranger than we can think.”
- Heisenberg

Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein

<4fd63205-a16b-4173-a7b2-b31c1d4e454an@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=44550&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#44550

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:14cd:b0:344:6cfa:42f9 with SMTP id u13-20020a05622a14cd00b003446cfa42f9mr2576187qtx.147.1661416404580;
Thu, 25 Aug 2022 01:33:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:88:b0:68e:2550:8f06 with SMTP id
h8-20020a056902008800b0068e25508f06mr2596052ybs.450.1661416404145; Thu, 25
Aug 2022 01:33:24 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!1.us.feeder.erje.net!3.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 01:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <39dc437e-0004-4614-82bd-3123b851b4c4n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=76.247.181.171; posting-account=zoRlLAkAAADnaynpk4ZzIoUiINS0rxoJ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.247.181.171
References: <39dc437e-0004-4614-82bd-3123b851b4c4n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <4fd63205-a16b-4173-a7b2-b31c1d4e454an@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Steinway vs. Bechstein
From: dan.ko...@gmail.com (Dan Koren)
Injection-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 08:33:24 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 6
 by: Dan Koren - Thu, 25 Aug 2022 08:33 UTC

On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 4:35:25 AM UTC-7, Dan Koren wrote:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6ZTm4r4pNM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgecQ1uytSA

dk

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.7
clearnet tor